|
Tournoi du 05-09-11
1 58,48 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,70 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
3 56,03 4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
4 52,68 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 50,22 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 46,21 5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal
7 40,40 2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline
8 39,29 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,27 11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 56,92 10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry
3 54,91 14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
4 53,12 9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude
5 50,89 12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 44,64 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
7 42,41 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
8 36,83 15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 8 57.14
2 NS 3S W+4 -520 9 64.29
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 85.71
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 % 5 NS 3S E = -400 9 64.29
6 NS 3T W = -110 4 28.57
7 NS 3C N = 140 11 78.57
8 NS 4K S+2 170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 % 9 NS 3PcN-2 -300 4 28.57
10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
12 NS 2P N = 110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 %13 NS 4C N = 620 2 14.29
14 NS 2S W = -120 9 64.29
15 NS 3K W = -110 12 85.71
16 NS 2C N+3 200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 %17 NS 6C N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 1 7.14
19 NS 1S N-1 -50 2 14.29
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 2K N = 90 2 14.29
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 7.14
24 NS 3P S+1 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 %25 NS 3KcN-3 -500 0 0.00
26 NS 4KcN+1 910 13 92.86
27 NS 2C N = 110 9 64.29
28 NS 5T N+1 620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 %29 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57
30 NS 6K S+1 940 1 7.14
31 NS 5T E-3 150 2 14.29
32 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 176,0 / 448 = 39,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 3K W+4 -190 14 100.00
3 NS 3C S+1 170 0 0.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 % 5 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
6 NS 3T W = -110 4 28.57
7 NS 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 4K S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 % 9 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 50.00
10 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 21.43
12 NS 1S W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 64.29
16 NS 2P S+3 200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 %17 NS 3C N = 140 6 42.86
18 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43
19 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 %21 NS 1S S = 90 12 85.71
22 NS 3P W-1 100 6 42.86
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 2P S+3 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 21.43
26 NS 4KcN+1 910 13 92.86
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 0 0.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 %29 NS 3P N+1 170 7 50.00
30 NS 6T N+1 940 1 7.14
31 NS 3P N = 140 0 0.00
32 NS 2K E+2 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 181,0 / 448 = 40,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 % 1 NS 4PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 6S W+1 -1020 2 14.29
3 NS 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 % 5 NS 3S E = -400 9 64.29
6 NS 3S E-3 300 12 85.71
7 NS 4C N = 620 14 100.00
8 NS 4C N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 80,36 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 % 9 NS 3P N-2 -100 11 78.57
10 NS 3C W-2 200 3 21.43
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 21.43
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 57.14
14 NS 4C E = -420 3 21.43
15 NS 2C N = 110 14 100.00
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 %17 NS 4C N = 420 10 71.43
18 NS 3S W-1 50 10 71.43
19 NS 1S N+3 180 14 100.00
20 NS 4T W = -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 2P W-1 100 6 42.86
23 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43
24 NS 3PcS+2 730 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 %25 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 78.57
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 71.43
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 21.43
28 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 %29 NS 4P N = 620 11 78.57
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 8 57.14
31 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43
32 NS 2S W-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 254,0 / 448 = 56,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 % 1 NS 4P N-3 -150 2 14.29
2 NS 3S W+4 -520 9 64.29
3 NS 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
4 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 % 5 NS 3S E-1 50 14 100.00
6 NS 3P E-1 100 9 64.29
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 14.29
8 NS 4C N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 % 9 NS 4K W = -130 7 50.00
10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29
11 NS 3S N = 400 11 78.57
12 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 57.14
14 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
15 NS 1S W+4 -210 6 42.86
16 NS 2S S+1 150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 %17 NS 3S S+1 430 14 100.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43
19 NS 1S N+2 150 10 71.43
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 4P W-3 300 13 92.86
23 NS 3T N = 110 13 92.86
24 NS 2P S+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 %25 NS 3C S-2 -100 8 57.14
