|
Tournoi du 03-12-09
1 58,51 3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
2 53,63 5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe
3 51,49 2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita
4 51,04 8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques
5 49,64 9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric
6 46,96 6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
7 46,88 7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules
8 46,37 1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
9 45,51 4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 53,91 15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André
2 53,15 10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
3 52,81 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
4 52,14 13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS
5 51,95 16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
6 47,71 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
7 47,45 14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette
8 40,73 17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
9 0,00 18 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 % 1 NS 2PcE-1 100 12 100.00
2 NS 3P W-1 50 9 75.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 8.33
4 NS 4P N = 620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 - : 0,00 % 5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 8 66.67
10 NS 3S E = -600 4 33.33
11 NS 3S E-1 50 12 100.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 %13 NS 2CcW = -670 0 0.00
14 NS 2P S+1 140 7 58.33
15 NS 4P S = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 3KcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 %17 NS 1S S-1 -50 2 16.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 8.33
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 NS 5T E+1 -620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %21 NS 6S S-1 -100 0 0.00
22 NS 2C E-1 100 2 16.67
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 6 50.00
24 NS 6P E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 9.5 79.17
26 NS 2KcW-2 500 11.3 94.17
27 NS 3KcW = -470 0 0.00
28 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %29 NS 3S N+1 630 11 91.67
30 NS 5T N-4 -200 2 16.67
31 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 NS 1S S = 90 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 155,8 / 336 = 46,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 1S W-1 100 7 58.33
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 91.67
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 % 9 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
10 NS 3S E = -600 4 33.33
11 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 33.33
12 NS 3S E-1 50 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 %17 NS 3K S-1 -50 2 16.67
18 NS 3P S+2 200 6 50.00
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 NS 4C W-5 500 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 %21 NS 3S S+2 660 2 16.67
22 NS 1S N+1 120 4 33.33
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 91.67
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 %25 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 2K W-1 100 6.9 57.50
27 NS 3K W+1 -130 5.1 42.50
28 NS 3S N+4 720 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %29 NS 3S N = 600 5 41.67
30 NS 3KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
31 NS 4C E-1 50 12 100.00
32 NS 2T S+1 110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %33 NS 2P S+2 170 11 91.67
34 NS 2C N-1 -100 4 33.33
35 NS 2P S = 110 9 75.00
36 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 % 1 NS 2PcE = -470 0 0.00
2 NS 1T W = -70 6 50.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 9 75.00
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 8 66.67
10 NS 1S W+2 -150 12 100.00
11 NS 3C W+2 -200 1 8.33
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 %13 NS 1C W = -80 8 66.67
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 16.67
15 NS 4P S = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 %17 NS 2K S+2 130 8 66.67
18 NS 4P S = 620 8 66.67
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 - : 0,00 %21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 %25 NS 2K E+1 -110 5.1 42.50
26 NS 2KcW-2 500 11.3 94.17
27 NS 3S E-1 50 11.3 94.17
28 NS 4C N+1 650 6.9 57.50 µ Tbl = 72,08 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 %29 NS 3S S+1 630 11 91.67
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 75.00
31 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 NS 2K W-3 300 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 %33 NS 3P S+1 170 11 91.67
34 NS 2K E = -90 9 75.00
35 NS 2S N = 120 12 100.00
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 196,6 / 336 = 58,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 NS 3P W-1 50 9 75.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 9 75.00
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
7 NS 3S W+4 -720 0 0.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %13 NS 2C W = -110 5 41.67
14 NS 3KcW-4 800 12 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 3TcE-2 500 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %17 NS 3K S = 110 6 50.00
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 8.33
19 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
20 NS 5T W+1 -620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 %21 NS 3S S+3 690 5 41.67
22 NS 3K N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 11 91.67
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 9.5 79.17
26 NS 1S N-1 -100 3.4 28.33
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.4 28.33
28 NS 3C N+1 170 1.6 13.33 µ Tbl = 37,29 %
18 - : 0,00 %29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 %33 NS 2P S = 110 6 50.00
34 NS 1S W = -90 9 75.00
35 NS 1S N = 90 6 50.00
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 152,9 / 336 = 45,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe
