|
Tournoi du 06-06-11
1 64,07 3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René
2 57,22 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,37 7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
4 54,07 2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
5 48,52 10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 46,48 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
7 44,63 9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
8 44,44 5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
9 42,78 1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille
10 42,41 6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,41 18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy
2 54,81 17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger
3 53,70 20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 52,41 19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
5 51,67 11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 49,63 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 49,26 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
8 45,00 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
9 43,33 13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
10 42,78 15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard
PAIRE Nr : 1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 % 1 NS 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
2 NS 4C E-3 150 10 55.56
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
5 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 % 7 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 16.67
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %13 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
15 NS 6C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %19 NS 2P E-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
21 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 3C N+1 170 5 27.78
24 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
26 NS 1S W-3 300 16 88.89
27 NS 3P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %28 NS 4C N = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 4K N+2 170 14 77.78
30 NS 4C S-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
2 NS 3T N+2 150 10 55.56
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
5 NS 3P E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 4C N+3 510 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 12 66.67
8 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
9 NS 5KcN-3 -500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %10 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %13 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
15 NS 3S N+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %19 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 0 0.00
21 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33
23 NS 2C N+4 230 11 61.11
24 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %25 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
26 NS 3K W = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %28 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 3C E-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 % 1 NS 6S S = 990 16 88.89
2 NS 1S N+4 210 16 88.89
3 NS 2K N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 6C N+1 1010 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
8 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
11 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00
12 NS 6S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %13 NS 2P S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3C W-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S+2 680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
18 NS 4P E+3 -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %19 NS 3K N-1 -50 10 55.56
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33
23 NS 2C N+4 230 11 61.11
24 NS 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %25 NS 3S S+3 490 17 94.44
26 NS 2PcN+2 1070 18 100.00
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %28 NS 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
29 NS 3K N+2 150 12 66.67
30 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 346,0 / 540 = 64,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
2 NS 1S E-2 100 4 22.22
3 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
5 NS 4PcE-1 100 16 88.89
6 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %10 NS 4T S = 130 16 88.89
11 NS 6S W-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3PcS-2 -300 6 33.33
15 NS 5K S = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %19 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %22 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %25 NS 3S S+3 490 17 94.44
26 NS Pass Passe 10 55.56
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %28 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
2 NS 2P W-1 50 1 5.56
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 8 44.44
5 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
6 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 5P E = -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %10 NS 2T S = 90 6 33.33
11 NS 3S E = -400 11 61.11
12 NS 5K E+2 -440 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %16 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 2S S = 120 15 83.33
18 NS 4P E = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %19 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
20 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %22 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 2C N+4 230 11 61.11
24 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 2PcN-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %28 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
30 NS 4T S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
2 NS 4T N = 130 6 33.33
3 NS 2K S+1 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
5 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 5K N-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %10 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
11 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %13 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
15 NS 3S N+3 690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 6P E-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %22 NS 2C N+2 170 2 11.11
23 NS 3C N+3 230 11 61.11
24 NS 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56
27 NS 2K S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %28 NS 2K N+2 130 4 22.22
29 NS 3P E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 2P E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
2 NS 3T N+3 170 14 77.78
3 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
5 NS 5KcS-1 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 4C W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %10 NS 3K N+1 130 16 88.89
11 NS 5C E-1 50 16 88.89
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
15 NS 3S S+3 690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %19 NS 3T W-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %22 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 3K N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %25 NS 2S S+4 240 3 16.67
26 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 %28 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 2PcE-2 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 1 NS 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
2 NS 4T N+1 150 10 55.56
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
8 NS 4TcE-4 800 18 100.00
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 %10 NS 3T S+1 130 16 88.89
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 16.67
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %13 NS 1S E-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 18 100.00
15 NS 5C N+1 680 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %19 NS 3C S-4 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 3C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %25 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
26 NS 1S S+2 150 12 66.67
27 NS 2P N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %28 NS 4C N = 620 12 66.67
29 NS 3P E-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 2PcE-2 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 % 1 NS 6S S = 990 16 88.89
2 NS 2C W-1 50 1 5.56
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
5 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 18 100.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 4PcE+1 -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %10 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
11 NS 3S W = -400 11 61.11
12 NS 6K E+1 -940 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %13 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22
15 NS 4S N+2 690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %16 NS 2P N = 110 18 100.00
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %19 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
20 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %22 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
23 NS 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %25 NS 2S S+4 240 3 16.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 8 44.44
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %28 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 1 NS 6S S = 990 16 88.89
2 NS 4TcN+1 910 18 100.00
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard : 42,78 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4C N+2 480 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,26 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44
8 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33
9 NS 5P E = -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne : 52,41 %10 NS 3T S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 5S E = -460 6 33.33
12 NS 5K E+1 -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy : 57,41 %13 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22
15 NS 5C N = 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger : 54,81 %16 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+2 -480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 43,33 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 13 72.22