26 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 3C S = 140 14 100.00
28 NS 2P S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 %29 NS 4P N+1 650 14 100.00
30 NS 7S S = 1520 14 100.00
31 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43
32 NS 3S W-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 91,07 %
Total : 251,0 / 448 = 56,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 8 57.14
2 NS 6S E+1 -1020 2 14.29
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 85.71
4 NS 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 % 5 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 28.57
6 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00
7 NS 2C N+1 140 11 78.57
8 NS 3S N+3 490 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 % 9 NS 3P N-2 -100 11 78.57
10 NS 1S W-2 200 3 21.43
11 NS 3S N = 400 11 78.57
12 NS 2P N = 110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 57.14
14 NS 2S W = -120 9 64.29
15 NS 3S W = -400 3 21.43
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 %17 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 21.43
18 NS 3S W = -400 1 7.14
19 NS 1S N+2 150 10 71.43
20 NS 3P E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 3P W-1 100 6 42.86
23 NS 3C W = -140 1 7.14
24 NS 3P S+2 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 %25 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 21.43
26 NS 2K N+3 150 5 35.71
27 NS 2C N = 110 9 64.29
28 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 %29 NS 3P N+1 170 7 50.00
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 8 57.14
31 NS 3P N+1 170 4 28.57
32 NS 1S E+3 -180 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
Total : 207,0 / 448 = 46,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 4 28.57
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 85.71
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 85.71
4 NS 1T E-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
6 NS 3T W = -110 4 28.57
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 14.29
8 NS 4K S+3 190 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 % 9 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
10 NS 4P S+2 680 14 100.00
11 NS 2S N+1 150 8 57.14
12 NS 3K W = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 57.14
14 NS 4C E = -420 3 21.43
15 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 64.29
16 NS 1C N+4 200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 %17 NS 4C N = 420 10 71.43
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 35.71
19 NS 1S N+2 150 10 71.43
20 NS 2P E-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 %21 NS 4TcW-4 800 14 100.00
22 NS 4P W-3 300 13 92.86
23 NS 4T N-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 3P S+1 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 11 78.57
26 NS 3K N+2 150 5 35.71
27 NS 2C S = 110 9 64.29
28 NS 3P N+3 230 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 %29 NS 3T W+1 -130 2 14.29
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 8 57.14
31 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43
32 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 236,0 / 448 = 52,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 % 1 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 57.14
2 NS 6P W+1 -1010 6 42.86
3 NS 3C S+2 200 2 14.29
4 NS 3C W-1 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 % 5 NS 3T E = -110 12 85.71
6 NS 4T W-1 100 9 64.29
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 14.29
8 NS 6S S = 990 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 % 9 NS 3S W = -600 2 14.29
10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
12 NS 3T E-6 300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 %13 NS 4PcE-4 1100 14 100.00
14 NS 1S W+3 -180 6 42.86
15 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
16 NS 3S S+1 430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 %17 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 21.43
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 35.71
19 NS 1S S+1 120 5 35.71
20 NS 3C S = 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 2P S+2 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 %25 NS 1S N = 90 14 100.00
26 NS 3K N+2 150 5 35.71
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 3 21.43
28 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 %29 NS 4T W+1 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 8 57.14
31 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43
32 NS 2K E = -90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 225,0 / 448 = 50,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,89 % 1 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 6S W+1 -1020 2 14.29
3 NS 3C S+3 230 4 28.57
4 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 54,91 % 5 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
6 NS 5TcW-3 800 14 100.00
7 NS 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 5K S+2 440 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,41 % 9 NS 5K W-1 100 14 100.00
10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29
11 NS 3S N+1 430 14 100.00
12 NS 5KcW-4 800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,07 %
9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude : 53,12 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 8 57.14
14 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
15 NS 3S W = -400 3 21.43
16 NS 2S S+2 180 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 36,83 %17 NS 4C N = 420 10 71.43
18 NS 3S E-3 150 14 100.00
19 NS 1S N+1 120 5 35.71
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 60,27 %21 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
22 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
23 NS 3T S = 110 13 92.86
24 NS 3P S+1 170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry : 56,92 %25 NS 2P W = -110 6 42.86
26 NS 4K N+1 150 5 35.71
27 NS 2C N = 110 9 64.29
28 NS 4P S+1 650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 44,64 %29 NS 4P N = 620 11 78.57
