|
Tournoi du 05-11-12
1 64,81 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 64,63 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 57,78 7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
4 55,93 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 54,44 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
6 53,89 3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
7 48,89 6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
8 42,04 4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
9 40,00 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée
10 39,26 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
11 28,33 2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,19 20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 59,44 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
3 52,41 21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
4 51,48 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
5 51,30 19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 50,56 16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
7 46,11 17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René
8 45,37 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
9 44,44 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques
10 42,22 18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
11 41,48 22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
PAIRE Nr : 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 6 33.33
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 94.44
3 NS 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 % 4 NS 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
5 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33
6 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %10 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %13 NS 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
14 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 4PcN-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 9 50.00
17 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
18 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %19 NS 2TcE+2 -580 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
21 NS 4C S+2 680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %22 NS 5C S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
24 NS 5KcS-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
27 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %28 NS 1S S = 90 13 72.22
29 NS 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
30 NS 4P S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 % 4 NS 3S S+4 720 3 16.67
5 NS 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %10 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 2S W-2 100 2 11.11
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
15 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %16 NS 4KcS-2 -300 3 16.67
17 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
21 NS 5T N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %22 NS 3P E-2 200 7 38.89
23 NS 4C S+1 650 11 61.11
24 NS 3K N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %28 NS 4KcN-3 -800 1 5.56
29 NS 2T N+2 130 4 22.22
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %31 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11
32 NS 5C W+2 -710 4 22.22
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 153,0 / 540 = 28,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 % 1 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 5 27.78
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 3T E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %10 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
15 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %16 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
17 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %19 NS 3T E-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %22 NS 3P E-2 200 7 38.89
23 NS 4C S = 620 3 16.67
24 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %28 NS 2S E-2 100 17 94.44
29 NS 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
30 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 5C W+2 -710 4 22.22
33 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 5T S = 600 5 27.78
3 NS 5K N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
5 NS 3C S = 140 10 55.56
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %10 NS 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
11 NS 2P S+1 140 14 77.78
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %13 NS 2K W+2 -130 18 100.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 5PcN-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %16 NS 3T N-2 -100 9 50.00
17 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %19 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
20 NS 2T S+2 130 11 61.11
21 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %22 NS 3P E-3 300 10 55.56
23 NS 4P S+1 650 11 61.11
24 NS 2P W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %28 NS 4KcN-3 -800 1 5.56
29 NS 6T N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %31 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
32 NS 4C W+3 -710 4 22.22
33 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
2 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 % 4 NS 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 2T E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
15 NS 4P N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %16 NS 3ScN-2 -300 3 16.67
17 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
18 NS 2S E = -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %19 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 17 94.44
23 NS 4C S = 620 3 16.67
24 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %25 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %28 NS 3T E = -110 9 50.00
29 NS 3S N+3 690 16 88.89
30 NS 3T N+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %31 NS 2C N = 110 17 94.44
32 NS 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78
33 NS 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N = 600 5 27.78
3 NS 2S N+3 210 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 % 4 NS 5S N+2 720 3 16.67
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11
8 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
11 NS 3C W-3 150 16 88.89
12 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 2S E = -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %19 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
20 NS 2P W-3 300 14 77.78
21 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %22 NS 4T N+1 150 4 22.22
23 NS 4C S+1 650 11 61.11
24 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
26 NS 5K W-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %28 NS 2C W = -110 9 50.00
29 NS 6T N-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 2T N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %31 NS 2C N = 110 17 94.44
32 NS 4C W+2 -680 9 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 % 4 NS 6S S+1 1470 15 83.33
5 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 % 7 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %10 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %13 NS 1S W+4 -210 12 66.67
14 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
15 NS 5PcN-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %19 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
21 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 14 77.78
23 NS 4C S+1 650 11 61.11
24 NS 3K N+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %28 NS 3C W+2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56
30 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 11 61.11
32 NS 5C W+1 -680 9 50.00
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 % 4 NS 6S S = 1440 8 44.44
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
