|
Tournoi du 06-04-13
1 64,30 1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe
2 62,26 20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent
3 59,00 10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 58,84 2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick
5 58,73 26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard
6 58,00 30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques
7 57,07 24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
8 54,95 3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques
9 54,73 32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond
10 54,52 6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis
11 52,58 11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
12 52,27 18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
13 51,47 17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain
14 51,08 31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko
15 50,63 12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François
16 50,61 25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie
17 50,27 8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
18 50,17 19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe
19 49,25 7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
20 48,89 5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard
21 47,30 15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
22 46,64 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
23 46,01 22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine
24 45,48 23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise
25 44,52 21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy
26 42,88 13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José
27 42,77 14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone
28 41,75 29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy
29 39,48 4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie
30 38,65 27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
31 37,09 9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
32 36,69 28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine
PAIRE Nr : 1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 10 35.71
2 NS 2C E-1 50 20 71.43
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 16 57.14
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 46.43
6 NS 3K W+1 -130 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 25 89.29
8 NS 5P W = -450 11 39.29
9 NS 2C S-1 -50 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %10 NS 3S W-3 300 26.9 96.07
11 NS 3TcW-2 300 21 75.00
12 NS 2P W = -110 20.3 72.50 µ Tbl = 81,19 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 20 71.43
14 NS 5K E = -400 22 78.57
15 NS 4P S = 620 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %16 NS 4P S = 420 19 67.86
17 NS 3S S = 400 26 92.86
18 NS 6C S = 1430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %19 NS 4PcW-3 800 28 100.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 27 96.43
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 5P S = 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C E = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %25 NS 6P W-1 100 23 82.14
26 NS 2P E-1 100 27 96.43
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 19 67.86
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P S+1 140 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 1S N+1 120 28 100.00
33 NS 3S N = 400 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %34 NS 3S W-2 100 24 85.71
35 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 42.86
36 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %37 NS 5T E = -400 4 14.29
38 NS 4PcW-3 800 28 100.00
39 NS 1S N-3 -300 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 3S W-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %43 NS 5PcE-1 100 26 92.86
44 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 21.43
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
Total : 810,2 / 1260 = 64,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 % 4 NS 2K S = 90 10 35.71
5 NS 3K W-1 50 22 78.57
6 NS 3S W = -600 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 2K W = -90 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %10 NS 2P W-1 100 15.1 53.93
11 NS 2P N+2 170 17 60.71
12 NS 2P W-1 50 25.3 90.36 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %13 NS 3T W = -110 0 0.00
14 NS 5P W = -450 18 64.29
15 NS 4CcW-3 500 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %16 NS 2P S+3 200 6 21.43
17 NS 3K S+1 130 12 42.86
18 NS 6C N = 1430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %19 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 14.29
20 NS 1K N+4 150 17 60.71
21 NS 1S N = 90 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %25 NS 4P W-1 100 23 82.14
26 NS 1S W = -90 16 57.14
27 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %28 NS 3C N+1 170 26 92.86
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P S+2 170 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %31 NS 3S S = 600 11 39.29
32 NS 3K N = 110 26 92.86
33 NS 3S N+1 430 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %34 NS 3S W-2 100 24 85.71
35 NS 3T W+1 -130 12 42.86
36 NS 1S E = -90 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4C N+1 450 13 46.43
39 NS 3T N-1 -100 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %40 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71
41 NS 3C E+2 -200 28 100.00
42 NS 3K E-2 200 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %43 NS 4PcW = -590 2 7.14
44 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 21.43
45 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 10,71 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %46 NS 3S W = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 4P W-1 50 22 78.57
48 NS 5T W+1 -620 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 741,4 / 1260 = 58,84 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 16 57.14
2 NS 3C E-1 50 20 71.43
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 23.6 84.29
11 NS 4TcE-2 300 21 75.00
12 NS 3P E-2 100 27.8 99.29 µ Tbl = 86,19 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %13 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 10.71
14 NS 6P E = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 4CcE-2 300 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 23 82.14
17 NS 2P N+1 140 14 50.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 26 92.86
20 NS 3K N+1 130 7 25.00
21 NS 3C E = -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 6P N-1 -100 1 3.57
24 NS 4C E = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %25 NS 5K E-2 200 28 100.00
26 NS 2C E = -110 8 28.57
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %28 NS 2K E = -90 10 35.71
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P N+2 170 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %31 NS 3S N+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 1S N-1 -50 17 60.71
33 NS 3S N = 400 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %34 NS 1S E = -90 4 14.29
35 NS 2P E = -110 22 78.57
36 NS 2S E = -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %37 NS 5K E+1 -420 2 7.14
38 NS 4PcE-2 500 22 78.57
39 NS 3P E = -140 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 3S E-3 300 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %43 NS 5T N-1 -50 23 82.14
44 NS 2P N = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 4C N+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %46 NS 2S E+1 -150 24 85.71
47 NS 4P E-1 50 22 78.57
48 NS 6T E = -1370 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 692,4 / 1260 = 54,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 % 1 NS 2C N = 110 24 85.71
2 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 7.14
3 NS 5P N-1 -50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 16 57.14
5 NS 2K W+1 -110 10 35.71
6 NS 3CcS-2 -300 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %10 NS 3TcN-2 -500 2.2 7.86
11 NS 3C E = -140 1 3.57
