|
Tournoi du 07-03-11
1 59,58 A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
2 57,50 A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
~ 57,50 A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand
4 53,54 A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
5 50,00 A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
6 47,92 A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques
7 47,29 A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 42,29 A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
9 34,38 A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
10 0,00 A10 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,42 a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse
2 58,80 a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 56,71 a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
4 51,62 a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
5 49,54 a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 48,38 a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 46,30 a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
8 45,37 a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
9 41,44 a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga
~ 41,44 a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75
2 NS 6C E-1 50 16 100.00
3 NS 2P E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 % 4 NS 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
5 NS 6C N-1 -100 1 6.25
6 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 % 7 NS 5P S-1 -100 7 43.75
8 NS 5K N = 400 4 25.00
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %10 NS 4C S-2 -200 4 25.00
11 NS 4CcS = 590 16 100.00
12 NS 3K E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 62.50
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 3P S+1 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %16 NS 5KcN-2 -300 14 87.50
17 NS 4C S = 420 16 100.00
18 NS 3K W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %19 NS 1ScW-2 500 16 100.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 87.50
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
23 NS 2C E-1 100 12 75.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %25 NS 2P S = 110 2 12.50
26 NS 2C W-1 100 11 68.75
27 NS 5K N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 13 81.25
29 NS 6P N = 1430 10 62.50
30 NS 3C W-4 200 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 276,0 / 480 = 57,50 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 11 68.75
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 37.50
3 NS Pass Passe 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 % 4 NS 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
5 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
6 NS 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 % 7 NS 5P S-2 -200 3 18.75
8 NS 4KcN+2 710 16 100.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %10 NS 3CcS-1 -200 4 25.00
11 NS 4CcS-1 -100 10 62.50
12 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 93.75
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 4C E-3 150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %16 NS 5C W = -650 10 62.50
17 NS 3P W-2 100 5 31.25
18 NS 3K W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %19 NS 1S W-2 200 11 68.75
20 NS 3K S-2 -200 6 37.50
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %22 NS 4C S = 420 3 18.75
23 NS 2C E = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 3S E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %25 NS 2S S = 120 6 37.50
26 NS 3C W-2 200 16 100.00
27 NS 1P N = 80 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %28 NS 3PcW-1 100 7 43.75
29 NS 6P N = 1430 10 62.50
30 NS 4K W-4 200 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 276,0 / 480 = 57,50 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 15 93.75
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50
3 NS Pass Passe 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 % 4 NS 5T E = -600 1 6.25
5 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
6 NS 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 % 7 NS 4P S+1 650 14 87.50
8 NS 4C W-3 150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S N = 400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %10 NS 4P N-2 -200 4 25.00
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 62.50
14 NS 1P N+4 200 8 50.00
15 NS 3C E-2 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %16 NS 4P E+3 -710 0 0.00
17 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
18 NS 3PcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %19 NS 1S W = -90 0 0.00
20 NS 2PcW+1 -870 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %22 NS 4C S = 420 3 18.75
23 NS 2C E-2 200 16 100.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %25 NS 1S S+2 150 12 75.00
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 4 25.00
27 NS 1S S = 90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %28 NS 1PcW+2 -360 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N+2 660 2 12.50
30 NS 3P N-1 -50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 165,0 / 480 = 34,38 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 % 1 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50
3 NS Pass Passe 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 % 4 NS 3C S+1 170 16 100.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
6 NS 2K E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 11 68.75
8 NS 3CcE-3 500 11 68.75
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %10 NS 4C S-2 -200 4 25.00
11 NS 3P E = -140 4 25.00
12 NS 4TcW+1 -610 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %13 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 25.00
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 4T N+1 150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %16 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 31.25
17 NS 3C N = 140 11 68.75
18 NS 1C E = -80 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %19 NS 2T S-1 -50 2 12.50
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 9 56.25
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 3S E-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %25 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 25.00
27 NS 4P N-3 -150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 13 81.25
29 NS 6S N = 1440 15 93.75
30 NS 3PcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 230,0 / 480 = 47,92 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00
