|
Tournoi du 02-01-12
1 58,31 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,13 A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine
3 53,52 A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
4 52,00 A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 51,50 A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
6 49,81 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
7 49,59 A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 49,22 A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
9 46,63 A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
10 44,41 A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 39,89 A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,85 a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
2 59,67 a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
3 57,22 a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
4 54,56 a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 51,89 a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 50,56 a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
7 46,35 a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 45,94 a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal
9 44,85 a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 43,74 a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
11 35,35 a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
2 NS 2T S-1 -100 4 22.22
3 NS 3S E = -600 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
5 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
6 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S+3 490 18 100.00
9 NS 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %10 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
11 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
12 NS 2C E+2 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %13 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
14 NS 5C S-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 3P E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %16 NS 4C E-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4PcN-3 -500 5 27.78
18 NS 1S S+4 210 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %19 NS 4TcE-1 200 13 72.22
20 NS 5PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 4CcS-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %22 NS 2CcW-2 500 17 94.44
23 NS 3S E-2 200 15 83.33
24 NS 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %25 NS 5TcS = 550 18 100.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %28 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
29 NS 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
30 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 4PcE-1 100 6 33.33
6 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56
9 NS 5P W+1 -680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %10 NS 3PcW+1 -930 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
12 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %13 NS Pass Passe 12 66.67
14 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33
15 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %16 NS 4C E-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4PcN-3 -500 5 27.78
18 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %19 NS 5T E-2 200 13 72.22
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %22 NS 2CcW-2 500 17 94.44
23 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
24 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %25 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 NS 5P N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %28 NS 3C S-2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 4K S = 130 9 50.00
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %31 NS 3T W = -110 7 38.89
32 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
Total : 215,4 / 540 = 39,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
2 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
8 NS 1S S+4 210 4 22.22
9 NS 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %10 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %13 NS 1C E+2 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %16 NS 5TcS-2 -300 2 11.11
17 NS 3T W = -110 14 77.78
18 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
20 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00
21 NS 4K W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %22 NS 3C W-3 300 9 50.00
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
24 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
29 NS 5KcS = 750 18 100.00
30 NS 2K S = 90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %31 NS 2P E-2 100 17 94.44
32 NS 3P S-2 -100 4 22.22
33 NS 4P W = -420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 51,48 %
Total : 265,8 / 540 = 49,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
2 NS 1S W-2 100 11 61.11
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
6 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %13 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 16.67
15 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %16 NS 4P W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4C E = -420 11 61.11
18 NS 2C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %19 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %22 NS 3S N = 400 13 72.22
23 NS 3S E-4 400 18 100.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %25 NS 3P E = -140 12 66.67
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %28 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
30 NS 3T E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22
32 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
33 NS 50%50% Moyen 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
3 NS 5T E = -600 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
6 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %13 NS 1S N = 90 14 77.78
14 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 NS 4P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %16 NS 4C W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %19 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 5T E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %22 NS 3C W-3 300 9 50.00
23 NS 2PcN-2 -500 5 27.78
24 NS 4PcN+1 690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %28 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
29 NS 5K S = 600 15 83.33
30 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %31 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44
32 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 278,1 / 540 = 51,50 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
2 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 % 4 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
5 NS 2S S+1 150 8 44.44
6 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
9 NS 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 6 33.33
17 NS 4C E = -420 11 61.11
18 NS 3K S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %19 NS 5T E-2 200 13 72.22
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 4K W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %22 NS 3S N = 400 13 72.22
23 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44
24 NS 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 5KcW+1 -950 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %28 NS 2K W+1 -110 11 61.11
29 NS 5K S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 1S N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %31 NS 2KcS-3 -800 0 0.00
32 NS 1S N-2 -100 4 22.22
33 NS 4P W = -420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 267,8 / 540 = 49,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 2C E-1 50 7 38.89
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 % 4 NS 1S E-2 200 17 94.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
6 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
8 NS 1S N+4 210 4 22.22
9 NS 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %19 NS 5T E-1 100 5 27.78
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 4K E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %22 NS 4K N-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
24 NS 6TcE-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 61.11
29 NS 5K N-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %31 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67
32 NS 2PcN-1 -100 4 22.22
33 NS 4P E = -420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
Total : 251,8 / 540 = 46,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
