|
Tournoi du 08-04-13
1 63,96 9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 54,79 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 51,88 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 50,62 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
5 49,38 3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy
6 49,17 2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel
7 48,54 7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques
8 43,75 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens
9 37,92 4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 0,00 10 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,90 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 58,80 19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
3 52,31 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
4 51,39 17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 49,07 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
6 46,06 14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
7 45,60 13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 45,14 18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude
9 44,68 15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 40,05 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 % 1 NS 3T N = 110 16 100.00
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 31.25
3 NS 4C W = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 56.25
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
6 NS 4K S+1 150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
8 NS 1P S+1 110 12 75.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %10 NS 1S N+3 180 12 75.00
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 5 31.25
12 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 3P S = 140 14 87.50
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %16 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 87.50
18 NS 2P W-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 12.50
21 NS 1S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %22 NS 2S N = 120 11 68.75
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 25.00
24 NS 2S W+2 -180 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %25 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 2CcW-1 200 11 68.75
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %28 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25
29 NS 3S N+1 630 6 37.50
30 NS 3S W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 210,0 / 480 = 43,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 6.25
2 NS 4P W-1 50 12 75.00
3 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 18.75
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 13 81.25
6 NS 3S S+3 490 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 18.75
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %10 NS 1S N+2 150 9 56.25
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 5 31.25
12 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %13 NS 5T W+1 -620 16 100.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 10 62.50
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %16 NS 3S W = -600 9 56.25
17 NS 3S N = 400 14 87.50
18 NS 1S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 12.50
21 NS 2C N+1 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %22 NS 2S N = 120 11 68.75
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 25.00
24 NS 3C W = -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 12.50
26 NS 1PcW-1 200 11 68.75
27 NS 3S W+3 -490 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 11 68.75
29 NS 3S S = 600 1 6.25
30 NS 3S W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 236,0 / 480 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 % 1 NS 3C E-1 50 14 87.50
2 NS 3P W = -140 5 31.25
3 NS 4C W = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 18.75
5 NS 2C W = -110 9 56.25
6 NS 3S S+4 520 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
8 NS 4C N = 420 15 93.75
9 NS 3S E = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %10 NS 1S N+2 150 9 56.25
11 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %13 NS 6T W+1 -1390 0 0.00
14 NS 3T E-1 50 7 43.75
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 87.50
18 NS 1ScE = -180 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 3C E = -140 8 50.00
21 NS 3C N = 140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
23 NS 1S S = 90 8 50.00
24 NS 2P N-2 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %25 NS 4P N = 420 12 75.00
26 NS 3K S+2 150 5 31.25
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 11 68.75
29 NS 3S N+2 660 12 75.00
30 NS 3S W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 237,0 / 480 = 49,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 31.25
3 NS 4C W = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 13 81.25
5 NS 2C W = -110 9 56.25
6 NS 3K N+2 150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 11 68.75
8 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3S W = -600 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %10 NS 3T N = 110 4 25.00
11 NS 5K E+1 -420 11 68.75
12 NS 3S S+1 630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 2C W = -110 4 25.00
15 NS 1P W+1 -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00
17 NS 3K S-1 -50 3 18.75
18 NS 1S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E = -620 6 37.50
21 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 5 31.25
26 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
27 NS 3S E-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %28 NS 3C W = -140 1 6.25
29 NS 3S S = 600 1 6.25
30 NS 3S W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
Total : 182,0 / 480 = 37,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 6.25
2 NS 4K N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 5C E-1 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 13 81.25
5 NS 3C E = -140 4 25.00
6 NS 3S N+4 520 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 15 93.75
8 NS 4C N = 420 15 93.75
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %10 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 5 31.25
12 NS 3T N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 3C E-1 50 7 43.75
15 NS 1S E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %16 NS 2S E-1 100 16 100.00
17 NS 2S N+1 150 9 56.25
18 NS 2C N-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %19 NS 4S E+2 -690 14 87.50
20 NS 4C E-2 200 16 100.00
21 NS 1S E-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %22 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 18.75
23 NS 2T E-1 100 10 62.50
24 NS 2S E+2 -180 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 9 56.25
26 NS 4K N+1 150 5 31.25
27 NS 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %28 NS 1S N = 90 14 87.50
29 NS 3S N+1 630 6 37.50
30 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 249,0 / 480 = 51,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75
2 NS 4P E-1 50 12 75.00
3 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 56.25
5 NS 1S W-1 50 16 100.00
6 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 8 50.00
9 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %10 NS 1S N = 90 2 12.50
11 NS 6S E-5 250 16 100.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %16 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 87.50
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 18.75
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 3T E-3 150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %22 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 18.75
23 NS 2C S = 110 12 75.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 9 56.25
26 NS 1S S+6 270 14 87.50
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %28 NS 2C W = -110 5 31.25
29 NS 3S S+1 630 6 37.50
30 NS 2S W-4 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 243,0 / 480 = 50,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75