3 NS 3TcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 % 4 NS 4T E+1 -150 6 37.50
5 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
6 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 % 7 NS 5KcN-1 -200 3 18.75
8 NS 5K N+1 420 7 43.75
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 13 81.25
11 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 6.25
14 NS 4P N+2 480 13 81.25
15 NS 4C E-2 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %16 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 31.25
17 NS 3C S = 140 11 68.75
18 NS 2C E-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %19 NS 1S W-2 200 11 68.75
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 87.50
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
23 NS 2C E-1 100 12 75.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %25 NS 2S S+1 150 12 75.00
26 NS 2C W-1 100 11 68.75
27 NS 2S S = 120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %28 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 12.50
29 NS 6P N = 1430 10 62.50
30 NS 4K W-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 227,0 / 480 = 47,29 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50
3 NS 2C N-3 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 14 87.50
5 NS 4PcE-4 800 16 100.00
6 NS 2K E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 11 68.75
8 NS 5K N+1 420 7 43.75
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %10 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 25.00
11 NS 4PcE-1 100 13 81.25
12 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 93.75
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %16 NS 3P E+2 -200 16 100.00
17 NS 3C N = 140 11 68.75
18 NS 3KcE-1 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %19 NS 1ScE-1 200 11 68.75
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 9 56.25
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %22 NS 4C N = 420 3 18.75
23 NS 2C E = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %25 NS 2S N = 120 6 37.50
26 NS 2C E-1 100 11 68.75
27 NS 3ScN-2 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %28 NS 3P E-1 50 4 25.00
29 NS 7P N-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 3P N = 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 257,0 / 480 = 53,54 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 % 1 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
2 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 75.00
3 NS 3K W+2 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 4 25.00
5 NS 5C N-1 -100 1 6.25
6 NS 3T N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 % 7 NS 6PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
8 NS 4KcN = 510 14 87.50
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %10 NS 3T E+1 -130 10 62.50
11 NS 2P E = -110 8 50.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 6.25
14 NS 3S N+3 490 16 100.00
15 NS 4T N+2 170 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %16 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 31.25
17 NS 3P W-2 100 5 31.25
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %19 NS 1S W-1 100 5 31.25
20 NS 3C S-3 -300 4 25.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %22 NS 4C S = 420 3 18.75
23 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %25 NS 2S S = 120 6 37.50
26 NS 3C W-1 100 11 68.75
27 NS 4P N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 13 81.25
29 NS 3S N+3 690 6 37.50
30 NS 2P N = 110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 203,0 / 480 = 42,29 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 15 93.75
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 37.50
3 NS 3T N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 % 4 NS 4C S-1 -100 10 62.50
5 NS 4C N = 620 10 62.50
6 NS 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 % 7 NS 5P S-1 -100 7 43.75
8 NS 4CcE-3 500 11 68.75
9 NS 3S N+2 460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 %10 NS 4C N = 620 16 100.00
11 NS 4PcE-1 100 13 81.25
12 NS 3T E+2 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 10 62.50
14 NS 4P N = 420 10 62.50
15 NS 4P N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %16 NS 5KcN-3 -500 12 75.00
17 NS 3P W-1 50 2 12.50
18 NS 4KcW-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %19 NS 1ScW-1 200 11 68.75
20 NS 3C N-4 -400 2 12.50
21 NS 4K W+1 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
23 NS 2C E-1 100 12 75.00
24 NS 3S W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %25 NS 2S S+1 150 12 75.00
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 25.00
27 NS 5KcS-2 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %28 NS 4PcW-2 300 13 81.25
29 NS 6S N = 1440 15 93.75
30 NS 3P N = 140 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 286,0 / 480 = 59,58 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 % 1 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 14 87.50
3 NS Pass Passe 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 % 4 NS 5T E = -600 1 6.25
5 NS 2C N+3 200 4 25.00
6 NS 2P S-2 -100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 % 7 NS 3PcS+2 1130 16 100.00
8 NS 4K N+2 170 2 12.50
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 13 81.25
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 %13 NS 2S E = -120 6 37.50
14 NS 4P N+2 480 13 81.25
15 NS 2K S+2 130 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %16 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 31.25
17 NS 3C S = 140 11 68.75
18 NS 3S E-4 200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %19 NS 1S W-1 100 5 31.25
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 87.50
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
23 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25
24 NS 3S E = -400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %25 NS 3S S = 400 16 100.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
27 NS 5KxS-3 -1000 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %28 NS 4P W-2 100 7 43.75
29 NS 4P N+2 680 4 25.00
30 NS 4CcW-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 240,0 / 480 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 -
a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,44 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,44 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse : 60,42 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 49,54 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 45,37 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 56,71 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,38 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard : 46,30 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy : 51,62 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,80 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 FRAITURE Louis -CASSART Guy
