|
Tournoi du 06-07-09
Duplicate du Lu 6 juillet 2009
1 60,65 1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
2 58,80 2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
3 56,94 9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
4 56,02 8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis
5 49,77 7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia
6 48,38 6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 48,15 3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga
8 45,37 4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
9 43,29 5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
10 32,64 10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,12 11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette
2 57,71 13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph
3 55,00 18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
4 53,75 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 51,67 15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
6 49,17 17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
7 46,46 19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean
8 41,88 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS
9 36,25 14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
10 0,00 20 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 43.75
2 NS 3S E = -400 3 18.75
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 4 25.00
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 14 87.50
6 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 14 87.50
8 NS 2C E-2 100 13 81.25
9 NS 3S S+3 490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %10 NS 2C E+3 -200 12 75.00
11 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50
12 NS 5CcE-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 68.75
14 NS 3C N-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 2P S = 110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 4KcN-1 -100 7 43.75
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %19 NS 1S S+4 210 13 81.25
20 NS 4K N = 130 9 56.25
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
20 - : 0,00 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 13 81.25
27 NS 3S E-3 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %28 NS 5KcN-3 -800 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75
30 NS 5TcE-3 500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 262,0 / 432 = 60,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 % 1 NS 6S S = 990 16 100.00
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 13 81.25
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 1P E+4 -200 14 87.50
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 % 7 NS 2P E = -110 2 12.50
8 NS 2P W-2 100 13 81.25
9 NS 3S S+1 430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 - : 0,00 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 15 93.75
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 62.50
15 NS 1S E-2 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 4KcN-1 -100 7 43.75
18 NS 1ScN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %19 NS 3T S+2 150 5 31.25
20 NS 4K N = 130 9 56.25
21 NS 4P W = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 10 62.50
23 NS 3S E-1 100 9 56.25
24 NS 2S E-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
27 NS 3T E-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %28 NS 6C E-1 50 12 75.00
29 NS 4C S+1 650 16 100.00
30 NS 3P N = 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 43.75
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 10 62.50
3 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75
6 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 2P W = -110 1 6.25
9 NS 2S S = 120 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %10 NS 6C W-1 100 15 93.75
11 NS 6C N-2 -100 1 6.25
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 62.50
15 NS 3K E = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
20 - : 0,00 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %19 NS 2S S+1 150 5 31.25
20 NS 4K S = 130 9 56.25
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %22 NS 1P N+1 110 14 87.50
23 NS 5K E-2 200 15 93.75
24 NS 4K W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 2C E = -110 6 37.50
27 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %28 NS 6C E-1 50 12 75.00
29 NS 4C S = 620 14 87.50
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 208,0 / 432 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 % 1 NS 4C N+1 450 2 12.50
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 % 7 NS 2C W-2 200 16 100.00
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 31.25
9 NS 5K N = 400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %10 NS 4CcW+1 -990 0 0.00
11 NS 3S N+3 490 16 100.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 4P W-1 50 12 75.00
18 NS 1S W+3 -180 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %19 NS 5T N = 400 16 100.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %22 NS 1S W-3 300 16 100.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 4 25.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50
27 NS 3S W-3 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %28 NS 5C W = -450 4 25.00
29 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 196,0 / 432 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 % 1 NS 4C N+3 510 12 75.00
2 NS 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 % 4 NS 3K W-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 4P E = -420 9 56.25
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 31.25
9 NS 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %10 NS 5C E-1 100 15 93.75
11 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50
12 NS 5C E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50
14 NS 2K N-2 -100 4 25.00
15 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 3S E-3 150 16 100.00
18 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
20 - : 0,00 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 4C W = -620 2 12.50
24 NS 3S E-3 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %25 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50
