|
Tournoi du 07-01-13
1 61,57 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,95 9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina
3 53,01 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
4 51,16 6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 48,38 4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
6 47,69 5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
7 44,44 2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
8 42,59 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 41,20 7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,03 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 58,80 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
3 52,55 15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 51,85 10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
5 50,23 11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 47,69 13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
7 44,91 16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André
~ 44,91 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
9 40,05 18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 12 75.00
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
5 NS 3K W = -110 16 100.00
6 NS 1S W-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 % 7 NS 5K S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 4PcN-3 -500 9 56.25
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %10 NS 3S W = -600 1 6.25
11 NS 3K S = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 5TcN = 750 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 3CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 13 81.25
17 NS 2C E-2 100 14 87.50
18 NS 2K W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %19 NS 6S S = 990 13 81.25
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
21 NS 3K W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %22 NS 4P E = -620 1 6.25
23 NS 3PcW = -730 0 0.00
24 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,08 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 6 37.50
26 NS 2P N = 110 14 87.50
27 NS 3S W = -400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 229,0 / 432 = 53,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 4P S = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 % 4 NS 4PcN-1 -200 8 50.00
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 25.00
6 NS 1S W-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 68.75
8 NS 4CcW+2 -790 2 12.50
9 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 31.25
11 NS 2K S+1 110 8 50.00
12 NS 4P E-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 2C N+1 140 15 93.75
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %16 NS 3T N+2 150 2 12.50
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 25.00
18 NS 2P W = -110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %19 NS 6S S = 990 13 81.25
20 NS 3S N = 600 3 18.75
21 NS 3P W = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75
23 NS 4P W-4 400 16 100.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %25 NS 3K S = 110 1 6.25
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 25.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 % 1 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 12.50
2 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 % 4 NS 5T E = -600 3 18.75
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 62.50
6 NS 2C N-1 -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 % 7 NS 5K S-2 -200 4 25.00
8 NS 5CcW = -650 4 25.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 1S N+2 150 16 100.00
12 NS 4T N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 2S E+2 -180 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 13 81.25
17 NS 3C E = -140 4 25.00
18 NS 4C W-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %19 NS 4C N = 420 8 50.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
21 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 43.75
23 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 5P N = 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 6 37.50
26 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 184,0 / 432 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 % 1 NS 3C S = 140 16 100.00
2 NS 5P S-1 -100 1 6.25
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
6 NS 1S W-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 68.75
8 NS 5PcN-5 -1100 0 0.00
9 NS 2T E+4 -170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 4C E-2 100 4 25.00
12 NS 4P E-3 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 75.00
15 NS 2S W = -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 7 43.75
17 NS 2P E-1 50 12 75.00
18 NS 3C W = -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %19 NS 6S N-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 1C N+2 140 0 0.00
21 NS 2P E+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 43.75
23 NS 3C N+1 170 10 62.50
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %25 NS 1P S+3 170 11 68.75
26 NS 4C E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 209,0 / 432 = 48,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 12 75.00
2 NS 5P S-1 -100 1 6.25
3 NS 3S S = 400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 % 4 NS 5TcE = -750 0 0.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 62.50
6 NS 1S E-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 68.75
8 NS 4CcW = -590 6 37.50
9 NS 5T E+1 -620 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %10 NS 3S W = -600 1 6.25
11 NS 1S N+1 120 12 75.00
12 NS 5TcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %13 NS 2P S+3 200 4 25.00
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 2P S-3 -300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 7 43.75
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
18 NS 4C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %19 NS 6C N-2 -100 3 18.75
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
21 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %22 NS 4P W = -620 1 6.25
23 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %25 NS 4CcE-2 500 16 100.00
26 NS 3C E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 206,0 / 432 = 47,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 % 1 NS 4PcE-1 100 4 25.00
2 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 % 4 NS 5PcN-2 -500 6 37.50
5 NS 2PcS-2 -500 1 6.25
6 NS 2P E-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 % 7 NS 3K S+1 130 16 100.00
8 NS 4PcN-3 -500 9 56.25
9 NS 3T E+3 -170 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 31.25
11 NS 3C W-1 50 2 12.50
12 NS 3S S+1 630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 3P S = 140 15 93.75
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %16 NS 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3C W = -140 4 25.00
18 NS 2C W-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %19 NS 6S S = 990 13 81.25
20 NS 3S N = 600 3 18.75