18 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 % 5 NS 5KcE-5 1100 12 100.00
6 NS 1S W-1 100 7 58.33
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 50.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 8 66.67
10 NS 1PcN-2 -500 10 83.33
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 50.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %17 NS 3T W-3 150 10 83.33
18 NS 4P S+1 650 10 83.33
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %21 NS 3S S+4 720 8 66.67
22 NS 1S S+2 150 7 58.33
23 NS 3C N-2 -200 6 50.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 9.5 79.17
26 NS 2K N-4 -400 0.8 6.67
27 NS 1S S-2 -100 8.6 71.67
28 NS 4C N = 620 4.3 35.83 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 %29 NS 3S N = 600 5 41.67
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 75.00
31 NS 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 NS 2C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 %33 NS 1P S+1 110 6 50.00
34 NS 1S W = -90 9 75.00
35 NS 2T N-1 -50 2 16.67
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 180,2 / 336 = 53,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 NS 3P W-2 100 12 100.00
3 NS 3P S+1 170 4 33.33
4 NS 4P N = 620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 4 33.33
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 16.67
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
18 - : 0,00 % 9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 %13 NS 2C W = -110 5 41.67
14 NS 2P S+1 140 7 58.33
15 NS 4P N = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 3C S-3 -150 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 %21 NS 3S S+3 690 5 41.67
22 NS 1S N+2 150 7 58.33
23 NS 3C N-3 -300 2 16.67
24 NS 5KcW-1 100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %25 NS 2S E = -120 2.5 20.83
26 NS 3T E-3 300 8.6 71.67
27 NS 3S E-1 50 11.3 94.17
28 NS 4C N+3 710 10.4 86.67 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 33.33
31 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 8.33
32 NS 2T S+1 110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %33 NS 2P S-1 -50 1 8.33
34 NS 1S W = -90 9 75.00
35 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 16.67
36 NS 3S E = -600 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 157,8 / 336 = 46,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 % 1 NS 2K W-1 50 10 83.33
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 2 16.67
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 8.33
4 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 1S W-2 200 11 91.67
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 11 91.67
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 8 66.67
10 NS 3S E = -600 4 33.33
11 NS 1S N-3 -200 1 8.33
12 NS 3S E-1 50 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 %13 NS 3T N = 110 12 100.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 3S N-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
18 - : 0,00 %17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 9.5 79.17
26 NS 2K W = -90 5.1 42.50
27 NS 1S E+3 -180 1.6 13.33
28 NS 4C N = 620 4.3 35.83 µ Tbl = 42,71 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 %29 NS 3S N = 600 5 41.67
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 75.00
31 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 8.33
32 NS 2T S = 90 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %33 NS 2P S = 110 6 50.00
34 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
35 NS 2P S = 110 9 75.00
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 157,5 / 336 = 46,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 2 16.67
3 NS 4P S = 420 9 75.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 1S W-2 200 11 91.67
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 50.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 8 66.67
10 NS 3S W = -600 4 33.33
11 NS 2S E = -120 8 66.67
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %13 NS 3T N-2 -200 2 16.67
14 NS 1P S+1 110 4 33.33
15 NS 5KcS-1 -200 0 0.00
16 NS 2P W = -110 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 %17 NS 4TcW-2 300 12 100.00
18 NS 3P S+1 170 4 33.33
19 NS 3S E = -600 12 100.00
20 NS 5S E = -660 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 53,15 %21 NS 6T N+1 1390 11 91.67
22 NS 2C E-2 200 10 83.33
23 NS 3CcN-1 -200 6 50.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 %29 NS 3S N = 600 5 41.67
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 75.00
31 NS 2K W = -90 10 83.33
32 NS 2C N+1 140 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 %33 NS 2P S-1 -50 1 8.33
34 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 16.67
35 NS 1S N-1 -50 2 16.67
36 NS 3S E = -600 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 196,0 / 384 = 51,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 40,73 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 16.67
2 NS 2P W = -110 2 16.67
3 NS 4P S = 420 9 75.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,95 % 5 NS 4P S = 620 5 41.67
6 NS 1S W = -90 2 16.67
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 50.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André : 53,91 % 9 NS 1S S+2 150 2 16.67
10 NS 3S E = -600 4 33.33
11 NS 2P N-2 -100 10 83.33
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette : 47,45 %13 NS 1S S = 90 10 83.33
14 NS 2P N+2 170 10 83.33
15 NS 4P S = 620 7 58.33
16 NS 2TcE-2 500 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS : 52,14 %17 NS 1S S-1 -50 2 16.67
18 NS 4P S+2 680 12 100.00
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 50.00
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 52,81 %21 NS 6T N+1 1390 11 91.67
22 NS 3S S = 400 12 100.00
23 NS 3S S-4 -400 0 0.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 47,71 %25 NS 2S E = -120 2.5 20.83
26 NS 2K N-4 -400 0.8 6.67
27 NS 3K W = -110 6.9 57.50
28 NS 3S N+2 660 8.6 71.67 µ Tbl = 39,17 %
18 - : 0,00 %33 NS BYE 0 0.00
34 NS BYE 0 0.00
35 NS BYE 0 0.00
