|
Tournoi du 06-08-12
1 69,05 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,93 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
3 50,60 4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
4 48,51 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 46,43 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
6 39,88 5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
7 36,61 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,99 14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
2 55,65 12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
3 52,98 11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 50,89 13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM
5 45,54 9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
6 40,48 8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit
~ 40,48 10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 % 1 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 16.67
2 NS 3P N = 140 12 100.00
3 NS 4C N+1 450 8 66.67
4 NS 3P W-2 200 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 % 5 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS Pass Passe 10 83.33
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 58.33
8 NS 5KcE-2 300 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 % 9 NS 3S S+3 490 12 100.00
10 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 66.67
11 NS 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 %13 NS 3CcN-1 -200 2 16.67
14 NS 3K S = 110 3 25.00
15 NS 4T S+1 150 10 83.33
16 NS 4P N+1 450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 %17 NS 4T E-2 100 9 75.00
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 50.00
19 NS 4P S+1 450 5 41.67
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 %21 NS 2ScE = -490 2 16.67
22 NS 2C S = 110 9 75.00
23 NS 6S W-3 300 12 100.00
24 NS 4P N-3 -150 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 %25 NS 3PcS-1 -100 5 41.67
26 NS 5C E-1 100 11 91.67
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 66.67
28 NS 3ScW-2 300 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 198,0 / 336 = 58,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 % 1 NS 2T S-1 -50 7 58.33
2 NS 4TcE-1 100 9 75.00
3 NS 4PcW-2 500 10 83.33
4 NS 2P W-1 100 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 % 5 NS 3C N = 140 4 33.33
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 58.33
7 NS 4P E-2 200 12 100.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 % 9 NS 3T N+2 150 0 0.00
10 NS 1S W-1 100 12 100.00
11 NS 3K N+1 130 10 83.33
12 NS 1S E = -90 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 %13 NS 2S E = -120 8 66.67
14 NS 2P E-5 250 12 100.00
15 NS 2C S+1 140 7 58.33
16 NS 3S S+1 430 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 %17 NS 2K S+1 110 12 100.00
18 NS 3C N = 140 12 100.00
19 NS 3S N+4 520 12 100.00
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 %21 NS 2S E-4 200 12 100.00
22 NS 5TcE-2 500 12 100.00
23 NS 5S E+2 -720 8 66.67
24 NS 2P N = 110 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 %25 NS 3P S-1 -50 8 66.67
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 16.67
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 66.67
28 NS 3S E-1 50 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 232,0 / 336 = 69,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 % 1 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 16.67
2 NS 4C W-1 50 5 41.67
3 NS 4P E-2 200 6 50.00
4 NS 2P W = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 % 5 NS 2C N+2 170 10 83.33
6 NS 1S E = -90 2 16.67
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 25.00
8 NS 5KcE-3 500 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 % 9 NS 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 NS 2K W = -90 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 16.67
14 NS 3C N+2 200 10 83.33
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 16.67
16 NS 3S S+1 430 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 %17 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 33.33
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 75.00
19 NS 4P S+1 450 5 41.67
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 %21 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 50.00
22 NS 2P N-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 6K E = -1370 5 41.67
24 NS 4P N-3 -150 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 16.67
27 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 16.67
28 NS 3S E = -400 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
Total : 123,0 / 336 = 36,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 10 83.33
2 NS 4C W = -420 2 16.67
3 NS 5K S-1 -50 2 16.67
4 NS 2P E = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 % 5 NS 2C N+2 170 10 83.33
6 NS 1S E-1 100 12 100.00
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 25.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 % 9 NS 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 NS 3C W = -140 4 33.33
11 NS 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 NS 2K W+2 -130 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 %13 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 50.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 6 50.00
15 NS 2C S+1 140 7 58.33
16 NS 4P N+1 450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 %17 NS 4K S-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 75.00
19 NS 4P S+3 510 10 83.33
20 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 %21 NS 3S E-2 100 10 83.33
22 NS 3T E+1 -130 3 25.00
23 NS 6S E = -1440 2 16.67
24 NS 2P N = 110 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 %25 NS 5T W-2 200 12 100.00
26 NS 4C E = -620 7 58.33
27 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
28 NS 2T E-2 100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 % 1 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 16.67
2 NS 3T E-2 100 9 75.00
3 NS 5K S-1 -50 2 16.67
4 NS 3P W-1 100 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 % 5 NS 2C N+1 140 4 33.33