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %22 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 75.00
23 NS 4K E-2 200 13 81.25
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %25 NS 3P S = 140 6 37.50
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 25.00
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 % 1 NS 3K N+1 130 12 75.00
2 NS 4P S+2 680 15 93.75
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 % 4 NS 5T E = -600 3 18.75
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
6 NS 2S W-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 % 7 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 25.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 14 87.50
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %10 NS 1S W = -90 9 56.25
11 NS 4K S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4P E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 1 6.25
14 NS 3S S-4 -200 2 12.50
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 4 25.00
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 25.00
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %19 NS 6S N-1 -50 6 37.50
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 56.25
21 NS 3C S = 140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75
23 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %25 NS 1P S+1 110 1 6.25
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 25.00
27 NS 5K W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 178,0 / 432 = 41,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 1 NS 3K S = 110 6 37.50
2 NS 4P S+2 680 15 93.75
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 % 4 NS 3P N = 140 16 100.00
5 NS 2PcN-2 -500 1 6.25
6 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 % 7 NS 5K S-2 -200 4 25.00
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 16 100.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %10 NS 3S W-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 3K S = 110 8 50.00
12 NS 3T N+1 130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %13 NS 4P S+1 650 11 68.75
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 2S W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 13 81.25
17 NS 4P E-4 200 16 100.00
18 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %19 NS 6S S = 990 13 81.25
20 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75
21 NS 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75
23 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 14 87.50
26 NS 2P N+1 140 16 100.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 266,0 / 432 = 61,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina
17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,03 % 1 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00
2 NS 4C N = 620 6 37.50
3 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André : 44,91 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
6 NS 1S W-1 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,55 % 7 NS 4K S-1 -100 11 68.75
8 NS 5C W = -450 12 75.00
9 NS 6S E-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 44,91 %10 NS 1S W = -90 9 56.25
11 NS 2K S+2 130 14 87.50
12 NS 3T N+1 130 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 47,69 %13 NS 3P S+1 170 1 6.25
14 NS 3C N-2 -100 7 43.75
15 NS 3C W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 58,80 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 13 81.25
17 NS 2K S-1 -50 10 62.50
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 50,23 %19 NS 7C S-2 -100 3 18.75
20 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75
21 NS 3P E = -140 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,85 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 43.75
23 NS 4K E-2 200 13 81.25
24 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 40,05 %25 NS 1P S+3 170 11 68.75
26 NS 3C E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 259,0 / 432 = 59,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 4 25.00
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 % 4 EO 5PcN-2 -500 10 62.50
5 EO 2PcS-2 -500 15 93.75
6 EO 2P E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 5 31.25
8 EO 4CcW+2 -790 14 87.50
9 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %10 EO 1S W = -90 7 43.75
11 EO 4K S-1 -50 16 100.00
12 EO 4P E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 18.75
17 EO 4P E-4 200 0 0.00
18 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %19 EO 6S N-3 -150 16 100.00
20 EO 1C N+2 140 16 100.00
21 EO 2P E+3 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25
23 EO 4K E-2 200 3 18.75
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %25 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3C E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 224,0 / 432 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAGMAN David -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 % 1 EO 4PcE-1 100 12 75.00
2 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 % 4 EO 4PcN-1 -200 8 50.00
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 12 75.00
6 EO 1S W-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 % 7 EO 3S S-2 -200 12 75.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 2 12.50
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4T N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 2S W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 9 56.25
17 EO 2P E-1 50 4 25.00
18 EO 3C W = -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %19 EO 7C S-2 -100 13 81.25
20 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25
21 EO 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %22 EO 4P W = -620 15 93.75
23 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 62.50
26 EO 2P N = 110 2 12.50
27 EO 3S W = -400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 217,0 / 432 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 100.00
2 EO 4P S = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 % 4 EO 5T E = -600 13 81.25
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
6 EO 2S W-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 % 7 EO 5K S-2 -200 12 75.00
8 EO 5CcW = -650 12 75.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %10 EO 3S W-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 3K S = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 3T N+1 130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 4 25.00
15 EO 2S W = -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 18.75
17 EO 2K S-1 -50 6 37.50
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %19 EO 6C N-2 -100 13 81.25
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
21 EO 2C S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %22 EO 4P E = -620 15 93.75
23 EO 3PcW = -730 16 100.00
24 EO 6P N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,92 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %25 EO 3P S = 140 10 62.50
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 75.00
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 % 1 EO 3K N+1 130 4 25.00
