|
Tournoi du 10-05-12
1 61,59 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 57,15 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
3 55,74 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
4 54,19 9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François
5 53,67 2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 51,40 12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis
7 50,37 4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
8 49,74 7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
9 49,07 10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
~ 49,07 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
11 42,33 11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
12 39,57 13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
13 37,96 6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine
14 0,00 14 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
14 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 2.6 26.00
8 NS 1S S = 90 2.6 26.00
9 NS 2C S+2 170 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %10 EO 2C N-1 -100 0.2 2.00
11 EO 3K N-2 -100 2.6 26.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %13 EO 3T E+1 -130 0.2 2.00
14 EO 4C N-2 -100 8.6 86.00
15 EO 2C S-2 -200 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %16 NS 2C S = 110 9.5 95.00
17 NS 2K W+1 -110 0.5 5.00
18 NS 3T S+1 130 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 8 80.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 5 50.00
24 NS 4C N+1 450 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 9.5 95.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 3.5 35.00
27 NS 3T N+1 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %31 EO 3S N = 600 0.5 5.00
32 EO 4P W = -620 9.5 95.00
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %34 NS 3C W-2 100 8.6 86.00
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 8.6 86.00
36 NS 3S S+2 660 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %37 EO 5C E = -450 10 100.00
38 EO 1S E = -90 6 60.00
39 EO 4C E = -620 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 154,3 / 270 = 57,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 % 1 EO 3C E-1 50 1 10.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 80.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %10 NS 4C N-4 -400 2.6 26.00
11 NS 1S E = -90 9.8 98.00
12 NS 2P N+1 140 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.6 86.00
14 EO 3C N+1 170 0.2 2.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %16 EO 2C S = 110 0.5 5.00
17 EO 2K W+1 -110 9.5 95.00
18 EO 3T S+1 130 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %19 NS 3S W = -600 0.5 5.00
20 NS 3K E = -110 8 80.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %25 NS 3S E = -600 3.5 35.00
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.5 5.00
27 NS 2PcW-1 100 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %31 EO 2C W-2 100 5 50.00
32 EO 2P W+2 -170 3.5 35.00
33 EO 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %34 EO 2C W = -110 9.8 98.00
35 EO 3S E+2 -660 8.6 86.00
36 EO 3S N+1 630 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 86,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %37 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 NS 1S E-2 200 10 100.00
39 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 144,9 / 270 = 53,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 % 1 NS 5T W-1 50 9 90.00
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 90.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 % 4 EO 3C W = -140 9.8 98.00
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 7.4 74.00
6 EO 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
14 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 80.00
17 EO 3T W-4 200 0.5 5.00
18 EO 4P N-3 -300 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %19 EO 3S W = -600 9.5 95.00
20 EO 3K E = -110 2 20.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %22 NS 1S N = 90 2 20.00
23 NS 3P E-1 100 9.5 95.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.5 5.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 8 80.00
27 NS 4T N = 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %28 NS 3C E-3 150 9 90.00
29 NS 3P S+1 170 7 70.00
30 NS 3P N = 140 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %34 EO 3C W-2 100 1.4 14.00
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 1.4 14.00
36 EO 3S S+2 660 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %37 EO 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
38 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 100.00
39 EO 2C E+2 -170 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 150,5 / 270 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 % 1 EO 3PcS-3 -500 10 100.00
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 80.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.6 26.00
6 NS 5CcE-2 500 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 7.4 74.00
8 EO 1S S = 90 7.4 74.00
9 EO 2C S+2 170 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %13 EO 2S W+2 -180 2.6 26.00
14 EO 2T N+2 130 2.6 26.00
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %19 EO 4CcS-3 -500 6.5 65.00
20 EO 3C N-3 -300 6.5 65.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %22 EO 1S N = 90 8 80.00
23 EO 3P E-1 100 0.5 5.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %28 NS 1S W = -90 5 50.00
29 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 10.00
30 NS 2P N = 110 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %31 NS 2C W-2 100 5 50.00
32 NS 4K N-2 -100 9.5 95.00
33 NS 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %37 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 EO 1S E-2 200 0 0.00
39 EO 3C E+1 -170 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 136,0 / 270 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 % 1 EO 5T W-1 50 1 10.00
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 1 10.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 7.4 74.00
6 EO 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 % 7 NS 2K W = -90 0.2 2.00
8 NS 1S S+2 150 9.8 98.00
9 NS 4C S = 420 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %10 EO 4C N-4 -400 7.4 74.00
