|
Tournoi du 08-04-10
1 57,41 9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
2 56,25 7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
~ 56,25 3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
4 51,62 6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal
5 50,23 8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
6 45,83 2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
7 44,68 1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
8 44,21 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
9 43,52 4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,33 12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy
2 55,09 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
3 54,63 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
4 52,78 17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
5 51,85 16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo
6 48,15 13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
7 45,14 10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine
8 43,52 14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
9 40,51 18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 NS 1S E-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 % 4 NS 3T N-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 37.50
6 NS 2P S+3 200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 % 7 NS 3KcE-1 200 15 93.75
8 NS 2PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
9 NS 1S W-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 37.50
11 NS 3C N+1 170 5 31.25
12 NS 6P E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 2S N = 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 13 81.25
17 NS 5C N+1 480 14 87.50
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %19 NS 1S N = 90 9 56.25
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 37.50
21 NS 2P S-2 -200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %22 NS 3S E = -600 7 43.75
23 NS 5K W-1 100 11 68.75
24 NS 5PcN-2 -300 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %25 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75
26 NS 2C E-2 200 16 100.00
27 NS 3S S+2 460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 193,0 / 432 = 44,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 4 25.00
2 NS 3S W-2 100 13 81.25
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 % 4 NS 3K S+1 130 9 56.25
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 37.50
6 NS 3C S+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 % 7 NS 4PcE-1 200 15 93.75
8 NS 2PcN-3 -500 2 12.50
9 NS 1S W-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %10 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
11 NS 3C S = 140 2 12.50
12 NS 5T W = -400 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 18.75
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 4 25.00
17 NS 4C N+2 480 14 87.50
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %19 NS 2S S-1 -50 3 18.75
20 NS 1S E = -90 16 100.00
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
23 NS 4K W = -130 2 12.50
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %25 NS 3T S-2 -100 16 100.00
26 NS 1S S-2 -200 2 12.50
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 198,0 / 432 = 45,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 % 1 NS 6P E-2 100 12 75.00
2 NS 3K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 15 93.75
5 NS 3S W-1 50 14 87.50
6 NS 3C S+3 230 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 % 7 NS 4CxS-2 -1000 0 0.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 10 62.50
9 NS 1S E-2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 75.00
12 NS 4P E+3 -510 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %13 NS 3S S = 600 7 43.75
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 13 81.25
17 NS 4C N+1 450 9 56.25
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %19 NS 2S S = 120 13 81.25
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 37.50
21 NS 3K E-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 37.50
24 NS 4P N = 420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %25 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
26 NS 2K S-1 -100 6 37.50
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 % 1 NS 4CcS-3 -500 2 12.50
2 NS 3S W-2 100 13 81.25
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 3 18.75
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 37.50
6 NS 4CcS+1 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 % 7 NS 3C S-2 -200 5 31.25
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75
9 NS 2T W-2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %10 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
11 NS 3KcE-2 300 8 50.00
12 NS 4P E = -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 4 25.00
17 NS 5C N = 450 9 56.25
18 NS 5K E+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 3 18.75
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 75.00
21 NS 3K E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 18.75
23 NS 3P N = 140 15 93.75
24 NS 6P N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %25 NS 4C W = -620 1 6.25
26 NS 3K S-2 -200 2 12.50
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 188,0 / 432 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 15 93.75
2 NS 3K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 3K S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 % 4 NS 3T N = 110 6 37.50
5 NS 3S E+2 -460 6 37.50
6 NS 5KcE-1 200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 % 7 NS 4C S-2 -200 5 31.25
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 25.00
9 NS 2C W-2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 18.75
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 75.00
12 NS 6P W+1 -1010 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 14 87.50
14 NS 5T E-1 50 16 100.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 4 25.00
17 NS 5TcW-2 300 6 37.50
18 NS 6K W = -920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 3 18.75
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 37.50
21 NS 3K E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %22 NS 2P E+2 -170 10 62.50
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 37.50
24 NS 5PcN-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %25 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75
26 NS 2T S = 90 8 50.00
27 NS 3S N+2 460 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 191,0 / 432 = 44,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 15 93.75
2 NS 3K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 % 4 NS 3K S+1 130 9 56.25
5 NS 6S E-1 50 14 87.50
6 NS 4CcS+1 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 10 62.50
8 NS 2S E+3 -210 12 75.00
9 NS 3C W-2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %10 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
11 NS 2C S+2 170 5 31.25
12 NS 5P E+2 -510 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %13 NS 3S S = 600 7 43.75
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS Pass Passe 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
17 NS 5T W-2 100 2 12.50
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %19 NS 2S S = 120 13 81.25
20 NS 3C E = -140 6 37.50
21 NS 3K E = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 18.75
23 NS 5K W-1 100 11 68.75