12 NS 2P W = -110 20.3 72.50 µ Tbl = 27,98 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %13 NS 2P N = 110 11 39.29
14 NS 6K E-1 50 25 89.29
15 NS 4PcS+1 990 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 23 82.14
17 NS 3S S = 400 26 92.86
18 NS 4C N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %19 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
20 NS 1S S+2 150 17 60.71
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %22 NS 3C E+1 -170 26 92.86
23 NS 2P S+2 170 4 14.29
24 NS 4C W = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 46.43
27 NS 3S N-3 -150 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 10.71
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %31 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 7.14
32 NS 1S N-2 -100 13 46.43
33 NS 4C N = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %34 NS 1S W = -90 4 14.29
35 NS 2S E = -120 19 67.86
36 NS 2P W-1 100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %37 NS 4PcW = -590 0 0.00
38 NS 3S S = 400 8 28.57
39 NS 3S N-4 -400 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 5C E+2 -710 4 14.29
42 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %43 NS 4P W = -420 7 25.00
44 NS 2P S = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 3C S+1 170 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %46 NS 3K W+2 -150 24 85.71
47 NS 2P W = -110 17 60.71
48 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
Total : 497,5 / 1260 = 39,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 10 35.71
2 NS 3C E-1 50 20 71.43
3 NS 4P S = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 25 89.29
5 NS 3K W-1 50 22 78.57
6 NS 3K W+1 -130 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 1S W-1 100 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 20 71.43
14 NS 6P W = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 4P S+1 650 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %16 NS 2P S+3 200 6 21.43
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 17.86
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %19 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 14.29
20 NS 2S S+1 150 17 60.71
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 17.86
23 NS 6KcW-3 800 28 100.00
24 NS 4C W = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 3KcS-1 -200 2 7.14
27 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %28 NS 2K E = -90 10 35.71
29 NS 4P N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 2C W = -110 9 32.14
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 42.86
36 NS 2C S-2 -200 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %37 NS 4C N+1 650 28 100.00
38 NS 4C N+1 450 13 46.43
39 NS 4T S-2 -200 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 4C E+3 -710 4 14.29
42 NS 3S W-2 200 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %43 NS 4P W = -420 7 25.00
44 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 21.43
45 NS 4C S = 620 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %46 NS 4K E+1 -150 24 85.71
47 NS 4P E-2 100 27 96.43
48 NS 5T W+1 -620 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 616,0 / 1260 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 10 35.71
2 NS 3C W-1 50 20 71.43
3 NS 4P N+1 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 16 57.14
5 NS 2C S = 110 28 100.00
6 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 3 10.71
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 15.1 53.93
11 NS 4T W-2 100 12 42.86
12 NS 3P W = -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 41,55 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %16 NS 3CcW-5 1400 26 92.86
17 NS 2S S = 120 10 35.71
18 NS 6C N = 1430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 12 42.86
20 NS 2S S+1 150 17 60.71
21 NS 2T W-2 100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 17.86
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %25 NS 4P E = -620 17 60.71
26 NS 1S N = 90 21 75.00
27 NS 4PcE+1 -690 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %28 NS 4K E-2 100 19 67.86
29 NS 4C N+1 650 26 92.86
30 NS 3C S+2 200 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 17.86
32 NS 1S N-1 -50 17 60.71
33 NS 2S N+2 180 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 3S W = -600 1 3.57
36 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 3PcE-1 200 5 17.86
39 NS 2P E-1 100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 3K E-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %43 NS 3P W+2 -200 11 39.29
44 NS 3P S = 140 26 92.86
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %46 NS 3S W = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 2P W = -110 17 60.71
48 NS 3S W+2 -660 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 686,9 / 1260 = 54,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 20 71.43
2 NS 2C E = -110 8 28.57
3 NS 4P S = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 8 28.57
5 NS 2K W = -90 16 57.14
6 NS 3T E+1 -130 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 3.57
9 NS 1S N+1 120 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %10 NS 4TcN-1 -200 6.5 23.21
11 NS 5KcN = 550 26 92.86
12 NS 50%40% Ajust 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %13 NS 2K S = 90 6 21.43
14 NS 6P W = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 2PcS+2 1070 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 12 42.86
20 NS 1S S+2 150 17 60.71
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 4P N = 620 6 21.43
24 NS 4C W = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 2C W = -110 8 28.57
27 NS 3C N = 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %28 NS 2K E = -90 10 35.71
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P S+1 140 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %31 NS 3S N = 600 11 39.29
32 NS 2C W-1 100 23 82.14
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %34 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
35 NS 3S E-1 100 26 92.86
36 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %37 NS 5C N-1 -100 11 39.29
38 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
39 NS 4K N-4 -400 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %40 NS 3C N = 140 19 67.86
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 3S W-2 200 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %43 NS 4PcW = -590 2 7.14
44 NS 2P S = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %46 NS 4K E+1 -150 24 85.71
47 NS 4P E-2 100 27 96.43
48 NS 3K E+2 -150 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,05 %
Total : 620,5 / 1260 = 49,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 10 35.71
2 NS 4C E-2 100 27 96.43
3 NS 4P S = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 25 89.29
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 46.43
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 % 7 NS 4P S+2 680 28 100.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 22 78.57
9 NS 1S S+1 120 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %10 NS 4TcN-2 -500 2.2 7.86
11 NS 4PcS-1 -100 5 17.86
12 NS 40%40% Ajust 11.2 40.00 µ Tbl = 21,90 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 10.71
14 NS 6P W = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 2P S+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %16 NS 3C W-3 300 12 42.86
17 NS 2C N+2 170 19 67.86
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 17.86
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %25 NS 4P W = -620 17 60.71
26 NS 2K S = 90 21 75.00
27 NS 3C N = 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %28 NS 3K E-1 50 15 53.57
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P S = 110 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %31 NS 3S S = 600 11 39.29
32 NS 1S N = 90 20 71.43
33 NS 2S N = 120 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 3S W-1 100 26 92.86
36 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4PcE-2 500 22 78.57
39 NS 3KcN-2 -500 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %40 NS 3C N = 140 19 67.86
41 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 32.14
