|
Tournoi du 02-08-10
1 64,82 5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 59,10 6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
3 57,98 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 52,32 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
5 49,17 8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
6 48,02 4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
7 47,15 7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine
8 46,27 10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
9 45,98 9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
10 45,48 2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis
11 41,65 11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
12 41,50 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 68,80 21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,68 17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 51,97 22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo
4 50,92 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
5 49,05 19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
6 48,95 23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 46,98 20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François
8 45,29 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
9 44,91 18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne
10 44,15 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
11 41,98 16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne
12 0,00 24 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E = -120 3 15.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 14 70.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %10 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S = Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %13 NS 2T E = -90 5 25.00
14 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 10.00
15 NS 3C E = -140 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 3PcN+1 630 16 80.00
18 NS 1S W = -90 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 42,17 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 2C S+1 140 15 75.00
21 NS 5P E-1 50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
23 NS 2S E+2 -180 15 75.00
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %25 NS 2P E-2 200 20 100.00
26 NS 1S S+2 150 18 90.00
27 NS 4P E-2 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,67 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %28 NS 3P E = -140 14 70.00
29 NS 1S S = 90 13 65.00
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %31 NS 3P E+1 -170 13 65.00
32 NS 2T N+2 130 20 100.00
33 NS 5P E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 345,3 / 660 = 52,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 % 4 NS 6S S+1 1470 17 85.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 19 95.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 % 7 NS 3K N+2 150 3 15.00
8 NS 2PcN-2 -300 17 85.00
9 NS 1S S+1 120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %10 NS 2S N+2 180 2 10.00
11 NS 3S S = Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W-1 50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %13 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 10.00
14 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3S W-3 150 3 15.00
18 NS 1S W-1 50 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 19,83 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 3C S+2 200 20 100.00
21 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
24 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %25 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 60.00
26 NS 2P W = -110 2 10.00
27 NS 3P E+2 -200 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %28 NS 4C W = -420 3 15.00
29 NS 1S W = -90 10 50.00
30 NS 1S N+2 150 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %31 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 50.00
32 NS 3S S-3 -150 2 10.00
33 NS 6PcE-2 300 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 272,9 / 600 = 45,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E-2 100 20 100.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 % 4 NS 3S N+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 70.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 15 75.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 1S S+1 120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
24 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %13 NS 2P N = 110 11 55.00
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 60.00
15 NS 3S W-3 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 4CcE-5 1100 20 100.00
18 NS 2C S = 110 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 78,17 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %19 NS 1S S+1 120 20 100.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 25.00
21 NS 5PcE-1 100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
23 NS 1S W+3 -210 9 45.00
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 20.00
26 NS 1S S+1 120 15 75.00
27 NS 4K W-1 50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %28 NS 3T S-3 -300 8 40.00
29 NS 1S S = 90 13 65.00
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %31 NS 4P E = -420 6 30.00
32 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 70.00
33 NS 5PcW = -650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 347,9 / 600 = 57,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 30.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 % 7 NS 3K N+2 150 3 15.00
8 NS 2PcN-2 -300 17 85.00
9 NS 1S S+1 120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 14 70.00
11 NS 3S S+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %13 NS 1S S+2 150 14 70.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 6 30.00
15 NS 4C E-1 50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 20 100.00
17 NS 4C E-3 150 3 15.00
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 38,50 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 2C S = 110 11 55.00
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
23 NS 2S W+2 -180 15 75.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %25 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00
27 NS 3K W = -110 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %28 NS 4C W = -420 3 15.00
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 30.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
24 - : 0,00 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 288,1 / 600 = 48,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 % 1 NS 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 % 4 NS 7S S = 2220 20 100.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 19 95.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 % 7 NS 3S S+4 720 20 100.00
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
9 NS 1S S+2 150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 14 70.00
11 NS 3S E = -500 10 50.00
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %13 NS 2K W-2 200 18 90.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 6 30.00
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 5T N = 400 10 50.00
18 NS 2P E-1 50 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 43,17 %
24 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
23 NS 2S W+3 -210 9 45.00
24 NS 1P N+1 110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %25 NS 2P E-1 100 16 80.00
26 NS 2P W-3 300 20 100.00
27 NS 3P E-1 50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 2P N = 110 18 90.00
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 85.00
32 NS 2T N-1 -50 14 70.00
33 NS 6PcE-1 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
Total : 388,9 / 600 = 64,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 % 4 NS 5K N+2 640 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
24 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %10 NS 3S N+3 690 20 100.00
11 NS 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %13 NS 2P N = 110 11 55.00
14 NS 3P E-1 50 18 90.00
15 NS 3S E-3 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %16 NS 2C N+3 450 17 85.00
17 NS 3P N+1 170 6 30.00
18 NS 1S E-2 100 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %19 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 2C N = 110 11 55.00
