|
Tournoi du 10-09-12
1 60,49 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,92 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
3 56,47 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
4 54,24 4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
5 48,88 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 45,09 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
7 44,64 7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
8 33,26 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,50 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
2 60,49 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 54,24 16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 51,56 13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 50,00 12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
6 48,21 11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
7 39,51 10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
8 33,48 9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 71.43
2 NS 5K E+2 -440 11 78.57
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
4 NS 4P E-2 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
6 NS 4P S+1 450 11 78.57
7 NS 2S E-2 200 13 92.86
8 NS 2P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 % 9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 14.29
10 NS 6P W = -1430 3 21.43
11 NS 2S E = -120 4 28.57
12 NS 4C S+2 680 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 %13 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 NS 4P W-1 50 1 7.14
16 NS 2S S+1 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 %17 NS 3P W-1 50 2 14.29
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43
19 NS 5CcN+1 750 14 100.00
20 NS 3S N+2 660 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 %21 NS 6C S+1 1460 14 100.00
22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 28.57
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 %25 NS 4P N+1 450 12 85.71
26 NS 2C W-1 100 11 78.57
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
28 NS 2P E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 14.29
31 NS 3S E+3 -490 12 85.71
32 NS 4KcN-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 219,0 / 448 = 48,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
2 NS 5S E+1 -490 8 57.14
3 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 2P E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
6 NS 4P S+1 450 11 78.57
7 NS 2C S = 110 9 64.29
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 % 9 NS 2C N+2 170 8 57.14
10 NS 4P W+2 -680 13 92.86
11 NS 3S E-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 6C S = 1430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 %13 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 71.43
14 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
15 NS 4P W-3 150 13 92.86
16 NS 2S S+2 180 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 %17 NS 4P W-2 100 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E = -400 11 78.57
19 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 3S N+2 660 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 %21 NS 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 28.57
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 4C S+1 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 7.14
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 35.71
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
28 NS 3S E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 %29 NS 2S N = 120 13 92.86
30 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 14.29
31 NS 6S W = -990 2 14.29
32 NS 3K N = 110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 253,0 / 448 = 56,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
2 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 21.43
3 NS 4C E = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 3TcS-5 -1400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
6 NS 4P S = 420 5 35.71
7 NS 3P E = -140 2 14.29
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 % 9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 14.29
10 NS 6P W = -1430 3 21.43
11 NS 3S E-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 4C S+1 650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 %13 NS 5TcS-2 -500 8 57.14
14 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
15 NS 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 %17 NS 3P W-1 50 2 14.29
18 NS 3S W = -400 11 78.57
19 NS 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 %21 NS 4C S+2 680 1 7.14
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 %25 NS 3P S+1 170 8 57.14
26 NS 3P W-1 100 11 78.57
27 NS 2C E+1 -140 8 57.14
28 NS 3T N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 %29 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
31 NS 6S E = -990 2 14.29
32 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 149,0 / 448 = 33,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
2 NS 6K W+1 -940 3 21.43
3 NS 4C E = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 2P E = -110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
6 NS 4P S+1 450 11 78.57
7 NS 3S E-1 100 6 42.86
8 NS 2C N = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 % 9 NS 4C N = 420 11 78.57
10 NS 5P W+1 -680 13 92.86
11 NS 3CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 %13 NS 4C E-2 200 14 100.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
15 NS 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 NS 2S S+2 180 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 %17 NS 3PcW-1 100 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43
19 NS 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
20 NS 4C N = 620 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 %21 NS 4C N+3 710 6 42.86
22 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 4C S+1 450 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 %25 NS 3P N = 140 5 35.71
26 NS 2P W-2 200 14 100.00
27 NS 4C E-1 50 14 100.00
28 NS 3P W-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
31 NS 6K W = -920 8 57.14
32 NS 4K N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 243,0 / 448 = 54,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 5K E+2 -440 11 78.57
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 85.71
4 NS 4P E-2 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 % 5 NS 3S W = -400 14 100.00
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 1 7.14
7 NS 2C S = 110 9 64.29
8 NS 2P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 % 9 NS 3C N = 140 6 42.86
10 NS 6P W = -1430 3 21.43
11 NS 3T E+3 -170 2 14.29
12 NS 4C S+2 680 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 %13 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 NS 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 NS 2S S+1 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 %17 NS 4P W-2 100 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43
19 NS 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 %21 NS 5C S+1 680 1 7.14
22 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 28.57
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 %25 NS 4CcS = 590 14 100.00
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 14.29
27 NS 3C E+1 -170 2 14.29
28 NS 2P E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 %29 NS 2S N = 120 13 92.86
30 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 14.29
31 NS 6S E = -990 2 14.29
32 NS 3K N = 110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 202,0 / 448 = 45,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
