|
Tournoi du 05-05-11
1 60,65 2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
2 59,03 1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
3 56,48 7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
4 52,31 8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
5 48,84 6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine
6 47,22 5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
7 43,52 9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle
8 41,44 3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre
9 40,51 4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,33 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
2 53,70 10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
~ 53,70 18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
4 50,69 16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
~ 50,69 13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François
6 50,23 17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
7 48,38 15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves
8 42,36 14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
9 41,90 12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
PAIRE Nr : 1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 5P E-3 150 16 100.00
3 NS 6K S+1 940 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 12.50
6 NS 4C S+1 450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 18.75
8 NS 2C N = 110 14 87.50
9 NS 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %10 NS 2K W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
12 NS 2C N+1 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %13 NS 3C W = -140 6 37.50
14 NS 2S N = 120 13 81.25
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %19 NS 1S E+3 -180 12 75.00
20 NS 2CcN-2 -500 3 18.75
21 NS 2K S+1 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 15 93.75
23 NS 3C E-1 100 7 43.75
24 NS 3S S+1 430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 7 43.75
26 NS 4P S+1 650 4 25.00
27 NS 2CcW-2 300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 255,0 / 432 = 59,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 % 1 NS 2C S+2 170 15 93.75
2 NS 4P E-1 50 14 87.50
3 NS 7K S = 1440 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 12.50
5 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 % 7 NS 3P W-1 100 13 81.25
8 NS 3ScW-1 100 11 68.75
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %10 NS 1K E+1 -90 4 25.00
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
12 NS 3C S = 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 37.50
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P S+1 650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 6S W = -990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %19 NS 1S E+3 -180 12 75.00
20 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 37.50
21 NS 2K S+1 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %22 NS 2S N = 120 10 62.50
23 NS 4C E-2 200 14 87.50
24 NS 3S S = 400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %25 NS 3S E-5 500 14 87.50
26 NS 4PcN = 790 12 75.00
27 NS 3T N+2 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 262,0 / 432 = 60,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S+4 520 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 12.50
5 NS 4P E = -420 8 50.00
6 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 % 7 NS 3P W-2 200 16 100.00
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
9 NS 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %10 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
12 NS 3C N = 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %13 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 2P S-3 -150 14 87.50
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 18.75
20 NS 3S E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 2P W-2 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %22 NS 2S N = 120 10 62.50
23 NS 4C E-2 200 14 87.50
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 7 43.75
26 NS 4P S+2 680 9 56.25
27 NS 3T N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 179,0 / 432 = 41,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 % 1 NS 3T W+2 -150 12 75.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 6K S+1 940 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 62.50
5 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %10 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 12.50
11 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 37.50
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 5T E+1 -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %19 NS 1S E+3 -180 12 75.00
20 NS 2CcN-2 -500 3 18.75
21 NS 3K S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %22 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 4C E-2 200 14 87.50
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %25 NS 2C W-3 300 12 75.00
26 NS 5CcE-3 800 15 93.75
27 NS 2C E-2 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 175,0 / 432 = 40,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S+4 520 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 6 37.50
5 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 75.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 % 7 NS 5CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 3T W-2 100 11 68.75
9 NS 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %10 NS 1S N+1 120 16 100.00
11 NS 5P S-5 -250 2 12.50
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %13 NS 2T E = -90 15 93.75
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 3C W-1 50 16 100.00
18 NS 6T E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %19 NS 1S E+4 -210 8 50.00
20 NS 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00
21 NS 2K S+1 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 25.00
23 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %25 NS 3CcN = 530 16 100.00
26 NS 4P S+1 650 4 25.00
27 NS 3T N+3 170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 204,0 / 432 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 4P W = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 6K S+1 940 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 12.50
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 12.50
6 NS 3C S = 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 NS 2S W = -120 4 25.00
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %10 NS 2K W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3C E = -140 15 93.75
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 37.50
