|
Tournoi du 11-04-11
1 63,75 7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 59,17 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 57,08 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 53,54 6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
5 52,29 4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques
6 48,75 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
7 42,50 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 40,62 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
9 32,29 3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
10 0,00 10 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,26 14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 52,78 15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 52,55 18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
4 50,69 17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne
~ 50,69 13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
6 49,07 16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 46,76 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude
~ 46,76 12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
9 46,30 19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette
10 45,14 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 % 1 NS 5C E = -450 12 75.00
2 NS 3P N+1 170 12 75.00
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 10 62.50
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 1S S+2 150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 1 6.25
8 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 10 62.50
11 NS 4P W-1 50 16 100.00
12 NS 5K S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 5T E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 12 75.00
17 NS 3T N+2 150 11 68.75
18 NS 2P W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 0 0.00
21 NS 2P E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
23 NS 4C E-1 100 6 37.50
24 NS 1S N+1 120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %25 NS 2S W = -120 3 18.75
26 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %28 NS 2K W-1 50 5 31.25
29 NS 4P E = -620 7 43.75
30 NS 4P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 204,0 / 480 = 42,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 % 1 NS 5CcE = -650 3 18.75
2 NS 1S S+2 150 8 50.00
3 NS 3P E = -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 % 4 NS 2T E-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 1K N+3 130 9 56.25
6 NS 1S S+2 150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 5 31.25
8 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
9 NS 4PcN = 590 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %10 NS 1P N+2 140 10 62.50
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 6S N = 1440 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 7 43.75
15 NS 3KcN = 670 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %16 NS 4T N = 130 15 93.75
17 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75
18 NS 1S S+1 120 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %19 NS 3C N+1 170 1 6.25
20 NS 3C E-3 300 16 100.00
21 NS 1S S+2 150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %22 NS 3C S+2 200 4 25.00
23 NS 4C E-1 100 6 37.50
24 NS 2P N+2 170 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %25 NS 1S W = -90 9 56.25
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 25.00
27 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %28 NS 2K W-1 50 5 31.25
29 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75
30 NS 4P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 284,0 / 480 = 59,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 % 1 NS 4C E+2 -480 10 62.50
2 NS 2P N+1 140 6 37.50
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 6.25
5 NS 3K S = 110 2 12.50
6 NS 2P S = 110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 5 31.25
8 NS 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
9 NS 4PcN+1 690 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %10 NS 1P S = 80 0 0.00
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 2T N-1 -50 2 12.50
15 NS 2K N = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %16 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 NS 2K N+1 110 4 25.00
18 NS 2P W = -110 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %19 NS 2C N+2 170 1 6.25
20 NS 3T W = -110 4 25.00
21 NS 2T N = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %22 NS 3K W = -110 0 0.00
23 NS 4CcE-1 200 11 68.75
24 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %25 NS 2P E = -110 6 37.50
26 NS 2C W = -110 2 12.50
27 NS 3S W-2 100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %28 NS 3TcN-2 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 7 43.75
30 NS 4P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 155,0 / 480 = 32,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 % 1 NS 5CcW+1 -750 0 0.00
2 NS 2P N+2 170 12 75.00
3 NS 3P E+2 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
6 NS 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 11 68.75
8 NS 3S S+1 430 4 25.00
9 NS 3P N+2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %10 NS 2P S = 110 3 18.75
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 4S S+2 690 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 81.25
15 NS 3KcN = 670 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %16 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 25.00
17 NS 4T S = 130 8 50.00
18 NS 2C N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00
21 NS 1S S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %22 NS 4P N+1 450 13 81.25
23 NS 4CcE-1 200 11 68.75
24 NS 2P N+1 140 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %25 NS 2S W-1 100 13 81.25
26 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %28 NS 2K W-2 100 9 56.25
29 NS 2P E+2 -170 12 75.00
30 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 251,0 / 480 = 52,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 % 1 NS 5PcN-3 -500 7 43.75
2 NS 4P N = 620 16 100.00
3 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 6 37.50
5 NS 3K N+1 130 9 56.25
6 NS 2S S+2 180 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 % 7 NS 2C S+1 140 1 6.25
8 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
9 NS 3P N+2 200 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %10 NS 3C S = 140 10 62.50
