|
Tournoi du 04-10-10
1 56,48 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 56,02 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 54,40 9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
4 53,47 7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine
5 51,39 4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
6 49,07 2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
~ 49,07 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
8 46,76 8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René
9 33,33 3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,73 10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,02 11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 51,16 13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
4 49,07 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 47,92 18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
6 47,69 16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
7 47,22 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 46,53 14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 41,67 15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 % 1 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
2 NS 4P N+1 650 15 93.75
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 % 4 NS 6P S = 1430 15 93.75
5 NS 2K E-1 50 9 56.25
6 NS 3T S = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 2K S+2 130 4 25.00
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %10 NS 3T W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3S W = -400 15 93.75
12 NS 4P W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %13 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 68.75
14 NS 3C N = 140 14 87.50
15 NS 2C N+1 140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 5P S-1 -50 14 87.50
18 NS 3P E = -140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %19 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 37.50
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 5 31.25
21 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 43.75
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 25.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %25 NS 6S W = -1440 3 18.75
26 NS 4P W-1 100 9 56.25
27 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 242,0 / 432 = 56,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S = 400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 % 4 NS 6P S-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3S W-2 100 14 87.50
6 NS 4T S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 4K N = 130 4 25.00
9 NS 3K N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %13 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 37.50
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14 87.50
15 NS 1S W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %16 NS 3S S = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 5K W = -400 6 37.50
18 NS 3P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %19 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 56.25
20 NS 2S E-1 100 9 56.25
21 NS 4T W+1 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %22 NS 4C E = -620 15 93.75
23 NS 3C E-1 100 13 81.25
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %25 NS 6S W = -1440 3 18.75
26 NS 5CcN-3 -800 1 6.25
27 NS 5P S = 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 % 4 NS 5P S-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 2K S+2 130 4 25.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %10 NS 2S W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %13 NS 1T N-3 -300 2 12.50
14 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 25.00
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %16 NS 3S S = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 4K W+1 -150 12 75.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %19 NS 4T E = -130 1 6.25
20 NS 3ScN-2 -500 1 6.25
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 25.00
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %25 NS 3S W+4 -720 8 50.00
26 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 25.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 144,0 / 432 = 33,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 % 1 NS 5T E = -400 11 68.75
2 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S N+1 430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 10 62.50
5 NS 1P E = -80 6 37.50
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 1 6.25
8 NS 3S N = 400 13 81.25
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %10 NS 3S E = -600 2 12.50
11 NS 3S E = -400 15 93.75
12 NS 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %13 NS 1C N-2 -200 6 37.50
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 1S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 37.50
18 NS 3P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %19 NS 5T E-1 100 14 87.50
20 NS 1S E-1 100 9 56.25
21 NS 4P E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 6.25
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 25.00
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %25 NS 3S E+4 -720 8 50.00
26 NS 4PcE-1 200 13 81.25
27 NS 6P N-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 222,0 / 432 = 51,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 % 1 NS 5T E-1 50 16 100.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 12 75.00
3 NS 3S N = 400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 4 NS 6P N = 1430 15 93.75
5 NS 3S E-2 100 14 87.50
6 NS 2P N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 % 7 NS 1S N+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 5K N = 400 13 81.25
9 NS 5K N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 3S E-3 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %13 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 37.50
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %16 NS 6S N-2 -100 1 6.25
17 NS 5KcE = -550 0 0.00
18 NS 3P E-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %19 NS 4K S-1 -50 9 56.25
20 NS 2C N+1 140 12 75.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %22 NS 5C E = -650 7 43.75
23 NS 3K N-1 -100 9 56.25
24 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %25 NS 3S E+4 -720 8 50.00
26 NS 5KcN-3 -800 1 6.25
27 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 244,0 / 432 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3T W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 3S W-2 100 14 87.50
6 NS 3C W-1 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 4P N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %10 NS 2S W+2 -180 4 25.00
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %13 NS 1S S-4 -400 0 0.00
