|
Tournoi du 09-08-10
1 62,73 7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
2 56,25 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 51,16 6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
4 48,61 2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
5 47,92 5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
6 47,22 4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques
7 46,30 3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
8 45,14 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
9 44,68 9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,19 14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 57,18 11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
3 56,25 15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 51,62 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
5 48,15 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 47,92 17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 44,44 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 42,36 16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
9 41,90 10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 2P S = 110 14 87.50
3 NS 2C W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 % 4 NS 3C W-3 300 10 62.50
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 43.75
6 NS 6C S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 % 7 NS 5K N = 600 12 75.00
8 NS 2P E-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 43.75
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %13 NS 5K N = 600 6 37.50
14 NS 3P S = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 6P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %19 NS 3K S+2 150 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W = -600 2 12.50
21 NS 6C S = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %22 NS 3S E+4 -720 0 0.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 2 12.50
24 NS 3T N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
26 NS 1S E-1 100 8 50.00
27 NS 2K S+2 130 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 195,0 / 432 = 45,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 2T W+2 -130 7 43.75
3 NS 4C E-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 2 12.50
5 NS 3S E-1 50 13 81.25
6 NS 4P S+1 450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 % 7 NS 3C N+1 170 6 37.50
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
9 NS 2P W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 43.75
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %13 NS 3C W-1 100 2 12.50
14 NS 3P S = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %16 NS 3S E = -600 13 81.25
17 NS 4P N+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 3S N+3 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 31.25
23 NS 1S W+3 -180 14 87.50
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %25 NS 5CcE-2 500 12 75.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
27 NS 1C S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 210,0 / 432 = 48,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 % 1 NS 3P S+2 200 1 6.25
2 NS 3P S-1 -100 12 75.00
3 NS 3C E = -140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 % 4 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
5 NS 5K W-1 50 13 81.25
6 NS 4C S+2 480 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 % 7 NS 4P E-3 300 10 62.50
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
9 NS 3KcS-2 -300 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 43.75
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 15 93.75
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 4 25.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %19 NS 5K N = 400 13 81.25
20 NS 3S W = -600 2 12.50
21 NS 6C N = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
23 NS 1C S-2 -200 11 68.75
24 NS 3T N+1 130 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %25 NS 5CcE-2 500 12 75.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
27 NS 2K S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 200,0 / 432 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 4TcW-2 300 16 100.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 % 4 NS 4C W-5 500 12 75.00
5 NS 2K W+2 -130 7 43.75
6 NS 4C S+2 480 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 % 7 NS 4K N = 130 4 25.00
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 14 87.50
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %13 NS 4PcE-1 200 4 25.00
14 NS 3P N = 140 10 62.50
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25
17 NS 4P N+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %19 NS 5K N = 400 13 81.25
20 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 6C N = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 12.50
23 NS 1C S-4 -400 4 25.00
24 NS 2S W = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %25 NS 3P S+1 170 2 12.50
26 NS 1S E-2 200 13 81.25
27 NS 3K N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 204,0 / 432 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 15 93.75
2 NS 3PcN-1 -200 3 18.75
3 NS 2C W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 % 4 NS 4K S = 130 7 43.75
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 43.75
6 NS 6C N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 % 7 NS 4CcS = 790 16 100.00
8 NS 4P E-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 3KcS-2 -300 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %10 NS 2S N+2 180 10 62.50
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 43.75
12 NS 1S W+2 -150 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %13 NS 5K N+1 620 10 62.50
14 NS 4C E-2 100 6 37.50
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %16 NS 3S E = -600 13 81.25
17 NS 4P N = 420 3 18.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 6C N = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %22 NS 6T W-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 2TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 4TcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %25 NS 5CcW-2 500 12 75.00
26 NS 2K S-1 -100 2 12.50
27 NS 2K S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 207,0 / 432 = 47,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 3T W = -110 10 62.50
3 NS 2C W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 14 87.50
5 NS 5K W = -400 0 0.00
6 NS 6C S = 980 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 % 7 NS 5K N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 4P E-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 3P W-1 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
11 NS 2C W-1 50 16 100.00
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %13 NS 5K N+1 620 10 62.50
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 3S N = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 6.25
17 NS 4P S = 420 3 18.75