2 NS 3P E = -140 5 31.25
3 NS 4C W = -620 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 18.75
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
6 NS 5K N = 400 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 15 93.75
8 NS 3T S-1 -50 8 50.00
9 NS 6S W-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %10 NS 1S N+4 210 15 93.75
11 NS 5K W+1 -420 11 68.75
12 NS 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %13 NS 5T W+2 -640 14 87.50
14 NS 2T E+2 -130 2 12.50
15 NS 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 25.00
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
18 NS 4C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 1S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 18.75
23 NS 1S N+1 120 14 87.50
24 NS 2S W-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %25 NS 4PcN = 590 14 87.50
26 NS 3T N+2 150 5 31.25
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 %28 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 6.25
29 NS 3S N+2 660 12 75.00
30 NS 2S W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 233,0 / 480 = 48,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 % 1 NS 2C E = -110 7 43.75
2 NS 3P W-1 50 12 75.00
3 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 % 4 NS 3K W+2 -150 16 100.00
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 25.00
6 NS 3S S+2 460 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 18.75
9 NS 6S E-1 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 %10 NS 1S N+1 120 6 37.50
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 5 31.25
12 NS 3S N+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 2P S+1 140 14 87.50
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %16 NS 3S W = -600 9 56.25
17 NS 1S S+2 150 9 56.25
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %19 NS 6S W-1 100 16 100.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 12.50
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 11 68.75
23 NS 3ScW-1 200 16 100.00
24 NS 3S W-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %25 NS 3P N = 140 5 31.25
26 NS 3K S+2 150 5 31.25
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %28 NS 2S S-1 -100 8 50.00
29 NS 3S S+3 690 16 100.00
30 NS 2S W-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 263,0 / 480 = 54,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 75.00
2 NS 4P W-2 100 16 100.00
3 NS 5K N-4 -200 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 18.75
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 81.25
6 NS 3S S+3 490 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 % 7 NS 3C W+2 -200 8 50.00
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 50.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %10 NS 1S N+4 210 15 93.75
11 NS 3S W = -400 14 87.50
12 NS 3S S+1 630 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 43.75
14 NS 2P S+1 140 14 87.50
15 NS 2C E-1 50 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %16 NS 2S E = -120 12 75.00
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 18.75
18 NS 3T E-3 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %19 NS 6S W = -1440 6 37.50
20 NS 4C E-1 100 12 75.00
21 NS 3C S+1 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %22 NS 3S N = 400 16 100.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 25.00
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %25 NS 5CcE-3 800 16 100.00
26 NS 3CcW-3 800 16 100.00
27 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %28 NS 3K S+1 130 16 100.00
29 NS 3S N+2 660 12 75.00
30 NS 3S W-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 307,0 / 480 = 63,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 -
16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 40,05 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 44,68 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette : 46,06 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 58,80 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude : 45,14 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,39 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,60 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,07 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 66,90 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 52,31 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 % 1 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3P E = -140 11 68.75
3 EO 4C W = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 81.25
5 EO 2C W = -110 7 43.75
6 EO 3S S+4 520 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 81.25
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %10 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 100.00
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 11 68.75
12 EO 3T N+2 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 100.00
15 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
18 EO 4C S-3 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %19 EO 6S W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 87.50
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %22 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 75.00
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %28 EO 3C W = -140 15 93.75
29 EO 3S S = 600 15 93.75
30 EO 3S W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
Total : 289,0 / 432 = 66,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 % 1 EO 3C E-1 50 2 12.50
2 EO 3P W = -140 11 68.75
3 EO 4C W = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 81.25
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 3 18.75
6 EO 3S S+3 490 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
8 EO 1P S+1 110 4 25.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %10 EO 1S N = 90 14 87.50
11 EO 6S E-5 250 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %13 EO 5T W+2 -640 2 12.50
14 EO 2T E+2 -130 14 87.50
15 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %16 EO 3S W = -600 7 43.75
17 EO 1S S+2 150 7 43.75
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 3C S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 11 68.75
26 EO 3T N+1 130 16 100.00
27 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %28 EO 1S N = 90 2 12.50
29 EO 3S N+1 630 10 62.50
30 EO 2S E = -120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 93.75
2 EO 4P W-1 50 4 25.00
3 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 7 43.75
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 100.00
6 EO 4K S+1 150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
8 EO 4C N = 420 1 6.25
9 EO 3S E = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %10 EO 1S N+4 210 1 6.25
11 EO 5K W+1 -420 5 31.25
12 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 2P S+1 140 2 12.50
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %16 EO 2S E = -120 4 25.00
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 81.25
18 EO 3T E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 16 100.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 7 43.75
26 EO 4K N+1 150 11 68.75
27 EO 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %28 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75
29 EO 3S S+1 630 10 62.50
30 EO 2S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 197,0 / 432 = 45,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Mercédès -GROSFILS Colette
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25
2 EO 3P W-1 50 4 25.00
3 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 81.25
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 3 18.75
6 EO 3S S+3 490 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
10 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %10 EO 3T N = 110 12 75.00
11 EO 5K E+1 -420 5 31.25
12 EO 3S S+1 630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %13 EO 5T W+1 -620 0 0.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 6 37.50