2 NS 1P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 % 4 NS 1S S = 90 1 5.56
5 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
6 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 NS 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
9 NS 6KcN-3 -500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
12 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %13 NS 2C E = -110 5 27.78
14 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %16 NS 3S E-5 500 18 100.00
17 NS 4T W-1 50 16 88.89
18 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %22 NS 2CcW-1 200 6 33.33
23 NS 4C W-2 200 15 83.33
24 NS 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %25 NS 5P E = -650 3 16.67
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %28 NS 3K W-1 50 18 100.00
29 NS 4CcW-2 500 12 66.67
30 NS 2S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %31 NS 3K E-1 50 13 72.22
32 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22
33 NS 3S W-4 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 81,30 %
Total : 314,9 / 540 = 58,31 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 6 33.33
2 NS 2S E-4 200 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 % 4 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
5 NS 4CcN-2 -500 1 5.56
6 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 NS 1S S+5 240 8 44.44
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %10 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
11 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
12 NS 2C E+3 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %13 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78
14 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00
15 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %16 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
17 NS 4PcN-4 -800 1 5.56
18 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %19 NS 5T E-2 200 13 72.22
20 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 4CcS-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 %28 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
29 NS 5K S = 600 15 83.33
30 NS 4T E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %31 NS 2K E = -90 10 55.56
32 NS 1P S = 80 16 88.89
33 NS 4P W = -420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,74 %
Total : 280,8 / 540 = 52,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 % 1 NS 5P S = 450 15 83.33
2 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 % 4 NS 1ScE-1 200 17 94.44
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 3KcE-2 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 % 7 NS 6C E-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
9 NS 6KcN-2 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 14 77.78
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %13 NS 1S N-1 -100 8 44.44
14 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33
15 NS 4P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %16 NS 4C W-2 200 12 66.67
17 NS 4KcS-4 -800 1 5.56
18 NS 2K S+1 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %19 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 5P N-1 -100 16 88.89
21 NS 4K E = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,67 %22 NS 3K N-1 -50 1 5.56
23 NS 3PcN-2 -500 5 27.78
24 NS 5P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 %28 NS 3K W = -110 11 61.11
29 NS 4K N = 130 9 50.00
30 NS 2P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 %31 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67
32 NS 1P E-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 4P W-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 67,96 %
Total : 297,7 / 540 = 55,13 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,35 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
2 NS 3S W-2 100 11 61.11
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 46,35 % 4 NS 1S S = 90 1 5.56
5 NS 4CcS-2 -500 1 5.56
6 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 50,56 % 7 NS 6S E = -1440 2 11.11
8 NS 1S S+4 210 4 22.22
9 NS 5KcN-2 -300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,85 %10 NS 2P W+3 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
12 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 43,74 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,94 %16 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
17 NS 6C E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 2C E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,56 %19 NS 4T E-1 100 5 27.78
20 NS 5P N-2 -200 8 44.44
21 NS 4K W = -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 59,85 %22 NS 3K N = 110 4 22.22
23 NS 3PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,22 %25 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,89 %31 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 38.89
32 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22
33 NS 4P W = -420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 49,63 %
Total : 239,8 / 540 = 44,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
2 EO 2T S-1 -100 14 77.78
3 EO 3S E = -600 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 % 4 EO 1S E-2 200 1 5.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
6 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44
9 EO 5P W+1 -680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %13 EO 1C E+2 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %16 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
17 EO 4PcN-4 -800 17 94.44
18 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %19 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %22 EO 3K N-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 3PcN-2 -500 13 72.22
24 EO 5P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %31 EO 2KcS-3 -800 18 100.00
32 EO 1S N-2 -100 14 77.78
33 EO 4P W = -420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 322,2 / 540 = 59,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
2 EO 2C E-1 50 11 61.11
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 4PcE-1 100 12 66.67
6 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 EO 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
9 EO 6KcN-3 -500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %13 EO 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22
14 EO 3P E = -140 18 100.00
15 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %16 EO 4P W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 38.89
18 EO 2C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %19 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 5P N-1 -100 2 11.11
21 EO 4K E = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %22 EO 3C W-3 300 9 50.00
23 EO 2PcN-2 -500 13 72.22
24 EO 4PcN+1 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %25 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %28 EO 2K W+1 -110 7 38.89
29 EO 5K S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 1S N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 % 4 EO 1S S = 90 17 94.44
5 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
6 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
8 EO 1S S+4 210 14 77.78
9 EO 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %10 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
11 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
12 EO 2C E+3 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %13 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %16 EO 4C W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4KcS-4 -800 17 94.44
18 EO 2K S+1 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %19 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 5T E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %22 EO 3K N = 110 14 77.78
23 EO 3PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 5KcW+1 -950 18 100.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %28 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
29 EO 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
30 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %31 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33
32 EO 2PcN-1 -100 14 77.78
33 EO 4P E = -420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
Total : 323,2 / 540 = 59,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
2 EO 1P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 EO 1S S+5 240 10 55.56
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %13 EO 1S N-1 -100 10 55.56
14 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67
15 EO 4P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %16 EO 4C W-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %19 EO 4T E-1 100 13 72.22
