|
Tournoi du 07-12-09
lu 07 dec 09
1 58,33 4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 58,15 5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
3 57,78 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy
4 52,04 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine
5 49,81 7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
6 49,26 1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
7 48,52 9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
8 44,63 10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
9 43,89 3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette
~ 43,89 11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
11 43,70 8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,78 14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 54,26 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
~ 54,26 22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
4 52,04 21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard
5 51,30 12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
6 51,11 15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 50,37 20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
8 47,41 18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
9 45,37 16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
10 43,33 13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François
11 42,78 19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 18 100.00
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
6 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 % 7 NS 4PcW-1 200 18 100.00
8 NS 3T N = 110 0 0.00
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %10 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N = 400 13 72.22
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 4P S+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 3K S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %19 NS 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %22 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33
23 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 3CcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
27 NS 4P N+2 480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %28 NS 5T S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44
30 NS 2K W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 7C S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %10 NS 3T S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N = 400 13 72.22
12 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %13 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 5P S = 450 17 94.44
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 2K S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 4P S+2 680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %22 NS 3S W-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 8 44.44
24 NS 2CcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 4K N+1 150 11 61.11
27 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %28 NS 6T N-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 4C W-4 400 17 94.44
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %31 NS 5CcS = 850 18 100.00
32 NS 2CcW-3 800 18 100.00
33 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 % 1 NS 2T E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S N = 90 17 94.44
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S S = 400 4 22.22
9 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %10 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
11 NS Pass Passe 4 22.22
12 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %13 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
14 NS 5P N-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
17 NS 5P N = 450 10 55.56
18 NS 2K S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
21 NS 4P S+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %22 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 11.11
23 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2K N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
26 NS 4T S+1 150 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 6C W-4 400 17 94.44
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %31 NS 5CcN-1 -200 12 66.67
32 NS 3K S-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 % 1 NS 2K N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 1S N = 90 17 94.44
3 NS 5C S+1 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 7C S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %10 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
12 NS 2C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %13 NS 3T E+1 -130 6 33.33
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 66.67
15 NS 4C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %16 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 4T S = 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %22 NS 2K S-1 -50 8 44.44
23 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
24 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4K S+2 170 18 100.00
27 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78
30 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %31 NS 6TcW-1 100 16 88.89
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 1 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 3S S+3 690 16 88.89
6 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N+3 490 18 100.00
9 NS 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %13 NS 2T E+1 -110 8 44.44
14 NS 5P S = 450 17 94.44
15 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %16 NS 4P S = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 2C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 5.56
21 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 12 66.67
23 NS 2S E-3 300 16 88.89
24 NS 2K N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %25 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4K S+1 150 11 61.11
27 NS 3P N+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
29 NS 3T E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
32 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
33 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 % 1 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 NS 5C S = 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 6C S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 7 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
8 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %10 NS 3K E-1 100 16 88.89
11 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
12 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %16 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 5T N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 4P S = 620 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %22 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 1CcW-2 500 18 100.00
24 NS 2P E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %25 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
26 NS 4K S+1 150 11 61.11
27 NS 4C S = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
30 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %31 NS 5C S-1 -100 14 77.78
32 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
33 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 % 1 NS 2T E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 NS 3C S+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 % 4 NS 3K N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 6C S = 1430 18 100.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %10 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
12 NS 2S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %13 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22
14 NS 3P S+2 200 8 44.44
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %19 NS 6P W-3 300 18 100.00
20 NS 3P W+1 -170 18 100.00
21 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
23 NS 2S E-2 200 14 77.78
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %25 NS 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
26 NS 3K S+2 150 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %28 NS 5T S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78
30 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
32 NS 3C N-3 -150 0 0.00
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 % 1 NS 2T E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
3 NS 6C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 6C S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 NS 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %10 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11
12 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %13 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
14 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
18 NS 2CcE = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 12 66.67
23 NS 1S N+2 150 12 66.67
24 NS 3C W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2C E = -110 3 16.67
27 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
30 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %31 NS 5P W = -450 5 27.78
32 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89
33 NS 2S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 % 1 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 22.22
2 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 7CcS-1 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %10 NS 2K W = -90 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N+1 430 17 94.44
12 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %13 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
14 NS 5P S-1 -50 4 22.22
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %16 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 3P S+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 4K S+1 150 11 61.11
27 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
30 NS 1P S+2 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %31 NS 5P W = -450 5 27.78
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 4P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 1 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
2 NS 2KcW = -180 2 11.11
3 NS 5C S+1 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
5 NS 7C N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
9 NS 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %10 NS 5K W-3 300 18 100.00
11 NS 6T S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 2P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %13 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
14 NS 6P S-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %16 NS 2CcE-2 500 18 100.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %19 NS 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
20 NS 4P W = -620 11 61.11
21 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 51,30 %22 NS 4T E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2CcW = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 %28 NS 6T S-1 -100 1 5.56
29 NS 3T E-1 100 11 61.11
30 NS 4T N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 %31 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard : 52,04 % 1 NS 2T E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78
3 NS 4C S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,37 % 4 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 4C S+2 680 14 77.78
6 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 7 NS 4KcS-1 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 47,41 %10 NS 2K W+1 -110 2 11.11
11 NS 2T N+2 130 8 44.44
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,26 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 66.67
15 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 45,37 %16 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
17 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
18 NS 2K S = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,11 %19 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22