2 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 21.43
3 NS 4C W = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 5PcE-2 500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 % 5 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 71.43
6 NS 4P N = 420 5 35.71
7 NS 2P W-2 200 13 92.86
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 % 9 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 14.29
10 NS 3S E+3 -690 9 64.29
11 NS 3T E = -110 7 50.00
12 NS 4C S+2 680 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 %13 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 NS 4P W-3 150 13 92.86
16 NS 1S S+3 180 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 %17 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 11 78.57
19 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 %21 NS 6C N = 1430 12 85.71
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 %25 NS 3P N = 140 5 35.71
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 35.71
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
28 NS 3C W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 5P E = -450 10 71.43
31 NS 3S E+3 -490 12 85.71
32 NS 5T E-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 255,0 / 448 = 56,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 6S W-1 50 14 100.00
3 NS 4P W = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 3S W = -600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 % 5 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
6 NS 4P S+1 450 11 78.57
7 NS 2C S-1 -100 4 28.57
8 NS 2C N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 % 9 NS 4C N = 420 11 78.57
10 NS 6P W = -1430 3 21.43
11 NS 2T E+1 -110 7 50.00
12 NS 4KcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 %13 NS 4C E = -620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
15 NS 4P W-1 50 1 7.14
16 NS 3S N+1 430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 %17 NS 3C S+1 170 12 85.71
18 NS 3S E = -400 11 78.57
19 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 %21 NS 4C S+3 710 6 42.86
22 NS 3S E = -600 14 100.00
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 3S S = 400 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 %25 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 7.14
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
27 NS 3C E = -140 8 57.14
28 NS 2P E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 4P W+1 -450 10 71.43
31 NS 6K W+1 -940 6 42.86
32 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 200,0 / 448 = 44,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 6K E+1 -940 3 21.43
3 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
4 NS 3S W-1 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,49 % 5 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 71.43
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 1 7.14
7 NS 3CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,56 % 9 NS 3S S+3 490 14 100.00
10 NS 3S W+3 -690 9 64.29
11 NS 4T E-1 50 12 85.71
12 NS 4C S+2 680 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 33,48 %13 NS 4C E-1 100 12 85.71
14 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
15 NS 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 NS 2S S+3 210 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 62,50 %17 NS 3P W-1 50 2 14.29
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 21.43
19 NS 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 3S N+2 660 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian : 48,21 %21 NS 5S N+2 720 10 71.43
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 57.14
24 NS 3S S+1 430 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,51 %25 NS 4P N = 420 10 71.43
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 57.14
27 NS 2C E = -110 12 85.71
28 NS 1S S+1 120 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 54,24 %29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
31 NS 3S E+3 -490 12 85.71
32 NS 3K S+1 130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 271,0 / 448 = 60,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 28.57
2 EO 5K E+2 -440 3 21.43
3 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
4 EO 4P E-2 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 % 5 EO 3S W = -400 0 0.00
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 13 92.86
7 EO 2C S = 110 5 35.71
8 EO 2P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 % 9 EO 2C N+2 170 6 42.86
10 EO 4P W+2 -680 1 7.14
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 6C S = 1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 %13 EO 4C E-1 100 2 14.29
14 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
15 EO 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 EO 2S S+3 210 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 %17 EO 3P W-1 50 12 85.71
18 EO 3S W = -400 3 21.43
19 EO 4C N+1 450 14 100.00
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 %21 EO 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
22 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 3S S = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 %25 EO 3P N = 140 9 64.29
26 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
28 EO 3P W-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 5P E = -450 4 28.57
31 EO 3S E+3 -490 2 14.29
32 EO 5T E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 150,0 / 448 = 33,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 5K E+2 -440 3 21.43
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 14.29
4 EO 4P E-2 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
6 EO 4P S+1 450 3 21.43
7 EO 2C S = 110 5 35.71
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 % 9 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 85.71
10 EO 3S E+3 -690 5 35.71
11 EO 3T E = -110 7 50.00
12 EO 4C S+2 680 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 %13 EO 5TcS-2 -500 6 42.86
14 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
15 EO 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 %17 EO 3C S+1 170 2 14.29
18 EO 3S E = -400 3 21.43
19 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 %21 EO 4C N+3 710 8 57.14
22 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 100.00
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 4C S+1 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 %25 EO 4P N = 420 4 28.57
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 42.86
27 EO 2C E = -110 2 14.29
28 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 85.71
31 EO 3S E+3 -490 2 14.29
32 EO 4KcN-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 177,0 / 448 = 39,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CASSART Guy -STEED Adrian
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
2 EO 6K W+1 -940 11 78.57
3 EO 4C E = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 2P E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 % 5 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 28.57
6 EO 4P N = 420 9 64.29
7 EO 2P W-2 200 1 7.14
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 % 9 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 85.71
10 EO 6P W = -1430 11 78.57
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 4C S+1 650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 %13 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
15 EO 4P W-1 50 13 92.86
16 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 %17 EO 4P W-2 100 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E = -400 3 21.43
19 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 3S N+2 660 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 %21 EO 5S N+2 720 4 28.57