14 NS 2K E-1 50 10 62.50
15 NS 1S W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 15 93.75
17 NS 5K W = -400 6 37.50
18 NS 2S E = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %19 NS 3T W = -110 4 25.00
20 NS 1K W-3 300 16 100.00
21 NS 4P E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 43.75
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 9 56.25
24 NS 4P W = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 12 75.00
26 NS 4P W-1 100 9 56.25
27 NS 4P N = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 % 1 NS 4T E+1 -150 14 87.50
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S = 400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 7 43.75
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
6 NS 3T S = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 3S S = 400 13 81.25
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %10 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 37.50
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %13 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 68.75
14 NS 2KcE+1 -280 2 12.50
15 NS 2P W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 25.00
17 NS 5K W = -400 6 37.50
18 NS 3P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %19 NS 4T W = -130 1 6.25
20 NS 2S E-2 200 14 87.50
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 %22 NS 4C E = -620 15 93.75
23 NS 2K S+1 110 16 100.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %25 NS 2P W+3 -200 14 87.50
26 NS 3P W = -140 6 37.50
27 NS 5TcW-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 231,0 / 432 = 53,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 5P S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 2K N-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 % 4 NS 4C N+2 680 12 75.00
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 12.50
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
8 NS 3S N = 400 13 81.25
9 NS 2S S-3 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %10 NS 3T E-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 4TcS-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %13 NS 2K S = 90 15 93.75
14 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
15 NS 2C N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %16 NS 4PcS-1 -100 1 6.25
17 NS 5K E = -400 6 37.50
18 NS 3P E = -140 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %19 NS 5T E-1 100 14 87.50
20 NS 2S N-2 -200 5 31.25
21 NS 3S W = -400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00
23 NS 3C E-1 100 13 81.25
24 NS 3P W+2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 %25 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00
26 NS 4PcW-2 500 16 100.00
27 NS 5P S = 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 202,0 / 432 = 46,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 49,07 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 5P S = 650 15 93.75
3 NS 3K N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,69 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3K E-1 50 9 56.25
6 NS 4T S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,67 % 7 NS 1S S = 90 1 6.25
8 NS 3K N+2 150 8 50.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,53 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 43.75
12 NS 4P W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 51,16 %13 NS 2K N = 90 15 93.75
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14 87.50
15 NS 2C N-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,22 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 15 93.75
17 NS 4C E-2 100 16 100.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 56,02 %19 NS 4T W-1 100 14 87.50
20 NS 3ScN-2 -500 1 6.25
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,73 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 6.25
23 NS 4KcS-2 -500 0 0.00
24 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 47,92 %25 NS 3K W+3 -170 16 100.00
26 NS 4PcW-1 200 13 81.25
27 NS 5P S = 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
Total : 235,0 / 432 = 54,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 % 1 EO 3S W+3 -490 16 100.00
2 EO 4P N+1 650 1 6.25
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 3S W-2 100 2 12.50
6 EO 3C W-1 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 4K N = 130 12 75.00
9 EO 3K N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %10 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 62.50
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %13 EO 1T N-3 -300 14 87.50
14 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %16 EO 4PcS-1 -100 15 93.75
17 EO 5K E = -400 10 62.50
18 EO 3P E = -140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %19 EO 5T E-1 100 2 12.50
20 EO 1S E-1 100 7 43.75
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 93.75
23 EO 4KcS-2 -500 16 100.00
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %25 EO 3S E+4 -720 8 50.00
26 EO 5KcN-3 -800 15 93.75
27 EO 6P S-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 271,0 / 432 = 62,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3T W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 4 EO 6P S-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3S W-2 100 2 12.50
6 EO 4T S-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 3S S = 400 3 18.75
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %10 EO 2S W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %13 EO 2K S = 90 1 6.25
14 EO 3S W = -400 16 100.00
15 EO 2C N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 5K E = -400 10 62.50
18 EO 3P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %19 EO 4T W-1 100 2 12.50
20 EO 3ScN-2 -500 15 93.75
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %22 EO 5C E = -650 9 56.25
23 EO 3K N-1 -100 7 43.75
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %25 EO 6S W = -1440 13 81.25
26 EO 4P W-1 100 7 43.75
27 EO 6P S-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 242,0 / 432 = 56,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S = 400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 9 56.25
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 100.00
6 EO 3T S = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 2K S+2 130 12 75.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %10 EO 3T E-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 4TcS-3 -500 16 100.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %13 EO 1C N-2 -200 10 62.50
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 1S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 1 6.25
17 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %19 EO 4K S-1 -50 7 43.75