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 6P N+1 1460 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 16 100.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 7 43.75
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %16 NS 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 NS 3K N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3P S-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 15 93.75
20 NS 2T W+1 -110 4 25.00
21 NS 2T N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %22 NS 2P N+4 230 8 50.00
23 NS 3S W-5 500 15 93.75
24 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %25 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 18.75
26 NS 3C W-1 100 6 37.50
27 NS 2C S-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %28 NS 2P S+1 140 14 87.50
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 6.25
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 234,0 / 480 = 48,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 % 1 NS 4P N-2 -100 16 100.00
2 NS Pass Passe 3 18.75
3 NS 1P E+2 -140 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 6.25
5 NS 2K N+3 150 16 100.00
6 NS 2P N = 110 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 11 68.75
8 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %10 NS 1P S+3 170 16 100.00
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 14 87.50
12 NS 7K S = 2140 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 7 43.75
15 NS 3P N+1 170 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %16 NS 5T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 NS 4T S+1 150 11 68.75
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 NS 3T W = -110 4 25.00
21 NS 1S S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %22 NS 1P N+4 200 4 25.00
23 NS 3C E = -140 2 12.50
24 NS 2K W-1 50 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %25 NS 2S W-1 100 13 81.25
26 NS 3CcW-2 500 8 50.00
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 12 75.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 7 43.75
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 257,0 / 480 = 53,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 % 1 NS 5P N-3 -150 14 87.50
2 NS Pass Passe 3 18.75
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 6 37.50
5 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
6 NS 2S N+2 180 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 % 7 NS 2C N+2 170 11 68.75
8 NS 3S N+1 430 4 25.00
9 NS 5CcE-3 800 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %10 NS 1P N+2 140 10 62.50
11 NS 4P E = -420 11 68.75
12 NS 6K N+1 1390 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %13 NS 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N+3 490 16 100.00
15 NS 4T E = -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %16 NS 4T N = 130 15 93.75
17 NS 3S N+2 460 15 93.75
18 NS 2P E-2 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 15 93.75
20 NS 2P N = 110 12 75.00
21 NS 2C N = 110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 13 81.25
23 NS 4CcE-2 500 15 93.75
24 NS 3C E-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %25 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 4P N = 620 14 87.50
27 NS 2S E = -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 %28 NS 1ScN = 180 16 100.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 7 43.75
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 306,0 / 480 = 63,75 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 % 1 NS 4PcN-3 -500 7 43.75
2 NS 3P N+1 170 12 75.00
3 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 14 87.50
5 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
6 NS 1S N+3 180 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 11 68.75
8 NS 3S S+2 460 12 75.00
9 NS 3P N+1 170 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 10 62.50
11 NS 4P W = -420 11 68.75
12 NS 4S S+3 720 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %13 NS 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 81.25
15 NS 5TcE-1 100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %16 NS 1S N-4 -200 2 12.50
17 NS 3K N = 110 4 25.00
18 NS 1S S = 90 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %19 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
20 NS 3T W-1 100 8 50.00
21 NS 1ScE-1 100 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %22 NS 4C S+1 450 13 81.25
23 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00
24 NS 1S S = 90 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %25 NS 1S W = -90 9 56.25
26 NS 3S N+1 630 16 100.00
27 NS 1K S-2 -100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %28 NS 2K W-2 100 9 56.25
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 6.25
30 NS 3S E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 274,0 / 480 = 57,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 1 NS 5CcE = -650 3 18.75
2 NS 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3S W = -600 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 6 37.50
5 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
6 NS 1S S+3 180 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 % 7 NS 2C S+3 200 16 100.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 4 25.00
9 NS 4PcN = 590 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %10 NS 2C S = 110 3 18.75
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 25.00
12 NS 3S S+2 660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 %13 NS 2P S = 110 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 7 43.75
15 NS 3C E-1 50 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %16 NS 5PcS-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 3K N = 110 4 25.00
18 NS 2C N-2 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %19 NS 3S S = 400 8 50.00
20 NS 2P S = 110 12 75.00
21 NS 1S E-1 50 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %22 NS 2P N+3 200 4 25.00
23 NS 3C E-1 100 6 37.50
24 NS 2K W-2 100 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %25 NS 3S E-2 200 16 100.00
26 NS 3S N = 600 11 68.75
27 NS 3T W-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %28 NS 3T N-1 -100 2 12.50
29 NS 4P E-1 100 15 93.75
30 NS 3S W = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 195,0 / 480 = 40,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 -