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 3S S+1 430 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 %25 EO 4P N+1 450 2 14.29
26 EO 2C W-1 100 3 21.43
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
28 EO 2P E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 %29 EO 2S N = 120 1 7.14
30 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 85.71
31 EO 6S E = -990 12 85.71
32 EO 3K N = 110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 216,0 / 448 = 48,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 6K E+1 -940 11 78.57
3 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 3S W-1 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
6 EO 4P S+1 450 3 21.43
7 EO 2S E-2 200 1 7.14
8 EO 2P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 % 9 EO 4C N = 420 3 21.43
10 EO 6P W = -1430 11 78.57
11 EO 2T E+1 -110 7 50.00
12 EO 4KcW-2 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 %13 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
15 EO 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 EO 2S S+2 180 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 %17 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 3 21.43
19 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 %21 EO 4C S+2 680 13 92.86
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 100.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 %25 EO 4CcS = 590 0 0.00
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 85.71
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
28 EO 2P E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 %29 EO 2S N = 120 1 7.14
30 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 85.71
31 EO 6S W = -990 12 85.71
32 EO 3K N = 110 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
Total : 224,0 / 448 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 100.00
2 EO 6S W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 4P W = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 3S W = -600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
6 EO 4P S = 420 9 64.29
7 EO 3P E = -140 12 85.71
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 % 9 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
10 EO 3S W+3 -690 5 35.71
11 EO 4T E-1 50 2 14.29
12 EO 4C S+2 680 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 %13 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 28.57
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
15 EO 4P W-3 150 1 7.14
16 EO 2S S+2 180 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 %17 EO 4P W-2 100 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57
19 EO 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 %21 EO 6C S+1 1460 0 0.00
22 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 71.43
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 %25 EO 3P N = 140 9 64.29
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 64.29
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
28 EO 3C W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
31 EO 6K W = -920 6 42.86
32 EO 4K N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
Total : 231,0 / 448 = 51,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
2 EO 6K E+1 -940 11 78.57
3 EO 4C E = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 3TcS-5 -1400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 % 5 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 28.57
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 13 92.86
7 EO 3CcS-1 -200 14 100.00
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 % 9 EO 4C N = 420 3 21.43
10 EO 5P W+1 -680 1 7.14
11 EO 3CcN-3 -500 14 100.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 %13 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 EO 4P W-2 100 7 50.00
16 EO 2S S+1 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 %17 EO 3P W-1 50 12 85.71
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57
19 EO 5CcN+1 750 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+2 660 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 %21 EO 6C N = 1430 2 14.29
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 92.86
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 64.29
27 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 85.71
28 EO 3S E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 4P W+1 -450 4 28.57
31 EO 6K W+1 -940 8 57.14
32 EO 3T E+1 -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 271,0 / 448 = 60,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
2 EO 6K E+1 -940 11 78.57
3 EO 4C W = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 5PcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
6 EO 4P S+1 450 3 21.43
7 EO 3S E-1 100 8 57.14
8 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 % 9 EO 3C N = 140 8 57.14
10 EO 6P W = -1430 11 78.57
11 EO 3T E+3 -170 12 85.71
12 EO 4C S+2 680 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 %13 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 EO 4P W-1 50 13 92.86
16 EO 2S S+1 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 %17 EO 3P W-1 50 12 85.71
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57
19 EO 4C N+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 3S N+2 660 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 %21 EO 4C S+3 710 8 57.14
22 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 71.43
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 4C S+1 450 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 %25 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 92.86
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 14 100.00
27 EO 3C E = -140 6 42.86
28 EO 2P E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 %29 EO 3S N-2 -200 14 100.00
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
31 EO 6S E = -990 12 85.71
32 EO 3C W = -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 280,0 / 448 = 62,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 56,47 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
2 EO 5S E+1 -490 6 42.86
3 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
4 EO 2P E = -110 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
7 MOLS Bruno -VERBOIS Léon : 44,64 % 5 EO 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
6 EO 4P S+1 450 3 21.43
7 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 71.43
8 EO 2C N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,88 % 9 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 85.71
10 EO 6P W = -1430 11 78.57
11 EO 2S E = -120 10 71.43
12 EO 4C S+2 680 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 56,92 %13 EO 4C E = -620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 EO 4P W-3 150 1 7.14
16 EO 1S S+3 180 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
4 NELIS Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 54,24 %17 EO 3PcW-1 100 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 11 78.57
19 EO 5C N+1 480 7 50.00
20 EO 4C N = 620 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 45,09 %21 EO 5C S+1 680 13 92.86
22 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 71.43
23 EO 2P W = -110 6 42.86
24 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 33,26 %25 EO 3P S+1 170 6 42.86
26 EO 3P W-1 100 3 21.43
27 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 42.86
28 EO 3T N-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 60,49 %29 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
31 EO 3S E+3 -490 2 14.29
32 EO 3K S+1 130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 243,0 / 448 = 54,24 %
|
|