11 EO 1S E = -90 0.2 2.00
12 EO 2P N+1 140 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %16 EO 1S S = 90 3.5 35.00
17 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 65.00
18 EO 4P N-2 -200 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %22 EO 1S N = 90 8 80.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 5 50.00
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %31 NS 3S N = 600 9.5 95.00
32 NS 4P W = -620 0.5 5.00
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %34 NS 3T E-2 100 8.6 86.00
35 NS 3S W+1 -630 8.6 86.00
36 NS 3S N = 600 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %37 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 NS 1S E = -90 4 40.00
39 NS 3C E+2 -200 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 132,5 / 270 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 20.00
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 60.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 EO 4C W+1 -450 7.4 74.00
6 EO 5CcE-2 500 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 % 7 EO 2T S+1 110 3.8 38.00
8 EO 1S S = 90 7.4 74.00
9 EO 4C S = 420 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %10 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0.2 2.00
11 NS 1S E+2 -150 2.6 26.00
12 NS 2P S-1 -100 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %19 EO 2S W+2 -180 3.5 35.00
20 EO 3KcE = -670 9.5 95.00
21 EO 3S W+3 -490 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 8 80.00
23 NS 4KcN-2 -500 0.5 5.00
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 0.5 5.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 6.5 65.00
27 EO 3T N+1 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %34 NS 2C W = -110 0.2 2.00
35 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.4 14.00
36 NS 3S N+1 630 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 14,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %37 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 NS 1S E = -90 4 40.00
39 NS 4C E = -620 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 102,5 / 270 = 37,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 % 1 NS 4T W = -130 5 50.00
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 90.00
3 NS 3S E-2 200 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 % 4 NS 4C W-2 200 9.8 98.00
5 NS 4C W = -420 8.6 86.00
6 NS 6TcS-3 -500 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 % 7 EO 2K W = -90 9.8 98.00
8 EO 1S S+2 150 0.2 2.00
9 EO 4C S = 420 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %10 EO 3T W+2 -150 2.6 26.00
11 EO 1S E+3 -180 9.8 98.00
12 EO 1S N+1 120 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.4 14.00
14 NS 6T S-2 -100 1.4 14.00
15 NS 4CcS-2 -500 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 2 20.00
23 EO 2P E = -110 5 50.00
24 EO 4C N+1 450 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %25 NS 2S W+1 -150 6.5 65.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 8 80.00
27 NS 3S S+1 430 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %34 NS 3K E-1 50 3.8 38.00
35 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.4 14.00
36 NS 3S S+3 690 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %37 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 100.00
38 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
39 NS 2C E+2 -170 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 134,3 / 270 = 49,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 % 1 NS 3PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 20.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 % 7 NS 1S E-3 300 9.8 98.00
8 NS 1S S+1 120 7.4 74.00
9 NS 4C S = 420 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %10 EO 3CcN-2 -500 9.8 98.00
11 EO 1S E+2 -150 7.4 74.00
12 EO 2P S-1 -100 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %13 EO 3S W = -600 5 50.00
14 EO 2PcW-1 100 5 50.00
15 EO 3P E-1 50 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %16 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 20.00
17 NS 2T W-3 150 6.5 65.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %25 EO 3S E = -600 6.5 65.00
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.5 95.00
27 EO 2PcW-1 100 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %28 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 10.00
29 NS 3C N+1 170 7 70.00
30 NS 2P N+1 140 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %34 EO 3K E-1 50 6.2 62.00
35 EO 3S E+2 -660 8.6 86.00
36 EO 3S S+3 690 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %37 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 NS 1S E-1 100 8 80.00
39 NS 4C E-1 100 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 166,3 / 270 = 61,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 % 1 NS 3T W+1 -130 5 50.00
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 20.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.6 26.00
6 NS 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %10 NS 2C N-1 -100 9.8 98.00
11 NS 3K N-2 -100 7.4 74.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.6 86.00
14 EO 6T S-2 -100 8.6 86.00
15 EO 4CcS-2 -500 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 %19 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.5 95.00
20 NS 3K E = -110 8 80.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 2 20.00
23 EO 4KcN-2 -500 9.5 95.00
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %28 EO 3C E-3 150 1 10.00
29 EO 3P S+1 170 3 30.00
30 EO 3P N = 140 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %31 NS 3S N-1 -100 0.5 5.00
32 NS 5KcN-2 -300 3.5 35.00
33 NS 4C N+1 450 9.5 95.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %37 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 EO 1S E-1 100 2 20.00
39 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 146,3 / 270 = 54,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 % 1 EO 3T W+1 -130 5 50.00
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 80.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 % 4 NS 2C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 NS 4C W = -420 8.6 86.00
6 NS 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 % 7 NS 2T S+1 110 6.2 62.00
