|
Tournoi du 07-02-11
1 60,93 5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
2 56,11 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,00 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
4 53,89 9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
5 53,33 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
6 49,07 6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
7 48,89 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
8 45,56 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
9 44,63 2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 44,44 10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
11 38,15 1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,81 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
~ 59,81 16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
3 58,70 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 54,44 13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude
5 54,26 14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 53,70 17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 49,26 19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
8 47,59 22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal
9 46,11 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
10 35,00 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
11 31,30 20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 7 38.89
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67
3 NS 2T N = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 5 27.78
5 NS 4T S-1 -100 10 55.56
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
8 NS 2P W+4 -230 13 72.22
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %10 NS 4P E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 1K N+3 130 14 77.78
12 NS 2K N+4 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22
15 NS 4P W = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %16 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
21 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 4P W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 6P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 2K S = 90 8 44.44
30 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 % 4 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 % 7 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 5C S-3 -150 17 94.44
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %10 NS 6P W-3 300 18 100.00
11 NS 2C E-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %13 NS 1S E-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78
21 NS 3S E+4 -520 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 4PcN = 790 18 100.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %25 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 6T E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %28 NS 3P W-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %31 NS 2P E-2 100 3 16.67
32 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 % 1 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 3PcN-1 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 3T N+1 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 % 7 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 55.56
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 55.56
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %10 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %13 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67
14 NS 2P W-4 200 11 61.11
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %16 NS 7P N = 1510 18 100.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %19 NS 2T N+3 150 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
21 NS 3S E+4 -520 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
24 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 3T E-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 3T E+1 -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
30 NS 2S E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %31 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
32 NS 4C E-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 7 38.89
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
3 NS 3P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 5 27.78
5 NS 3K E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 1K N+2 110 8 44.44
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %13 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67
14 NS 3T S+1 130 6 33.33
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %16 NS 3S N+3 490 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 5C S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 4C E+3 -510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 NS 4CcS-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %25 NS 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 NS 1S W+4 -210 12 66.67
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 15 83.33
29 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
30 NS 1S S+3 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %31 NS 3KcW-2 300 18 100.00
32 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 3PcW-3 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 % 1 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
2 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
3 NS 2P S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 % 4 NS 2S S = 120 5 27.78
5 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
8 NS 5CcS-3 -500 2 11.11
9 NS 4C W = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 5T N = 400 15 83.33
15 NS 2C W+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %16 NS 6P N+1 1010 14 77.78
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
20 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
24 NS 2C S+3 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W-2 200 16 88.89
27 NS 4P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 15 83.33
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 3T S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %31 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
32 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 % 1 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11
2 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
3 NS 3T N+1 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
5 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 % 7 NS 2P W = -110 13 72.22
8 NS 2P W+4 -230 13 72.22
9 NS 1P W = -80 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 2P W-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %16 NS 6P N+1 1010 14 77.78
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
24 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %25 NS 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 NS 3S W = -600 10 55.56
27 NS 4P W = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %28 NS 4P W-2 100 12 66.67
29 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67
30 NS 2K E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %31 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
32 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 3T N+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 % 1 NS 2S E-2 100 16 88.89
2 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44
3 NS 4T N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 % 4 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33
5 NS 3C W-3 150 18 100.00
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 % 7 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 5C N-3 -150 17 94.44
9 NS 5C W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %10 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
11 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
12 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %13 NS Pass Passe 8 44.44
14 NS 3ScN+2 750 18 100.00
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 17 94.44
20 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 6S W+1 -1020 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 4PcN-1 -200 1 5.56
24 NS 4CcS-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %25 NS 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 NS 3CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %28 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 17 94.44
30 NS 3S E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %31 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 5CcW-2 500 17 94.44
