|
Tournoi du 09-07-12
1 62,04 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 54,81 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 53,15 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 52,22 11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
5 51,11 10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
6 49,26 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 47,96 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel
8 47,78 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
9 45,00 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette
10 43,70 3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
11 42,96 5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,15 18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 58,70 16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 56,67 17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès
4 55,93 20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 51,30 12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit
6 50,93 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 48,70 19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine
8 45,93 21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
9 42,78 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 38,52 15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
11 37,41 13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 % 1 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 33.33
2 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 4 NS 5K S-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3P W = -140 11 61.11
6 NS 2S W-5 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
8 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 2C E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %10 NS 3T W+3 -170 18 100.00
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %13 NS 5P S+2 710 4 22.22
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %16 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
17 NS 2K W+3 -150 6 33.33
18 NS 3C W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 4C W-1 100 6 33.33
24 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %25 NS 2K N+1 110 2 11.11
26 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %28 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 6P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
8 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 3C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %10 NS 5T W = -600 15 83.33
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 4C E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %13 NS 4P S+3 710 4 22.22
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 3C W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %19 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 NS 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
24 NS 1P N+2 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %25 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %28 NS 3PcN-1 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 2T E = -90 12 66.67
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %31 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00
32 NS 5TcS-2 -300 12 66.67
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
2 NS 3P N+1 170 2 11.11
3 NS 4KcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 % 7 NS 2S S+2 180 4 22.22
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 2C E = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
11 NS 4C N+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %13 NS 5P S+1 680 0 0.00
14 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3K W = -110 15 83.33
18 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %19 NS 1S W-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %22 NS 4C W+2 -680 6 33.33
23 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 3T N = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11
26 NS 3T N-2 -200 4 22.22
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %28 NS 1S W-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22
32 NS 5TcS-2 -300 12 66.67
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 236,0 / 540 = 43,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 % 1 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
2 NS 3P N+2 200 4 22.22
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 NS 1P S+3 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %10 NS 5T W = -600 15 83.33
11 NS 4C S+1 450 1 5.56
12 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %13 NS 6P S+1 1460 15 83.33
14 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22
15 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 55.56
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %19 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %22 NS 6C W = -1430 2 11.11
23 NS 3C W-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 5K W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %28 NS 2P N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %31 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
32 NS 5CcN-3 -500 8 44.44
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 % 1 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
2 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89
6 NS 4P S = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 5K S-4 -200 0 0.00
9 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %13 NS 6P S+1 1460 15 83.33
14 NS 5CcN-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 2K W+2 -130 10 55.56
18 NS 2K S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3P E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
23 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
24 NS 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11
26 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 2S E+1 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3T W+2 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %31 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
32 NS 5PcE = -850 0 0.00
33 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 1 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 % 4 NS 4K S = 130 18 100.00
5 NS 3P W = -140 11 61.11
6 NS 3C N+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %10 NS 6T W = -1370 2 11.11
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3K S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3S W-1 50 18 100.00
18 NS 2C E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %19 NS 2P N-2 -100 6 33.33
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
23 NS 3C W-1 100 6 33.33
24 NS 2K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %25 NS 2K N+2 130 6 33.33
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 3CcS-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %28 NS 2K W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3T E-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %31 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 % 1 NS 2K W+2 -130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 4P W-1 50 18 100.00
6 NS 2P S+2 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %10 NS 5T W+1 -620 12 66.67
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 4K S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %13 NS 4P S+3 710 4 22.22
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 3C N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %19 NS 2K N-3 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %22 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
23 NS 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %25 NS 2K N+1 110 2 11.11
26 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 4PcE-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %28 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %31 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 % 1 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 NS 3P S+2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 3C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %10 NS 5S E+1 -690 6 33.33
11 NS 4C S+1 450 1 5.56
12 NS 3K S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89
15 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 4K W = -130 10 55.56
18 NS 3K S+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
23 NS 3K N = 110 11 61.11
24 NS 2T N+1 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %25 NS 2K N+1 110 2 11.11
26 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
27 NS 2CcS = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %28 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 NS 3K N-1 -100 10 55.56
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %31 NS 4CcE-1 100 18 100.00
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 335,0 / 540 = 62,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 % 1 NS 1S E+4 -210 4 22.22
2 NS 4P N = 620 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4C N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 18 100.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %10 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 33.33
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 9 50.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 3C E = -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %19 NS 2S E-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 11 61.11
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
27 NS 5KcW = -550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 %28 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 16.67
29 NS 3T E = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %31 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 55.56
32 NS 4P E+2 -680 2 11.11
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 18 100.00
2 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 % 4 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
6 NS 2P S+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %10 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0 0.00
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %13 NS 6P S+1 1460 15 83.33
14 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00
15 NS 2C N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 2C W = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %19 NS 1S W = -90 10 55.56
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3P E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit : 51,30 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22
23 NS 4K N = 130 15 83.33
24 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 %28 NS 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 NS 2K N = 90 14 77.78
30 NS 5C E = -450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 %31 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
32 NS 5T S-2 -100 18 100.00
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 276,0 / 540 = 51,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,93 % 1 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
2 NS 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 55,93 % 4 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
5 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 3P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine : 48,70 % 7 NS 1P S+4 200 6 33.33
8 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 63,15 %10 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 33.33
11 NS 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
12 NS 3C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès : 56,67 %13 NS 6P S+1 1460 15 83.33
14 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 58,70 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 3K W = -110 15 83.33
18 NS 2K S = 90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 38,52 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 15 83.33