8 NS 1S S = 90 2.6 26.00
9 NS 4C S = 420 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 1.4 14.00
14 NS 3C N+1 170 9.8 98.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %16 EO 2C S-1 -50 8 80.00
17 EO 2T W-3 150 3.5 35.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %25 EO 2S W+1 -150 3.5 35.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 2 20.00
27 EO 3S S+1 430 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
14 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %31 EO 2C W-2 100 5 50.00
32 EO 4K N-2 -100 0.5 5.00
33 EO 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %34 NS 3K E-1 50 3.8 38.00
35 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 50.00
36 NS 6K S = 1370 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %37 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 EO 1S E = -90 6 60.00
39 EO 3C E+2 -200 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 132,5 / 270 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 80.00
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 4 40.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 % 4 EO 2C W-1 100 5 50.00
5 EO 4C W = -420 1.4 14.00
6 EO 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 6.2 62.00
8 NS 1S S = 90 2.6 26.00
9 NS 3C S+1 170 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %10 NS 3T W+2 -150 7.4 74.00
11 NS 1S E+3 -180 0.2 2.00
12 NS 1S N+1 120 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %13 NS 2S W+2 -180 7.4 74.00
14 NS 2T N+2 130 7.4 74.00
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 20.00
17 NS 3T W-4 200 9.5 95.00
18 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %19 EO 2S W+1 -150 0.5 5.00
20 EO 3K E = -110 2 20.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %28 EO 2S S-2 -200 9 90.00
29 EO 3C N+1 170 3 30.00
30 EO 2P N+1 140 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %34 EO 3T E-2 100 1.4 14.00
35 EO 3S W+1 -630 1.4 14.00
36 EO 3S N = 600 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %37 NS 5C E = -450 0 0.00
38 NS 1S E = -90 4 40.00
39 NS 4C E = -620 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 127,0 / 300 = 42,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 % 1 NS 3C E-1 50 9 90.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 20.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 % 4 EO 4C W-2 200 0.2 2.00
5 EO 4C W = -420 1.4 14.00
6 EO 6TcS-3 -500 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
11 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 42,33 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 3.8 38.00
8 EO 1S S = 90 7.4 74.00
9 EO 3C S+1 170 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 39,57 %10 NS 3K N-2 -200 5 50.00
11 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 50.00
12 NS 3C W = -140 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %13 NS 3S W = -600 5 50.00
14 NS 2PcW-1 100 5 50.00
15 NS 3P E-1 50 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %16 NS 1S S = 90 6.5 65.00
17 NS 1S W = -90 3.5 35.00
18 NS 4P N-2 -200 3.5 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %19 NS 4CcS-3 -500 3.5 35.00
20 NS 3C N-3 -300 3.5 35.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 6.5 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 9.5 95.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 2 20.00
27 EO 4T N = 130 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %31 EO 3S N-1 -100 9.5 95.00
32 EO 5KcN-2 -300 6.5 65.00
33 EO 4C N+1 450 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %37 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 50.00
38 EO 1S E = -90 6 60.00
39 EO 4C E = -620 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 154,2 / 300 = 51,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 % 1 EO 4T W = -130 5 50.00
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 1 10.00
3 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 % 4 NS 3C W = -140 0.2 2.00
5 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.6 26.00
6 NS 5T S-1 -50 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 % 7 EO 1S E-3 300 0.2 2.00
8 EO 1S S+1 120 2.6 26.00
9 EO 4C S = 420 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
12 ARICKX Roger -FRAITURE Louis : 51,40 %10 EO 3K N-2 -200 5 50.00
11 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 50.00
12 EO 3C W = -140 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 %13 NS 3T E+1 -130 9.8 98.00
14 NS 4C N-2 -100 1.4 14.00
15 NS 2C S-2 -200 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %19 NS 2S W+2 -180 6.5 65.00
20 NS 3KcE = -670 0.5 5.00
21 NS 3S W+3 -490 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %22 NS 1S N = 90 2 20.00
23 NS 2P E = -110 5 50.00
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 0.5 5.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %28 EO 1S W = -90 5 50.00
29 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 90.00
30 EO 2P N = 110 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 %31 NS 2C W-2 100 5 50.00
32 NS 2P W+2 -170 6.5 65.00
33 NS 4C N = 420 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %34 EO 3K E-1 50 6.2 62.00
35 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 50.00
36 EO 6K S = 1370 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
Total : 118,7 / 300 = 39,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 -
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 57,15 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 53,67 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 55,74 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,37 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 COLLET Edgard -CAMUS Colette : 49,07 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VAN AVERMAET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 37,96 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -HUBLET Carlo : 49,74 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,59 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 BONMARIAGE François -HALLEUX Jean François : 54,19 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 49,07 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 390 = 0,00 %
|
|