33 NS 4T N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 6 33.33
3 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 5 27.78
5 NS 3K E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3C S+2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 % 7 NS 3C S-2 -200 6 33.33
8 NS 5P W+1 -480 7 38.89
9 NS 4C W = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
11 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78
12 NS 5K N = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %13 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67
14 NS 3T S+3 170 8 44.44
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %16 NS 6P N+1 1010 14 77.78
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %22 NS 3S E = -600 16 88.89
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 27.78
24 NS 4C S+2 480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 5P W = -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %28 NS 3P W-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 3S S = 600 17 94.44
30 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %31 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
32 NS 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 3P N-2 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 5 27.78
5 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
6 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 % 7 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 7 38.89
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %10 NS 4P W-2 200 14 77.78
11 NS 2C W-2 100 4 22.22
12 NS 4T S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 2C E-4 200 11 61.11
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00
18 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 4C E+3 -510 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %25 NS 1C W = -80 12 66.67
26 NS 1P E+1 -110 14 77.78
27 NS 3S E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 %28 NS 5PcW-4 800 18 100.00
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %31 NS 3C N = 140 12 66.67
32 NS 4CcW-2 500 17 94.44
33 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 % 1 NS 2T S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 2T N+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 % 4 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
5 NS 3K E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
8 NS 5CcS-3 -500 2 11.11
9 NS 4C W = -620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %10 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78
12 NS 2S N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %13 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67
14 NS 1S W-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %16 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3S W+4 -520 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 35,00 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 3P N = 140 10 55.56
24 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
30 NS 4CcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 %31 NS 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
32 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 3S S = 400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,70 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
2 NS 3PcN-1 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques : 31,30 % 4 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33
5 NS 2K E+2 -130 2 11.11
6 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 49,26 % 7 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22
8 NS 5CcS-3 -500 2 11.11
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,11 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
11 NS 3C E-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 53,70 %13 NS 1S E-1 100 13 72.22
14 NS 3S N = 400 15 83.33
15 NS 4C W = -420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 59,81 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 59,81 %19 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89
20 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 6C E+1 -1010 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,26 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 38.89
23 NS 4C E-2 200 16 88.89
24 NS 4C S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude : 54,44 %25 NS 3S E = -600 7 38.89
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 11.11
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal : 47,59 %31 NS 2P E-2 100 3 16.67
32 NS 2S S = 120 12 66.67
33 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 11 61.11
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33
3 EO 2T N = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 % 4 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67
5 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 % 7 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 5C S-3 -150 1 5.56
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
11 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22
12 EO 5K N = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %13 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33
14 EO 2P W-4 200 7 38.89
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
18 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 5C S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 4C E+3 -510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
24 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W-2 200 2 11.11
27 EO 4P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %31 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
32 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 3T N+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 189,0 / 540 = 35,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Claude
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 % 1 EO 2S E-2 100 2 11.11
2 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56
3 EO 4T N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 % 4 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 % 7 EO 3C S-2 -200 12 66.67
8 EO 5P W+1 -480 11 61.11
9 EO 4C W = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %10 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 100.00
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 2C E-4 200 7 38.89
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3S W+4 -520 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
24 EO 2C S+3 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %25 EO 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 88.89
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %28 EO 4P W-2 100 6 33.33
29 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33
30 EO 2K E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 13 72.22
5 EO 3K E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3C S+2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 % 7 EO 2K E+2 -130 8 44.44
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 44.44
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %10 EO 4P W-2 200 4 22.22
11 EO 2C W-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 4T S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %13 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33
14 EO 3T S+1 130 12 66.67
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %16 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
20 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 4C E-2 200 2 11.11
24 EO 4C S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %25 EO 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 EO 3S W = -600 8 44.44
27 EO 4P W = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 2K S = 90 10 55.56
30 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %31 EO 3C N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 5CcW-2 500 1 5.56
33 EO 4T N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 66.67
3 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 % 7 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 11 61.11
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 1K N+2 110 10 55.56
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %13 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33
14 EO 1S W-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %16 EO 6P N+1 1010 4 22.22
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 6C E+1 -1010 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 3P N = 140 8 44.44