14 NS 2P S = 110 10 62.50
15 NS 3S S+1 630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 18.75
20 NS 3K S+1 130 16 100.00
21 NS 2TcE-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %22 NS 2C N = 110 6 37.50
23 NS 3C E-1 100 7 43.75
24 NS 2CcE-2 300 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %25 NS 2P N = 110 4 25.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 0 0.00
27 NS 3CcW-4 800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 211,0 / 432 = 48,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 6K S+1 940 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 3C E = -140 14 87.50
6 NS 2C N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
9 NS 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %10 NS 1K W = -70 6 37.50
11 NS 3C E = -140 15 93.75
12 NS 3C N = 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %13 NS 2C E = -110 12 75.00
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 25.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 6K E-4 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %19 NS 2T E+1 -110 16 100.00
20 NS 3S E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 3P W-2 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 %22 NS 2S N = 120 10 62.50
23 NS 3C E-1 100 7 43.75
24 NS 2S S = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %25 NS 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 4P S+2 680 9 56.25
27 NS 3CcW-2 300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 244,0 / 432 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 % 1 NS 2C S+2 170 15 93.75
2 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 6K S+1 940 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 5K E-1 50 16 100.00
6 NS 3C S = 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 3 18.75
8 NS 3S E-3 150 16 100.00
9 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %10 NS 2K W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3C E+2 -200 4 25.00
12 NS 2C N+1 140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 37.50
14 NS 2S N+1 150 16 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %16 NS 3S N = 400 9 56.25
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 18.75
20 NS 3S E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 2K S+1 110 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 %22 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 12.50
23 NS 3C E-1 100 7 43.75
24 NS 2K E-3 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 %25 NS 5K W-2 200 10 62.50
26 NS 4P S+1 650 4 25.00
27 NS 2C W-3 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 226,0 / 432 = 52,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle
17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 50,23 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25
2 NS 4P E = -420 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S+4 520 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,69 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 8 50.00
5 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 12.50
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 48,38 % 7 NS 3P W-1 100 13 81.25
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 42,36 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 11 68.75
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
12 NS 5TcW-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 50,69 %13 NS 1S E = -90 15 93.75
14 NS 2S N = 120 13 81.25
15 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 41,90 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75
18 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 58,33 %19 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 18.75
20 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
21 NS 2K S = 90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric : 53,70 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 15 93.75
23 NS 2C E = -110 2 12.50
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 53,70 %25 NS 4K W-1 100 2 12.50
26 NS 5KcW-3 800 15 93.75
27 NS 2C W-3 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 188,0 / 432 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 STEED Adrian -COLINET Eric
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 5P E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 87.50
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 87.50
6 EO 3C S = 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 % 7 EO 3P W-1 100 3 18.75
8 EO 3ScW-1 100 5 31.25
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %10 EO 1K W = -70 10 62.50
11 EO 3C E = -140 1 6.25
12 EO 3C N = 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %13 EO 2C W+2 -170 16 100.00
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %19 EO 1S E+3 -180 4 25.00
20 EO 2CcN-2 -500 13 81.25
21 EO 3K S-2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 1 6.25
23 EO 2C E = -110 14 87.50
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %25 EO 3CcN = 530 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S+1 650 12 75.00
27 EO 3T N+3 170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 87.50
5 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
9 EO 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %10 EO 3C N-3 -300 16 100.00
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
12 EO 3C N = 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 62.50
14 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 5T E+1 -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 81.25
20 EO 3S E = -600 16 100.00
21 EO 2K S = 90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 75.00
23 EO 2C E+2 -170 16 100.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 9 56.25
26 EO 4P S+1 650 12 75.00
27 EO 2CcW-2 300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 252,0 / 432 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 % 1 EO 2C S+2 170 1 6.25
2 EO 4P E-1 50 2 12.50
3 EO 7K S = 1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 3C E = -140 2 12.50
6 EO 2C N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 % 7 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
9 EO 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %10 EO 2K W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3C E+2 -200 12 75.00
12 EO 2C N+1 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 62.50
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 100.00
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %19 EO 1S E+4 -210 8 50.00
20 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00