42 NS 3K W+1 -130 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %43 NS 5T S-2 -100 19 67.86
44 NS 2P S = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 4C N+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %46 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 10.71
47 NS 4P W = -420 10 35.71
48 NS 6S W = -1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
Total : 633,4 / 1260 = 50,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 % 1 NS 1S N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4P S+2 480 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 % 4 NS 3K S-1 -100 4 14.29
5 NS 3K W-1 50 22 78.57
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 3 10.71
8 NS 4P E+2 -480 1 3.57
9 NS 1S S-2 -100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %10 NS 3K E-1 100 15.1 53.93
11 NS 4PcS-1 -100 5 17.86
12 NS Pass Ajust 11.2 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,26 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 14 50.00
14 NS 4P W+2 -480 15 53.57
15 NS 2P S+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %16 NS 3P S+2 200 6 21.43
17 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 3.57
18 NS 4C S+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %19 NS 3K N+2 150 12 42.86
20 NS 3K N+2 150 17 60.71
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 3C W-1 100 27 96.43
27 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 10.71
29 NS 4C N+2 680 28 100.00
30 NS 3T N = 110 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %31 NS 3S S = 600 11 39.29
32 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 10.71
33 NS 2C N+3 200 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 42.86
36 NS 2C S-3 -300 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4PcE-2 500 22 78.57
39 NS 3P E = -140 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %40 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 3.57
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %43 NS 4PcW = -590 2 7.14
44 NS 5KcS-7 -2000 0 0.00
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %46 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 10.71
47 NS 2KcS-2 -500 0 0.00
48 NS 5K E = -600 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 467,3 / 1260 = 37,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 20 71.43
2 NS 2S W = -120 4 14.29
3 NS 4P N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 16 57.14
5 NS 3K W-1 50 22 78.57
6 NS 2P N = 110 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 1S N+1 120 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %10 NS 4T N-1 -100 8.6 30.71
11 NS 3ScW-5 1100 28 100.00
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 20 71.43
14 NS 6P W = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 2P S+3 200 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %16 NS 3P S+2 200 6 21.43
17 NS 2C N+2 170 19 67.86
18 NS 6C N = 1430 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %19 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 14.29
20 NS 3S N = 600 27 96.43
21 NS 1S N = 90 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 35.71
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 3S W-2 100 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %28 NS 3C S+2 200 28 100.00
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 3C S+2 200 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 1S N-2 -100 13 46.43
33 NS 3S N+2 460 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 2T E+2 -130 12 42.86
36 NS 2C S-2 -200 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %37 NS 5C N-1 -100 11 39.29
38 NS 4PcE-2 500 22 78.57
39 NS 3P E = -140 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %40 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 3K W-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %43 NS 5T N-1 -50 23 82.14
44 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 21.43
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %46 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 10.71
47 NS 4P W = -420 10 35.71
48 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
Total : 743,4 / 1260 = 59,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 10 35.71
2 NS 3K N-1 -100 13 46.43
3 NS 4CcE-2 500 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 16 57.14
5 NS 3P S-2 -200 4 14.29
6 NS 3T E+1 -130 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 3 10.71
8 NS 4P W = -420 22 78.57
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %10 NS 4TcN-2 -500 2.2 7.86
11 NS 3C E = -140 1 3.57
12 NS 2P W = -110 20.3 72.50 µ Tbl = 27,98 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %13 NS 3S S = 600 28 100.00
14 NS 4P W+2 -480 15 53.57
15 NS 2P N+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %16 NS 4P S = 420 19 67.86
17 NS 2S S+1 150 16 57.14
18 NS 4C S+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 23 82.14
20 NS 2S N+1 150 17 60.71
21 NS 3C E = -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 17.86
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 1S N = 90 21 75.00
27 NS 2C N+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 2C E = -110 9 32.14
33 NS 3S N+2 460 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %34 NS 1S W = -90 4 14.29
35 NS 1S E+3 -180 5 17.86
36 NS 2T W-1 100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %37 NS 5C N-2 -200 7 25.00
38 NS 4PcE-2 500 22 78.57
39 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %40 NS 4P S+1 450 28 100.00
41 NS 4C E+1 -650 20 71.43
42 NS 4T E = -130 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %43 NS 5K N-2 -100 19 67.86
44 NS 2P S = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %46 NS 5K E = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 7.14
48 NS 3T W+3 -170 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
Total : 662,5 / 1260 = 52,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 27 96.43
2 NS 3C E-2 100 27 96.43
3 NS 4P S = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 % 4 NS 2K S-1 -100 4 14.29
5 NS 4C S-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 3T E+2 -150 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 25 89.29
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 1S S-1 -50 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 15.1 53.93
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 9 32.14
12 NS 3P W = -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 37,98 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %13 NS 4T E-1 100 8 28.57
14 NS 4C E-2 100 28 100.00
15 NS 4K N-2 -200 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %16 NS 4CcW-6 1700 28 100.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 26 92.86
18 NS 6S S = 1440 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,62 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %19 NS 2K N+3 150 12 42.86
20 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 3.57
21 NS 3C E = -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 28 100.00
23 NS 5P N = 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 7.14
27 NS 5C N = 450 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %28 NS 3K E = -110 3 10.71
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 3S S = 400 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %34 NS 3S W-3 150 28 100.00
35 NS 2S E+2 -180 5 17.86
36 NS 1S E = -90 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4C N+2 480 16 57.14
39 NS 3K N-1 -100 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %40 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 3.57
41 NS 4C E+2 -680 12 42.86
42 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %43 NS 3P W+2 -200 11 39.29
44 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 21.43
45 NS 4C S = 620 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %46 NS 5K E = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 4P W = -420 10 35.71
48 NS 6T W = -1370 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 637,9 / 1260 = 50,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 % 1 NS 2K W+1 -110 2 7.14
2 NS 2C E = -110 8 28.57