21 NS 3P S+1 170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 57,78 %22 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
23 NS 1C W = -80 6 33.33
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,33 %25 NS 2K E+2 -130 8 44.44
26 NS 2C E = -110 3 16.67
27 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,26 %31 NS 5P W = -450 5 27.78
32 NS 1P N-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 0 0.00
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 % 4 EO 3K N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 6C S = 1430 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %10 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89
12 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %13 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
14 EO 5P N-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C W = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %16 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %22 EO 4T E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2CcW = -470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4K S+1 150 7 38.89
27 EO 3P N+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %31 EO 5C S-1 -100 4 22.22
32 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
33 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 HUBLET Carlo -HALLEUX Jean François
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 % 1 EO 2T E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 EO 3C S+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 7C S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 EO 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %10 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
11 EO Pass Passe 14 77.78
12 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %13 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
14 EO 5P S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 4T S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %19 EO 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 6 33.33
23 EO 2S E-3 300 2 11.11
24 EO 2K N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %25 EO 2K E+2 -130 10 55.56
26 EO 2C E = -110 15 83.33
27 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
30 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 6C S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S S = 400 14 77.78
9 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %10 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
12 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %13 EO 3T E+1 -130 12 66.67
14 EO 4P S = 420 6 33.33
15 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %16 EO 2CcE-2 500 0 0.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
21 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %22 EO 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
23 EO 1C W = -80 12 66.67
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %25 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4K S+1 150 7 38.89
27 EO 4C S = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %28 EO 5T S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56
30 EO 2K W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
32 EO 3C N-3 -150 18 100.00
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 % 1 EO 2T E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
3 EO 6C S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %10 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
12 EO 2C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %13 EO 4C W+1 -650 18 100.00
14 EO 6P S-2 -100 18 100.00
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 2C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %19 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78
21 EO 3P S+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %22 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
23 EO 1CcW-2 500 0 0.00
24 EO 2P E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00
27 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %28 EO 5T S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22
30 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %31 EO 5CcS = 850 0 0.00
32 EO 2CcW-3 800 0 0.00
33 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 % 1 EO 2T E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S N = 90 1 5.56
3 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 7CcS-1 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %10 EO 5K W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 6T S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 2P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %13 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 55.56
14 EO 5P S = 450 1 5.56
15 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %16 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 2K S = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 4P S = 620 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %22 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67
23 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 3CcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %25 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
26 EO 3K S+2 150 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %28 EO 6T N-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 4C W-4 400 1 5.56
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %31 EO 5P W = -450 13 72.22
32 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11
33 EO 2S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 % 1 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 77.78
2 EO 1S N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 7C S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
9 EO 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 EO 4P S = 420 6 33.33
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %16 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 5T N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %19 EO 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
23 EO 2S E-2 200 4 22.22
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 4K N+1 150 7 38.89
27 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
30 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %31 EO 5CcN-1 -200 6 33.33
32 EO 3K S-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 % 1 EO 2K N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 1S N = 90 1 5.56
3 EO 5C S+1 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 7C N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2S N+1 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
9 EO 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %10 EO 2K W+1 -110 16 88.89
11 EO 2T N+2 130 10 55.56
12 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 4P S+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 3K S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %19 EO 6P W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
21 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %22 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 10 55.56
24 EO 2CcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2C E = -110 15 83.33
27 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 6C W-4 400 1 5.56
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %31 EO 5P W = -450 13 72.22
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 4P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 % 1 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
2 EO 2KcW = -180 16 88.89
3 EO 5C S+1 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 3S S+3 690 2 11.11
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 % 7 EO 4KcS-1 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 %10 EO 3K E-1 100 2 11.11
11 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
12 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
15 EO 4C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 6 33.33
23 EO 1S N+2 150 6 33.33
24 EO 3C W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4T S+1 150 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
30 EO 1P S+2 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %31 EO 6TcW-1 100 2 11.11
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 de NICOLAS Bernard -RAVET Brigitte
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 % 1 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 % 4 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 4C S+2 680 4 22.22
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 % 7 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
8 EO 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 %10 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N = 400 5 27.78
12 EO 2S E = -120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %13 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78
14 EO 3P S+2 200 10 55.56
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %16 EO 4P S = 420 5 27.78
17 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
18 EO 2K S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %22 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 88.89
23 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2K N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 4K S+1 150 7 38.89
27 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22
30 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 FICHELLE Marcel -COLLET Edgard
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 % 1 EO 2T E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22
3 EO 4C S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 6C S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 % 7 EO 4PcW-1 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3T N = 110 18 100.00
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 %10 EO 2K W = -90 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1 5.56
12 EO 2S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %13 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 5P S = 450 1 5.56
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
18 EO 2CcE = -470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 94.44
21 EO 4P S+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %25 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
26 EO 4K S+2 170 0 0.00
27 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 44,63 %28 EO 6T S-1 -100 17 94.44
29 EO 3T E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 4T N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %31 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
32 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
33 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 52,04 % 1 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 50.00
3 EO 5C S = 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 49,26 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
5 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
6 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 PETIT Jean -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,81 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CASSART Guy : 57,78 %10 EO 3T S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N = 400 5 27.78
12 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 43,70 %13 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
14 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
15 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 PAQUET Anne -SALFI Huguette : 43,89 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
17 EO 5P N = 450 8 44.44
18 EO 2K S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 48,52 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
20 EO 4P W = -620 7 38.89
21 EO 3P S+1 170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 58,33 %22 EO 2K S-1 -50 10 55.56
23 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 ROEGIERS Marga -NIGOT Pierre : 58,15 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
29 EO 3T E-1 100 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,89 %31 EO 5P W = -450 13 72.22
32 EO 1P N-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
|
|