27 NS 3S E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %28 NS 6C E-1 50 12 75.00
29 NS 2P N+1 140 5 31.25
30 NS 6C E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 187,0 / 432 = 43,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 7 43.75
2 NS 3S E = -400 3 18.75
3 NS 4C W = -620 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 2P E+3 -200 14 87.50
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 11 68.75
8 NS 2P W = -110 1 6.25
9 NS 3S S+1 430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %10 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 12.50
11 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50
12 NS 5C E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 6.25
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 10 62.50
15 NS 2C W = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 4P E-1 50 12 75.00
18 NS 1S N-3 -300 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %19 NS 1S S+4 210 13 81.25
20 NS 4P E-2 200 14 87.50
21 NS 4P W = -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 3S E-2 200 15 93.75
24 NS 3S E-3 150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
20 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %28 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 25.00
29 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 12.50
30 NS 3P N = 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 209,0 / 432 = 48,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia
20 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 4P E = -420 9 56.25
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 1S N = 90 10 62.50
9 NS 2S S+3 210 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %10 NS 4C W = -620 7 43.75
11 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50
12 NS 5C E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 68.75
14 NS 2T W = -90 6 37.50
15 NS 2C W = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %16 NS 3C W-2 200 16 100.00
17 NS 3P W = -140 3 18.75
18 NS 2T W+2 -130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %19 NS 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E-1 100 3 18.75
21 NS 4P W = -420 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %22 NS 3P N-2 -100 1 6.25
23 NS 6P E-1 100 9 56.25
24 NS 3K W-1 50 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
27 NS 3S W-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 %28 NS 5C W = -450 4 25.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 11 68.75
30 NS 2P N+1 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 215,0 / 432 = 49,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 % 1 NS 5C N+1 480 7 43.75
2 NS 5T W-1 50 16 100.00
3 NS 4K W+1 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
20 - : 0,00 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 37.50
8 NS 2K W-1 50 8 50.00
9 NS 3S S+1 430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 %10 NS 4C E = -620 7 43.75
11 NS 6C N-2 -100 1 6.25
12 NS 4C W = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 15 93.75
14 NS 2C S = 110 15 93.75
15 NS 2C W = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 3P E = -140 3 18.75
18 NS 2C E = -110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %19 NS 3T S+2 150 5 31.25
20 NS 4PcW-2 500 16 100.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %22 NS 3PcN-1 -100 1 6.25
23 NS 3S E-1 100 9 56.25
24 NS 3CcS-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %25 NS 4P N+2 480 16 100.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 16 100.00
27 NS 3S W-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %28 NS 6C W-1 50 12 75.00
29 NS 3C S+1 170 8 50.00
30 NS 3P N = 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 242,0 / 432 = 56,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 % 1 NS 6C N = 980 14 87.50
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 13 81.25
3 NS 3K W+3 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 68.75
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75
6 NS 4P N-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
20 - : 0,00 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %10 NS 4C W = -620 7 43.75
11 NS 4C N = 420 10 62.50
12 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50
14 NS 2P N = 110 15 93.75
15 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 11 68.75
17 NS 4KcN-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E+3 -180 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %19 NS 1S S+3 180 10 62.50
20 NS 4K N = 130 9 56.25
21 NS 3S W = -400 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 10 62.50
23 NS 4C W-1 100 9 56.25
24 NS 4PcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 13 81.25
27 NS 2S W-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %28 NS 6C W-1 50 12 75.00
29 NS 2P N+1 140 5 31.25
30 NS 3P N+1 170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 246,0 / 432 = 56,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,75 % 1 NS 6K N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 2PcS-1 -200 6 37.50
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 51,67 % 4 NS 2P S-3 -300 2 12.50
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 3 18.75
6 NS 4C W = -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,25 % 7 NS 2P E-1 100 11 68.75
8 NS 1S N+1 120 16 100.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean : 46,46 %10 NS 4C W = -620 7 43.75
11 NS 6C N-1 -50 4 25.00
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 55,00 %13 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 6.25
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50
15 NS 2C W = -110 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René : 49,17 %16 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 75.00
18 NS 3C N-4 -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 57,71 %19 NS 3T S+2 150 5 31.25
20 NS 3P E-1 100 3 18.75
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 41,88 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 10 62.50
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
