|
Tournoi du 03-09-12
1 61,81 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 61,34 A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 59,95 A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
4 59,26 A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
5 58,56 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 40,74 A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine
7 36,57 A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
8 35,88 A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
~ 35,88 A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,50 a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 54,86 a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 54,63 a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
4 51,85 a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
5 50,46 a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane -
6 45,14 a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon
7 44,91 a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
8 43,75 a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
9 41,90 a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 3S S+2 660 16 100.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 25.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 % 7 NS Pass Passe 12 75.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
9 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %10 NS 2T S = 90 16 100.00
11 NS 2S E-3 150 16 100.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 81.25
14 NS 3S S+3 490 10 62.50
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %16 NS 1P S+3 170 5 31.25
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 12.50
18 NS 4P E-2 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %19 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
21 NS 3C W = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 25.00
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 14 87.50
24 NS 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %25 NS 2P N+2 170 13 81.25
26 NS 4P W = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 3C W+3 -230 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 253,0 / 432 = 58,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 15 93.75
2 NS 1S N+3 180 10 62.50
3 NS 2C W+2 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 % 4 NS 3CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 25.00
6 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 4 25.00
9 NS 4P S = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %10 NS 4C E = -620 2 12.50
11 NS 3T E = -110 5 31.25
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %13 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
14 NS 6S S = 990 16 100.00
15 NS 4PcW-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %16 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %19 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %22 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 62.50
23 NS 3S W = -600 11 68.75
24 NS 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 6.25
26 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
Total : 176,0 / 432 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 12 75.00
2 NS 4T W-5 250 12 75.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 % 4 NS 2P E+3 -200 11 68.75
5 NS 4P W-3 150 8 50.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
8 NS 4P S+2 480 16 100.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 12 75.00
11 NS 4K E-1 50 12 75.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75
14 NS 3S S+2 460 3 18.75
15 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 16 100.00
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 12.50
18 NS 3S W-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
20 NS 3C S = 140 15 93.75
21 NS 3C W = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %22 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 25.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 11 68.75
24 NS 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 6.25
26 NS 4P W-1 100 15 93.75
27 NS 2C W+3 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 256,0 / 432 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 25.00
2 NS 2S N+1 150 4 25.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 % 4 NS 3P W+2 -200 11 68.75
5 NS 3TcS-1 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2T S = 90 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 5P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %10 NS 1C E+4 -200 8 50.00
11 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 2 12.50
14 NS 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
15 NS 2P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %16 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
17 NS 5T W+1 -420 12 75.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 10 62.50
20 NS 2C S+1 140 15 93.75
21 NS 2C W = -110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %22 NS 2K W = -90 13 81.25
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
24 NS 1S W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 155,0 / 432 = 35,88 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 3TcE-3 500 14 87.50
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 25.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 25.00
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
9 NS 4P N+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %10 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 75.00
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 56.25
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 81.25
14 NS 3S S+3 490 10 62.50
15 NS 2P W-2 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %16 NS 4C N = 420 11 68.75
17 NS 5T W = -400 14 87.50
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
20 NS 3K S = 110 12 75.00
21 NS 3C W = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %22 NS 2K W = -90 13 81.25
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
24 NS 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %25 NS 2P N+2 170 13 81.25
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 62.50
27 NS 2C W+2 -170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 265,0 / 432 = 61,34 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 6.25
2 NS 3K N+3 170 8 50.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 % 4 NS 5PcE-1 200 16 100.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 25.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 12.50
9 NS 4P S+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %10 NS 4C E = -620 2 12.50
11 NS 3K E = -110 5 31.25
12 NS 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75
14 NS 3S N+2 460 3 18.75
15 NS 3PcW-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %16 NS 2S S = 120 2 12.50
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 12.50
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %19 NS 4C N = 420 6 37.50
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
21 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %22 NS 2P S-3 -150 4 25.00
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25
24 NS 3K W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %25 NS 3T E-1 100 4 25.00
26 NS 3P W = -140 10 62.50
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 158,0 / 432 = 36,57 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 6.25
2 NS 3C E-3 150 4 25.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 % 4 NS 2P E+3 -200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 1P S-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 % 7 NS Pass Passe 12 75.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
9 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %10 NS 4C E = -620 2 12.50
11 NS 4C N-3 -150 2 12.50
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75
14 NS 3S S+3 490 10 62.50
15 NS 2P W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %16 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 NS 4PcE-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %19 NS 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3C W = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 25.00
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 37.50
24 NS 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 3 18.75
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 155,0 / 432 = 35,88 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 4K N+1 150 4 25.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 25.00
5 NS 4PcW-4 800 16 100.00
6 NS 3T N = 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 % 7 NS Pass Passe 12 75.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
9 NS 4P N+1 450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %10 NS 5TcS-2 -500 6 37.50
11 NS 2C N = 110 14 87.50
12 NS 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %13 NS 1S E = -90 16 100.00
14 NS 3S S+3 490 10 62.50
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %16 NS 4P S = 420 11 68.75
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %19 NS 3S N = 400 2 12.50
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
21 NS 3C W = -140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 25.00
23 NS 4C E-1 100 16 100.00
24 NS 3S W-5 250 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75
27 NS 3C W+1 -170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 267,0 / 432 = 61,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon : 45,14 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 15 93.75
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 44,91 % 4 NS 3P E+2 -200 11 68.75
5 NS 4C N = 620 12 75.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,86 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 16 100.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
9 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,85 %10 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 75.00
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 56.25
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,50 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75
14 NS 3S S+3 490 10 62.50
15 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David : 43,75 %16 NS 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
17 NS 4T W+2 -170 16 100.00
18 NS 3S W-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane - : 50,46 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 16 100.00
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 37.50
