|
Tournoi du 05-12-11
1 60,23 A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 59,70 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 53,38 A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
4 51,92 A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
5 51,83 A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 50,58 A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric
7 48,68 A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
8 47,33 A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 47,12 A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard
10 47,02 A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
11 45,78 A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
12 36,42 A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine
13 0,00 A13 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,57 a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
2 57,22 a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 56,25 a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René
4 55,09 a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 52,76 a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
6 51,17 a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 50,69 a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
8 50,00 a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
9 46,22 a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
10 44,96 a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie
11 44,32 a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
12 42,87 a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
13 36,33 a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude
PAIRE Nr : A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 3 15.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 % 4 NS 3P S-1 -100 17 85.00
5 NS 3S S+2 660 18 90.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 18 90.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 19 95.00
9 NS 3K S+1 130 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %10 NS 4P S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 2K N+2 130 13 65.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %13 NS 3CcN-1 -200 1 5.00
14 NS 7P W = -1510 0 0.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 3 15.00
18 NS 3P W+1 -170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 12 60.00
20 NS 5P N-1 -100 9 45.00
21 NS 2P S+1 140 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %22 NS 3S N = 400 17 85.00
23 NS 2C W = -110 8 40.00
24 NS 2K N+2 130 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 NS 3C S-2 -200 0.1 0.50
27 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,50 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 3T S = 110 14 70.00
30 NS 3P N+1 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 292,1 / 600 = 48,68 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 % 4 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 30.00
5 NS 5PcE-4 800 20 100.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 11 55.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 1K S+2 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %10 NS 6S S = 1440 20 100.00
11 NS 4K N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.00
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 8 40.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 NS 3S W-3 150 18 90.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %19 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 10.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 18 90.00
21 NS 3KcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %22 NS 4C N = 420 20 100.00
23 NS 1S W-1 100 19 95.00
24 NS 3C S+1 170 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 96,67 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 NS 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 4K E-1 100 12 60.00
30 NS 3P N+1 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 320,3 / 600 = 53,38 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 16 80.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 11 55.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 5K S-2 -100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %10 NS 6P S-1 -100 1 5.00
11 NS 4K N = 130 13 65.00
12 NS 5T N = 600 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %13 NS 3T N = 110 12 60.00
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 8 40.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %16 NS 3C E-2 200 18 90.00
17 NS 5T W-2 100 15 75.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %19 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 20.00
20 NS 5P N = 650 18 90.00
21 NS 2C N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 14 70.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %25 NS 4P N = 420 3.4 17.00
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 11.50
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,17 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 4T S-2 -200 2 10.00
30 NS 3P N+1 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 4 20.00
32 NS 2C N+2 170 18 90.00
33 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 282,7 / 600 = 47,12 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 % 1 NS 4PcN = 590 20 100.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
5 NS 2S S+3 210 10 50.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %10 NS 4C S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 2K N+2 130 13 65.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %13 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 20.00
14 NS 5TcN-5 -1100 3 15.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %16 NS 3C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 11 55.00
18 NS 3P W = -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %19 NS 2C N = 110 18 90.00
20 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00
21 NS 2C N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %22 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 10.00
23 NS 1S S = 90 16 80.00
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %25 NS 4P N = 420 3.4 17.00
26 NS 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50
27 NS 2K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 2 10.00
29 NS 3T S-2 -200 2 10.00
30 NS 3P N-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 4 20.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 2S N = 120 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 274,7 / 600 = 45,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 20 100.00
5 NS 3P E-2 100 4 20.00
6 NS 2ScN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 18 90.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 19 95.00
9 NS 3K S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 18 90.00
14 NS 5KcS-5 -1100 3 15.00
15 NS 3T E = -110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %16 NS 2K N = 90 6 30.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 11 55.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %19 NS 1S S-2 -100 7 35.00
20 NS 5P N = 650 18 90.00
21 NS 2C N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %22 NS 2S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 NS 3S W-1 100 19 95.00
24 NS 4T W-2 100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %25 NS 4P N+2 480 16.6 83.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 13.3 66.50
27 NS 3S N-3 -150 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 3T S-1 -100 8 40.00
30 NS 3P N+1 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 282,1 / 600 = 47,02 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 3 15.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 17 85.00
5 NS 4T S = 130 7 35.00
6 NS 4K W = -130 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 18 90.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 5K S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %10 NS 4P S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 3C W-1 50 4 20.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