18 NS 6S W = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %19 NS 4K N+1 150 5 31.25
20 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 3S N+3 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 31.25
23 NS 2K S-2 -200 11 68.75
24 NS 2PcE-4 800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %25 NS 5PcS = 650 16 100.00
26 NS 1S E-1 100 8 50.00
27 NS 3K S = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 221,0 / 432 = 51,16 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 15 93.75
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 7 43.75
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 4 25.00
5 NS 3ScE-3 500 16 100.00
6 NS 6C S = 980 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 % 7 NS 3P E-1 100 2 12.50
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00
9 NS 4C W-3 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 87.50
11 NS 3K S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 1S W+1 -120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 15 93.75
14 NS 3P S+1 170 16 100.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 6T W = -920 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %19 NS 3CcW+1 -930 0 0.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 6S N = 1440 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 %22 NS 6S E-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 1C S-3 -300 7 43.75
24 NS 3T S = 110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
26 NS 3T E-1 100 8 50.00
27 NS 2S S = 120 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 271,0 / 432 = 62,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 NS 3K S-2 -200 3 18.75
3 NS 3C W = -140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 % 4 NS 4K S = 130 7 43.75
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 43.75
6 NS 6C S-1 -50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 14 87.50
8 NS 1S W-1 50 13 81.25
9 NS 4T E+1 -150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 87.50
11 NS 3C W = -140 7 43.75
12 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 18.75
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 16 100.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 11 68.75
18 NS 6K E = -920 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %19 NS 3S S = 400 13 81.25
20 NS 3S W-2 200 16 100.00
21 NS 6C N = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 %22 NS 6T E-1 100 14 87.50
23 NS 1C S-1 -100 16 100.00
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 6 37.50
26 NS 3S W-6 600 16 100.00
27 NS 2K S = 90 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon
17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,92 % 1 NS 3C W-4 200 1 6.25
2 NS 4TcW+1 -610 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 42,36 % 4 NS 4KcS = 710 16 100.00
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 2 12.50
6 NS 7S N-2 -100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,25 % 7 NS 4PcE-1 200 8 50.00
8 NS 2P E = -110 8 50.00
9 NS 4C E = -620 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,19 %10 NS 4C N = 620 14 87.50
11 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 43.75
12 NS 1S E+3 -180 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,44 %13 NS 5K N+1 620 10 62.50
14 NS 5C E-3 150 14 87.50
15 NS 4P S = 620 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,62 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 NS 2P S+3 200 0 0.00
18 NS 6S E = -990 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 57,18 %19 NS 3S S = 400 13 81.25
20 NS 3S W = -600 2 12.50
21 NS 6C S = 1430 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,90 %22 NS 3S E = -600 10 62.50
23 NS 1C S-3 -300 7 43.75
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,15 %25 NS 4P S+1 450 6 37.50
26 NS 2C E-2 200 13 81.25
27 NS 3K S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 193,0 / 432 = 44,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 2P S = 110 2 12.50
3 EO 2C W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 2 12.50
5 EO 5K W = -400 16 100.00
6 EO 6C S = 980 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 % 7 EO 3C N+1 170 10 62.50
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 100.00
9 EO 2P W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %10 EO 4C N = 620 2 12.50
11 EO 3K S-3 -150 16 100.00
12 EO 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 1 6.25
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 6K E = -920 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %19 EO 5K N = 400 3 18.75
20 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 6C N = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %22 EO 3S E = -600 6 37.50
23 EO 1C S-3 -300 9 56.25
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %25 EO 5CcW-2 500 4 25.00
26 EO 2K S-1 -100 14 87.50
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 181,0 / 432 = 41,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 3T W = -110 6 37.50
3 EO 2C W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 14 87.50
5 EO 3S E-1 50 3 18.75
6 EO 4P S+1 450 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 % 7 EO 3P E-1 100 14 87.50
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
9 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 16 100.00
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 56.25
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 100.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 81.25
15 EO 3S S = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %19 EO 3S S = 400 3 18.75
20 EO 3S W = -600 14 87.50
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %22 EO 6T W-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 2TcN-3 -800 16 100.00
24 EO 4TcN-2 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 16 100.00
26 EO 1S E-1 100 8 50.00
27 EO 2K S+2 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 247,0 / 432 = 57,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 2T W+2 -130 9 56.25
3 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 12 75.00
5 EO 3ScE-3 500 0 0.00
6 EO 6C S = 980 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 % 7 EO 4P E-3 300 6 37.50
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
9 EO 3KcS-2 -300 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %10 EO 4C N = 620 2 12.50
11 EO 3C W = -140 9 56.25
12 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %13 EO 4PcE-1 200 12 75.00
14 EO 3P N = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 3S S = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 EO 2P S+3 200 16 100.00
18 EO 6S E = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 6C N = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %22 EO 3S E+4 -720 16 100.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 14 87.50
24 EO 3T N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %25 EO 5PcS = 650 0 0.00
26 EO 1S E-1 100 8 50.00