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 NS 3P E = -140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 50,93 %22 NS 6C W-1 100 18 100.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.56
24 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette : 37,41 %25 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 42,78 %31 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
32 NS 5TcS-2 -300 12 66.67
33 NS 3S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 HALLEUX Jean François -SPELLANZON Benoit
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 % 1 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 66.67
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 2P S+2 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
8 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 3C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %10 EO 5S E+1 -690 12 66.67
11 EO 4C S+1 450 17 94.44
12 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %13 EO 5P S+1 680 18 100.00
14 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 3C E = -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %19 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78
23 EO 4K N = 130 3 16.67
24 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89
26 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 2S E+1 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %31 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 SEVRIN Jacqueline -ERNOTTE Marie-Antoinette
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 % 1 EO 2K W+2 -130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 3C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
11 EO 4C N+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3K E+1 -130 8 44.44
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %19 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3P E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
23 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
24 EO 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %25 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %28 EO 2K W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3T E-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 202,0 / 540 = 37,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 EO 3P S+2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 % 7 EO 2S S+2 180 14 77.78
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 2C E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %10 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 66.67
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %13 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 16.67
14 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78
15 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 2C W = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3P E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %22 EO 6C W-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 17 94.44
24 EO 2C S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %25 EO 2K N+2 130 12 66.67
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 3CcS-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %28 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 6P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %31 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 % 1 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %10 EO 5T W = -600 3 16.67
11 EO 4C S+1 450 17 94.44
12 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %13 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 16.67
14 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 2K W+2 -130 8 44.44
18 EO 2K S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3P E = -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
23 EO 3C W-1 100 12 66.67
24 EO 2K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %25 EO 2K N+1 110 16 88.89
26 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %28 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %31 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00
32 EO 5TcS-2 -300 6 33.33
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 208,0 / 540 = 38,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
2 EO 3P N+1 170 16 88.89
3 EO 4KcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4C N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %10 EO 6S E+1 -1470 18 100.00
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %13 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 16.67
14 EO 5CcN-2 -300 18 100.00
15 EO 2C N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3K W = -110 3 16.67
18 EO 2K S = 90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %19 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 66.67
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 4C W-1 100 12 66.67
24 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %25 EO 2K N+1 110 16 88.89
26 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 4PcE-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %28 EO 3PcN-1 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 2T E = -90 6 33.33
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %31 EO 4CcE-1 100 0 0.00
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CASSART Guy -STEED Mercédès
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 % 1 EO 1S E+4 -210 14 77.78
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 EO 1P S+3 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %13 EO 6P S+1 1460 3 16.67
14 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 2C E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %22 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
23 EO 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %25 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %28 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 EO 3K N-1 -100 8 44.44
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78
32 EO 5TcS-2 -300 6 33.33
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 1 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
2 EO 3P N+2 200 14 77.78
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 % 4 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
6 EO 2P S+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 5K S-4 -200 18 100.00
9 EO 4C W = -620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %10 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 66.67
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %16 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
17 EO 2K W+3 -150 12 66.67
18 EO 3C W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %19 EO 2K N-3 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 50.00
23 EO 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
24 EO 1P N+2 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %25 EO 2K N+1 110 16 88.89
26 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
27 EO 2CcS = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %28 EO 1S W-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %31 EO 2C E+1 -140 8 44.44
32 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 88.89
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 341,0 / 540 = 63,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 de WASSEIGE Ariane -GENDEBIEN Catherine
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11
6 EO 4P S = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 % 7 EO 1P S+4 200 12 66.67
8 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 %10 EO 6T W = -1370 16 88.89
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3K S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %13 EO 5P S+2 710 14 77.78
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %19 EO 1S W = -90 8 44.44
20 EO 3S S = 600 9 50.00
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
23 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 2T N+1 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89
26 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 77.78
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %28 EO 3P N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 3T E = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %31 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
32 EO 5CcN-3 -500 10 55.56
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 % 1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 % 4 EO 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
5 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 3P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 %10 EO 3T W+3 -170 0 0.00
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 3K S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %13 EO 4P S+3 710 14 77.78
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 3C N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 3C W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %22 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 66.67
23 EO 3K N = 110 7 38.89
24 EO 3T N = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 18 100.00
27 EO 5KcW = -550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %28 EO 2P N-1 -100 15 83.33
29 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 4C W+2 -480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %31 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
32 EO 5T S-2 -100 0 0.00
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 % 1 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 % 4 EO 4K S = 130 0 0.00
5 EO 3P W = -140 7 38.89
6 EO 3C N+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
8 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
9 EO 2C E = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 %10 EO 5T W+1 -620 6 33.33
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 4K S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %13 EO 4P S+3 710 14 77.78
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 4K W = -130 8 44.44
18 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %19 EO 1S W-1 100 3 16.67
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 7 38.89
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
27 EO 5K W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 51,11 %28 EO 2K E = -90 9 50.00
29 EO 2K N = 90 4 22.22
30 EO 5C E = -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %31 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
32 EO 5PcE = -850 18 100.00
33 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,81 % 1 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
2 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 47,78 % 4 EO 5K S-2 -200 16 88.89
5 EO 3P W = -140 7 38.89
6 EO 2S W-5 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,26 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -MASSAUX Joel : 47,96 %10 EO 5T W = -600 3 16.67
11 EO 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
12 EO 4C E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,04 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 9 50.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11
15 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 43,70 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 3K W = -110 3 16.67
18 EO 2C E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -SALFI Huguette : 45,00 %19 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %22 EO 6C W = -1430 16 88.89
23 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 42,96 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3T W+2 -150 18 100.00
30 EO 4C E+1 -450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 52,22 %31 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
32 EO 5TcS-2 -300 6 33.33
33 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
|
|