18 NS 2S E+4 -240 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %19 NS 2S S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 6PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 2C N+2 170 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 10.00
23 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 10.00
24 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %25 NS 6P N-1 -50 0.1 0.50
26 NS 2S N+1 150 5.6 28.00
27 NS 1S S+2 150 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %28 NS 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
29 NS 3P W-2 200 16 80.00
30 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 2K E-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 218,5 / 600 = 36,42 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 9 45.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 19 95.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 3S S+1 630 14 70.00
6 NS 5T E-2 200 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 % 7 NS 3K N-3 -300 2 10.00
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 10.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 17 85.00
11 NS 3C W-1 50 4 20.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %13 NS 3T S = 110 12 60.00
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 19 95.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 20 100.00
20 NS 5P N-1 -100 9 45.00
21 NS 2C N+1 140 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 8 40.00
24 NS 3C S+1 170 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 NS 3K S+2 150 5.6 28.00
27 NS 2S N+1 150 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %28 NS 3S N+2 660 20 100.00
29 NS 3S N+2 660 20 100.00
30 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 3S N = 400 20 100.00
33 NS 2K W = -90 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 361,4 / 600 = 60,23 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 16 80.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 3P S = 140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 % 4 NS 3C E = -140 13 65.00
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4CcN-3 -500 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 11 55.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 10.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 17 85.00
11 NS 3K N+1 130 13 65.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %13 NS 3T S+1 130 16 80.00
14 NS 4KcS-4 -800 12 60.00
15 NS 1T N-2 -200 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %16 NS 3CcE-1 200 18 90.00
17 NS 3S W-4 200 20 100.00
18 NS 3P W = -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %22 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 NS 2C W = -110 8 40.00
24 NS 4T W-3 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %25 NS 3S N+3 490 19.9 99.50
26 NS 3S N = 600 13.3 66.50
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 40.00
30 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 358,2 / 600 = 59,70 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 9 45.00
2 NS 5P E = -450 10 50.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 10.00
6 NS 2K W+1 -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 11 55.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 1K S+2 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %10 NS 4P S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 3C W-1 50 4 20.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %13 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 35.00
14 NS 6P W+1 -1010 8 40.00
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %16 NS 2P N = 110 14 70.00
17 NS 3T W+1 -130 7 35.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 %19 NS 2S S-2 -100 7 35.00
20 NS 6P N-1 -100 9 45.00
21 NS 2P N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %25 NS 4P N+2 480 16.6 83.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 19.9 99.50
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %28 NS 4C N+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 18 90.00
30 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 311,5 / 600 = 51,92 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 9 45.00
2 NS 4P E = -420 19 95.00
3 NS 3P S = 140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 65.00
5 NS 2T S+2 130 7 35.00
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 % 7 NS 3K N-3 -300 2 10.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 3P E-3 300 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %10 NS 5P S-1 -100 1 5.00
11 NS 3K N+1 130 13 65.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %13 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 35.00
14 NS 4P W+3 -510 15 75.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %16 NS 1S S-2 -100 1 5.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 3 15.00
18 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 12 60.00
20 NS 6PcN-1 -200 3 15.00
21 NS 2C N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,32 %22 NS 3S N = 400 17 85.00
23 NS 2C W = -110 8 40.00
24 NS 3S W-2 100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 3T S-1 -100 8 40.00
30 NS 4PcN = 590 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 1S W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 284,0 / 600 = 47,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 9 45.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
5 NS 3S S+1 630 14 70.00
6 NS 2K W-1 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 % 7 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 30.00
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 10.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %10 NS 4P S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 4C E-3 150 20 100.00
12 NS 6T N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 %13 NS 5KcW-1 200 20 100.00
14 NS 4P W+3 -510 15 75.00
15 NS 3TcE-1 100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 20.00
17 NS 3S W-2 100 15 75.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %19 NS 1S S = 90 16 80.00
20 NS 6P N-2 -200 3 15.00
21 NS 2P N+1 140 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 10.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 8 40.00
24 NS 3C S = 140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 13.3 66.50
27 NS 3S N-3 -150 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %31 NS 3S S+3 690 14 70.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 303,5 / 600 = 50,58 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,33 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 16 80.00
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 10.00
3 NS 2P S+1 140 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 14 70.00
6 NS 3T E = -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 % 7 NS 3K N-3 -300 2 10.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 11 55.00
9 NS 3K S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René : 56,25 %10 NS 4P S = 620 9 45.00
11 NS 3K N+1 130 13 65.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 %13 NS 3T S = 110 12 60.00
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 19 95.00
15 NS 3T E-1 50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %16 NS 2S E-2 200 18 90.00
17 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 35.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 12 60.00
20 NS 6P N-1 -100 9 45.00
21 NS 2C N+2 170 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3T W-3 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 11 55.00
29 NS 4T S-2 -200 2 10.00
30 NS 3P N+1 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %31 NS 3S S+2 660 4 20.00
32 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 40.00
33 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 311,0 / 600 = 51,83 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 -