27 EO 3K S = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 1 6.25
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 9 56.25
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 % 4 EO 4C N-3 -300 16 100.00
5 EO 5K W-1 50 3 18.75
6 EO 4C S+2 480 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 2 12.50
8 EO 1S W-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 4T E+1 -150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 2 12.50
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %13 EO 5K N+1 620 6 37.50
14 EO 5C E-3 150 2 12.50
15 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %16 EO 3S E = -600 3 18.75
17 EO 4P N = 420 13 81.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %19 EO 3K S+2 150 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W = -600 14 87.50
21 EO 6C S = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 68.75
23 EO 2K S-2 -200 5 31.25
24 EO 2PcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %25 EO 5CcE-2 500 4 25.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 100.00
27 EO 1C S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 % 1 EO 3P S+2 200 15 93.75
2 EO 3P S-1 -100 4 25.00
3 EO 3C E = -140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 4 EO 4K S = 130 9 56.25
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 56.25
6 EO 6C S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 % 7 EO 4K N = 130 12 75.00
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %10 EO 4C N = 620 2 12.50
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 56.25
12 EO 1S E+3 -180 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %13 EO 5K N+1 620 6 37.50
14 EO 4C E-2 100 10 62.50
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 3S N+3 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 68.75
23 EO 1S W+3 -180 2 12.50
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
26 EO 3T E-1 100 8 50.00
27 EO 2S S = 120 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 260,0 / 432 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 3K S-2 -200 13 81.25
3 EO 3C W = -140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 % 4 EO 4C W-5 500 4 25.00
5 EO 2K W+2 -130 9 56.25
6 EO 4C S+2 480 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 % 7 EO 4PcE-1 200 8 50.00
8 EO 2P E = -110 8 50.00
9 EO 4C E = -620 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 %10 EO 2S N+2 180 6 37.50
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 56.25
12 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %13 EO 5K N = 600 10 62.50
14 EO 3P S = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 6P S-2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 93.75
17 EO 4P S = 420 13 81.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %19 EO 4K N+1 150 11 68.75
20 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 3S N+3 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %22 EO 6S E-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 1C S-3 -300 9 56.25
24 EO 3T S = 110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %25 EO 5CcE-2 500 4 25.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
27 EO 2K S+1 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 243,0 / 432 = 56,25 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 8 50.00
2 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 % 4 EO 4KcS = 710 0 0.00
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 87.50
6 EO 7S N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 % 7 EO 4CcS = 790 0 0.00
8 EO 4P E-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 3KcS-2 -300 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 56.25
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %13 EO 5K N+1 620 6 37.50
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 100.00
15 EO 3S N = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %16 EO 3S E = -600 3 18.75
17 EO 4P N+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %19 EO 3CcW+1 -930 16 100.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
23 EO 1C S-2 -200 5 31.25
24 EO 3T N+1 130 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 10 62.50
26 EO 3S W-6 600 0 0.00
27 EO 2K S = 90 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 183,0 / 432 = 42,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 % 1 EO 3C W-4 200 15 93.75
2 EO 4TcW+1 -610 16 100.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 % 4 EO 4K S = 130 9 56.25
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 56.25
6 EO 6C N-2 -100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 % 7 EO 5K N = 600 4 25.00
8 EO 2P E-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
11 EO 2C W-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %13 EO 3C W-1 100 14 87.50
14 EO 3P S = 140 6 37.50
15 EO 3S S = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 50.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 6T W = -920 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %19 EO 5K N = 400 3 18.75
20 EO 3S W = -600 14 87.50
21 EO 6C N = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %22 EO 6T E-1 100 2 12.50
23 EO 1C S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %25 EO 3P S+1 170 14 87.50
26 EO 1S E-2 200 3 18.75
27 EO 3K N = 110 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 207,0 / 432 = 47,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,92 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 1 6.25
2 EO 3PcN-1 -200 13 81.25
3 EO 2C W = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 45,14 % 4 EO 3C W-3 300 6 37.50
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 9 56.25
6 EO 6C S-1 -50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 51,16 % 7 EO 5K N-1 -100 16 100.00
8 EO 4P E-1 50 3 18.75
9 EO 3P W-1 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 48,61 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
11 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 56.25
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -HALLEUX Jean François : 62,73 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 1 6.25
14 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
3 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,30 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 75.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 31.25
18 EO 6S W = -990 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,25 %19 EO 3S S = 400 3 18.75
20 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 6C N = 1430 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,22 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 87.50
23 EO 1C S-4 -400 12 75.00
24 EO 2S W = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
9 FRAITURE Louis -VERBOIS Léon : 44,68 %25 EO 4P S+1 450 10 62.50
26 EO 2C E-2 200 3 18.75
27 EO 3K S-1 -50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 208,0 / 432 = 48,15 %
|
|