21 NS 4K N-4 -400 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 20 100.00
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %25 NS 2P E = -110 9 45.00
26 NS 1S N+1 120 15 75.00
27 NS 3P E-1 50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 17 85.00
29 NS 3C N = 140 20 100.00
30 NS 1S N+4 210 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 20 100.00
32 NS 2K N = 110 18 90.00
33 NS 5PcE = -650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 354,6 / 600 = 59,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 % 1 NS 3P E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 2C N+1 140 10 50.00
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 % 7 NS 3K N+1 130 0 0.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 2T S-1 -50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 6 30.00
11 NS 3S E = Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %13 NS 3C E-2 200 18 90.00
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 60.00
15 NS 4C E = -420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %16 NS 3S S-1 430 14 70.00
17 NS 4CcE-3 500 14 70.00
18 NS 1S W-1 50 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 61,50 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 25.00
21 NS 5C E = -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %22 NS 2T W+5 -190 18 90.00
23 NS 2S E+2 -180 15 75.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 20.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 20.00
27 NS 4P E-1 50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
24 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %31 NS 2P E+2 -170 13 65.00
32 NS 2T N-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 6KcN-2 -300 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 282,9 / 600 = 47,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 % 1 NS 4P E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 % 4 NS 3S N+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 70.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 7 35.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 14 70.00
11 NS 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %13 NS 3T E-2 200 18 90.00
14 NS 3P E-1 50 18 90.00
15 NS 4C E-1 50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
24 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 2 10.00
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 5PcE = -650 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
23 NS 2S W+2 -180 15 75.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %25 NS 2S N = 120 18 90.00
26 NS 2P W-1 100 12 60.00
27 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %28 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 50.00
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 30.00
30 NS 4C N+1 450 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %31 NS 1S W+4 -210 8 40.00
32 NS 2P N-4 -200 0 0.00
33 NS 5PcW = -650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 295,0 / 600 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 19 95.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
24 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 15 75.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 1S S+1 120 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 6 30.00
11 NS 3S E = Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 3P W = -140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %13 NS 2T E = -90 5 25.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 6 30.00
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 4P N = 420 12 60.00
18 NS 1S W-1 50 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 46,50 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %19 NS 1S S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 25.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %22 NS 2T E+4 -170 20 100.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 10.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %25 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 20.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00
27 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %28 NS 4P E = -420 3 15.00
29 NS 1S W-1 100 16 80.00
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %31 NS 2P E+1 -140 17 85.00
32 NS 2T N-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 5PcE = -650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 275,9 / 600 = 45,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 19 95.00
2 NS 2S E = -120 3 15.00
3 NS 2S S = 120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 9 45.00
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 % 7 NS 3S S+3 690 18 90.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 14 70.00
11 NS 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %13 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3P E-1 50 18 90.00
15 NS 4C E = -420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 17 85.00
17 NS 4CcE-2 300 8 40.00
18 NS 2P E-2 100 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 69,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 2C S+2 170 18 90.00
21 NS 6P E-2 100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 10.00
24 NS 2T S-2 -100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
24 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %28 NS 2P E+2 -170 12 60.00
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 6 30.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 %31 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00
32 NS 3C W = -140 4 20.00
33 NS 6K N-2 -100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 277,6 / 600 = 46,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 10 50.00
2 NS 2S E-1 50 12 60.00
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 2 10.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 30.00
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 10 50.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 20 100.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 6 30.00
11 NS 3S S+2 Moyen 10 -2.00 50.00 -10.00 %
12 NS 4P W-1 50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
24 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 3CcE-1 100 0 0.00
18 NS 2P E-1 50 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 26,50 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 1C S+2 140 15 75.00
21 NS 5TcS = 750 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %22 NS 3S E = -600 16 80.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 6 30.00
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %25 NS 2P E = -110 9 45.00
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 2P E = -110 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,92 %28 NS 4C W = -420 3 15.00
29 NS 2K S-2 -200 1 5.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %31 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 20.00
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 5P E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 249,9 / 600 = 41,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
24 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 56,68 % 4 NS 6S S+1 1470 17 85.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 30.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 68,80 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 7 35.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 8 40.00
9 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 45,29 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 14 70.00
11 NS 3S S+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne : 44,91 %13 NS 2K N = 90 8 40.00
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 60.00
15 NS 4C E = -420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo : 51,97 %16 NS 4C S = 420 7 35.00
17 NS 5TcS+1 650 18 90.00
18 NS 5TcS+1 Moyen 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,15 %19 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 25.00
21 NS 5P E = -450 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René : 49,05 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 10.00
24 NS 4T W-2 100 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,95 %25 NS 2T S = 90 14 70.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 8 40.00