3 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 % 4 NS 2K S-1 -100 4 14.29
5 NS 3P N-2 -200 4 14.29
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 10,71 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 4P W = -420 22 78.57
9 NS 1S E = -90 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %10 NS 3T N = 110 21.5 76.79
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 32.14
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 45,60 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 20 71.43
14 NS 6P W = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 5K S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %16 NS 3C W-4 400 15 53.57
17 NS 2S S+2 180 22 78.57
18 NS 5C N+1 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %19 NS 3K N+2 150 12 42.86
20 NS 2S S+1 150 17 60.71
21 NS 2TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 5P N = 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C W = -420 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 3K S-2 -200 2 7.14
27 NS 4PcW+1 -690 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %28 NS 3S W-3 150 23 82.14
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2P S+2 170 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 10.71
33 NS 4P S = 420 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %37 NS 4C S = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4C N = 420 10 35.71
39 NS 3S N-1 -100 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %40 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71
41 NS 4C E+3 -710 4 14.29
42 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %43 NS 3P W = -140 16 57.14
44 NS 3P N+1 170 28 100.00
45 NS 4C S+1 650 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %46 NS 5K E = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 14.29
48 NS 4S E+2 -690 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 540,3 / 1260 = 42,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 27 96.43
2 NS 3C E-1 50 20 71.43
3 NS 4P S+1 450 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 % 4 NS 2K S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2KcE = -180 8 28.57
6 NS 3T E+1 -130 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 3 10.71
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 39.29
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 15.1 53.93
11 NS 3P S = 140 14 50.00
12 NS 3P W = -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 43,93 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 11 39.29
14 NS 6P E = -980 6 21.43
15 NS 4C E-2 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %16 NS 2C W-4 400 15 53.57
17 NS 2K S+1 110 8 28.57
18 NS 3S S+2 660 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %19 NS 3C S+1 170 18 64.29
20 NS 1P N = 80 4 14.29
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 4C E-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %25 NS 6P E-1 100 23 82.14
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 13 46.43
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %28 NS 2P W-3 150 23 82.14
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %31 NS 3S S+1 630 22 78.57
32 NS 3C E = -140 3 10.71
33 NS 2C N+2 170 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %34 NS 3S W-2 100 24 85.71
35 NS 3S W = -600 1 3.57
36 NS 2P W-1 100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %40 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 32.14
41 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
42 NS 4T E+1 -150 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 15,48 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 %43 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 50.00
44 NS 1S S+1 120 24 85.71
45 NS 4C S = 620 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %46 NS 3S E = -400 13 46.43
47 NS 4P W-1 50 22 78.57
48 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 538,9 / 1260 = 42,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 20 71.43
2 NS 2C E = -110 8 28.57
3 NS 4P N = 420 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 25 89.29
5 NS 3K W-1 50 22 78.57
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 3P W = -140 28 100.00
9 NS 2K W = -90 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %10 NS 3S W-3 Ajust 11.2 40.00
11 NS 3P S+1 170 17 60.71
12 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %13 NS 3P N = 140 20 71.43
14 NS 4P W = -420 20 71.43
15 NS 4C W-2 100 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,07 %16 NS 3P S+2 200 6 21.43
17 NS 2S N-2 -100 1 3.57
18 NS 4C S+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 20 71.43
20 NS 3K N+1 130 7 25.00
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 6P N-1 -100 1 3.57
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 25.00
26 NS 2C W = -110 8 28.57
27 NS 4C N = 420 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %28 NS 3K E = -110 3 10.71
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 3S N+3 490 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 17.86
32 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 10.71
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 2S W = -120 19 67.86
36 NS 2C E-1 100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %37 NS 4C N-2 -200 7 25.00
38 NS 4PcE-1 200 5 17.86
39 NS 3S N-4 -400 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 %43 NS 4T N = 130 28 100.00
44 NS 2P S = 110 17 60.71
45 NS 4C S = 620 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 %46 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 10.71
47 NS 4P W = -420 10 35.71
48 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
Total : 596,0 / 1260 = 47,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko : 51,08 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 4 14.29
2 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 46.43
3 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques : 58,00 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 25 89.29
5 NS 3P N-2 -200 4 14.29
6 NS 3CcS-2 -300 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy : 41,75 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 15 53.57
8 NS 3P W+2 -200 26 92.86
9 NS 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine : 36,69 %10 NS 3S W-3 300 26.9 96.07
11 NS 4TcW-3 500 24 85.71
12 NS 3P W = -140 7.8 27.86 µ Tbl = 69,88 %
27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine : 38,65 %13 NS 3P N+1 170 26 92.86
14 NS 5K E-1 50 25 89.29
15 NS 2P S+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard : 58,73 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 2S N-1 -50 5 17.86
18 NS 4C N+2 680 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie : 50,61 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 23 82.14
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 3.57
21 NS 3C E = -140 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise : 45,48 %22 NS 4C E = -620 18 64.29
23 NS 4P N+1 650 17 60.71
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine : 46,01 %25 NS 6P W-1 100 23 82.14
26 NS 1S S = 90 21 75.00
27 NS 2C N+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy : 44,52 %28 NS 4K E-1 50 15 53.57
29 NS 4C N = 620 12 42.86
30 NS 1S N+1 120 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent : 62,26 %31 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
32 NS 3C E-1 100 23 82.14
33 NS 2S N+1 150 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe : 50,17 %34 NS 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 NS 3S W-1 100 26 92.86
36 NS 2C S-3 -300 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 52,27 %37 NS 4C N = 620 20 71.43
38 NS 4P E-1 100 2 7.14
39 NS 3KcN-2 -500 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,47 %40 NS 2C N = 110 16 57.14
41 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 32.14
42 NS 3S W-1 100 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond : 54,73 %46 NS 4K E+1 -150 24 85.71
47 NS 4P W = -420 10 35.71
48 NS 3S W+1 -630 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 587,7 / 1260 = 46,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 DUCENE Thierry -DEVIGNE Alain
