|
Tournoi du 04-03-13
1 65,00 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
2 58,89 2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
3 58,15 8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux
4 53,70 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 51,67 3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 49,44 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 43,33 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 42,96 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
9 40,37 4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
10 36,48 10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,56 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 62,04 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 57,96 11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
4 52,04 16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette
5 49,07 12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 46,67 14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean
7 46,11 20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 42,96 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 40,56 18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick
10 37,04 19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 18 100.00
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 % 4 NS 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33
5 NS 2C S = 110 4 22.22
6 NS 5CcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 % 7 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 5.56
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %10 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
11 NS 3P S = 140 18 100.00
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 3P N-5 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %16 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
17 NS 1P E+3 -170 18 100.00
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %19 NS 3S W+3 -690 10 55.56
20 NS 5CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 6P S+1 1460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 1S S+3 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %25 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3T W-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
29 NS 3S S-3 -300 5 27.78
30 NS 1P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 % 1 NS 4K S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
5 NS 2S N+3 210 13 72.22
6 NS 5C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 7 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %10 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 2P W = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
15 NS 3P N-6 -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %16 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
18 NS 2KcE-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %19 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00
20 NS 6KcE-3 800 18 100.00
21 NS 4P S+1 650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %22 NS 3P E-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22
24 NS 3T S+2 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 1CcS = 160 18 100.00
27 NS 2K N+3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 18 100.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
Total : 318,0 / 540 = 58,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
5 NS 5T N+1 620 16 88.89
6 NS 5CcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
9 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %10 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 3K S = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 1S W+3 -180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 4K N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E = -400 16 88.89
18 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %19 NS 3S W+3 -690 10 55.56
20 NS 5CcS-1 -200 5 27.78
21 NS 4K S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
23 NS 2C N = 110 8 44.44
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %25 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
26 NS 2S E = -120 7 38.89
27 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %28 NS 2P S+3 200 13 72.22
29 NS 1S S = 90 16 88.89
30 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 1 NS 2C E-2 100 7 38.89
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 3C N+2 200 10 55.56
6 NS 5P E = -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 % 7 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 3P S-3 -150 1 5.56
9 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 55.56
11 NS 2K S+1 110 10 55.56
12 NS 1P W+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %13 NS 2C S = 110 8 44.44
14 NS 3P W-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 3KcS = 670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 22.22
18 NS 2S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %19 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 55.56
20 NS 5PcS-2 -500 2 11.11
21 NS 3TcW-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %22 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
26 NS 2T W+1 -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3K S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
29 NS 4P N-4 -400 1 5.56
30 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 218,0 / 540 = 40,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 % 1 NS 2C E-2 100 7 38.89
2 NS 1P E+3 -170 16 88.89
3 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 4 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
5 NS 3T N+2 150 6 33.33
6 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89
8 NS 3P N-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %10 NS 2P N-2 -200 3 16.67
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
14 NS 3P E-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 4T E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 NS 2C E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %19 NS 6T E = -1370 2 11.11
20 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
21 NS 6P N = 1430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %22 NS 2S E-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 1ScE-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
27 NS 2K N+3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N-3 -300 5 27.78
30 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
3 NS 2K E+4 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 3K W-1 50 2 11.11
6 NS 5C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %10 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
15 NS 4P N-4 -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
18 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %19 NS 3S E+4 -720 4 22.22
20 NS 4KcE-1 200 8 44.44
21 NS 6K N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %22 NS 2S E = -120 10 55.56
23 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22
24 NS 2S N+1 150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %25 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
26 NS 3ScW = -750 0 0.00
27 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
29 NS 3S S-4 -400 1 5.56
30 NS 1S S = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 1 NS 3TcW-2 300 18 100.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 2S N+3 210 13 72.22
6 NS 5PcE-1 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 % 7 NS 3P S+1 170 18 100.00