36 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 166,8 / 336 = 49,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 % 1 EO 2PcE-1 100 0 0.00
2 EO 3P W-1 50 3 25.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 91.67
4 EO 4P N = 620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 66.67
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 10 83.33
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 % 9 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 100.00
10 EO 3S E = -600 8 66.67
11 EO 2C E+2 -170 8 66.67
12 EO 3S E-1 50 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 %13 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 100.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %17 EO 2K S+2 130 4 33.33
18 EO 4P S = 620 4 33.33
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 EO 4PcS-3 -800 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 %21 EO 6T N+1 1390 1 8.33
22 EO 2C E-2 200 2 16.67
23 EO 3CcN-1 -200 6 50.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2.5 20.83
26 EO 1S N-1 -100 8.6 71.67
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 8.6 71.67
28 EO 3C N+1 170 10.4 86.67 µ Tbl = 62,71 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 %33 EO 1P S+1 110 6 50.00
34 EO 1S W = -90 3 25.00
35 EO 2T N-1 -50 10 83.33
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 204,1 / 384 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 EO 3P W-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 3P S+1 170 8 66.67
4 EO 4P N = 620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 1S W-1 100 5 41.67
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 1 8.33
8 EO 4C E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 4 33.33
10 EO 3S E = -600 8 66.67
11 EO 1S N-3 -200 11 91.67
12 EO 3S E-1 50 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %13 EO 1C W = -80 4 33.33
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 10 83.33
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 3S N-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 %17 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 3P S+1 170 8 66.67
19 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
20 EO 5S E = -660 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %21 EO 3S S+3 690 7 58.33
22 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 100.00
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 1 8.33
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 %25 EO 2S E = -120 9.5 79.17
26 EO 2K N-4 -400 11.2 93.33
27 EO 3K W = -110 5.1 42.50
28 EO 3S N+2 660 3.4 28.33 µ Tbl = 60,83 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 %29 EO 3S N = 600 7 58.33
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 3 25.00
31 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 183,2 / 384 = 47,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 1S W-2 200 1 8.33
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 1 8.33
8 EO 4C E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 4 33.33
10 EO 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
11 EO 3C W+2 -200 11 91.67
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 %13 EO 3T N-2 -200 10 83.33
14 EO 1P S+1 110 8 66.67
15 EO 5KcS-1 -200 12 100.00
16 EO 2P W = -110 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %17 EO 3K S = 110 6 50.00
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 91.67
19 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 100.00
20 EO 5T W+1 -620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 %21 EO 6T N+1 1390 1 8.33
22 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 3S S-4 -400 12 100.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2.5 20.83
26 EO 2K N-4 -400 11.2 93.33
27 EO 1S S-2 -100 3.4 28.33
28 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 64.17 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 %29 EO 3S N+1 630 1 8.33
30 EO 5T N-4 -200 10 83.33
31 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 EO 1S S = 90 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 %33 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 91.67
34 EO 1S W = -90 3 25.00
35 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 83.33
36 EO 3S E = -600 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 202,8 / 384 = 52,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COLLET Claudine -NILLIS
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 % 1 EO 2K W-1 50 2 16.67
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 10 83.33
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 91.67
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 4 33.33
10 EO 3S W = -600 8 66.67
11 EO 2S E = -120 4 33.33
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %13 EO 2C W = -110 7 58.33
14 EO 3KcW-4 800 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 3TcE-2 500 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 %17 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 83.33
18 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 50.00
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 %21 EO 3S S+4 720 4 33.33
22 EO 1S S+2 150 5 41.67
23 EO 3C N-2 -200 6 50.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 2.5 20.83
26 EO 2KcW-2 500 0.7 5.83
27 EO 3KcW = -470 12 100.00
28 EO 6C N-2 -200 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 100.00
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 8 66.67
31 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 91.67
32 EO 2T S+1 110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %33 EO 2P S+2 170 1 8.33
34 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 66.67
35 EO 2P S = 110 3 25.00
36 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 200,2 / 384 = 52,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -SALFI Huguette
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 % 1 EO 2PcE = -470 12 100.00
2 EO 1T W = -70 6 50.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 3 25.00
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 1S W-2 200 1 8.33