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 18 64.29
2 EO 2C E-1 50 8 28.57
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 12 42.86
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 21.43
6 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 2K W = -90 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %10 EO 4TcN-2 -500 25.8 92.14
11 EO 3C E = -140 27 96.43
12 EO 2P W = -110 7.7 27.50 µ Tbl = 72,02 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %13 EO 4P N-1 -100 25 89.29
14 EO 6P E = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 4CcE-2 300 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %16 EO 4CcW-6 1700 0 0.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 7.14
18 EO 6S S = 1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,38 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %19 EO 3P W = -140 28 100.00
20 EO 1S S+2 150 11 39.29
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 5P N = 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 3KcS-1 -200 26 92.86
27 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %28 EO 2P W-3 150 5 17.86
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2S N-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 23 82.14
32 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 39.29
33 EO 2S N+2 180 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 2S W = -120 9 32.14
36 EO 2C E-1 100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %37 EO 5C N-1 -100 17 60.71
38 EO 3P E+1 -170 28 100.00
39 EO 4K N-4 -400 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %40 EO 2C N = 110 12 42.86
41 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 67.86
42 EO 3S W-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %43 EO 5T S-2 -100 9 32.14
44 EO 2P S = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 4C N+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 648,5 / 1260 = 51,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 % 4 EO 2K S = 90 18 64.29
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 21.43
6 EO 3S W = -600 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 25 89.29
8 EO 4P W = -420 6 21.43
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 4.4 15.71
11 EO 4TcE-2 300 7 25.00
12 EO 3P E-2 100 0.2 0.71 µ Tbl = 13,81 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %13 EO 4T E-1 100 20 71.43
14 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 4K N-2 -200 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 5 17.86
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 7.14
18 EO 4C N+1 650 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %19 EO 3K N+2 150 16 57.14
20 EO 2S S+1 150 11 39.29
21 EO 2TcN-2 -500 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,48 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 82.14
23 EO 6KcW-3 800 0 0.00
24 EO 4C W = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %25 EO 6P E-1 100 5 17.86
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 15 53.57
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %28 EO 4K E-2 100 9 32.14
29 EO 4C N+1 650 2 7.14
30 EO 3C S+2 200 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 23 82.14
32 EO 2C E+1 -140 25 89.29
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %34 EO 1S W+1 -120 28 100.00
35 EO 3S E-1 100 2 7.14
36 EO 2C W+1 -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4P E-1 100 26 92.86
39 EO 3KcN-2 -500 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %40 EO 3C N = 140 9 32.14
41 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 67.86
42 EO 3K W+1 -130 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %43 EO 5PcE-1 100 2 7.14
44 EO 3P S-1 -100 22 78.57
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %46 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 89.29
47 EO 2KcS-2 -500 28 100.00
48 EO 5K E = -600 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
Total : 658,6 / 1260 = 52,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JAUNIAUX Georges -BUSQUIN Philippe
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 8 28.57
2 EO 2S W = -120 24 85.71
3 EO 4P N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 12.9 46.07
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 19 67.86
12 EO 3P W = -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 62,02 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %13 EO 2P N = 110 17 60.71
14 EO 6K E-1 50 3 10.71
15 EO 4PcS+1 990 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %16 EO 3C W-4 400 13 46.43
17 EO 2S S+2 180 6 21.43
18 EO 5C N+1 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %19 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 85.71
20 EO 2S S+1 150 11 39.29
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 28 100.00
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C E-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %25 EO 4P E = -620 11 39.29
26 EO 1S N = 90 7 25.00
27 EO 4PcE+1 -690 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %28 EO 3K E = -110 25 89.29
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %31 EO 3S N = 600 17 60.71
32 EO 2C W-1 100 5 17.86
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 3S W-1 100 2 7.14
36 EO 2C S-3 -300 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4PcE-2 500 6 21.43
39 EO 3KcN-2 -500 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 3S W-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %43 EO 4PcW = -590 26 92.86
44 EO 5KcS-7 -2000 28 100.00
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %46 EO 3S W = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 4P W-1 50 6 21.43
48 EO 5T W+1 -620 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 632,1 / 1260 = 50,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -DRAMAIX Vincent
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 42.86
2 EO 3C E-1 50 8 28.57
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 12 42.86
5 EO 3P S-2 -200 24 85.71
6 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %10 EO 3TcN-2 -500 25.8 92.14
11 EO 3C E = -140 27 96.43
12 EO 2P W = -110 7.7 27.50 µ Tbl = 72,02 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 28.57
14 EO 6P W = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 5K S-3 -300 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %16 EO 2P S+3 200 22 78.57
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 23 82.14
18 EO 4C N+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %19 EO 3C S+1 170 10 35.71
20 EO 1P N = 80 24 85.71
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 82.14
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 2C W = -110 20 71.43
27 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %28 EO 2K E = -90 18 64.29
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P S+1 140 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %31 EO 3S S-3 -300 28 100.00
32 EO 3C E-1 100 5 17.86
33 EO 2S N+1 150 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 3S W-1 100 2 7.14
36 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %37 EO 5T E = -400 24 85.71
38 EO 4PcW-3 800 0 0.00
39 EO 1S N-3 -300 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %40 EO 4C N-2 -100 27 96.43
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 2C W+2 -170 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %43 EO 4PcW = -590 26 92.86
44 EO 3P N-1 -100 22 78.57
45 EO 4C S-1 -100 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 89,29 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %46 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 89.29
47 EO 4P W = -420 18 64.29
48 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
Total : 784,5 / 1260 = 62,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DEGUELLE Jacques -ALLARD Guy
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 18 64.29
2 EO 3K N-1 -100 15 53.57
3 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 12 42.86
5 EO 2K W+1 -110 18 64.29
6 EO 3CcS-2 -300 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 3 10.71
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 28.57