16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,07 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 59,26 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 46,30 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,55 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne : 50,69 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 50,69 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 46,76 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude : 46,76 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,14 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 480 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -NELIS Claude
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 % 1 EO 5C E = -450 4 25.00
2 EO 3P N+1 170 4 25.00
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 93.75
5 EO 3K S = 110 14 87.50
6 EO 2P S = 110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 11 68.75
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
9 EO 4PcN = 590 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %10 EO 3C S = 140 6 37.50
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 6P N+1 1460 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 9 56.25
15 EO 3P N+1 170 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %16 EO 4T N = 130 1 6.25
17 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25
18 EO 2P E-2 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %19 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
20 EO 3T W-1 100 8 50.00
21 EO 1ScE-1 100 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %22 EO 2P N+3 200 12 75.00
23 EO 3C E-1 100 10 62.50
24 EO 2K W-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %28 EO 2K W-2 100 7 43.75
29 EO 2P E+2 -170 4 25.00
30 EO 4P E = -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 202,0 / 432 = 46,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 % 1 EO 4C E+2 -480 6 37.50
2 EO 2P N+1 140 10 62.50
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 % 4 EO 2T E-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 1K N+3 130 7 43.75
6 EO 1S S+2 150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 15 93.75
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %10 EO 1P S+3 170 0 0.00
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 2 12.50
12 EO 7K S = 2140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %13 EO 2P N+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
15 EO 4T E = -130 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %16 EO 1S N-4 -200 14 87.50
17 EO 3K N = 110 12 75.00
18 EO 1S S = 90 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %19 EO 3S S = 400 8 50.00
20 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00
21 EO 1S E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %25 EO 2S W-1 100 3 18.75
26 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %28 EO 2P S+1 140 2 12.50
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 93.75
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 202,0 / 432 = 46,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 % 1 EO 5CcE = -650 13 81.25
2 EO 1S S+2 150 8 50.00
3 EO 3P E = -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 6 37.50
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 100.00
6 EO 1S S+2 150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 11 68.75
8 EO 2S S+2 180 16 100.00
9 EO 4PcN+1 690 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %10 EO 1P N+2 140 6 37.50
11 EO 4P E = -420 5 31.25
12 EO 6K N+1 1390 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3 18.75
15 EO 5TcE-1 100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %16 EO 5PcS-4 -800 16 100.00
17 EO 3K N = 110 12 75.00
18 EO 2C N-2 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
10 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 18.75
23 EO 4CcE-1 200 5 31.25
24 EO 2P N+1 140 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %25 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 81.25
26 EO 3C W-1 100 10 62.50
27 EO 2C S-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 4 25.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 9 56.25
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 % 1 EO 4PcN-3 -500 9 56.25
2 EO 3P N+1 170 4 25.00
3 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 10 62.50
5 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
6 EO 1S S+3 180 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %10 EO 2P S = 110 13 81.25
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 4S S+2 690 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 9 56.25
15 EO 3KcN = 670 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %16 EO 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 EO 3K N-1 -50 16 100.00
18 EO 3P S-4 -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %19 EO 2C N+2 170 15 93.75
20 EO 3T W = -110 12 75.00
21 EO 2T N = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %22 EO 1P N+4 200 12 75.00
23 EO 3C E = -140 14 87.50
24 EO 2K W-1 50 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %25 EO 2S W = -120 13 81.25
26 EO 3S N-3 -300 16 100.00
27 EO 2S E+1 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %28 EO 1ScN = 180 0 0.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 9 56.25
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 256,0 / 432 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 % 1 EO 5CcE = -650 13 81.25
2 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 100.00
3 EO 3S W = -600 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
10 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 5 31.25
8 EO 3S S+1 430 12 75.00
9 EO 3P N+2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 6 37.50
11 EO 4P W = -420 5 31.25
12 EO 4S S+3 720 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 9 56.25
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %16 EO 4T N = 130 1 6.25
17 EO 3S N+2 460 1 6.25
18 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %19 EO 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 EO 3T W = -110 12 75.00
21 EO 1S S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %22 EO 3K W = -110 16 100.00
23 EO 4CcE-1 200 5 31.25
24 EO 2P N-2 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %25 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 100.00
26 EO 4P N = 620 2 12.50
27 EO 2S E = -120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %28 EO 2K W-1 50 11 68.75
29 EO 4P E = -620 9 56.25
30 EO 4P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 228,0 / 432 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