15 NS 5CcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %16 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
17 NS 2C N+1 140 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %22 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44
23 NS 4C S+1 650 11 61.11
24 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 14 77.78
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %28 NS 3K N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 3S S+3 690 16 88.89
30 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %31 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
32 NS 5C W = -650 14 77.78
33 NS 4T E+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 350,0 / 540 = 64,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 1 NS 2S N+2 180 10 55.56
2 NS 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 % 4 NS 6C N+1 1460 12 66.67
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11
8 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44
9 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
11 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %13 NS 1S W+2 -150 15 83.33
14 NS 2S N+2 180 12 66.67
15 NS 4PcN = 790 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %16 NS 1S N+3 180 14 77.78
17 NS 2T S+1 110 5 27.78
18 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %19 NS 3T E-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 14 77.78
26 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
27 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 %28 NS 4PcE-1 100 17 94.44
29 NS 3S N+2 660 10 55.56
30 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %31 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 27.78
32 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 349,0 / 540 = 64,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 % 1 NS 3K N = 110 4 22.22
2 NS 5T S = 600 5 27.78
3 NS 2S N+2 180 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 4 NS 7S S = 2220 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
6 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 11 61.11
8 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44
9 NS 1S W = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
11 NS 3S E-4 200 18 100.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 33.33
15 NS 3PcN = 730 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %16 NS 4PcS-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 2C N+2 170 18 100.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %19 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 3T S+1 130 11 61.11
21 NS 5P S = 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques : 44,44 %22 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67
23 NS 5C S = 650 11 61.11
24 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 %28 NS 2K N = 90 13 72.22
29 NS 3S S+3 690 16 88.89
30 NS 2S S+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 %31 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44
32 NS 5CcW+1 -1050 0 0.00
33 NS 4T E+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée
21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert : 52,41 % 1 NS 2S N+1 150 8 44.44
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 65,19 % 4 NS 6S S+1 1470 15 83.33
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 33.33
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 51,30 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 6 33.33
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 2S W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %10 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
11 NS 2P N = 110 8 44.44
12 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René : 46,11 %13 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 6 33.33
15 NS 4P N+1 650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 50,56 %16 NS 2S S-3 -150 6 33.33
17 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 59,44 %19 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11
20 NS 3T S = 110 6 33.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 51,48 %22 NS 3C N = 140 2 11.11
23 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 5K N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 45,37 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 41,48 %31 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 4C W+1 -650 14 77.78
33 NS 1P E+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 216,0 / 540 = 40,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -THIRY Jacques
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 12 66.67
2 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.56
3 EO 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 % 4 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 16.67
5 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
11 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
15 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %16 EO 1S N+3 180 4 22.22
17 EO 2T S+1 110 13 72.22
18 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %19 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
20 EO 2T S+2 130 7 38.89
21 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %22 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33
23 EO 5C S = 650 7 38.89
24 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %25 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %31 EO 2C N = 110 1 5.56
32 EO 4C W+2 -680 9 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 % 4 EO 3S S+4 720 15 83.33
5 EO 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %10 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
11 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %13 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 16.67
14 EO 2S N+2 180 6 33.33
15 EO 4PcN = 790 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %16 EO 3T N-2 -100 9 50.00
17 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %19 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 3T S+1 130 7 38.89
21 EO 5P S = 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 1 5.56
23 EO 4C S = 620 15 83.33
24 EO 3S N-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %28 EO 2C W = -110 9 50.00
29 EO 6T N-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 2T N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 % 4 EO 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 3T E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
11 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %13 EO 2K W+2 -130 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 5PcN-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %16 EO 4PcS-4 -800 18 100.00
17 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %19 EO 3P S-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %22 EO 3C N = 140 16 88.89
23 EO 6C S-1 -100 18 100.00
24 EO 5K N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
26 EO 5K W-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %28 EO 1S S = 90 5 27.78
29 EO 3S N+1 630 12 66.67
30 EO 4P S-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 5C W+1 -680 9 50.00
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56
9 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %10 EO 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
11 EO 2P S+1 140 4 22.22
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
15 EO 3PcN = 730 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %16 EO 3ScN-2 -300 15 83.33
17 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
18 EO 2S E = -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %19 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89
20 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %22 EO 4T N+1 150 14 77.78
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7 38.89
24 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
27 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %28 EO 3C W+2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44