14 EO 6P W = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 4P S+1 650 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %16 EO 2C W-4 400 13 46.43
17 EO 2K S+1 110 20 71.43
18 EO 3S S+2 660 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 70,24 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 16 57.14
20 EO 2S S+1 150 11 39.29
21 EO 2T W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 6P N-1 -100 27 96.43
24 EO 4C W-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 2C W = -110 20 71.43
27 EO 3C N = 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %28 EO 4K E-1 50 13 46.43
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 1S N+1 120 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %31 EO 3S S = 600 17 60.71
32 EO 1S N = 90 8 28.57
33 EO 2S N = 120 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %34 EO 3S W-2 100 4 14.29
35 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 57.14
36 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4PcE-2 500 6 21.43
39 EO 3P E = -140 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %40 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29
41 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00
42 EO 3K E-2 200 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %43 EO 5T N-1 -50 5 17.86
44 EO 3P S-1 -100 22 78.57
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %46 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 14.29
47 EO 4P E-1 50 6 21.43
48 EO 6T E = -1370 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 561,0 / 1260 = 44,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 LAMOTTE André -MONSEUR CLaudine
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 % 1 EO 2C N = 110 4 14.29
2 EO 2C E+1 -140 26 92.86
3 EO 5P N-1 -50 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 % 4 EO 2K S-1 -100 24 85.71
5 EO 4C S-4 -400 28 100.00
6 EO 3T E+2 -150 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 1S W-1 100 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %10 EO 3T N = 110 6.5 23.21
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 67.86
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 54,40 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %16 EO 3CcW-5 1400 2 7.14
17 EO 2S S = 120 18 64.29
18 EO 6C N = 1430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 8 28.57
20 EO 3K N+1 130 21 75.00
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 4P N = 620 22 78.57
24 EO 4C W = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %25 EO 6P W-1 100 5 17.86
26 EO 1S S = 90 7 25.00
27 EO 2C N+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %28 EO 3K E-1 50 13 46.43
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P S = 110 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
33 EO 3S N = 400 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 20,24 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 57.14
36 EO 2C S-3 -300 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4C N+1 450 15 53.57
39 EO 3T N-1 -100 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %40 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 3K W-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %43 EO 5T N-1 -50 5 17.86
44 EO 2P N = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 4C N+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %46 EO 5K E = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 4P W+1 -450 26 92.86
48 EO 3T W+3 -170 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
Total : 579,7 / 1260 = 46,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 PADOU Bernard -GILLAIN Françoise
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 1 3.57
2 EO 3C E-2 100 1 3.57
3 EO 4P S = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 10.71
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 21.43
6 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P W = -420 6 21.43
9 EO 1S E = -90 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 12.9 46.07
11 EO 4T W-2 100 16 57.14
12 EO 3P W = -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 58,45 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 17 60.71
14 EO 6P E = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 4C E-2 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 16 57.14
20 EO 1S S+2 150 11 39.29
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %25 EO 4P W = -620 11 39.29
26 EO 2K S = 90 7 25.00
27 EO 3C N = 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 9 32.14
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P S+1 140 15 53.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %31 EO 3S S = 600 17 60.71
32 EO 2C E+1 -140 25 89.29
33 EO 2C N+3 200 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %34 EO 3S W-2 100 4 14.29
35 EO 3T W+1 -130 16 57.14
36 EO 1S E = -90 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %37 EO 5C N-1 -100 17 60.71
38 EO 4PcE-2 500 6 21.43
39 EO 3P E = -140 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %43 EO 5K N-2 -100 9 32.14
44 EO 2P S = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 4C S-1 -100 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %46 EO 3K W+2 -150 4 14.29
47 EO 2P W = -110 11 39.29
48 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
Total : 573,1 / 1260 = 45,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 18 64.29
2 EO 3C E-1 50 8 28.57
3 EO 4P S = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 % 4 EO 2K S-1 -100 24 85.71
5 EO 3P N-2 -200 24 85.71
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 89,29 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 25 89.29
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 2C S-2 -100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 12.9 46.07
11 EO 3P S = 140 14 50.00
12 EO 3P W = -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 56,07 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %13 EO 2K S = 90 22 78.57
14 EO 6P W = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 2PcS+2 1070 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %16 EO 3P S+2 200 22 78.57
17 EO 2S N-2 -100 27 96.43
18 EO 4C S+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 82.14
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %25 EO 6P W-1 100 5 17.86
26 EO 2P E-1 100 1 3.57
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 25 89.29
29 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00
30 EO 3T N = 110 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %31 EO 3S S = 600 17 60.71
32 EO 3K N = 110 2 7.14
33 EO 3S N+1 430 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 27,38 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 2T E+2 -130 16 57.14
36 EO 2C S-2 -200 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %37 EO 5K E+1 -420 26 92.86
38 EO 4PcE-2 500 6 21.43
39 EO 3P E = -140 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %40 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 4T E = -130 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 29,76 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %43 EO 4P W = -420 21 75.00
44 EO 2P S = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 3C S+1 170 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %46 EO 5K E = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 4P W = -420 18 64.29
48 EO 6T W = -1370 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 719,1 / 1260 = 57,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 MAHY Alain -HERBOTS Jean-Marie
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 % 1 EO 2K W+1 -110 26 92.86
2 EO 2C E = -110 20 71.43
3 EO 6P N-2 -100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 12 42.86
5 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
6 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 25 89.29
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %10 EO 4TcN-1 -200 21.5 76.79
11 EO 5KcN = 550 2 7.14
12 EO 50%40% Ajust 11.2 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,31 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %13 EO 3P N = 140 8 28.57
14 EO 4P W = -420 8 28.57