10 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
6 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 % 7 EO 2C S+1 140 15 93.75
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
9 EO 3P N+2 200 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 6 37.50
11 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 5K S-2 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %13 EO 2P S = 110 16 100.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 9 56.25
15 EO 3C E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %16 EO 5T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 EO 4T S+1 150 5 31.25
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %19 EO 3C N+1 170 15 93.75
20 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
23 EO 4CcE-2 500 1 6.25
24 EO 3C E-2 100 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %25 EO 2P E = -110 10 62.50
26 EO 2C W = -110 14 87.50
27 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %28 EO 2K W-2 100 7 43.75
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 93.75
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 212,0 / 432 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 SALFI Huguette -PAQUET Anne
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 % 1 EO 5CcW+1 -750 16 100.00
2 EO 2P N+2 170 4 25.00
3 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 10 62.50
5 EO 3K N+1 130 7 43.75
6 EO 2S S+2 180 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 5 31.25
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %10 EO 2C S = 110 13 81.25
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 3S S+2 660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 100.00
15 EO 5T E-1 50 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
10 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 1 6.25
20 EO 2P N = 110 4 25.00
21 EO 2C N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %22 EO 3C S+2 200 12 75.00
23 EO 4C E-1 100 10 62.50
24 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %25 EO 1S W = -90 7 43.75
26 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
27 EO 1K S-2 -100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %28 EO 3TcN-2 -500 16 100.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 9 56.25
30 EO 4P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 219,0 / 432 = 50,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 % 1 EO 5PcN-3 -500 9 56.25
2 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
3 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 93.75
5 EO 2K N+3 150 0 0.00
6 EO 2P N = 110 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 % 7 EO 2C N+2 170 5 31.25
8 EO 3S N+1 430 12 75.00
9 EO 5CcE-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %10 EO 1P S = 80 16 100.00
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
10 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 4 25.00
17 EO 3T N+2 150 5 31.25
18 EO 2P W-1 50 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %19 EO 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 EO 2P S = 110 4 25.00
21 EO 1S S = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 %22 EO 4C S+1 450 3 18.75
23 EO 4P N-3 -300 16 100.00
24 EO 1S S = 90 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %25 EO 1S W = -90 7 43.75
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 75.00
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %28 EO 3T N-1 -100 14 87.50
29 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25
30 EO 3S W = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
Total : 227,0 / 432 = 52,55 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 % 1 EO 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 EO Pass Passe 13 81.25
3 EO 1P E+2 -140 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 10 62.50
5 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
6 EO 2S N+2 180 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 5 31.25
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 25.00
9 EO 3P N+1 170 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 2T N-1 -50 14 87.50
15 EO 2K N = 90 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %16 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 75.00
17 EO 4T S = 130 8 50.00
18 EO 2C N = 110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %19 EO 3S N = 400 8 50.00
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 16 100.00
21 EO 2P E-1 50 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %22 EO 2P N+4 230 8 50.00
23 EO 3S W-5 500 1 6.25
24 EO 2C E = -110 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 %25 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S N = 600 5 31.25
27 EO 3T W-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %28 EO 2K W-1 50 11 68.75
29 EO 4P E-1 100 1 6.25
30 EO 4P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 200,0 / 432 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,75 % 1 EO 5P N-3 -150 2 12.50
2 EO Pass Passe 13 81.25
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,08 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 2 12.50
5 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
6 EO 1S N+3 180 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 40,62 % 7 EO 2C S+3 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 12 75.00
9 EO 4PcN = 590 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 59,17 %10 EO 1P N+2 140 6 37.50
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 75.00
12 EO 6S N = 1440 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 52,29 %13 EO 2P S+1 140 8 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 3 18.75
15 EO 3KcN = 670 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COOLEN Josef : 32,29 %16 EO 4T N-1 -50 8 50.00
17 EO 2K N+1 110 12 75.00
18 EO 2P W = -110 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,75 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 1 6.25
20 EO 2T W+1 -110 12 75.00
21 EO 2T N-1 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 42,50 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 3 18.75
23 EO 4C E-1 100 10 62.50
24 EO 1S N+1 120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
6 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 53,54 %25 EO 2S W-1 100 3 18.75
26 EO 3CcW-2 500 8 50.00
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
10 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 195,0 / 432 = 45,14 %
|
|