24 NS 2P N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %25 NS 4C E = -620 1 6.25
26 NS 2C E-1 100 10 62.50
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 NS 3K E-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 % 4 NS 3CcW-1 200 12 75.00
5 NS 6S W-1 50 14 87.50
6 NS 2KcE+1 -380 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 % 7 NS 2C S-1 -100 8 50.00
8 NS 2S E = -120 16 100.00
9 NS 1S W-3 300 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %10 NS 4P E = -620 12 75.00
11 NS 3S N+1 430 16 100.00
12 NS 4P E+3 -510 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 14 87.50
14 NS 4T E+2 -170 14 87.50
15 NS 3S N+2 660 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 4 25.00
17 NS 4C N+2 480 14 87.50
18 NS 5K E+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %19 NS 1S N = 90 9 56.25
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 37.50
21 NS 1S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 %22 NS 3S E = -600 7 43.75
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 37.50
24 NS 4PcN-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %25 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 43.75
26 NS 2P S = 110 13 81.25
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 % 1 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 5 31.25
3 NS 2S W-1 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 15 93.75
5 NS 3S W+4 -520 0 0.00
6 NS 4CcS = 590 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 % 7 NS 4CxS-1 -400 2 12.50
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 43.75
9 NS 2CcW-2 500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %10 NS 4P W = -620 12 75.00
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 10 62.50
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 2S N+1 150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 13 81.25
17 NS 2TcW+1 -280 0 0.00
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %19 NS 2KcW-2 500 16 100.00
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 87.50
21 NS 1S N-3 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 4PcN-1 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 6PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 %25 NS 4T S-3 -150 12 75.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 13 81.25
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 217,0 / 432 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie : 52,78 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 NS 3S E-4 200 16 100.00
3 NS 3C N = 140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 51,85 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 3 18.75
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 37.50
6 NS 2C S+3 200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 54,63 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 12 75.00
8 NS 2S E+2 -180 14 87.50
9 NS 2ScE-2 500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 43,52 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 75.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 48,15 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 14 87.50
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50
15 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy : 58,33 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 13 81.25
17 NS 3C N+3 230 4 25.00
18 NS 5K W+1 -420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 55,09 %19 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 18.75
20 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
21 NS 1S N-3 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine : 45,14 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 3P N = 140 15 93.75
24 NS 4PcN-1 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis : 40,51 %25 NS 3C E = -140 14 87.50
26 NS 2S S-2 -200 2 12.50
27 NS 3S N+3 490 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 248,0 / 432 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MARCHAL Christian -COLLET Christine
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 EO 1S E-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 % 4 EO 3K S+1 130 7 43.75
5 EO 6S E-1 50 2 12.50
6 EO 4CcS+1 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 % 7 EO 4PcE-1 200 1 6.25
8 EO 2PcN-3 -500 14 87.50
9 EO 1S W-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %10 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
11 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
12 EO 4P E+3 -510 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %13 EO 3S S = 600 9 56.25
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 18.75
17 EO 2TcW+1 -280 16 100.00
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 81.25
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 25.00
21 EO 3K E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 3P N = 140 1 6.25
24 EO 4PcN-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %25 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25
26 EO 2T S = 90 8 50.00
27 EO 3S N+2 460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 195,0 / 432 = 45,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 1 6.25
2 EO 3K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 % 4 EO 3K S+1 130 7 43.75
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 62.50
6 EO 3C S+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 % 7 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 50.00
8 EO 2S E = -120 0 0.00
9 EO 1S W-3 300 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 25.00
12 EO 4P E+3 -510 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 6 37.50
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 2S N+1 150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 12 75.00
17 EO 5C N = 450 7 43.75
18 EO 5K E+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %19 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 81.25
20 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 100.00
21 EO 1S N-3 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %22 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 37.50
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 62.50
24 EO 5PcN-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %25 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25
26 EO 2C E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3S S+2 460 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 JOBE Philippe -ROUSSEAU Willy
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 12 75.00
2 EO 3S W-2 100 3 18.75
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 % 4 EO 3CcW-1 200 4 25.00
5 EO 6S W-1 50 2 12.50
6 EO 2KcE+1 -380 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 7 EO 4CxS-2 -1000 16 100.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 6 37.50
9 EO 1S E-2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %10 EO 4P W = -620 4 25.00
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 100.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 16 100.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 2S S-3 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 3 18.75
17 EO 3C N+3 230 12 75.00
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 81.25
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 62.50
21 EO 3K E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %22 EO 3S E = -600 9 56.25
23 EO 5K W-1 100 5 31.25