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 3S S = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %10 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 44.44
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 2TcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 4K N = 130 18 100.00
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 61.11
18 NS 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %19 NS 6S E-1 100 18 100.00
20 NS 5KcE-2 500 10 55.56
21 NS 4P S+3 710 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %22 NS 3C E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 2C N+2 170 17 94.44
24 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22
27 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 %28 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89
29 NS 2S S-2 -200 9 50.00
30 NS 1C S+2 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 351,0 / 540 = 65,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
2 NS 4P W = -420 11 61.11
3 NS 5C E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 4C S+1 650 18 100.00
6 NS 5C N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 % 7 NS 4K E-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 2S N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 %10 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 4P W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %13 NS 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
15 NS 3C E+3 -230 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %16 NS 1S N = 90 14 77.78
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
18 NS 2S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %19 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 55.56
20 NS 4KcS = 710 16 88.89
21 NS 6P S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %22 NS 3C E-1 100 13 72.22
23 NS 2C N+2 170 17 94.44
24 NS 2T S+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %25 NS 1P N+2 140 17 94.44
26 NS 3T W = -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3K N+3 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 NS 2T S+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 % 1 NS 2C E-1 50 4 22.22
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56
5 NS 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %10 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 16.67
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 2K N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 %13 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 27.78
14 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
18 NS 2C E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %19 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 55.56
20 NS 4P N = 620 13 72.22
21 NS 4P S+1 650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
23 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
24 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %25 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
26 NS 3T W = -110 12 66.67
27 NS 3K N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %28 NS 2P S+3 200 13 72.22
29 NS 2S S-2 -200 9 50.00
30 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,04 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
3 NS 6K E = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 62,04 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean : 46,67 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 55.56
9 NS 4C S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 37,04 %10 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick : 40,56 %13 NS 2K E+1 -110 2 11.11
14 NS 3K N = 110 16 88.89
15 NS 4K S = 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 4P W = -420 14 77.78
18 NS 3T S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,56 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
20 NS 5CcS-1 -200 5 27.78
21 NS 5P S+1 680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 49,07 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
23 NS 1S S = 90 6 33.33
24 NS 3T S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian : 57,96 %25 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
27 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %28 NS 2P S+1 140 2 11.11
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22
30 NS 1TcW-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 197,0 / 540 = 36,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COULIE Joelle -STEED Adrian
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
5 EO 5T N+1 620 2 11.11
6 EO 5CcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 % 7 EO 3T N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %10 EO 2P N-2 -200 15 83.33
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
15 EO 4P N-4 -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %19 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 44.44
20 EO 4KcS = 710 2 11.11
21 EO 6P S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
23 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
24 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
27 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
29 EO 4P N-4 -400 17 94.44
30 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GROSFILS Colette -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
5 EO 2S N+3 210 5 27.78
6 EO 5C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 % 7 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 3S S-3 -150 17 94.44
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %10 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 4K N = 130 0 0.00
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %16 EO 1S N = 90 4 22.22
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
18 EO 2S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %19 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 44.44
20 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
21 EO 4P S+1 650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
23 EO 1S S = 90 12 66.67
24 EO 3T S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
26 EO 2T W+1 -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3K S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 3S N-3 -300 13 72.22
30 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 % 1 EO 4K S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 % 4 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67
5 EO 2C S = 110 14 77.78
6 EO 5CcS-3 -500 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %10 EO 2K W+1 -110 10 55.56
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 2TcS-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %13 EO 3K E+1 -130 18 100.00
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
15 EO 3C E+3 -230 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
18 EO 2C E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
20 EO 5CcS-1 -200 13 72.22
21 EO 5P S+1 680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %22 EO 3S W = -600 18 100.00
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
27 EO 2K N+3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
29 EO 3S S-4 -400 17 94.44
30 EO 1S S = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 354,0 / 540 = 65,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -MASSART Jean
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
2 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
3 EO 5C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44
5 EO 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 4C S-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 8 44.44
