|
Tournoi du 06-09-10
1 59,07 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
2 58,70 2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 56,85 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 55,74 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
5 54,07 5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
6 47,96 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
7 46,67 10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
8 46,30 7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
9 40,56 4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
10 34,07 3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,26 15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
2 57,59 18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
3 50,37 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
~ 50,37 11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
5 49,63 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
6 49,26 13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
~ 49,26 19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 48,52 20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
9 47,41 16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
10 38,33 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 % 1 NS 4K E-4 200 14 77.78
2 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 16 88.89
6 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 % 7 NS 5KcE-1 200 16 88.89
8 NS 2C W-3 150 12 66.67
9 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %10 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 77.78
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C W = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
14 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %16 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
17 NS 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
18 NS 6T S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %19 NS 4T W+1 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 11 61.11
21 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %22 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 2P S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %25 NS 5PcN = 650 18 100.00
26 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 % 1 NS 3KcE-1 100 10 55.56
2 NS 1S E-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 % 4 NS 6S N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89
6 NS 4C S+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 % 7 NS 5KcE = -750 2 11.11
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %13 NS 3T N-3 -300 1 5.56
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %16 NS 3P W = -140 7 38.89
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 6T S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 5C W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %22 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
23 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89
24 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %25 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %28 NS 3C N+2 200 18 100.00
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2CcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 % 1 NS 3CxN-1 -200 2 11.11
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 2 11.11
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 % 4 NS 6T S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 7 38.89
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 % 7 NS 5K E-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 2C E-1 50 6 33.33
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %10 NS 3P W+2 -200 10 55.56
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %13 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %16 NS 4CcS-3 -500 0 0.00
17 NS 4C N+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 6S N-4 -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 5TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %22 NS 2C W+2 -170 11 61.11
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %25 NS 5P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %28 NS 2K W-1 50 2 11.11
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 184,0 / 540 = 34,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 % 1 NS 3CcN = 530 18 100.00
2 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 15 83.33
5 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 % 7 NS 4PcS-2 -500 10 55.56
8 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11
9 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %10 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %13 NS 2P S-2 -200 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %16 NS 2S E = -120 14 77.78
17 NS 4C S = 420 4 22.22
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %19 NS 5CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
20 NS 4C W = -620 3 16.67
21 NS 4C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %22 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 2P S+3 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %25 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %28 NS 2C N+1 140 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 % 1 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
2 NS 1S E-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 3C N-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 7 NS 5K E = -600 7 38.89
8 NS 3P E-3 150 12 66.67
9 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %10 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 77.78
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %13 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 33.33
14 NS 3P W = -140 14 77.78
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %16 NS 3P E = -140 7 38.89
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 6S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %19 NS 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00
20 NS 4C W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %22 NS 3P E = -140 16 88.89
23 NS 3K W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 1P S+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %25 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %28 NS 3C N = 140 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 % 1 NS 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
2 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22
8 NS 2CcW-2 300 17 94.44
9 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %10 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 77.78
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 4C W = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %13 NS 3C E-1 100 18 100.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 10 55.56
15 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %16 NS 3P W = -140 7 38.89
17 NS 4C S = 420 4 22.22
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %19 NS 4CcN-2 -300 3 16.67
20 NS 4C W = -620 3 16.67
21 NS 4C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 5.56
23 NS 3K W-1 100 13 72.22
24 NS 3K S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %25 NS 5KcE-2 500 15 83.33
26 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
27 NS 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 % 1 NS 5K W-3 150 12 66.67
2 NS 1S E-1 50 13 72.22
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
6 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 % 7 NS 5K E = -600 7 38.89
8 NS 3CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
11 NS 2P W-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %13 NS 1S N-3 -300 1 5.56
14 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00
15 NS 4C S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %16 NS 3P W-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 6S S-4 -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %19 NS 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00
20 NS 4C W-1 100 16 88.89
21 NS 3C W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %22 NS 4P E = -620 6 33.33
23 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
24 NS 1S S+3 180 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %25 NS 5P N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S N = 600 6 33.33
27 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 %28 NS 1C N+2 140 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 3K N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 % 1 NS 4KcE-3 500 16 88.89
2 NS 1S E-1 50 13 72.22
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 % 4 NS 6S N = 1440 18 100.00
5 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 % 7 NS 5PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 3PcW-1 100 8 44.44
9 NS 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %13 NS 2P S-1 -100 16 88.89
14 NS 4P E = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %16 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 3C W = -140 8 44.44
21 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %22 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 5.56
23 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
24 NS 1P S+2 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %25 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 307,0 / 540 = 56,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 % 1 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 15 83.33
5 NS 5P E-1 50 18 100.00
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 % 7 NS 5K E-2 200 16 88.89
8 NS 2CcW-2 300 17 94.44
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %10 NS 4P W = -620 7 38.89
11 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %13 NS 2C E = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
15 NS 5CcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %16 NS 3P W = -140 7 38.89
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %19 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 NS 4T N-1 -100 11 61.11
21 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %22 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 61.11
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %25 NS 5TcE-2 500 15 83.33
26 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
27 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 6 33.33
2 NS 1S E = -90 7 38.89
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 59,26 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
5 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,63 % 7 NS 5KcE-1 200 16 88.89
8 NS 4P E-3 150 12 66.67
9 NS 3K N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,26 %10 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 57,59 %13 NS 2C E = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 4P W-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 4C S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,37 %16 NS 3P W = -140 7 38.89