24 EO 5PcN-2 -300 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %25 EO 4C E = -620 15 93.75
26 EO 2C E-1 100 6 37.50
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 252,0 / 432 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 EO 3K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 3P W+2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 1 6.25
5 EO 3S W-1 50 2 12.50
6 EO 3C S+3 230 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 7 EO 4CxS-1 -400 14 87.50
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25
9 EO 2CcW-2 500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %10 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
11 EO 3KcE-2 300 8 50.00
12 EO 4P E = -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 2 12.50
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 12 75.00
17 EO 5TcW-2 300 10 62.50
18 EO 6K W = -920 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %19 EO 1S N = 90 7 43.75
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 62.50
21 EO 2P S-2 -200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 81.25
23 EO 5K W-1 100 5 31.25
24 EO 2P N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %25 EO 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 EO 1S S-2 -200 14 87.50
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 208,0 / 432 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 1 EO 6P E-2 100 4 25.00
2 EO 3K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 1 6.25
5 EO 3S W+4 -520 16 100.00
6 EO 4CcS = 590 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 7 EO 3C S-2 -200 11 68.75
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 56.25
9 EO 2T W-2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 100.00
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 25.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 2 12.50
14 EO 5T E-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 3 18.75
17 EO 5C N+1 480 2 12.50
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %19 EO 2S S = 120 3 18.75
20 EO 3C E = -140 10 62.50
21 EO 3K E = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 100.00
23 EO 4K W = -130 14 87.50
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %25 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
26 EO 2P S = 110 3 18.75
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 188,0 / 432 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 % 1 EO 4PcE = -590 16 100.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 2S W-1 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 13 81.25
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 62.50
6 EO 4CcS+1 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 4 25.00
8 EO 2S E+2 -180 2 12.50
9 EO 2ScE-2 500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 81.25
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 25.00
12 EO 6P W+1 -1010 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 2S N = 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
17 EO 5T W-2 100 14 87.50
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %19 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 81.25
20 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %22 EO 3S E = -600 9 56.25
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 62.50
24 EO 4PcN-1 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %25 EO 3C E+1 -170 9 56.25
26 EO 2K S-1 -100 10 62.50
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 236,0 / 432 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 1 EO 4CcS-3 -500 14 87.50
2 EO 3S W-2 100 3 18.75
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 13 81.25
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 62.50
6 EO 2C S+3 200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 % 7 EO 4C S-2 -200 11 68.75
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 12 75.00
9 EO 2C W-2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 10 62.50
11 EO 3C N+1 170 11 68.75
12 EO 6P E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %13 EO 3S S = 600 9 56.25
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO Pass Passe 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 12 75.00
17 EO 4C N+2 480 2 12.50
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %19 EO 1S N = 90 7 43.75
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 62.50
21 EO 1S N-4 -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 62.50
24 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %25 EO 4T S-3 -150 4 25.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 3 18.75
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 224,0 / 432 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MARTIN Hubert -MARTIN Nathalie
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 8 50.00
2 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00
3 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 % 4 EO 3T N = 110 10 62.50
5 EO 3S E+2 -460 10 62.50
6 EO 5KcE-1 200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 % 7 EO 3KcE-1 200 1 6.25
8 EO 2PcN-4 -800 16 100.00
9 EO 1S W-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 %10 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
11 EO 2C S+2 170 11 68.75
12 EO 5P E+2 -510 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 81.25
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50
15 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 12 75.00
17 EO 4C N+2 480 2 12.50
18 EO 5K E+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %19 EO 2S S = 120 3 18.75
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 62.50
21 EO 3K E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 4PcN-1 -200 16 100.00
24 EO 6PcN-4 -800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %25 EO 4C W = -620 15 93.75
26 EO 3K S-2 -200 14 87.50
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 228,0 / 432 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CLERIN François-Xavier -FRAITURE Louis
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 44,21 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 1 6.25
2 EO 3K E-1 50 11 68.75
3 EO 3K S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 VAN DOOREN Michele -SALFI Huguette : 44,68 % 4 EO 3T N-1 -100 16 100.00
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 62.50
6 EO 2P S+3 200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 MARLET Pierre -BRUYR Pascal : 51,62 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 6 37.50
8 EO 2S E+3 -210 4 25.00
9 EO 3C W-2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 45,83 %10 EO 4P E = -620 4 25.00
11 EO 3C S = 140 14 87.50
12 EO 5T W = -400 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 56,25 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 2 12.50
14 EO 4T E+2 -170 2 12.50
15 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 18.75
17 EO 4C N+1 450 7 43.75
18 EO 5K W+1 -420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 50,23 %19 EO 2KcW-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 2 12.50
21 EO 1S N-3 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
4 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 81.25
23 EO 3P N = 140 1 6.25
24 EO 6P N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 57,41 %25 EO 3C E = -140 2 12.50
26 EO 2S S-2 -200 14 87.50
27 EO 3S N+3 490 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 175,0 / 432 = 40,51 %
|
|