11 EO 2K S+1 110 8 44.44
12 EO 1P W+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
15 EO 3P N-6 -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 7 38.89
18 EO 2C E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %19 EO 3S W+3 -690 8 44.44
20 EO 5CcS-1 -200 13 72.22
21 EO 4K S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %22 EO 2S E = -120 8 44.44
23 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78
24 EO 2S N+1 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %25 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3T W-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %28 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11
29 EO 2S S-2 -200 9 50.00
30 EO 1C S+2 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 % 1 EO 2C E-1 50 14 77.78
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 % 7 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 3P S-3 -150 17 94.44
9 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %10 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
14 EO 3P E-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 4T E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %16 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
18 EO 2KcE-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %19 EO 3S E+4 -720 14 77.78
20 EO 4KcE-1 200 10 55.56
21 EO 6K N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
23 EO 2C N = 110 10 55.56
24 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %25 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78
27 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
29 EO 3S S-3 -300 13 72.22
30 EO 1P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 335,0 / 540 = 62,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 KINET -MOSSERAY Bernadette
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
3 EO 6K E = -1370 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 3C N+2 200 8 44.44
6 EO 5P E = -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11
8 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %10 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
11 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %13 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 72.22
14 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
18 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %19 EO 6S E+1 -1470 18 100.00
20 EO 6KcE-3 800 0 0.00
21 EO 4P S+1 650 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %22 EO 3C E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 2C N+2 170 1 5.56
24 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %25 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
26 EO 2S E = -120 11 61.11
27 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 EO 2T S+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 % 1 EO 2C E-2 100 11 61.11
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 4 EO 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
5 EO 3T N+2 150 12 66.67
6 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %10 EO 1S S-2 -200 15 83.33
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 2K N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 3P N-5 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 4P W = -420 4 22.22
18 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 %19 EO 6S E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 5KcE-2 500 8 44.44
21 EO 4P S+3 710 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %22 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78
24 EO 3T S+2 150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %25 EO 1P N+2 140 1 5.56
26 EO 3T W = -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3K N+3 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %28 EO 2P S+3 200 5 27.78
29 EO 1S S = 90 2 11.11
30 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 BERGER -COURTOIS Patrick
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 % 1 EO 2C E-2 100 11 61.11
2 EO 1P E+3 -170 2 11.11
3 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 3K W-1 50 16 88.89
6 EO 5C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 % 7 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 3S S = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %10 EO 1S S-3 -300 18 100.00
11 EO 3K S = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 1S W+3 -180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %13 EO 2K E+1 -110 16 88.89
14 EO 3K N = 110 2 11.11
15 EO 4K S = 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %16 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
17 EO 1P E+3 -170 0 0.00
18 EO 2C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %19 EO 3S E+3 -690 8 44.44
20 EO 5PcS-2 -500 16 88.89
21 EO 3TcW-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 %22 EO 3C E-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 2C N+2 170 1 5.56
24 EO 2T S+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 1CcS = 160 0 0.00
27 EO 2K N+3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %28 EO 2P S+3 200 5 27.78
29 EO 2S S-2 -200 9 50.00
30 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
3 EO 2K E+4 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 2S N+3 210 5 27.78
6 EO 5PcE-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 % 7 EO 4K E-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 2S N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %10 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 4K N-1 -50 9 50.00
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 77.78
18 EO 2S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %19 EO 3S W+3 -690 8 44.44
20 EO 5CcS-3 -800 18 100.00
21 EO 6P S+1 1460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %22 EO 2S E-1 100 5 27.78
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 1ScE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 %25 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
26 EO 3T W = -110 6 33.33
27 EO 3K N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 200,0 / 540 = 37,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 65,00 % 1 EO 3TcW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 7 38.89
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -massaux : 58,15 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
5 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
6 EO 5C N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 42,96 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 8 44.44
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,89 %10 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 2P W = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 40,37 %13 EO 2C S = 110 10 55.56
14 EO 3P W-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 3KcS = 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 51,67 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E = -400 2 11.11
18 EO 3TcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,70 %19 EO 6T E = -1370 16 88.89
20 EO 4P N = 620 5 27.78
21 EO 6P N = 1430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,44 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 1S S+3 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,33 %25 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
26 EO 3ScW = -750 18 100.00
27 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 36,48 %28 EO 2P S+1 140 16 88.89
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78
30 EO 1TcW-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
|
|