15 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %16 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 2S N+1 150 7 43.75
18 EO 2C N-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 3C E = -140 8 50.00
21 EO 3C N = 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %22 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 81.25
23 EO 2C S = 110 4 25.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %25 EO 4PcN-1 -100 16 100.00
26 EO 2CcW-1 200 5 31.25
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %28 EO 2C W+1 -140 15 93.75
29 EO 3S N+2 660 4 25.00
30 EO 2S W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 199,0 / 432 = 46,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 Beyne anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 4 25.00
2 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 5K N-4 -200 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
10 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 5 31.25
8 EO 3S N-3 -150 16 100.00
9 EO 3S W = -600 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %10 EO 1S N+1 120 10 62.50
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 11 68.75
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 3C E-1 50 9 56.25
15 EO 1S E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %16 EO 3S W = -600 7 43.75
17 EO 3S N = 400 2 12.50
18 EO 1S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 3T E-3 150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
23 EO 1S S = 90 8 50.00
24 EO 2P N-2 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %25 EO 4PcN = 590 2 12.50
26 EO 3T N+2 150 11 68.75
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %28 EO 2C W = -110 11 68.75
29 EO 3S N+1 630 10 62.50
30 EO 3S W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 193,0 / 432 = 44,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 3 18.75
5 EO 2C W = -110 7 43.75
6 EO 3K N+2 150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 1 6.25
8 EO 4C N = 420 1 6.25
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %10 EO 1S N+3 180 4 25.00
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 11 68.75
12 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 2P S+1 140 2 12.50
15 EO 2C E-1 50 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %16 EO 2K E+1 -110 2 12.50
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 81.25
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 87.50
21 EO 2C N+1 140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 81.25
23 EO 1S N+1 120 2 12.50
24 EO 2S W-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %25 EO 4P N = 420 4 25.00
26 EO 3K S+2 150 11 68.75
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %28 EO 2S S-1 -100 8 50.00
29 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
30 EO 2S W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 173,0 / 432 = 40,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 68.75
3 EO 4C W = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 3 18.75
5 EO 3C E = -140 12 75.00
6 EO 3S N+4 520 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 16 100.00
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 8 50.00
9 EO 3S W+3 -690 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %10 EO 1S N+4 210 1 6.25
11 EO 3S W = -400 2 12.50
12 EO 3S S+1 630 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 3P S = 140 2 12.50
15 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E-1 100 4 25.00
21 EO 1S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %22 EO 2S N = 120 5 31.25
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 75.00
24 EO 3C W = -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %25 EO 3P N = 140 11 68.75
26 EO 3K S+2 150 11 68.75
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 5 31.25
29 EO 3S N+2 660 4 25.00
30 EO 3S W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 222,0 / 432 = 51,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VERBOIS Léon -NELIS Claude
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 93.75
2 EO 4K N-2 -200 16 100.00
3 EO 5C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 43.75
5 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3P W = -140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 1 6.25
8 EO 3T S-1 -50 8 50.00
9 EO 6S W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %10 EO 1S N+2 150 7 43.75
11 EO 6S W = -990 16 100.00
12 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
10 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %16 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 100.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 12.50
18 EO 2P W-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E = -620 10 62.50
21 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 5 31.25
23 EO 3ScW-1 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 87.50
26 EO 1PcW-1 200 5 31.25
27 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %28 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N+2 660 4 25.00
30 EO 3S W-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 195,0 / 432 = 45,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25
2 EO 4P E-1 50 4 25.00
3 EO 3C W+1 -170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 81.25
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
6 EO 5K N = 400 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 81.25
9 EO 6S E-1 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
10 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %13 EO 6T W+1 -1390 16 100.00
14 EO 3T E-1 50 9 56.25
15 EO 1S E = -90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00
17 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 81.25
18 EO 1S E-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %19 EO 6S W = -1440 10 62.50
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 87.50
21 EO 1S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %22 EO 2S N-1 -50 13 81.25
23 EO 2T E-1 100 6 37.50
24 EO 2S E+2 -180 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 %25 EO 5CcE-3 800 0 0.00
26 EO 3CcW-3 800 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E+4 -520 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 5 31.25
29 EO 3S S = 600 15 93.75
30 EO 3S W-2 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
7 MOLS Bruno -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,54 % 1 EO 2C E = -110 9 56.25
2 EO 3P E = -140 11 68.75
3 EO 4C W = -620 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
8 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,79 % 4 EO 3K W+2 -150 0 0.00
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 75.00
6 EO 3S S+2 460 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 63,96 % 7 EO 3C W+2 -200 8 50.00
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 50.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Joel : 49,17 %10 EO 1S N+2 150 7 43.75
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 11 68.75
12 EO 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,92 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 56.25
14 EO 2C W = -110 12 75.00
15 EO 1P W+1 -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
3 VAGMAN David -cassart guy : 49,38 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 75.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 12.50
18 EO 1ScE = -180 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 51,88 %19 EO 4S E+2 -690 2 12.50
20 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 1S E-2 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -Van Oppens : 43,75 %22 EO 2S N = 120 5 31.25
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 75.00
24 EO 2S W+2 -180 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 50,62 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 7 43.75
26 EO 1S S+6 270 2 12.50
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
10 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 226,0 / 432 = 52,31 %
|
|