a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 42,87 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 63,57 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 50,69 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,17 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,09 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie : 44,96 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier : 50,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 52,76 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 57,22 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 46,22 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 17 85.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 20 100.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 20 100.00
5 EO 3S S+1 630 6 30.00
6 EO 5T E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 9 45.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 1K S+2 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 3 15.00
11 EO 3K N+1 130 7 35.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %13 EO 3T N = 110 8 40.00
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 12 60.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %16 EO 2P N = 110 6 30.00
17 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 65.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %19 EO 2C N = 110 2 10.00
20 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00
21 EO 2C N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %22 EO 3S N = 400 3 15.00
23 EO 2C W = -110 12 60.00
24 EO 3S W-2 100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %25 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 17.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 6.7 33.50
27 EO 3S N-3 -150 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 2K E-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 265,9 / 600 = 44,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 PIETQUIN Joseph -LAENENS René
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 11 55.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 1 5.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 % 4 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 70.00
5 EO 5PcE-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 9 45.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 18 90.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %10 EO 4P S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 3K N+1 130 7 35.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %13 EO 3K W+1 -130 13 65.00
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 12 60.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %16 EO 3C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 9 45.00
18 EO 3P W = -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 40.00
20 EO 6PcN-1 -200 17 85.00
21 EO 2C N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %22 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.00
24 EO 4T W-2 100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 6.7 33.50
27 EO 3S N-3 -150 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %28 EO 2S N+2 180 20 100.00
29 EO 3P W-2 200 4 20.00
30 EO 4PcN-2 -300 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 337,5 / 600 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 % 4 EO 3C E = -140 7 35.00
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 20 100.00
6 EO 4CcN-3 -500 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 9 45.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 5K S-2 -100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %10 EO 4P S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 3C W-1 50 16 80.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %16 EO 1S S-2 -100 19 95.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 17 85.00
18 EO 4P W+2 -480 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 40.00
20 EO 6P N-1 -100 11 55.00
21 EO 2C N+2 170 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 90.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 12 60.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %25 EO 6P N-1 -50 19.9 99.50
26 EO 2S N+1 150 14.4 72.00
27 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 3T S = 110 6 30.00
30 EO 3P N+1 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
33 EO 2K W = -90 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 297,5 / 540 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 4 20.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 3P S = 140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 9 45.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 1K S+2 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %10 EO 4C S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 2K N+2 130 7 35.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %13 EO 2K W+2 -130 13 65.00
14 EO 4P W+3 -510 5 25.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %16 EO 2K N = 90 14 70.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 9 45.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %19 EO 1S S = 90 4 20.00
20 EO 6P N-2 -200 17 85.00
21 EO 2P N+1 140 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 EO 3C S-2 -200 19.9 99.50
27 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,50 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 4T S-2 -200 18 90.00
30 EO 3P N+1 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 1S S-2 -100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 284,9 / 540 = 52,76 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 4 20.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 30.00
6 EO 3T E = -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %10 EO 5P S-1 -100 19 95.00
11 EO 3K N+1 130 7 35.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 2 10.00
14 EO 5KcS-5 -1100 17 85.00
15 EO 3T E = -110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 16 80.00
17 EO 3S W-2 100 5 25.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %19 EO 2S S-4 -200 20 100.00
20 EO 6PcN-2 -500 20 100.00
21 EO 2C N+2 170 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %22 EO 3S N = 400 3 15.00
23 EO 2C W = -110 12 60.00
24 EO 2K N+2 130 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 EO 3K S+2 150 14.4 72.00
27 EO 2S N+1 150 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 4K E-1 100 8 40.00
30 EO 3P N+1 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 249,6 / 540 = 46,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 11 55.00
2 EO 5P E = -450 10 50.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
5 EO 2S S+3 210 10 50.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %13 EO 3T S = 110 8 40.00
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 1 5.00
15 EO 3T E-1 50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 95.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 100.00
18 EO 2S E+4 -240 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 40.00
20 EO 5P N-1 -100 11 55.00
21 EO 2P S+1 140 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 12 60.00
24 EO 3C S+1 170 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 10 50.00
26 EO 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 60.00
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 16 80.00
32 EO 2C N+2 170 2 10.00
33 EO 2S N-3 -150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 273,7 / 540 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -NEVE Jean-Marie
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 % 1 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 35.00
5 EO 2T S+2 130 13 65.00
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 2 10.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.00
9 EO 3K S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %10 EO 4P S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 6T N-1 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A13 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
20 EO 5P N-1 -100 11 55.00
21 EO 2C N+1 140 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 20 100.00