17 NS 4C S = 420 4 22.22
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 49,26 %19 NS 4CcN-2 -300 3 16.67
20 NS 4PcS-2 -500 6 33.33
21 NS 2C E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 38,33 %22 NS 2T N-1 -50 18 100.00
23 NS 2PcN = 670 18 100.00
24 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 50,37 %25 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11
27 NS 2P W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,52 %28 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 % 1 EO 4K E-4 200 4 22.22
2 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 % 4 EO 6T S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 11 61.11
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 % 7 EO 5KcE = -750 16 88.89
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %10 EO 2P W+2 -170 4 22.22
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %13 EO 3C E-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 8 44.44
15 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %16 EO 3P W-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 6S S-4 -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 3C W = -140 10 55.56
21 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %22 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %25 EO 6P N-2 -100 18 100.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 % 1 EO 3CxN-1 -200 16 88.89
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 16 88.89
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 % 4 EO 6S N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11
6 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 % 7 EO 5KcE-1 200 2 11.11
8 EO 2C W-3 150 6 33.33
9 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %10 EO 2P W+2 -170 4 22.22
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 4C W = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %13 EO 1S N-3 -300 17 94.44
14 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %16 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %19 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 4T N-1 -100 7 38.89
21 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %22 EO 2T N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 EO 2PcN = 670 0 0.00
24 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %25 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %28 EO 3C N = 140 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 207,0 / 540 = 38,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 % 1 EO 3KcE-1 100 8 44.44
2 EO 1S E-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 2 11.11
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 % 7 EO 5K E-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 2C E-1 50 12 66.67
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
11 EO 2P W-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4C E+2 -480 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %13 EO 2P S-1 -100 2 11.11
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %16 EO 3P W = -140 11 61.11
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %19 EO 4CcN-2 -300 15 83.33
20 EO 4PcS-2 -500 12 66.67
21 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %22 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 2P S+3 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %25 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 16 88.89
27 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 1 EO 4KcE-3 500 2 11.11
2 EO 1S E-1 50 5 27.78
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 3 16.67
5 EO 5P E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 % 7 EO 5KcE-1 200 2 11.11
8 EO 4P E-3 150 6 33.33
9 EO 3K N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %10 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %13 EO 3T N-3 -300 17 94.44
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %16 EO 3P E = -140 11 61.11
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 6S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 5TcN-3 -800 18 100.00
21 EO 2C E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %22 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 94.44
23 EO 3K W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 3K S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %25 EO 5PcN = 650 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %28 EO 1C N+2 140 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 3K N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 % 1 EO 4CcN-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
5 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 % 7 EO 4PcS-2 -500 8 44.44
8 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89
9 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %13 EO 2C E+2 -170 12 66.67
14 EO 3P W = -140 4 22.22
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %16 EO 3P W = -140 11 61.11
17 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 6T S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %19 EO 4CcN-2 -300 15 83.33
20 EO 4C W = -620 15 83.33
21 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %22 EO 2C W+2 -170 7 38.89
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %25 EO 5P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S N = 600 12 66.67
27 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %28 EO 2C N+1 140 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 320,0 / 540 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 66.67
2 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 3 16.67
5 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 7 EO 5K E = -600 11 61.11
8 EO 3P E-3 150 6 33.33
9 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %10 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 22.22
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C W = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %13 EO 2C E = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 5CcS-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %16 EO 3P W = -140 11 61.11
17 EO 4C S = 420 14 77.78
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 EO 5C W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %22 EO 4P E = -620 12 66.67
23 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
24 EO 1S S+3 180 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %25 EO 5P N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 % 1 EO 3CcN = 530 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78
8 EO 2CcW-2 300 1 5.56
9 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %10 EO 4P W = -620 11 61.11
11 EO 2S N-3 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00
14 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %16 EO 3P W = -140 11 61.11
17 EO 4C S = 420 14 77.78
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 %19 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00
20 EO 4C W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 3C W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %22 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
23 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11
24 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %25 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %28 EO 2K W-1 50 16 88.89
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 2P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VANDAM Jean -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 % 1 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
2 EO 1S E-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 3C N-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 9 50.00
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 % 7 EO 5K E = -600 11 61.11
8 EO 3CcN-2 -300 18 100.00
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %10 EO 3P W+2 -200 8 44.44
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %13 EO 2C E = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 4P W-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %16 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
17 EO 3C S+2 200 18 100.00
18 EO 6T S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %19 EO 5CcN-3 -500 18 100.00
20 EO 4C W = -620 15 83.33
21 EO 4C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 %22 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 94.44
23 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
24 EO 1P S+2 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %25 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00
26 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 % 1 EO 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
2 EO 1S E = -90 11 61.11
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 7 EO 5PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
8 EO 3PcW-1 100 10 55.56
9 EO 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %13 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 13 72.22
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %16 EO 2S E = -120 4 22.22
17 EO 4C S = 420 14 77.78
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %19 EO 4T W+1 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 7 38.89
21 EO 2C E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %22 EO 3P E = -140 2 11.11
23 EO 3K W-1 100 5 27.78
24 EO 1P S+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 %25 EO 5TcE-2 500 3 16.67
26 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
27 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %28 EO 3C N+2 200 0 0.00
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2CcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 46,30 % 1 EO 5K W-3 150 6 33.33
2 EO 1S E-1 50 5 27.78
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,85 % 4 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
5 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 47,96 % 7 EO 5K E-2 200 2 11.11
8 EO 2CcW-2 300 1 5.56
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,70 %10 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 40,56 %13 EO 2P S-2 -200 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00
15 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
3 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 34,07 %16 EO 4CcS-3 -500 18 100.00
17 EO 4C N+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 6S N-4 -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 54,07 %19 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 50.00
20 EO 4C W-1 100 2 11.11
21 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 55,74 %22 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 38.89
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 2P S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 59,07 %25 EO 5KcE-2 500 3 16.67
26 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
27 EO 2P W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 46,67 %28 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
|
|