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne : 41,98 %28 NS 4P E-2 100 20 100.00
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.00
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François : 46,98 %31 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 10.00
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 14 70.00
33 NS 5PcW = -650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 249,0 / 600 = 41,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E = -120 17 85.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 2C N+1 140 10 50.00
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 % 7 EO 3K N+2 150 17 85.00
8 EO 2PcN-2 -300 3 15.00
9 EO 1S S+1 120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 6 30.00
11 EO 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %13 EO 2P N = 110 9 45.00
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 40.00
15 EO 3S W-3 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 4P N = 420 8 40.00
18 EO 1S W-1 50 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 53,50 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 2C S = 110 9 45.00
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 90.00
24 EO 2T S-2 -100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %25 EO 2P E-1 100 4 20.00
26 EO 2P W-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 3P E-1 50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %28 EO 4C W = -420 17 85.00
29 EO 2K S-2 -200 19 95.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00
32 EO 2K N = 110 2 10.00
33 EO 5PcE = -650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 336,1 / 660 = 50,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 % 1 EO 3P E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 100.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 % 4 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 15.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 13 65.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 6 30.00
11 EO 3S S+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %13 EO 2T E = -90 15 75.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 70.00
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
17 EO 4C E-3 150 17 85.00
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 61,50 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 2C S+2 170 2 10.00
21 EO 6P E-2 100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
23 EO 2S W+3 -210 11 55.00
24 EO 1P N+1 110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %25 EO 2P E = -110 11 55.00
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 20 100.00
27 EO 2P E = -110 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
30 EO 1S N+4 210 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %31 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 35.00
32 EO 2T N+2 130 0 0.00
33 EO 5P E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 298,9 / 660 = 45,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 19 95.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 % 4 EO 3S N+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 6 30.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 5 25.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 1S S+1 120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 14 70.00
11 EO 3S E = Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 3P W = -140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %13 EO 1S S+2 150 6 30.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 70.00
15 EO 4C E-1 50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 3 15.00
17 EO 4CcE-2 300 12 60.00
18 EO 2P E-2 100 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 30,67 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 15 75.00
21 EO 5P E = -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %22 EO 3S E = -600 4 20.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 14 70.00
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %25 EO 2P E = -110 11 55.00
26 EO 1S N+1 120 5 25.00
27 EO 3P E-1 50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %28 EO 3P E = -140 6 30.00
29 EO 1S S = 90 7 35.00
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %31 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 35.00
32 EO 2T N-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 6KcN-2 -300 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 291,4 / 660 = 44,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MICHEL Chantal -MACAUX Lucienne
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 % 1 EO 4P E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 % 4 EO 3S N+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 6 30.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 5 25.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 1S S+1 120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 6 30.00
11 EO 3S S+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %13 EO 1S S-2 -200 20 100.00
14 EO 3P E-1 50 2 10.00
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 5T N = 400 10 50.00
18 EO 2P E-1 50 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 56,83 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 1C S+2 140 5 25.00
21 EO 5TcS = 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %25 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S+2 150 2 10.00
27 EO 4P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %28 EO 4P E-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 19 95.00
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %31 EO 2P E+3 -200 10 50.00
32 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 90.00
33 EO 6PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 277,1 / 660 = 41,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 % 4 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 15.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 70.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 % 7 EO 3K N+2 150 17 85.00
8 EO 2PcN-2 -300 3 15.00
9 EO 1S S+1 120 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 6 30.00
11 EO 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %13 EO 2K W-2 200 2 10.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 70.00
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 3CcE-1 100 20 100.00
18 EO 2P E-1 50 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 73,50 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %19 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 2C N = 110 9 45.00
21 EO 4K N-4 -400 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
23 EO 2S E+2 -180 5 25.00
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 80.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 80.00
27 EO 4P E-1 50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %28 EO 4C W = -420 17 85.00
29 EO 1S W = -90 10 50.00
30 EO 1S N+2 150 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %31 EO 1S W+4 -210 12 60.00
32 EO 2P N-4 -200 20 100.00
33 EO 5PcW = -650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 374,1 / 660 = 56,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 WILLEMS Jacques -BEYNE Anne
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 1 5.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 70.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 % 7 EO 3S S+3 690 2 10.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 2P E = -110 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 6 30.00
11 EO 3S E = -500 10 50.00
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %13 EO 2K N = 90 12 60.00
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 40.00
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %16 EO 2C N+3 450 3 15.00
17 EO 3P N+1 170 14 70.00
18 EO 1S E-2 100 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 2C S+1 140 5 25.00
21 EO 5P E-1 50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %22 EO 2T W+5 -190 2 10.00
23 EO 2S E+2 -180 5 25.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %25 EO 3T N-1 -50 8 40.00
26 EO 2P W = -110 18 90.00
27 EO 3P E+2 -200 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %28 EO 3P E+2 -200 10 50.00
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 70.00