30 NS 6S S+1 1020 8 57.14
31 NS 4P N = 620 10 71.43
32 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 262,0 / 448 = 58,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 ROEGIERS Marga -NELIS Claude
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 42.86
2 EO 3S W+4 -520 5 35.71
3 EO 4C S+2 480 2 14.29
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 % 5 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 71.43
6 EO 4T W = -130 14 100.00
7 EO 2C N+1 140 3 21.43
8 EO 3S N+3 490 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 % 9 EO 3K W+1 -130 7 50.00
10 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 100.00
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 78.57
12 EO 1S W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 6 42.86
14 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 78.57
16 EO 2S S+2 180 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 %17 EO 4C N = 420 4 28.57
18 EO 3S W-1 50 4 28.57
19 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
20 EO 4T W = -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 3P W = -140 14 100.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 2P S+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 %25 EO 3C S-2 -100 6 42.86
26 EO 3P S-2 -200 14 100.00
27 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
28 EO 2P S+2 170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 %29 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 85.71
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 42.86
31 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57
32 EO 2S W+1 -150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 238,0 / 448 = 53,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDAM Cécile -MASSINON Henry
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 42.86
2 EO 6S E+1 -1020 12 85.71
3 EO 4C S+2 480 2 14.29
4 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 % 5 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
6 EO 3T W = -110 10 71.43
7 EO 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 4K S+1 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 % 9 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00
10 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
11 EO 2S N+1 150 6 42.86
12 EO 3K W = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 6 42.86
14 EO 4C E = -420 11 78.57
15 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 %17 EO 4C S-1 -50 11 78.57
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 64.29
19 EO 1S S+1 120 9 64.29
20 EO 3C S = 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 4P W-3 300 1 7.14
23 EO 3T N = 110 1 7.14
24 EO 2P S+2 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 %25 EO 2P W = -110 8 57.14
26 EO 4K N+1 150 9 64.29
27 EO 2C N = 110 5 35.71
28 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 %29 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43
30 EO 6K S+1 940 13 92.86
31 EO 5T E-3 150 12 85.71
32 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 255,0 / 448 = 56,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 % 1 EO 4P N-3 -150 12 85.71
2 EO 3S W+4 -520 5 35.71
3 EO 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
4 EO 4C E = -620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 100.00
6 EO 3T W = -110 10 71.43
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 85.71
8 EO 4K S+3 190 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 % 9 EO 3P N-2 -100 3 21.43
10 EO 3C W-2 200 11 78.57
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 78.57
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 %13 EO 4PcE-4 1100 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W+3 -180 8 57.14
15 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 100.00
16 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 %17 EO 3C N = 140 8 57.14
18 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57
19 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 100.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
23 EO 3T S = 110 1 7.14
24 EO 3P S+1 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 %25 EO 3KcN-3 -500 14 100.00
26 EO 4KcN+1 910 1 7.14
27 EO 2C N = 110 5 35.71
28 EO 5T N+1 620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 %29 EO 3P N+1 170 7 50.00
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 42.86
31 EO 3P N+1 170 10 71.43
32 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
Total : 270,0 / 448 = 60,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 DAPHNE Chantal -CLERIN François-Xavier
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 6S W+1 -1020 12 85.71
3 EO 3C S+3 230 10 71.43
4 EO 3C W+1 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 % 5 EO 3S E = -400 5 35.71
6 EO 3T W = -110 10 71.43
7 EO 3C N = 140 3 21.43
8 EO 4K S+2 170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 % 9 EO 3S W = -600 12 85.71
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
12 EO 3T E-6 300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 6 42.86
14 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
15 EO 1S W+4 -210 8 57.14
16 EO 2S S+1 150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 %17 EO 4C N = 420 4 28.57
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 64.29
19 EO 1S N+2 150 4 28.57
20 EO 2P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 2P W-1 100 8 57.14
23 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57
24 EO 3PcS+2 730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 78.57
26 EO 2K N+3 150 9 64.29
27 EO 2C N = 110 5 35.71
28 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 %29 EO 3P N+1 170 7 50.00
30 EO 6T N+1 940 13 92.86
31 EO 3P N = 140 14 100.00
32 EO 2K E+2 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 228,0 / 448 = 50,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 % 1 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 42.86
2 EO 6P W+1 -1010 8 57.14
3 EO 3C S+2 200 12 85.71