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 6 33.33
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 45,00 %22 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 51,67 %25 NS 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
26 NS 2S E = -120 1 5.56
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 53,70 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
30 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
2 EO 4C E-3 150 8 44.44
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 6C N+1 1010 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 6 33.33
8 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
9 EO 5KcN-3 -500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %10 EO 2T S = 90 12 66.67
11 EO 3S E = -400 7 38.89
12 EO 5K E+2 -440 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %13 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
15 EO 3S N+3 690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %19 EO 3C S-4 -200 18 100.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %22 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
26 EO 2S E = -120 17 94.44
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %28 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 % 1 EO 6S S = 990 2 11.11
2 EO 1S N+4 210 2 11.11
3 EO 2K N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
5 EO 3P E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 4C N+3 510 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 % 7 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %10 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
15 EO 3S S+3 690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %19 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
20 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %22 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %25 EO 3S S+3 490 1 5.56
26 EO Pass Passe 8 44.44
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %28 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00
30 EO 4T S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
2 EO 3T N+2 150 8 44.44
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
5 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
8 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %10 EO 3K N+1 130 2 11.11
11 EO 5C E-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %13 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
15 EO 5C N+1 680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %16 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %22 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 17 94.44
24 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 2PcN-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %28 EO 2K N+2 130 14 77.78
29 EO 3P E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 2P E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 % 1 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
2 EO 4T N+1 150 8 44.44
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
5 EO 4C N-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 5P E = -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %10 EO 4T S = 130 2 11.11
11 EO 6S W-1 50 2 11.11
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %13 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 9 50.00
15 EO 3S N+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %16 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 2S S = 120 3 16.67
18 EO 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %19 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 44.44
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %22 EO 2C N+2 170 16 88.89
23 EO 3C N+3 230 7 38.89
24 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %25 EO 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
26 EO 1S W-3 300 2 11.11
27 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %28 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 2PcE-2 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CAMUS Colette -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 1 EO 6S S = 990 2 11.11
2 EO 2C W-1 50 17 94.44
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %10 EO 3T S+1 130 2 11.11
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 15 83.33
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 5 27.78
20 EO 6P E-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67
23 EO 2C N+4 230 7 38.89
24 EO 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %25 EO 2S S+4 240 15 83.33
26 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %28 EO 4C N = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 4K N+2 170 4 22.22
30 EO 4C S-5 -250 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 % 1 EO 6S S = 990 2 11.11
2 EO 4TcN+1 910 0 0.00
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
5 EO 4PcE-1 100 2 11.11
6 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 5P E = -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 83.33
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %13 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78
15 EO 4S N+2 690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %19 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 18 100.00
21 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %22 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 3K N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %25 EO 3S S+3 490 1 5.56
26 EO 2PcN+2 1070 0 0.00
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %28 EO 4C N = 620 6 33.33
29 EO 3P E-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 2PcE-2 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de WASSEIGE Claude -ARICKX Roger
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
2 EO 1S E-2 100 14 77.78
3 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 10 55.56
5 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
6 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 5K N-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %10 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
11 EO 3S W = -400 7 38.89
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %13 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
15 EO 6C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 %19 EO 3T W-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67
23 EO 2C N+4 230 7 38.89
24 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %25 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
26 EO 1S S+2 150 6 33.33
27 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %28 EO 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
29 EO 3K N+2 150 6 33.33
30 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 SALFI Huguette -CASSART Guy
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
2 EO 2P W-1 50 17 94.44
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
5 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 4C N+2 480 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
11 EO 6S W = -990 18 100.00
12 EO 6S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %13 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78
15 EO 5C N = 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %16 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %19 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 66.67
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 3C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %25 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
26 EO 3K W = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %28 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -MACAUX Lucienne
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
2 EO 4T N = 130 12 66.67
3 EO 2K S+1 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
5 EO 5KcS-1 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56
8 EO 4TcE-4 800 0 0.00
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %10 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 5S E = -460 12 66.67
12 EO 5K E+1 -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %13 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 3C W-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S+2 680 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %19 EO 2P E-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
21 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %22 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
23 EO 2C N+4 230 7 38.89
24 EO 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 %25 EO 2S S+4 240 15 83.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 10 55.56
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %28 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 3C E-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
7 WARNIER François -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 55,37 % 1 EO 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
2 EO 3T N+3 170 4 22.22
3 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,22 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 GELISSEN Edouard -VERBOIS Léon : 44,63 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67
9 EO 4PcE+1 -990 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 54,07 %10 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 6K E+1 -940 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 46,48 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
14 EO 3PcS-2 -300 12 66.67
15 EO 5K S = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 NELIS Claude -LAENENS René : 64,07 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
18 EO 4P E+3 -510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 44,44 %19 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
20 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 STEED Adrian -LEGROS Mireille : 42,78 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
23 EO 3C N+1 170 13 72.22
24 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 42,41 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44
27 EO 2K S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,52 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
30 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
|
|