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 50.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 %13 EO 1S S = 90 2 16.67
14 EO 2P N+2 170 2 16.67
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 2TcE-2 500 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 %17 EO 3T W-3 150 2 16.67
18 EO 4P S+1 650 2 16.67
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 %21 EO 6S S-1 -100 12 100.00
22 EO 2C E-1 100 10 83.33
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 6 50.00
24 EO 6P E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 %25 EO 2S E = -120 9.5 79.17
26 EO 3T E-3 300 3.4 28.33
27 EO 3S E-1 50 0.7 5.83
28 EO 4C N+3 710 1.6 13.33 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %29 EO 3S N = 600 7 58.33
30 EO 3KcS-2 -300 12 100.00
31 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
32 EO 2T S+1 110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 %33 EO 2P S = 110 6 50.00
34 EO 2S N-2 -200 12 100.00
35 EO 2P S = 110 3 25.00
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 182,2 / 384 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 MATELART Marc -VAN DOOREN André
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 10 83.33
3 EO 4P S = 420 3 25.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 100.00
7 EO 3S W+4 -720 12 100.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 % 9 EO 1S S+2 150 10 83.33
10 EO 3S E = -600 8 66.67
11 EO 2P N-2 -100 2 16.67
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 %17 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 83.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 91.67
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 EO 5T E+1 -620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 %21 EO 3S S+3 690 7 58.33
22 EO 1S N+2 150 5 41.67
23 EO 3C N-3 -300 10 83.33
24 EO 5KcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %25 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 100.00
26 EO 2K W-1 100 5.1 42.50
27 EO 3K W+1 -130 6.9 57.50
28 EO 3S N+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 %29 EO 3S N = 600 7 58.33
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 25.00
31 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 91.67
32 EO 2T S = 90 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %33 EO 3P S+1 170 1 8.33
34 EO 2K E = -90 3 25.00
35 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 207,0 / 384 = 53,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 6 50.00
2 EO 3P W-1 50 3 25.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 3 25.00
4 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 % 5 EO 4P S = 620 7 58.33
6 EO 1S W = -90 10 83.33
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 50.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 4 33.33
10 EO 1PcN-2 -500 2 16.67
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 50.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 %13 EO 2CcW = -670 12 100.00
14 EO 2P S+1 140 5 41.67
15 EO 4P S = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 3KcS-2 -300 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %21 EO 3S S+2 660 10 83.33
22 EO 1S N+1 120 8 66.67
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 1 8.33
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 2.5 20.83
26 EO 2K W = -90 6.9 57.50
27 EO 1S E+3 -180 10.4 86.67
28 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 64.17 µ Tbl = 57,29 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %29 EO 3S S+1 630 1 8.33
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 3 25.00
31 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 50.00
32 EO 2K W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 %33 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 91.67
34 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 83.33
35 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 83.33
36 EO 3S E = -600 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 199,5 / 384 = 51,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 10 83.33
2 EO 2P W = -110 10 83.33
3 EO 4P S = 420 3 25.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 % 5 EO 5KcE-5 1100 0 0.00
6 EO 1S W-1 100 5 41.67
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 6 50.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 4 33.33
10 EO 3S E = -600 8 66.67
11 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 %13 EO 2C W = -110 7 58.33
14 EO 2P S+1 140 5 41.67
15 EO 4P N = 620 5 41.67
16 EO 3C S-3 -150 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %17 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 83.33
18 EO 3P S+2 200 6 50.00
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 50.00
20 EO 4C W-5 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %25 EO 2K E+1 -110 6.9 57.50
26 EO 2KcW-2 500 0.7 5.83
27 EO 3S E-1 50 0.7 5.83
28 EO 4C N+1 650 5.1 42.50 µ Tbl = 27,92 %
8 NAVEZ -VANDERHULST Jacques : 51,04 %29 EO 3S N = 600 7 58.33
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 25.00
31 EO 2K W = -90 2 16.67
32 EO 2C N+1 140 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %33 EO 2P S = 110 6 50.00
34 EO 1S W = -90 3 25.00
35 EO 1S N = 90 6 50.00
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 156,4 / 384 = 40,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 -
5 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 53,63 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,37 % 5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 46,96 % 9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VUYTS Michèle -SOENENS Anita : 51,49 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 46,88 %17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 58,51 %21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PETIJEAN -PETITJEAN Robert : 45,51 %29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 MAYENCE Jean-Philippe -DELFORGE Frédéric : 49,64 %33 EO BYE 0 0.00
34 EO BYE 0 0.00
35 EO BYE 0 0.00
36 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 432 = 0,00 %
|
|