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 4K W = -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %22 EO 3S N = 400 5 27.78
23 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56
24 EO 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %25 EO 5TcS = 550 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 7 38.89
29 EO 5K N-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %31 EO 3T W = -110 11 61.11
32 EO 2P S-3 -150 18 100.00
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
Total : 294,6 / 540 = 54,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 VAGMAN David -DAPHNE Chantal
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
2 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
5 EO 4CcN-2 -500 17 94.44
6 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %13 EO 1S N = 90 4 22.22
14 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 EO 4P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %16 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
17 EO 6C E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 2C E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %19 EO 5T E-2 200 5 27.78
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 4K W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %22 EO 2CcW-2 500 1 5.56
23 EO 3S E-2 200 3 16.67
24 EO 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %28 EO 3C S-2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 4K S = 130 9 50.00
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %31 EO 3K E-1 50 5 27.78
32 EO 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78
33 EO 3S W-4 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 18,70 %
Total : 248,1 / 540 = 45,94 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
2 EO 2S E-4 200 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
6 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 % 7 EO 6C E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
9 EO 6KcN-2 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 12 66.67
17 EO 4C E = -420 7 38.89
18 EO 3K S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %19 EO 4TcE-1 200 5 27.78
20 EO 5PcN-2 -500 18 100.00
21 EO 4CcS-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %22 EO 4K N-1 -50 17 94.44
23 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
24 EO 6TcE-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %25 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
26 EO 5P N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %28 EO 3K W-1 50 0 0.00
29 EO 4CcW-2 500 6 33.33
30 EO 2S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %31 EO 2P E-2 100 1 5.56
32 EO 3P S-2 -100 14 77.78
33 EO 4P W = -420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 48,52 %
Total : 236,2 / 540 = 43,74 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
2 EO 1S W-2 100 7 38.89
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 % 4 EO 1ScE-1 200 1 5.56
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 3KcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 50.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %10 EO 2P W+3 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %16 EO 4C E-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4PcN-3 -500 13 72.22
18 EO 1S S+4 210 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %19 EO 5T E-1 100 13 72.22
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 4K E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %22 EO 2CcW-2 500 1 5.56
23 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %25 EO 5P E = -650 15 83.33
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
29 EO 5KcS = 750 0 0.00
30 EO 2K S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %31 EO 2K E = -90 8 44.44
32 EO 1P S = 80 2 11.11
33 EO 4P W = -420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,26 %
Total : 242,2 / 540 = 44,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 % 1 EO 5P S = 450 3 16.67
2 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
6 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
8 EO 1S S+4 210 14 77.78
9 EO 5KcN-2 -300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %13 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
14 EO 5C S-1 -50 15 83.33
15 EO 3P E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %19 EO 5T E-2 200 5 27.78
20 EO 5P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %22 EO 2CcW-1 200 12 66.67
23 EO 4C W-2 200 3 16.67
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %28 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
29 EO 5K S = 600 3 16.67
30 EO 4T E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78
32 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
33 EO 50%50% Moyen 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
3 EO 5T E = -600 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 % 4 EO 1S S = 90 17 94.44
5 EO 4CcS-2 -500 17 94.44
6 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
9 EO 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 %10 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
12 EO 2C E+2 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %16 EO 4C E-2 200 6 33.33
17 EO 4PcN-3 -500 13 72.22
18 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %22 EO 3C W-3 300 9 50.00
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %28 EO 3C N-2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 3C W = -140 18 100.00
30 EO 3T E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %31 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33
32 EO 1P E-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 4P W-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 32,04 %
Total : 250,3 / 540 = 46,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
2 EO 3S W-2 100 7 38.89
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 % 4 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
5 EO 2S S+1 150 10 55.56
6 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
9 EO 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
11 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %13 EO Pass Passe 6 33.33
14 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67
15 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %16 EO 3S E-5 500 0 0.00
17 EO 4T W-1 50 2 11.11
18 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
20 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
21 EO 4K W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %25 EO 3P E = -140 6 33.33
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A10 ROSOUX Louis -COLLET Claudine : 55,13 %28 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
29 EO 4K N = 130 9 50.00
30 EO 2P N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %31 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56
32 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 190,9 / 540 = 35,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 GENDEBIEN Catherine -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,59 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 12 66.67
2 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 49,81 % 4 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
5 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
6 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 MASSART Jean -DOUETTE Albert : 46,63 % 7 EO 6S E = -1440 16 88.89
8 EO 1S N+4 210 14 77.78
9 EO 5C E = -650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.2 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 39,89 %10 EO 3PcW+1 -930 18 100.00
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,31 %13 EO 2C E = -110 13 72.22
14 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
15 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,22 %16 EO 5TcS-2 -300 16 88.89
17 EO 3T W = -110 4 22.22
18 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,00 %19 EO 5T E-2 200 5 27.78
20 EO 4P N-2 -200 10 55.56
21 EO 4CcS-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 53,52 %22 EO 3S N = 400 5 27.78
23 EO 3S E-4 400 0 0.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.5 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,50 %28 EO 3K W = -110 7 38.89
29 EO 5K S = 600 3 16.67
30 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A11 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,41 %31 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 61.11
32 EO 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78
33 EO 4P W = -420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 50,37 %
Total : 280,2 / 540 = 51,89 %
|
|