30 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %31 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89
32 EO 5C W+2 -710 14 77.78
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 % 1 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 72.22
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 % 4 EO 6C N+1 1460 6 33.33
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
11 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
15 EO 4P N = 620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %16 EO 2S S-3 -150 12 66.67
17 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %19 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
20 EO 2P W-3 300 4 22.22
21 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %22 EO 5C S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
24 EO 5KcS-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %28 EO 4KcN-3 -800 17 94.44
29 EO 2T N+2 130 14 77.78
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %31 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
32 EO 5C W = -650 4 22.22
33 EO 4T E+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DOUETTE André -LAENENS René
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 % 1 EO 2S N+2 180 8 44.44
2 EO 3S N+1 630 6 33.33
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
5 EO 3C S = 140 8 44.44
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56
9 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 12 66.67
15 EO 4P N+1 650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 2S E = -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %19 EO 2TcE+2 -580 18 100.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
21 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 22.22
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7 38.89
24 EO 3K N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %28 EO 3K N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 3S S+3 690 2 11.11
30 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 7 38.89
32 EO 5C W+2 -710 14 77.78
33 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 5T S = 600 13 72.22
3 EO 5K N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 % 4 EO 7S S = 2220 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
6 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 2T E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %10 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
11 EO 2P N = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 9 50.00
17 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
18 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %19 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
21 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %22 EO 3P E-2 200 11 61.11
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7 38.89
24 EO 3K N+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 4 22.22
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %28 EO 2S E-2 100 1 5.56
29 EO 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
30 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %31 EO 1S S-1 -100 13 72.22
32 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 228,0 / 540 = 42,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 % 1 EO 3K N = 110 14 77.78
2 EO 5T S = 600 13 72.22
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 % 4 EO 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 12 66.67
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 2S W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
11 EO 3C W-3 150 2 11.11
12 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %13 EO 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
14 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
15 EO 4PcN-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 3T S = 110 12 66.67
21 EO 5T N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %22 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56
23 EO 4C S+1 650 7 38.89
24 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %28 EO 4PcE-1 100 1 5.56
29 EO 3S N+2 660 8 44.44
30 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %31 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
32 EO 4C W+3 -710 14 77.78
33 EO 2C S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
3 EO 2S N+2 180 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 % 4 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 16.67
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 12 66.67
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89
8 EO 4P N-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 %10 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 100.00
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %13 EO 1S W+4 -210 6 33.33
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
15 EO 5PcN-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %16 EO 4KcS-2 -300 15 83.33
17 EO 4C S-3 -150 18 100.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %22 EO 3P E-2 200 11 61.11
23 EO 4C S = 620 15 83.33
24 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 4 22.22
26 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
27 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %28 EO 4KcN-3 -800 17 94.44
29 EO 6T N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %31 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56
32 EO 5CcW+1 -1050 18 100.00
33 EO 4T E+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 352,0 / 540 = 65,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DELHEZ Jacques -POULAERT Gilbert
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 % 1 EO 2S N+1 150 10 55.56
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 % 4 EO 5S N+2 720 15 83.33
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 7 38.89
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 %10 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
11 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 12 66.67
15 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %16 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
17 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %19 EO 3T E-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
27 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 54,44 %28 EO 2K N = 90 5 27.78
29 EO 3S S+3 690 2 11.11
30 EO 2S S+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %31 EO 2C N = 110 1 5.56
32 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22
33 EO 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,89 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N = 600 13 72.22
3 EO 2S N+3 210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 39,26 % 4 EO 6S S = 1440 10 55.56
5 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67
6 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 57,78 % 7 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 1S W = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 CHAPELIER Bernard -SMEULDERS Alain : 28,33 %10 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
11 EO 2S W-2 100 16 88.89
12 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 64,81 %13 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
15 EO 5CcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 GROSFILS Colette -STEED Mercédès : 53,89 %16 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
17 EO 2C N+1 140 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 64,63 %19 EO 3T E-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,04 %22 EO 3P E-3 300 8 44.44
23 EO 4P S+1 650 7 38.89
24 EO 2P W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,93 %28 EO 3T E = -110 9 50.00
29 EO 3S N+3 690 2 11.11
30 EO 3T N+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -KINET Renée : 40,00 %31 EO 1S S-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 22.22
33 EO 1P E+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
|
|