24 NS 2K W = -90 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette : 58,12 %25 NS 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 12.50
27 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
20 - : 0,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 141,0 / 432 = 32,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 REGNIER Franz -SALFI Huguette
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 9 56.25
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 81.25
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 16 100.00
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25
6 EO 4PcN-4 -800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 % 7 EO 2P E = -110 14 87.50
8 EO 2P W-2 100 3 18.75
9 EO 3S S+1 430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %10 EO 5C E-1 100 1 6.25
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50
12 EO 5C E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 93.75
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 37.50
15 EO 2C W = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %16 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 3P W = -140 13 81.25
18 EO 2T W+2 -130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %19 EO 3T S+2 150 11 68.75
20 EO 4PcW-2 500 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 6 37.50
23 EO 4C W-1 100 7 43.75
24 EO 4PcS-4 -800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50
27 EO 3S E = -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %28 EO 5C W = -450 12 75.00
29 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 100.00
30 EO 3P N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 279,0 / 480 = 58,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 9 56.25
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 37.50
3 EO 3K W+1 -130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 1P E+4 -200 2 12.50
6 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 2 12.50
8 EO 2C E-2 100 3 18.75
9 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %10 EO 4C W+1 -650 14 87.50
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50
12 EO 5C E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %13 EO 1S E = -90 5 31.25
14 EO 2T W = -90 10 62.50
15 EO 2C W = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 3P E = -140 13 81.25
18 EO 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %19 EO 1S S+3 180 6 37.50
20 EO 4K N = 130 7 43.75
21 EO 3S W = -400 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 6 37.50
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 100.00
24 EO 2K W = -90 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50
27 EO 3S W-3 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %28 EO 6C E-1 50 4 25.00
29 EO 2P N+1 140 11 68.75
30 EO 6C E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 201,0 / 480 = 41,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COLLET Edgard -PIETQUIN Joseph
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 % 1 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 3 18.75
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 12 75.00
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 2 12.50
6 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 2P W = -110 15 93.75
9 EO 2S S = 120 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %10 EO 4C W = -620 9 56.25
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50
12 EO 5C E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 1 6.25
14 EO 2C S = 110 1 6.25
15 EO 2C W = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 4KcN-2 -300 16 100.00
18 EO 1S E+3 -180 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %19 EO 3T S+2 150 11 68.75
20 EO 3P E-1 100 13 81.25
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %22 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 12 75.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %25 EO 6P N-2 -100 16 100.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50
27 EO 3S E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %28 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 75.00
29 EO 3C S-1 -100 14 87.50
30 EO 3P N = 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 277,0 / 480 = 57,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 % 1 EO 5C N+1 480 9 56.25
2 EO 5T W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 4K W+1 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25
6 EO 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 5 31.25
8 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %10 EO 4CcW+1 -990 16 100.00
11 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 1 6.25
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 37.50
15 EO 1S E-2 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 1S N-2 -200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %19 EO 2S S+1 150 11 68.75
20 EO 4K S = 130 7 43.75
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 3S E-2 200 1 6.25
24 EO 3S E-3 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 3 18.75
27 EO 3S E-3 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %28 EO 5C W = -450 12 75.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 5 31.25
30 EO 2P N+1 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 174,0 / 480 = 36,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 % 1 EO 6C N = 980 2 12.50
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 3 18.75
3 EO 3K W+3 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 % 4 EO 2P S-3 -300 14 87.50
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25
6 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 % 7 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 68.75
9 EO 5K N = 400 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %10 EO 4C E = -620 9 56.25
11 EO 6C N-2 -100 15 93.75
12 EO 4C W = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50
14 EO 2K N-2 -100 12 75.00
15 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %16 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 4KcN-1 -100 9 56.25
18 EO 1ScN-3 -800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %19 EO 1S S+4 210 3 18.75
20 EO 4P E-2 200 2 12.50