4 EO 3C W-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 % 5 EO 3S E = -400 5 35.71
6 EO 3S E-3 300 2 14.29
7 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
8 EO 4C N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 19,64 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 % 9 EO 5K W-1 100 0 0.00
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71
11 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
12 EO 5KcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,93 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 100.00
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 100.00
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 35.71
16 EO 2P S+3 200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 %17 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 78.57
18 EO 3S W = -400 13 92.86
19 EO 1S N+2 150 4 28.57
20 EO 3P E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 2K N = 90 12 85.71
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 92.86
24 EO 3P S+1 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 3 21.43
26 EO 3K N+2 150 9 64.29
27 EO 2C S = 110 5 35.71
28 EO 3P N+3 230 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 %29 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
30 EO 7S S = 1520 0 0.00
31 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57
32 EO 3S W-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 8,93 %
Total : 190,0 / 448 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 % 1 EO 4PcN-3 -500 14 100.00
2 EO 6S W+1 -1020 12 85.71
3 EO 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 % 5 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
6 EO 5TcW-3 800 0 0.00
7 EO 3P E-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 5K S+2 440 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 % 9 EO 4K W = -130 7 50.00
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71
11 EO 3S N = 400 3 21.43
12 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 6 42.86
14 EO 2S W = -120 5 35.71
15 EO 3S W = -400 11 78.57
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 %17 EO 6C N-2 -100 14 100.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 13 92.86
19 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 85.71
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 %21 EO 4TcW-4 800 0 0.00
22 EO 4P W-3 300 1 7.14
23 EO 4T N-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 3P S+1 170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 %25 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 78.57
26 EO 4KcN+1 910 1 7.14
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 14 100.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 %29 EO 4T W+1 -150 14 100.00
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 42.86
31 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57
32 EO 2K E = -90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 246,0 / 448 = 54,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 10 71.43
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 2 14.29
3 EO 4C S+2 480 2 14.29
4 EO 1T E-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 % 5 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3P E-1 100 5 35.71
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 85.71
8 EO 4C N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 % 9 EO 3P N-2 -100 3 21.43
10 EO 1S W-2 200 11 78.57
11 EO 3S N = 400 3 21.43
12 EO 2P N = 110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 %13 EO 4C N = 620 12 85.71
14 EO 2S W = -120 5 35.71
15 EO 3K W = -110 2 14.29
16 EO 2C N+3 200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 %17 EO 4C N = 420 4 28.57
18 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
19 EO 1S N+1 120 9 64.29
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 %21 EO 1S S = 90 2 14.29
22 EO 3P W-1 100 8 57.14
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 2P S+3 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 %25 EO 1S N = 90 0 0.00
26 EO 3K N+2 150 9 64.29
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 11 78.57
28 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 %29 EO 4P N = 620 3 21.43
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 6 42.86
31 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57
32 EO 2S W-1 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 165,0 / 448 = 36,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
2 COURTOIS Patrick -BOULANGER Jacqueline : 40,40 % 1 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 3K W+4 -190 0 0.00
3 EO 3C S+1 170 14 100.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,22 % 5 EO 3T E = -110 2 14.29
6 EO 4T W-1 100 5 35.71
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 85.71
8 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 39,29 % 9 EO 3PcN-2 -300 10 71.43
10 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
12 EO 2P N = 110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,68 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 6 42.86
14 EO 4C E = -420 11 78.57
15 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 35.71
16 EO 1C N+4 200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
4 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HUBLET Carlo : 56,03 %17 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57
19 EO 1S N+2 150 4 28.57
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
5 DELTOUR Emile -COURTOIS Chantal : 46,21 %21 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
22 EO 3P W-1 100 8 57.14
23 EO 3C W = -140 13 92.86
24 EO 3P S+2 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 56,70 %25 EO 3T S-1 -50 3 21.43
26 EO 3S S+1 630 4 28.57
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 78.57
28 EO 4P S+1 650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,48 %29 EO 4P N = 620 3 21.43
30 EO 6S S+1 1020 6 42.86
31 EO 4P N = 620 4 28.57
32 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 200,0 / 448 = 44,64 %
|
|