21 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,90 %22 NS 3K W-1 100 16 100.00
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25
24 NS 1S S+2 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 54,63 %25 NS 3P N+2 200 16 100.00
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 62.50
27 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 259,0 / 432 = 59,95 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 % 4 EO 5PcE-1 200 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 75.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 12 75.00
9 EO 4P S = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %10 EO 4C E = -620 14 87.50
11 EO 4C N-3 -150 14 87.50
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25
14 EO 3S S+2 460 13 81.25
15 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 6 37.50
20 EO 2C S+1 140 1 6.25
21 EO 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %22 EO 3K W-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75
24 EO 1S S+2 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %25 EO 2P N+2 170 3 18.75
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 37.50
27 EO 2C W+2 -170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 181,0 / 432 = 41,90 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 de WASSEIGE Ariane -
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 15 93.75
2 EO 3K N+3 170 8 50.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 % 4 EO 3CcS-4 -1100 16 100.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 75.00
6 EO 1S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 % 7 EO Pass Passe 4 25.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
9 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 4 25.00
11 EO 4K E-1 50 4 25.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %13 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S+3 490 6 37.50
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %16 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
17 EO 5T W+1 -420 4 25.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 62.50
21 EO 3P N-2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %22 EO 2K W = -90 3 18.75
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
24 EO 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %25 EO 2P N+2 170 3 18.75
26 EO 4P W = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 3C W+3 -230 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 218,0 / 432 = 50,46 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAGMAN David
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 1 6.25
2 EO 1S N+3 180 6 37.50
3 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 % 4 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 1P S-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
8 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %10 EO 5TcS-2 -500 10 62.50
11 EO 2C N = 110 2 12.50
12 EO 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 87.50
14 EO 3S S+1 430 16 100.00
15 EO 2P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %16 EO 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
17 EO 4T W+2 -170 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
20 EO 3K S = 110 4 25.00
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 75.00
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 2 12.50
24 EO 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %25 EO 3T E-1 100 12 75.00
26 EO 3P W = -140 6 37.50
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 189,0 / 432 = 43,75 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 93.75
2 EO 3C E-3 150 12 75.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 % 4 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 31.25
5 EO 4P W-3 150 8 50.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 % 7 EO Pass Passe 4 25.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
9 EO 4P N+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %10 EO 1C E+4 -200 8 50.00
11 EO 4CcN-3 -500 16 100.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25
14 EO 3S S+3 490 6 37.50
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %16 EO 4C N = 420 5 31.25
17 EO 5T W = -400 2 12.50
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %19 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %22 EO 2P S-3 -150 12 75.00
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75
24 EO 3K W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 93.75
26 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
Total : 270,0 / 432 = 62,50 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 4 25.00
2 EO 4T W-5 250 4 25.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 75.00
5 EO 4PcW-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 3T N = 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 100.00
9 EO 5P N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %10 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 25.00
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 43.75
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 3 18.75
14 EO 3S S+3 490 6 37.50
15 EO 2P W-2 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %16 EO 1P S+3 170 11 68.75
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 87.50
18 EO 4P E-2 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %19 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
21 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %22 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 37.50
23 EO 3S W = -600 5 31.25
24 EO 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 224,0 / 432 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 4K N+1 150 12 75.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 % 4 EO 3P W+2 -200 5 31.25
5 EO 3TcS-1 -200 16 100.00
6 EO 2T S = 90 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
9 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 %10 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 25.00
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 43.75
12 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 3 18.75
14 EO 3S S+3 490 6 37.50
15 EO 3C N-2 -200 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %16 EO 2S S = 120 14 87.50
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 87.50
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %19 EO 4C N = 420 10 62.50
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 75.00
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
24 EO 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 93.75
26 EO 4P W-1 100 1 6.25
27 EO 2C W+3 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 237,0 / 432 = 54,86 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 75.00
2 EO 2S N+1 150 12 75.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 % 4 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 31.25
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
9 EO 4P N+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 %10 EO 2T S = 90 0 0.00
11 EO 2S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25
14 EO 3S N+2 460 13 81.25
15 EO 3PcW-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 31.25
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %19 EO 2C N+2 170 16 100.00
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 100.00
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %22 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 75.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 5 31.25
24 EO 3K W-2 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25
27 EO 3C W+1 -170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 194,0 / 432 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 LAENENS René -VERBOIS Léon
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 1 6.25
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 100.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 75.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 75.00
6 EO 3T N = 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 % 7 EO Pass Passe 4 25.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
9 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 %10 EO 4C E = -620 14 87.50
11 EO 3K E = -110 11 68.75
12 EO 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %13 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 100.00
14 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
15 EO 4PcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %16 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 100.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 50.00
18 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
20 EO 3C S = 140 1 6.25
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 75.00
23 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S W-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 13 81.25
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 195,0 / 432 = 45,14 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
A.5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 61,34 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 3TcE-3 500 2 12.50
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 58,56 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 75.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 4 25.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 36,57 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 87.50
9 EO 4P S+1 450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.2 MASSAUX Joel -COLLET Christine : 40,74 %10 EO 4C E = -620 14 87.50
11 EO 3T E = -110 11 68.75
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
A.7 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 35,88 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25
14 EO 3S S+3 490 6 37.50
15 EO 2P W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A.3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 59,26 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 87.50
18 EO 3S W-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,81 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 87.50
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
21 EO 3C W = -140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.4 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 35,88 %22 EO 2K W = -90 3 18.75
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 62.50
24 EO 1S W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 59,95 %25 EO 3P N+2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 37.50
27 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 236,0 / 432 = 54,63 %
|
|