20 EO 2C N+1 140 4 25.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 9 56.25
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 75.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 25.00
26 EO 4P W-1 100 7 43.75
27 EO 4P N = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 204,0 / 432 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 % 1 EO 4T E+1 -150 2 12.50
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S = 400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 % 4 EO 5P S-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 75.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 3S N = 400 3 18.75
9 EO 2S S-3 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 87.50
11 EO 3S E = -400 1 6.25
12 EO 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %13 EO 2K N = 90 1 6.25
14 EO 2C N+1 140 2 12.50
15 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %16 EO 6S N-2 -100 15 93.75
17 EO 5KcE = -550 16 100.00
18 EO 3P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %19 EO 3K S-2 -100 10 62.50
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 68.75
21 EO 2P E+3 -200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 7 43.75
24 EO 4P W = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %25 EO 6S W = -1440 13 81.25
26 EO 5CcN-3 -800 15 93.75
27 EO 5P S = 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COURTIN Simone -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 % 4 EO 4C N+2 680 4 25.00
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 87.50
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 15 93.75
8 EO 3S N = 400 3 18.75
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 4P W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %13 EO 1S N-2 -200 10 62.50
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 5P S-1 -50 2 12.50
18 EO 3P E = -140 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %19 EO 3T W = -110 12 75.00
20 EO 1K W-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %22 EO 4C E = -620 1 6.25
23 EO 3C E-1 100 3 18.75
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %25 EO 2P W+3 -200 2 12.50
26 EO 3P W = -140 10 62.50
27 EO 5TcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 201,0 / 432 = 46,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 5P S-1 -100 16 100.00
3 EO 2K N-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 6 37.50
5 EO 1P E = -80 10 62.50
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 % 7 EO 1S S = 90 15 93.75
8 EO 3K N+2 150 8 50.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %13 EO 2K S-1 -100 5 31.25
14 EO 3C N = 140 2 12.50
15 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 1 6.25
17 EO 5K W = -400 10 62.50
18 EO 2S E = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %19 EO 3K S-1 -50 7 43.75
20 EO 2S E-1 100 7 43.75
21 EO 4T W+1 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %22 EO 4C E = -620 1 6.25
23 EO 2K S+1 110 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %25 EO 3S W+4 -720 8 50.00
26 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 75.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 180,0 / 432 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 % 1 EO 5T E = -400 5 31.25
2 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3K E-1 50 7 43.75
6 EO 4T S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 % 7 EO 1S N+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 5K N = 400 3 18.75
9 EO 5K N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 %10 EO 3T W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3S W = -400 1 6.25
12 EO 4P W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %13 EO 1S S-4 -400 16 100.00
14 EO 2K E-1 50 6 37.50
15 EO 1S W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %16 EO 3S S = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 5K W = -400 10 62.50
18 EO 3P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %19 EO 4T W = -130 15 93.75
20 EO 2S E-2 200 2 12.50
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 56.25
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 75.00
24 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %25 EO 6S E+1 -1470 16 100.00
26 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
27 EO 5P S = 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 206,0 / 432 = 47,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 5P S = 650 1 6.25
3 EO 3K N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 % 4 EO 6P N = 1430 1 6.25
5 EO 3S E-2 100 2 12.50
6 EO 2P N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 2K S+2 130 12 75.00
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 %10 EO 2S W+2 -180 12 75.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %13 EO 1S N-2 -200 10 62.50
14 EO 2C N+1 140 2 12.50
15 EO 1S W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 75.00
17 EO 5K W = -400 10 62.50
18 EO 3P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %19 EO 4T E = -130 15 93.75
20 EO 3ScN-2 -500 15 93.75
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00
23 EO 3C E-1 100 3 18.75
24 EO 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %25 EO 3S E+4 -720 8 50.00
26 EO 4PcE-1 200 3 18.75
27 EO 6P N-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,48 % 1 EO 5T E-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 4 25.00
3 EO 3S N = 400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,02 % 4 EO 6P S = 1430 1 6.25
5 EO 2K E-1 50 7 43.75
6 EO 3T S = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,07 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 100.00
9 EO 4P N-4 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 49,07 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 100.00
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 56.25
12 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 PETIT Jean -COLLET Claudine : 53,47 %13 EO 2K S-1 -100 5 31.25
14 EO 2KcE+1 -280 14 87.50
15 EO 2P W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
3 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 33,33 %16 EO 3S S = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 4K W+1 -150 4 25.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 46,76 %19 EO 5T E-1 100 2 12.50
20 EO 2S N-2 -200 11 68.75
21 EO 3S W = -400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,39 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 93.75
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 75.00
24 EO 4P E+1 -450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 54,40 %25 EO 3K W+3 -170 0 0.00
26 EO 4PcW-1 200 3 18.75
27 EO 5P S = 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
Total : 207,0 / 432 = 47,92 %
|
|