2 EO 4P S+2 680 1 6.25
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 % 4 EO 5T E = -600 13 81.25
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 37.50
6 EO 2C N-1 -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 % 7 EO 5K S-2 -200 12 75.00
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 4C E-2 100 12 75.00
12 EO 4P E-3 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %13 EO 3P S+1 170 15 93.75
14 EO 3C N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 3C W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 9 56.25
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
18 EO 4C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %19 EO 6S S = 990 3 18.75
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
21 EO 3K W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %22 EO 3C N-1 -50 4 25.00
23 EO 4K E-2 200 3 18.75
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %25 EO 3K S = 110 15 93.75
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 12 75.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 206,0 / 432 = 47,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 % 1 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 87.50
2 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 % 4 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
5 EO 2PcN-2 -500 15 93.75
6 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 5 31.25
8 EO 5PcN-5 -1100 16 100.00
9 EO 2T E+4 -170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %10 EO 1S W = -90 7 43.75
11 EO 2K S+2 130 2 12.50
12 EO 3T N+1 130 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %13 EO 2P S+3 200 12 75.00
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 9 56.25
15 EO 2P S-3 -300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 18.75
17 EO 2C E-2 100 2 12.50
18 EO 2K W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %19 EO 6S S = 990 3 18.75
20 EO 3S N = 600 13 81.25
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25
23 EO 4P W-4 400 0 0.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %25 EO 1P S+1 110 15 93.75
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 75.00
27 EO 5K W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 194,0 / 432 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 % 1 EO 3K S = 110 10 62.50
2 EO 4P S+2 680 1 6.25
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
6 EO 1S W-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 % 7 EO 4K S-1 -100 5 31.25
8 EO 5C W = -450 4 25.00
9 EO 6S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 %10 EO 3S W = -600 15 93.75
11 EO 1S N+1 120 4 25.00
12 EO 5TcN-2 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 3CcN-2 -300 16 100.00
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %16 EO 5T N-1 -50 16 100.00
17 EO 3C W = -140 12 75.00
18 EO 2C W-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %19 EO 6S S = 990 3 18.75
20 EO 3S N = 600 13 81.25
21 EO 3P W = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 56.25
23 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 10 62.50
26 EO 2C E = -110 16 100.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 227,0 / 432 = 52,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 LAENENS René -DOUETTE André
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 % 1 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
2 EO 5P S-1 -100 15 93.75
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
6 EO 1S W-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 5 31.25
8 EO 4CcW = -590 10 62.50
9 EO 5T E+1 -620 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 %10 EO 3S W = -600 15 93.75
11 EO 3K S = 110 8 50.00
12 EO 5TcN = 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 3P S = 140 1 6.25
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %16 EO 3T N+2 150 14 87.50
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 75.00
18 EO 2P W = -110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %19 EO 6S N-1 -50 10 62.50
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
21 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %22 EO 3P E = -140 9 56.25
23 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 5P N = 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 2 12.50
26 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 194,0 / 432 = 44,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 % 1 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00
2 EO 4C N = 620 10 62.50
3 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 % 4 EO 5TcE = -750 16 100.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 37.50
6 EO 1S E-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 % 7 EO 5K S-3 -300 16 100.00
8 EO 4PcN-3 -500 7 43.75
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 68.75
11 EO 3C W-1 50 14 87.50
12 EO 3S S+1 630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %13 EO 4P S+1 650 5 31.25
14 EO 2C N+1 140 1 6.25
15 EO 3S E = -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 12 75.00
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 75.00
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %19 EO 4C N = 420 8 50.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 43.75
21 EO 1S W+3 -180 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25
23 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %25 EO 1P S+3 170 5 31.25
26 EO 4C E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 255,0 / 432 = 59,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 NEVE Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 47,69 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 4 25.00
2 EO 5P S-1 -100 15 93.75
3 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Christine : 53,01 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
5 EO 3K W = -110 0 0.00
6 EO 1S W-1 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,16 % 7 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
8 EO 4PcN-3 -500 7 43.75
9 EO 3T E+3 -170 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
2 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 44,44 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 68.75
11 EO 2K S+1 110 8 50.00
12 EO 4P E-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,20 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 15 93.75
14 EO 3S S-4 -200 14 87.50
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 42,59 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 3 18.75
17 EO 3C E = -140 12 75.00
18 EO 4C W-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,57 %19 EO 6S S = 990 3 18.75
20 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25
21 EO 3P E = -140 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 48,38 %22 EO 3P E = -140 9 56.25
23 EO 3C N+1 170 6 37.50
24 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 CASSART Guy -DESSY Lina : 59,95 %25 EO 1P S+3 170 5 31.25
26 EO 3C E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 173,0 / 432 = 40,05 %
|
|