21 EO 4P W = -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %22 EO 1P N+1 110 2 12.50
23 EO 5K E-2 200 1 6.25
24 EO 4K W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
27 EO 3S W-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %28 EO 5KcN-3 -800 16 100.00
29 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25
30 EO 5TcE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 248,0 / 480 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 % 1 EO 6K N-3 -150 16 100.00
2 EO 2PcS-1 -200 10 62.50
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25
6 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 100.00
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 68.75
9 EO 3T S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %10 EO 2C E+3 -200 4 25.00
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50
12 EO 5CcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50
14 EO 2P N = 110 1 6.25
15 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %16 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 4P E-1 50 4 25.00
18 EO 1S N-3 -300 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %19 EO 3T S+2 150 11 68.75
20 EO 4K N = 130 7 43.75
21 EO 4P W = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %22 EO 3P N-2 -100 15 93.75
23 EO 6P E-1 100 7 43.75
24 EO 3K W-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 2C E = -110 10 62.50
27 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %28 EO 6C W-1 50 4 25.00
29 EO 3C S+1 170 8 50.00
30 EO 3P N = 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 258,0 / 480 = 53,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 LAENENS René -CHANTRAINE René
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 % 1 EO 4C N+1 450 14 87.50
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 % 4 EO 3K W-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 4P E = -420 7 43.75
6 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 % 7 EO 2P E-1 100 5 31.25
8 EO 2P W = -110 15 93.75
9 EO 3S S+1 430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %10 EO 4C W = -620 9 56.25
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 37.50
12 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %13 EO 1S E = -90 5 31.25
14 EO 3C N-3 -150 16 100.00
15 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %16 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 4 25.00
18 EO 3C N-4 -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 %19 EO 5T N-1 -50 16 100.00
20 EO 4P E-1 100 13 81.25
21 EO 4P W = -420 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 6 37.50
23 EO 3S E-1 100 7 43.75
24 EO 2S E-1 50 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %25 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00
27 EO 3S W-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %28 EO 6C E-1 50 4 25.00
29 EO 4C S = 620 2 12.50
30 EO 4P N = 420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 236,0 / 480 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 % 1 EO 4C N+3 510 4 25.00
2 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 50.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 2P E+3 -200 2 12.50
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 1S N = 90 6 37.50
9 EO 2S S+3 210 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %10 EO 6C W-1 100 1 6.25
11 EO 6C N-2 -100 15 93.75
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %13 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 93.75
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 87.50
15 EO 2C W = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 100.00
17 EO 4KcN-1 -100 9 56.25
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %19 EO 5T N = 400 0 0.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 100.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 %22 EO 3PcN-1 -100 15 93.75
23 EO 3S E-1 100 7 43.75
24 EO 3CcS-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
27 EO 3T E-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %28 EO 6C W-1 50 4 25.00
29 EO 2P N+1 140 11 68.75
30 EO 3P N+1 170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 264,0 / 480 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CAMUS Colette -PETIT Jean
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 9 56.25
2 EO 3S E = -400 13 81.25
3 EO 4C W = -620 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 5 31.25
5 EO 4P E = -420 7 43.75
6 EO 4C W = -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 10 62.50
8 EO 2K W-1 50 8 50.00
9 EO 3S S+1 430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %10 EO 4C W = -620 9 56.25
11 EO 6C N-1 -50 12 75.00
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 6 37.50
15 EO 3K E = -110 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 5 31.25
17 EO 4P W-1 50 4 25.00
18 EO 1S W+3 -180 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %19 EO 1S S+4 210 3 18.75
20 EO 4K N = 130 7 43.75
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 4C W = -620 14 87.50
24 EO 3S E-3 150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 %25 EO 4P N = 420 8 50.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 3 18.75
27 EO 2S W-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %28 EO 6C E-1 50 4 25.00
29 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
30 EO 3P N = 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 223,0 / 480 = 46,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 -
7 BOUVY Claire -VANDERBISSE Julia : 49,77 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 56,02 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 56,94 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 58,80 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 ARRICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 45,37 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 NIGOT Pierre -ROGIERS Marga : 48,15 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 43,29 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 60,65 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 48,38 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -MATELART Marc : 32,64 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
|
|