24 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 6P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %28 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 1 5.56
30 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %31 EO 2P E-2 100 15 83.33
32 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 % 1 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
2 EO 3PcN-1 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 3T N+1 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 13 72.22
5 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
6 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22
12 EO 2S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 5T N = 400 3 16.67
15 EO 2C W+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3S W+4 -520 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 4PcN-1 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 4P W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %25 EO 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 EO 3CcN-4 -1100 18 100.00
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %28 EO 3P W-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %31 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
32 EO 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 323,0 / 540 = 59,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 3P N-2 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 13 72.22
5 EO 3K E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
8 EO 5CcS-3 -500 16 88.89
9 EO 4C W = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 3S N = 400 3 16.67
15 EO 4C W = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %16 EO 6P N+1 1010 4 22.22
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
21 EO 3S W+4 -520 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 4PcN-1 -200 17 94.44
24 EO 4CcS-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 6T E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %28 EO 3P W-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 3S S = 600 1 5.56
30 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %31 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
32 EO 4C E-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 11 61.11
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
3 EO 3P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 4 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
5 EO 3K E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
8 EO 5CcS-3 -500 16 88.89
9 EO 4C W = -620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
11 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %16 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 100.00
17 EO 4P E+2 -480 18 100.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 5.56
20 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 6S W+1 -1020 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 5P W = -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
30 EO 2S E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %31 EO 3C N = 140 6 33.33
32 EO 4CcW-2 500 1 5.56
33 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 1 EO 2T S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 2T N+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 % 4 EO 2S S = 120 13 72.22
5 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 % 7 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78
8 EO 5CcS-3 -500 16 88.89
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %10 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 2P W-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %13 EO 1S E-1 100 5 27.78
14 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78
15 EO 4P W = -420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22
21 EO 3S E+4 -520 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %22 EO 3S E = -600 2 11.11
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
26 EO 3T E-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 3T E+1 -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %28 EO 5PcW-4 800 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %31 EO 3KcW-2 300 0 0.00
32 EO 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00
33 EO 3PcW-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 COOLEN Josef -DELHEZ Jacques
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 % 1 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
2 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
3 EO 2P S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 % 4 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67
5 EO 2K E+2 -130 16 88.89
6 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 7 EO 2P W = -110 5 27.78
8 EO 2P W+4 -230 5 27.78
9 EO 1P W = -80 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 %10 EO 4P E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 1K N+3 130 4 22.22
12 EO 2K N+4 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %13 EO Pass Passe 10 55.56
14 EO 3ScN+2 750 0 0.00
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %16 EO 3S N+3 490 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
24 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %25 EO 1C W = -80 6 33.33
26 EO 1P E+1 -110 4 22.22
27 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 16.67
29 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
30 EO 1S S+3 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %31 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
32 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 3S S = 400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 169,0 / 540 = 31,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
2 EO 3PcN-1 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
5 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
8 EO 2P W+4 -230 5 27.78
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 %10 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
11 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
12 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %13 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 5T N-1 -50 18 100.00
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %16 EO 6P N+1 1010 4 22.22
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %19 EO 2T N+3 150 18 100.00
20 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E+4 -520 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %25 EO 3S E = -600 11 61.11
26 EO 1S W+4 -210 6 33.33
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 MOSSERAY Bernadette -LAENENS René : 44,44 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 4CcS-4 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %31 EO 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
32 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
33 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ROSOUX Louis -DAPHNE Chantal
6 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 1 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89
2 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
3 EO 3T N+1 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 38,15 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 13 72.22
5 EO 4T S-1 -100 8 44.44
6 EO 3C S+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 55,00 % 7 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 5C N-3 -150 1 5.56
9 EO 5C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
2 RAVET Brigitte -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,63 %10 EO 6P W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 2C E-2 100 14 77.78
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,11 %13 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33
14 EO 3T S+3 170 10 55.56
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,33 %16 EO 7P N = 1510 0 0.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 53,89 %19 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 4C E+3 -510 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 48,89 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 61.11
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 72.22
24 EO 4CcS-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 60,93 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 16.67
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
30 EO 3T S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,56 %31 EO 2P E-2 100 15 83.33
32 EO 2S S = 120 6 33.33
33 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
|
|