6 NS 1S E = -90 2 16.67
7 NS 3S W-1 100 10 83.33
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 % 9 NS 3S N+2 460 6 50.00
10 NS 3C W = -140 4 33.33
11 NS 3T N-1 -50 2 16.67
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 2 16.67
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 4PcW-3 500 12 100.00
16 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 %17 NS 1T E+1 -90 2 16.67
18 NS 3CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
19 NS 4P N+1 450 5 41.67
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 %21 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 33.33
22 NS 3T E+1 -130 3 25.00
23 NS 6K E = -1370 5 41.67
24 NS 2P N = 110 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 10 83.33
26 NS 5C E-1 100 11 91.67
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 66.67
28 NS 3S E = -400 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 134,0 / 336 = 39,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 % 1 NS 2T S-1 -50 7 58.33
2 NS 4C W-1 50 5 41.67
3 NS 5K S-1 -50 2 16.67
4 NS 3S S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 % 5 NS 2C N+2 170 10 83.33
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 58.33
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 58.33
8 NS 3PcS+1 630 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 % 9 NS 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 33.33
11 NS 2C N+1 140 12 100.00
12 NS 3K E = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 %13 NS 3T E-2 200 12 100.00
14 NS 1P N+3 170 8 66.67
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
16 NS 3S S+2 460 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 %17 NS 4T E-2 100 9 75.00
18 NS 3K W+2 -150 2 16.67
19 NS 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 %21 NS 3TcE+1 -570 0 0.00
22 NS 2C S = 110 9 75.00
23 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 41.67
26 NS 4C E = -620 7 58.33
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 66.67
28 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM : 50,89 % 1 NS 2T S = 90 12 100.00
2 NS 4PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
3 NS 5CcN = 650 12 100.00
4 NS 3S N-3 -300 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 55,65 % 5 NS 3C S = 140 4 33.33
6 NS 2K E = -90 2 16.67
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
8 NS 5TcW-2 300 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,98 % 9 NS 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 NS 1S W = -90 10 83.33
11 NS 4TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 40,48 %13 NS 3C N = 140 10 83.33
14 NS 2K S+1 110 3 25.00
15 NS 3T S+1 130 4 33.33
16 NS 3S S+2 460 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,54 %17 NS 2K S = 90 6 50.00
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 33.33
19 NS 4P S+1 450 5 41.67
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit : 40,48 %21 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 66.67
22 NS 4T E-1 100 6 50.00
23 NS 2K E+4 -170 10 83.33
24 NS 4P N = 420 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 63,99 %25 NS 3S E = -600 2 16.67
26 NS 5C E = -650 2 16.67
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 66.67
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CLERIN François-Xavier -SPELLANZON Benoit
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 % 1 EO 2P N-2 -100 10 83.33
2 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
3 EO 4C N+1 450 4 33.33
4 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 % 5 EO 2C N+1 140 8 66.67
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 83.33
7 EO 3S W-1 100 2 16.67
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 % 9 EO 3T N+2 150 12 100.00
10 EO 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 3K N+1 130 2 16.67
12 EO 1S E = -90 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 %13 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 1P N+3 170 4 33.33
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 12 100.00
16 EO 3S S+2 460 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 %17 EO 3C N-1 -50 8 66.67
18 EO 3K W-1 50 3 25.00
19 EO 4P S+1 450 7 58.33
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 %21 EO 2P N-1 -100 4 33.33
22 EO 4T E-1 100 6 50.00
23 EO 2K E+4 -170 2 16.67
24 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 %25 EO 5T W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4C E = -620 5 41.67
27 EO 4P W = -420 12 100.00
28 EO 2T E-2 100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 136,0 / 336 = 40,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 % 1 EO 1S S-2 -100 10 83.33
2 EO 3T E-2 100 3 25.00
3 EO 5K S-1 -50 10 83.33
4 EO 3P W-1 100 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 % 5 EO 3C N = 140 8 66.67
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 5 41.67
7 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 % 9 EO 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 66.67
11 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 10 83.33
14 EO 3C N+2 200 2 16.67
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 83.33
16 EO 3S S+1 430 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 %17 EO 2K S = 90 6 50.00
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 66.67
19 EO 4P S+1 450 7 58.33
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 %21 EO 3S E-2 100 2 16.67
22 EO 3T E+1 -130 9 75.00
23 EO 6S E = -1440 10 83.33
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 %25 EO 3PcS-1 -100 7 58.33
26 EO 5C E-1 100 1 8.33
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 33.33
28 EO 3ScW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 153,0 / 336 = 45,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 % 1 EO 2T S-1 -50 5 41.67
2 EO 4TcE-1 100 3 25.00
3 EO 4PcW-2 500 2 16.67
4 EO 2P W-1 100 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 % 5 EO 2C N+2 170 2 16.67
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 5 41.67