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25
2 EO 6C E-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 2P E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 % 4 EO 5T E = -600 15 93.75
5 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
6 EO 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 % 7 EO 5P S-2 -200 13 81.25
8 EO 4KcN+2 710 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 3 18.75
11 EO 4PcE = -590 16 100.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %13 EO 2C N = 110 1 6.25
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %16 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 68.75
17 EO 3P W-2 100 11 68.75
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %19 EO 1ScW-1 200 5 31.25
20 EO 3C N-4 -400 14 87.50
21 EO 4K W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
23 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 3S E = -400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A10 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 18.75
29 EO 6S N = 1440 1 6.25
30 EO 3PcN-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CHANTRAINE René -COLLET Edgard
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 1 6.25
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50
3 EO Pass Passe 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 % 4 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
5 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
6 EO 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 % 7 EO 5P S-1 -100 9 56.25
8 EO 5K N = 400 12 75.00
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %10 EO 4C N-2 -200 12 75.00
11 EO 4PcE-1 100 3 18.75
12 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 15 93.75
14 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
15 EO 4T N+2 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %16 EO 5KcN-3 -500 4 25.00
17 EO 3P W-1 50 14 87.50
18 EO 4KcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %19 EO 1S W-1 100 11 68.75
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 12.50
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
A10 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %25 EO 2S S-1 -50 16 100.00
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 75.00
27 EO 4P N-3 -150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %28 EO 3K N-1 -100 14 87.50
29 EO 6P N = 1430 6 37.50
30 EO 4K W-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 200,0 / 432 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 31.25
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 10 62.50
3 EO Pass Passe 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 % 4 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
5 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 93.75
6 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 % 7 EO 4P S+1 650 2 12.50
8 EO 4C W-3 150 16 100.00
9 EO 3S N = 400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %10 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 37.50
11 EO 2P E = -110 8 50.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 6 37.50
14 EO 4P N = 420 6 37.50
15 EO 4P N-4 -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %16 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 68.75
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 31.25
18 EO 3S E-4 200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 3S E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %25 EO 2S S+1 150 4 25.00
26 EO 2C W-1 100 5 31.25
27 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %28 EO 3P E-1 50 12 75.00
29 EO 7P N-1 -100 16 100.00
30 EO 3P N = 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 209,0 / 432 = 48,38 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 COLLET Claudine -WUYARD Alphonse
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 1 6.25
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50
3 EO 3T N-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 % 4 EO 5T E = -600 15 93.75
5 EO 2C N+3 200 12 75.00
6 EO 2P S-2 -100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
A10 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %10 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 75.00
11 EO 3P E = -140 12 75.00
12 EO 4TcW+1 -610 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %13 EO 2C N = 110 1 6.25
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 4C E-3 150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %16 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 68.75
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 31.25
18 EO 2C E-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %19 EO 1S W = -90 16 100.00
20 EO 2PcW+1 -870 16 100.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %22 EO 4C N = 420 13 81.25
23 EO 2C E = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %25 EO 2P S = 110 14 87.50
26 EO 2C W-1 100 5 31.25
27 EO 5K N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 18.75
29 EO 3S N+3 690 10 62.50
30 EO 2P N = 110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 261,0 / 432 = 60,42 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 NIGOT Pierre -ROEGIERS Marga
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 12.50
3 EO Pass Passe 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 5 31.25
8 EO 3CcE-3 500 5 31.25
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %10 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
11 EO 4PcE-1 100 3 18.75
12 EO 3T E+2 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 15 93.75
14 EO 4P N+2 480 3 18.75
15 EO 4C E-2 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %16 EO 5C W = -650 6 37.50
17 EO 3P W-2 100 11 68.75
18 EO 3K W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %19 EO 1ScE-1 200 5 31.25
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 43.75
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %22 EO 4C S = 420 13 81.25
23 EO 2C E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %25 EO 2S S = 120 10 62.50
26 EO 3C W-1 100 5 31.25
27 EO 4P N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 18.75
29 EO 6P N = 1430 6 37.50
30 EO 3C W-4 200 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 179,0 / 432 = 41,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