15 EO 4C W-2 100 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %16 EO 3C W-3 300 16 57.14
17 EO 2C N+2 170 9 32.14
18 EO 4C N+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 5 17.86
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 27 96.43
21 EO 3C E = -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 3C W-1 100 1 3.57
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %28 EO 3C N+1 170 2 7.14
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P S+2 170 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 1S N-2 -100 15 53.57
33 EO 3S N+2 460 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %34 EO 1S E = -90 24 85.71
35 EO 2P E = -110 6 21.43
36 EO 2S E = -120 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %37 EO 5C N-2 -200 21 75.00
38 EO 4PcE-2 500 6 21.43
39 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 5C E+2 -710 24 85.71
42 EO 4C W = -620 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %43 EO 3P W+2 -200 17 60.71
44 EO 3P S-1 -100 22 78.57
45 EO 4C S = 620 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %46 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 14.29
47 EO 4P E-2 100 1 3.57
48 EO 5T W+1 -620 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 637,7 / 1260 = 50,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 HOCQ Daniel -PIERET Richard
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 18 64.29
2 EO 3C W-1 50 8 28.57
3 EO 4P N+1 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 % 4 EO 2K S-2 -200 28 100.00
5 EO 2KcE = -180 20 71.43
6 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 27 96.43
9 EO 1S N+1 120 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %10 EO 3S W-3 Ajust 16.8 60.00
11 EO 3P S+1 170 11 39.29
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 25 89.29
14 EO 6P W = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 2P S+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 28 100.00
17 EO 2S N-1 -50 23 82.14
18 EO 4C N+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %19 EO 3K N+2 150 16 57.14
20 EO 3K N+2 150 11 39.29
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 5P S = 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %28 EO 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 3C S+2 200 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %31 EO 3S N+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 39.29
33 EO 3S N = 400 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %34 EO 1S W = -90 24 85.71
35 EO 1S E+3 -180 23 82.14
36 EO 2T W-1 100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %37 EO 4PcW = -590 28 100.00
38 EO 3S S = 400 20 71.43
39 EO 3S N-4 -400 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %40 EO 4C N-2 -100 27 96.43
41 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 57.14
42 EO 2C W+1 -140 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %43 EO 4P W = -420 21 75.00
44 EO 3P S-1 -100 22 78.57
45 EO 4C S = 620 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %46 EO 5K E = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 3S W+1 -430 24 85.71
48 EO 4S E+2 -690 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
Total : 740,0 / 1260 = 58,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 COOLEN Joseph -COLLET Claudine
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 1 3.57
2 EO 3C E-1 50 8 28.57
3 EO 4P S+1 450 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 20 71.43
5 EO 2K W = -90 12 42.86
6 EO 3T E+1 -130 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 3P W = -140 0 0.00
9 EO 2K W = -90 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %10 EO 4TcN-2 -500 25.8 92.14
11 EO 4PcS-1 -100 23 82.14
12 EO 40%40% Ajust 11.2 40.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %13 EO 3P N+1 170 2 7.14
14 EO 5K E-1 50 3 10.71
15 EO 2P S+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %16 EO 3P S+2 200 22 78.57
17 EO 3S N-2 -100 27 96.43
18 EO 4C S+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %19 EO 4PcW-3 800 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 1 3.57
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 64.29
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,52 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %25 EO 4P W-1 100 5 17.86
26 EO 1S W = -90 12 42.86
27 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 2C E = -110 19 67.86
33 EO 3S N+2 460 1 3.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %34 EO 1S W = -90 24 85.71
35 EO 2S E = -120 9 32.14
36 EO 2P W-1 100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4C N+2 480 12 42.86
39 EO 3K N-1 -100 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 4C E+3 -710 24 85.71
42 EO 3S W-2 200 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %43 EO 3P W = -140 12 42.86
44 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %46 EO 3S W = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 2P W = -110 11 39.29
48 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 487,0 / 1260 = 38,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 LELEU Eva -HUBERT Christine
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 8 28.57
2 EO 2C E = -110 20 71.43
3 EO 4P S = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 10.71
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 21.43
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 7 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 6 21.43
9 EO 1S S+1 120 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %10 EO 3S W-3 300 1.1 3.93
11 EO 4TcW-3 500 4 14.29
12 EO 3P W = -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 30,12 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 14 50.00
14 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 46.43
15 EO 2P S+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 32.14
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 7.14
18 EO 6C S = 1430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %19 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 85.71
20 EO 3S N = 600 1 3.57
21 EO 1S N = 90 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 1S N = 90 7 25.00
27 EO 2C N+1 140 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %28 EO 2K E = -90 18 64.29
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P N+2 170 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %34 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
35 EO 2S E+2 -180 23 82.14
36 EO 1S E = -90 9 32.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %37 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
38 EO 4C N+1 450 15 53.57
39 EO 4T S-2 -200 16 57.14 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %40 EO 4C N = 420 4 14.29
41 EO 4C E+3 -710 24 85.71
42 EO 2C W+1 -140 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %43 EO 3P W+2 -200 17 60.71
44 EO 3P S = 140 2 7.14
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %46 EO 3S E = -400 15 53.57
47 EO 4P W-1 50 6 21.43
48 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 462,3 / 1260 = 36,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 29 MASSAUX Joel -BRIOT Tanguy
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 8 28.57
2 EO 2C E = -110 20 71.43
3 EO 4P N = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 10.71
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 53.57
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 3P W+2 -200 2 7.14
9 EO 2T E+1 -110 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 %10 EO 3K E-1 100 12.9 46.07
11 EO 4PcS-1 -100 23 82.14
12 EO Pass Ajust 11.2 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,07 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 28.57
14 EO 5K E = -400 6 21.43
15 EO 4P S = 620 6 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %16 EO 3P S+2 200 22 78.57
17 EO 2C N+2 170 9 32.14
18 EO 6C N = 1430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %19 EO 3S S-2 -100 24 85.71
20 EO 1K N+4 150 11 39.29
21 EO 1S N = 90 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 82.14