21 EO 2K S+1 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 1 6.25
23 EO 3C E-1 100 9 56.25
24 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %25 EO 2P N = 110 12 75.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 16 100.00
27 EO 3CcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 181,0 / 432 = 41,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 87.50
5 EO 4P E = -420 8 50.00
6 EO 3C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 81.25
8 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 3PcE = -730 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %10 EO 2P S-2 -200 14 87.50
11 EO 5TcN-4 -800 16 100.00
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %13 EO 1S E = -90 1 6.25
14 EO 2S N = 120 3 18.75
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 3C W-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 6T E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %19 EO 1S E+3 -180 4 25.00
20 EO 2CcN-2 -500 13 81.25
21 EO 2K S+1 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %22 EO 2C N = 110 10 62.50
23 EO 3C E-1 100 9 56.25
24 EO 2CcE-2 300 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %25 EO 3S E-5 500 2 12.50
26 EO 4PcN = 790 4 25.00
27 EO 3T N+2 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S+4 520 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 5K E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3C S = 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
12 EO 5TcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %13 EO 2T E = -90 1 6.25
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %19 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 81.25
20 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
21 EO 2TcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %22 EO 2S N = 120 6 37.50
23 EO 4C E-2 200 2 12.50
24 EO 3S S = 400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %25 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 100.00
26 EO 4P S+2 680 7 43.75
27 EO 3CcW-2 300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 183,0 / 432 = 42,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 % 1 EO 2C S+2 170 1 6.25
2 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 37.50
5 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 % 7 EO 3P W-1 100 3 18.75
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 %10 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
11 EO 5P S-5 -250 14 87.50
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %13 EO 3C W = -140 10 62.50
14 EO 2S N = 120 3 18.75
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %19 EO 1S E+3 -180 4 25.00
20 EO 2C N-2 -200 10 62.50
21 EO 2K S+1 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %22 EO 2S N = 120 6 37.50
23 EO 3C E-1 100 9 56.25
24 EO 2S S = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 9 56.25
26 EO 4P S+2 680 7 43.75
27 EO 3T N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 209,0 / 432 = 48,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 % 1 EO 3T W+2 -150 4 25.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 6K S+1 940 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 8 50.00
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 87.50
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 7 EO 5CcN-3 -800 16 100.00
8 EO 3T W-2 100 5 31.25
9 EO 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 %10 EO 2K W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
12 EO 2C N+1 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 62.50
14 EO 2P S = 110 6 37.50
15 EO 3S S+1 630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 3C W+2 -200 16 100.00
18 EO 6S W = -990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %19 EO 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 3P W-2 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %22 EO 2S N = 120 6 37.50
23 EO 4C E-2 200 2 12.50
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %25 EO 5K W-2 200 6 37.50
26 EO 4P S+1 650 12 75.00
27 EO 2C W-3 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 4P E = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S+4 520 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 62.50
5 EO 3C E+2 -200 4 25.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 81.25
8 EO 2C N = 110 2 12.50
9 EO 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 %10 EO 2K W-1 100 5 31.25
11 EO 3C E = -140 1 6.25
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 62.50
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 9 56.25
18 EO 6K E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 81.25
20 EO 3S E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 2P W-2 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %22 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 87.50
23 EO 3C E-1 100 9 56.25
24 EO 2K E-3 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %25 EO 2C W-3 300 4 25.00
26 EO 5CcE-3 800 1 6.25
27 EO 2C E-2 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 217,0 / 432 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
5 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 47,22 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75
2 EO 4P W = -420 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S+4 520 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
1 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 59,03 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 87.50
6 EO 4C S+1 450 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 48,84 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00
8 EO 2S W = -120 12 75.00
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 60,65 %10 EO 1K E+1 -90 12 75.00
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
12 EO 3C S = 140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %13 EO 2C E = -110 4 25.00
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 12 75.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 GLEVICZKY André -MARLET Pierre : 41,44 %16 EO 3S N = 400 7 43.75
17 EO 2P S-3 -150 2 12.50
18 EO 3S W+3 -490 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 52,31 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 81.25
20 EO 3S E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 2K S+1 110 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -DELHEZ Jacques : 40,51 %22 EO 4C N-3 -150 16 100.00
23 EO 4C E-2 200 2 12.50
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 SOENENS Anita -VUYTS Michèle : 43,52 %25 EO 4K W-1 100 14 87.50
26 EO 5KcW-3 800 1 6.25
27 EO 2C W-3 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
|
|