24 EO 3T W-3 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %25 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.50
26 EO 3S N = 600 6.7 33.50
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 4T S-2 -200 18 90.00
30 EO 3P N+1 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 1S S-2 -100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 242,8 / 540 = 44,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 11 55.00
2 EO 4P E = -420 1 5.00
3 EO 3P S = 140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
5 EO 3P E-2 100 16 80.00
6 EO 2ScN-5 -1100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 % 7 EO 1S N-2 -200 14 70.00
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 18 90.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %10 EO 4P S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 3C W-1 50 16 80.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %13 EO 3CcN-1 -200 19 95.00
14 EO 7P W = -1510 20 100.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %19 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 90.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 2 10.00
21 EO 3KcW-1 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %22 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 EO 2C W = -110 12 60.00
24 EO 4T W-3 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 2 10.00
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 16 80.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 2C S-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A13 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
5 EO 3S S+1 630 6 30.00
6 EO 2K W-1 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 % 7 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 90.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 3K S = 110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %10 EO 4P S = 620 11 55.00
11 EO 2K N+2 130 7 35.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %13 EO 3T S = 110 8 40.00
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 1 5.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 EO 3S W-3 150 2 10.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 6 30.00
24 EO 3C S = 140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %25 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 17.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.50
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 18 90.00
29 EO 3T S-2 -200 18 90.00
30 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 1S W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 231,5 / 540 = 42,87 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 11 55.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 3 15.00
5 EO 4T S = 130 13 65.00
6 EO 4K W = -130 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 2 10.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.00
9 EO 3K S+1 130 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 19 95.00
14 EO 6P W+1 -1010 12 60.00
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 %16 EO 2S E-2 200 2 10.00
17 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 65.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %19 EO 2K E+1 -110 16 80.00
20 EO 5P N = 650 2 10.00
21 EO 2C N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %25 EO 4P N = 420 16.6 83.00
26 EO 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50
27 EO 2K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 60.00
30 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 20 100.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
Total : 276,3 / 540 = 51,17 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 DELHEZ Jacques -CLERIN François-Xavier
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 17 85.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 % 4 EO 3P S-1 -100 3 15.00
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2 10.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 % 7 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 90.00
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 90.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %10 EO 6S S = 1440 0 0.00
11 EO 4K N-1 -50 20 100.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %13 EO 3T S+1 130 4 20.00
14 EO 4KcS-4 -800 8 40.00
15 EO 1T N-2 -200 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %16 EO 3C E-2 200 2 10.00
17 EO 5T W-2 100 5 25.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A13 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %22 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 90.00
23 EO 1S S = 90 4 20.00
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %28 EO 4C N+1 650 9 45.00
29 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 60.00
30 EO 3P N+1 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude
A12 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,83 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 4 20.00
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 90.00
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 90.00
6 EO 2K W+1 -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 2 10.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 5K S-3 -150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %10 EO 6P S-1 -100 19 95.00
11 EO 4K N = 130 7 35.00
12 EO 5T N = 600 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A11 COENE Jacqueline -COLINET Eric : 50,58 %13 EO 5KcW-1 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4P W+3 -510 5 25.00
15 EO 3TcE-1 100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %16 EO 3CcE-1 200 2 10.00
17 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
18 EO 3P W = -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 %19 EO 1S S-2 -100 13 65.00
20 EO 5P N = 650 2 10.00
21 EO 2C N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 53,38 %22 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
23 EO 1S W-1 100 1 5.00
24 EO 3C S+1 170 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 3,33 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %28 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %31 EO 3S S+2 660 16 80.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 218,0 / 600 = 36,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
A.5 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,02 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 100.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 50.00
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,33 % 7 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 90.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 9 45.00
9 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,23 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 3 15.00
11 EO 3C W-1 50 16 80.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,78 %13 EO 3K W+2 -150 16 80.00
14 EO 5TcN-5 -1100 17 85.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.1 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 48,68 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 10 50.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 17 85.00
18 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.9 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 51,92 %19 EO 2S S-2 -100 13 65.00
20 EO 6P N-1 -100 11 55.00
21 EO 2P N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.6 VAGMAN David -COLLET Claudine : 36,42 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 90.00
23 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 90.00
24 EO 3C S-2 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
A.3 SALFI Huguette -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,12 %25 EO 4P N = 420 16.6 83.00
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 17.7 88.50
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,83 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,70 %31 EO 3S S+3 690 6 30.00
32 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 60.00
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 343,3 / 540 = 63,57 %
|
|