A10 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 % 4 EO 3C S+1 170 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
6 EO 2K E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 7 EO 5KcN-1 -200 13 81.25
8 EO 5K N+1 420 9 56.25
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %10 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 75.00
11 EO 4CcS = 590 0 0.00
12 EO 3K E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %13 EO 2S E = -120 10 62.50
14 EO 4P N+2 480 3 18.75
15 EO 2K S+2 130 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %16 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
17 EO 3C N = 140 5 31.25
18 EO 3KcE-1 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %19 EO 1S W-2 200 5 31.25
20 EO 3K S-2 -200 10 62.50
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %22 EO 4C S = 420 13 81.25
23 EO 2C E+2 -170 16 100.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %25 EO 1S S+2 150 4 25.00
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 75.00
27 EO 1S S = 90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %28 EO 4PcW-2 300 3 18.75
29 EO 6S N = 1440 1 6.25
30 EO 3P N = 140 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 179,0 / 432 = 41,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 % 1 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50
3 EO Pass Passe 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 4 EO 4T E+1 -150 10 62.50
5 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
6 EO 2K E+1 -110 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 5 31.25
8 EO 5K N+1 420 9 56.25
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 3 18.75
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 37.50
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 3P S+1 170 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A10 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 %19 EO 1S W-1 100 11 68.75
20 EO 3C S-3 -300 12 75.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %22 EO 4C S = 420 13 81.25
23 EO 2C E = -110 11 68.75
24 EO 3S E-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %25 EO 2S S+1 150 4 25.00
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 75.00
27 EO 5KcS-2 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %28 EO 1PcW+2 -360 16 100.00
29 EO 3S N+2 660 14 87.50
30 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 245,0 / 432 = 56,71 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 16 100.00
3 EO 3TcS-3 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 2 12.50
5 EO 4PcE-4 800 0 0.00
6 EO 2K E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 % 7 EO 6PcS-2 -500 16 100.00
8 EO 4KcN = 510 2 12.50
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %10 EO 4P N-2 -200 12 75.00
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
A10 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %16 EO 5KcN-2 -300 2 12.50
17 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 3K W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %19 EO 2T S-1 -50 14 87.50
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 43.75
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
23 EO 2C E-1 100 4 25.00
24 EO 3S W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %25 EO 2S S = 120 10 62.50
26 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 1P N = 80 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %28 EO 4P W-2 100 9 56.25
29 EO 4P N+2 680 12 75.00
30 EO 4CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 196,0 / 432 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 % 1 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 62.50
3 EO 2C N-3 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 75.00
5 EO 5C N-1 -100 15 93.75
6 EO 3T N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 % 7 EO 5P S-1 -100 9 56.25
8 EO 4CcE-3 500 5 31.25
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
A10 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 37.50
14 EO 1P N+4 200 8 50.00
15 EO 3C E-2 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %16 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 68.75
17 EO 3C N = 140 5 31.25
18 EO 1C E = -80 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %19 EO 1ScW-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 12.50
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
23 EO 2C E-1 100 4 25.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 %25 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 16 100.00
27 EO 5KxS-3 -1000 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %28 EO 3PcW-1 100 9 56.25
29 EO 6P N = 1430 6 37.50
30 EO 4K W-4 200 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 HUBLET Carlo -de TERWANGNE Philippe
A.7 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,29 % 1 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 100.00
2 EO 3C E+2 -200 4 25.00
3 EO 3K W+2 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
A.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 59,58 % 4 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 37.50
5 EO 4C N = 620 6 37.50
6 EO 2K E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 50,00 % 7 EO 3PcS+2 1130 0 0.00
8 EO 4K N+2 170 14 87.50
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 57,50 %10 EO 3CcS-1 -200 12 75.00
11 EO 4CcS-1 -100 6 37.50
12 EO 3S E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
A.4 de WASSEIGE Claude -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,92 %13 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 75.00
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 4T N+1 150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 34,38 %16 EO 4P E+3 -710 16 100.00
17 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 100.00
18 EO 3PcN-2 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.5 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,29 %19 EO 1S W-2 200 5 31.25
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 12.50
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
A.1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -BRIOT Fernand : 57,50 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
23 EO 2C E-1 100 4 25.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.6 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 53,54 %25 EO 2S N = 120 10 62.50
26 EO 2C E-1 100 5 31.25
27 EO 3ScN-2 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A10 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
|
|