30 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %31 EO 4P E = -420 14 70.00
32 EO 1S S-1 -50 6 30.00
33 EO 5PcW = -650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 296,4 / 660 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Edgard -CHANTRAINE René
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 19 95.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 % 7 EO 3S S+4 720 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 100.00
9 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 14 70.00
11 EO 3S S+2 Moyen 10 -2.00 50.00 -10.00 %
12 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %13 EO 2P N = 110 9 45.00
14 EO 3P E-1 50 2 10.00
15 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 3PcN+1 630 4 20.00
18 EO 1S W = -90 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 57,83 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 15 75.00
21 EO 5C E = -450 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 90.00
24 EO 4T W-2 100 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %25 EO 2S N = 120 2 10.00
26 EO 2P W-1 100 8 40.00
27 EO 4P E = -420 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %28 EO 3T S-3 -300 12 60.00
29 EO 1S S = 90 7 35.00
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 3 15.00
32 EO 2T N-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 5PcE = -650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 323,7 / 660 = 49,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LIBERT Laurent -HALLEUX Jean François
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 1 5.00
2 EO 2S E = -120 17 85.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 % 4 EO 7S S = 2220 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 10 50.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 %10 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E+1 Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %13 EO 2T E = -90 15 75.00
14 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 90.00
15 EO 3C E = -140 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %16 EO 3S S-1 430 6 30.00
17 EO 4CcE-3 500 6 30.00
18 EO 1S W-1 50 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 38,50 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %19 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00
20 EO 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 6C E = -980 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
23 EO 2S W+2 -180 5 25.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 80.00
26 EO 1S S+1 120 5 25.00
27 EO 4K W-1 50 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %28 EO 4P E = -420 17 85.00
29 EO 1S W-1 100 4 20.00
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %31 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 90.00
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 30.00
33 EO 5PcW = -650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 310,1 / 660 = 46,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 % 1 EO 4C W-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 2S S = 120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 18 90.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 70.00
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 13 65.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 2C W = -110 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 %10 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 100.00
11 EO 3S S = Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %13 EO 3C E-2 200 2 10.00
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 8 40.00
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 20 100.00
17 EO 3S W-3 150 17 85.00
18 EO 1S W-1 50 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 80,17 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 18 90.00
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 100.00
21 EO 5PcE = -650 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
23 EO 1S W+3 -210 11 55.00
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %25 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 80.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00
27 EO 2P E+3 -200 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %28 EO 4C W = -420 17 85.00
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 70.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %31 EO 4P W+2 -480 20 100.00
32 EO 3C W = -140 16 80.00
33 EO 6K N-2 -100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 454,1 / 660 = 68,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 SALME Victoria -HUBLET Carlo
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 10 50.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 % 4 EO 5K N+2 640 20 100.00
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 19 95.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 14 70.00
11 EO 3S E = Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %13 EO 1S S-1 -100 18 90.00
14 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 100.00
15 EO 4C W-1 50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 5TcS+1 650 2 10.00
18 EO 5TcS+1 Moyen 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %19 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 75.00
21 EO 5PcE-1 100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %22 EO 2T E+4 -170 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 90.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %25 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 100.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00
27 EO 3K W = -110 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %28 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 40.00
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 70.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %31 EO 2P E+1 -140 3 15.00
32 EO 2T N-1 -50 6 30.00
33 EO 6PcE-1 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
Total : 343,0 / 660 = 51,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 19 95.00
2 EO 2S E-1 50 8 40.00
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 52,32 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 11 55.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 6 30.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 % 7 EO 3K N+1 130 20 100.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 12 60.00
9 EO 2T S-1 -50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %10 EO 2S N+2 180 18 90.00
11 EO 3S S = Moyen 10 50.00
12 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %13 EO 3T E-2 200 2 10.00
14 EO 3P E-1 50 2 10.00
15 EO 4C E-1 50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %16 EO 4C S = 420 13 65.00
17 EO 4CcE-5 1100 0 0.00
18 EO 2C S = 110 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 21,83 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 %19 EO 1S S-4 -200 20 100.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 75.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
23 EO 2S W+2 -180 5 25.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 %25 EO 2T S = 90 6 30.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 12 60.00
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 3 15.00
29 EO 2P N = 110 2 10.00
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %31 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 80.00
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 5P E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
Total : 323,1 / 660 = 48,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 -
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 41,50 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 45,98 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,10 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,98 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,65 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,17 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 64,82 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 DERIE Jean-Pierre -ROSOUX Louis : 45,48 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 46,27 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 EVRARD Armand -COLLET Claudine : 47,15 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 48,02 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
|
|