23 EO 4P N+1 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,81 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %25 EO 5K E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 2C E = -110 20 71.43
27 EO 4C N-1 -50 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %28 EO 3K E = -110 25 89.29
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %31 EO 3S S-2 -200 26 92.86
32 EO 1S N-2 -100 15 53.57
33 EO 4C N = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %37 EO 4C S = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 4C N = 420 18 64.29
39 EO 3S N-1 -100 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 3K E-1 100 11 39.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %43 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 50.00
44 EO 1S S+1 120 4 14.29
45 EO 4C S = 620 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %46 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 14.29
47 EO 4P E-2 100 1 3.57
48 EO 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,95 %
Total : 526,1 / 1260 = 41,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 30 LEDECQ Eric -GHIERCHE Jacques
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 18 64.29
2 EO 4C E-2 100 1 3.57
3 EO 4P S = 420 13 46.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 3 10.71
5 EO 3P N-2 -200 24 85.71
6 EO 3CcS-2 -300 21 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 25 89.29
8 EO 4P E+2 -480 27 96.43
9 EO 1S S-2 -100 25 89.29 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 %10 EO 3S W-3 300 1.1 3.93
11 EO 3TcW-2 300 7 25.00
12 EO 2P W = -110 7.7 27.50 µ Tbl = 18,81 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 28.57
14 EO 6P W = -980 22 78.57
15 EO 2P S+3 200 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %16 EO 2P S+3 200 22 78.57
17 EO 3K S+1 130 16 57.14
18 EO 6C N = 1430 5 17.86 µ Tbl = 51,19 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 5 17.86
20 EO 2S N+1 150 11 39.29
21 EO 3C E = -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %22 EO 4C E = -620 10 35.71
23 EO 6P N-1 -100 27 96.43
24 EO 4C E = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 1S N-2 -200 26 92.86
27 EO 5C N = 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,95 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 25 89.29
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 79,76 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 2C E+1 -140 25 89.29
33 EO 4P S = 420 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 57.14
36 EO 2C S-2 -200 23 82.14 µ Tbl = 63,10 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %40 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 67.86
41 EO 6C E = -1430 28 100.00
42 EO 4T E+1 -150 24 85.71 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %43 EO 4PcW = -590 26 92.86
44 EO 2P S = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 4C S+1 650 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %46 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 89.29
47 EO 4P W = -420 18 64.29
48 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 72,62 %
Total : 730,8 / 1260 = 58,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 31 VELIKOVA Rouja -HRISTOV Petko
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 24 85.71
2 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 53.57
3 EO 6P N-2 -100 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 % 4 EO 3K S-1 -100 24 85.71
5 EO 3K W-1 50 6 21.43
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 3 10.71
8 EO 5P W = -450 17 60.71
9 EO 2C S-1 -50 12 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 %10 EO 4T N-1 -100 19.4 69.29
11 EO 3ScW-5 1100 0 0.00
12 EO 2P W+1 -140 20.2 72.14 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %13 EO 3T W = -110 28 100.00
14 EO 5P W = -450 10 35.71
15 EO 4CcW-3 500 8 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %16 EO 4P S = 420 9 32.14
17 EO 2S S+1 150 12 42.86
18 EO 4C S+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 2 7.14
20 EO 3K N+1 130 21 75.00
21 EO 3C E = -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 5P N = 650 11 39.29
24 EO 4C W-1 50 7 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 15 53.57
27 EO 3S N-3 -150 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %28 EO 3S W-3 150 5 17.86
29 EO 4C N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 2P S+2 170 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 2C W = -110 19 67.86
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %34 EO 3S W-2 100 4 14.29
35 EO 3S W = -600 27 96.43
36 EO 2P W-1 100 3 10.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %37 EO 4C N = 620 8 28.57
38 EO 3PcE-1 200 23 82.14
39 EO 2P E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,90 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %43 EO 4T N = 130 0 0.00
44 EO 2P S = 110 11 39.29
45 EO 4C S = 620 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
8 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 50,27 %46 EO 3S W+1 -430 25 89.29
47 EO 4P W = -420 18 64.29
48 EO 6S W = -1440 28 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,52 %
Total : 643,6 / 1260 = 51,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 32 GROSU Natacha -LEFEVRE Raymond
9 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 37,09 % 1 EO 1S N-3 -150 28 100.00
2 EO 2P S-2 -200 28 100.00
3 EO 4P S+2 480 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
1 MARCHAL Christian -MAYENCE Jean-Philippe : 64,30 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 12 42.86
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 53.57
6 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 44,05 %
10 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,00 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 13 46.43
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 60.71
9 EO 1S N+1 120 2 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
2 DARDENNE Philippe -POLETTO Patrick : 58,84 %10 EO 2P W-1 100 12.9 46.07
11 EO 2P N+2 170 11 39.29
12 EO 2P W-1 50 2.7 9.64 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
11 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 52,58 %13 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 46.43
15 EO 2P N+1 140 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -HENRI Jacques : 54,95 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 17.86
17 EO 2P N+1 140 14 50.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 17 60.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
12 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 50,63 %19 EO 2K N+3 150 16 57.14
20 EO 2P N-1 -100 27 96.43
21 EO 3C E = -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
4 ROOSELEER Dominique -LETENRE Jean-Marie : 39,48 %22 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 7.14
23 EO 2P S+2 170 24 85.71
24 EO 4C W = -420 20 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
13 TERMOLLE Raymond -BOUYEZ José : 42,88 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 21 75.00
26 EO 3K S-2 -200 26 92.86
27 EO 4PcW+1 -690 27 96.43 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
5 TIRMARCHE Quentin -de NICOLAS Bernard : 48,89 %28 EO 2K E = -90 18 64.29
29 EO 4P N = 620 16 57.14
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 26 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
14 LAURENSIS Michèle -PIERARD Simone : 42,77 %31 EO 3S S+1 630 6 21.43
32 EO 3C E = -140 25 89.29
33 EO 2C N+2 170 18 64.29 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 VUYTS Michèle -GERARD Francis : 54,52 %34 EO 3S W-1 50 14 50.00
35 EO 3S W = -600 27 96.43
36 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 67.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,30 %37 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 75.00
38 EO 4PcE-1 200 23 82.14
39 EO 3S N-4 -400 22 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 49,25 %40 EO 3C N = 140 9 32.14
41 EO 4C E+1 -650 8 28.57
42 EO 3S W-2 200 4 14.29 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,64 %46 EO 4K E+1 -150 4 14.29
47 EO 4P W = -420 18 64.29
48 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 689,6 / 1260 = 54,73 %
|
|