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 41.67
8 EO 3PcS+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 % 9 EO 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 EO 3P N-2 -200 12 100.00
11 EO 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 EO 2K W = -90 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 %13 EO 3C N = 140 2 16.67
14 EO 2K S+1 110 9 75.00
15 EO 3T S+1 130 8 66.67
16 EO 3S S+2 460 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 %17 EO 4K S-2 -100 12 100.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 3 25.00
19 EO 4P S+3 510 2 16.67
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 %21 EO 2ScE = -490 10 83.33
22 EO 2C S = 110 3 25.00
23 EO 6S W-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 4P N-3 -150 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 2 16.67
26 EO 5C E-1 100 1 8.33
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 33.33
28 EO 3S E = -400 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 136,0 / 336 = 40,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 % 1 EO 2T S-1 -50 5 41.67
2 EO 4C W-1 50 7 58.33
3 EO 5K S-1 -50 10 83.33
4 EO 3S S-4 -400 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 % 5 EO 2C N+2 170 2 16.67
6 EO 1S E = -90 10 83.33
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 75.00
8 EO 5KcE-3 500 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 % 9 EO 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 EO 1S W = -90 2 16.67
11 EO 4TcN-4 -800 12 100.00
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 %13 EO 2S E+1 -150 6 50.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 6 50.00
15 EO 2C S+1 140 5 41.67
16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 %17 EO 4T E-2 100 3 25.00
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 50.00
19 EO 4P S+1 450 7 58.33
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 %21 EO 3T W+1 -130 8 66.67
22 EO 3T E+1 -130 9 75.00
23 EO 6K E = -1370 7 58.33
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 %25 EO 3P S-1 -50 4 33.33
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 83.33
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 33.33
28 EO 3S E-1 50 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 178,0 / 336 = 52,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 % 1 EO 2P N-2 -100 10 83.33
2 EO 4C W-1 50 7 58.33
3 EO 4P E-2 200 6 50.00
4 EO 2P W = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 % 5 EO 3C S = 140 8 66.67
6 EO 2K E = -90 10 83.33
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 100.00
8 EO 5TcW-2 300 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 % 9 EO 3S S+2 460 6 50.00
10 EO 3C W = -140 8 66.67
11 EO 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 EO 2K W+2 -130 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 %13 EO 3CcN-1 -200 10 83.33
14 EO 3K S = 110 9 75.00
15 EO 4T S+1 150 2 16.67
16 EO 4P N+1 450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 %17 EO 1T E+1 -90 10 83.33
18 EO 3CcN-1 -200 12 100.00
19 EO 4P N+1 450 7 58.33
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 %21 EO 2S E-4 200 0 0.00
22 EO 5TcE-2 500 0 0.00
23 EO 5S E+2 -720 4 33.33
24 EO 2P N = 110 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 7 58.33
26 EO 4C E = -620 5 41.67
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 33.33
28 EO 1S E+2 -150 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 187,0 / 336 = 55,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 LAENENS René -VAN GYSEGHEM
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 % 1 EO 2T S = 90 0 0.00
2 EO 4PcN-2 -500 12 100.00
3 EO 5CcN = 650 0 0.00
4 EO 3S N-3 -300 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 % 5 EO 2C N+2 170 2 16.67
6 EO 1S E-1 100 0 0.00
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 75.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 % 9 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
10 EO 3P N-1 -100 4 33.33
11 EO 2C S = 110 6 50.00
12 EO 3K E = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 10 83.33
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 100.00
15 EO 4PcW-3 500 0 0.00
16 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 %17 EO 2K S+1 110 0 0.00
18 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
19 EO 3S N+4 520 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E+3 -690 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 %21 EO 3TcE+1 -570 12 100.00
22 EO 2C S = 110 3 25.00
23 EO 6S E+1 -1470 12 100.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 100.00
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 83.33
27 EO 2P W+2 -170 10 83.33
28 EO 3S E = -400 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
4 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,60 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 2 16.67
2 EO 4C W = -420 10 83.33
3 EO 5K S-1 -50 10 83.33
4 EO 2P E = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 58,93 % 5 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 100.00
6 EO Pass Passe 2 16.67
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 41.67
8 EO 5KcE-2 300 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 39,88 % 9 EO 3S N+2 460 6 50.00
10 EO 3C W = -140 8 66.67
11 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 83.33
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 69,05 %13 EO 2S E = -120 4 33.33
14 EO 2P E-5 250 0 0.00
15 EO 2C S+1 140 5 41.67
16 EO 3S S+1 430 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,51 %17 EO 4T E-2 100 3 25.00
18 EO 3K W+2 -150 10 83.33
19 EO 3S N+1 430 12 100.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 36,61 %21 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 50.00
22 EO 2P N-4 -200 12 100.00
23 EO 6K E = -1370 7 58.33
24 EO 4P N-3 -150 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 46,43 %25 EO 3S E = -600 10 83.33
26 EO 5C E = -650 10 83.33
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 33.33
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 215,0 / 336 = 63,99 %
|
|