|
Tournoi du 11-10-10
1 60,49 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 56,92 1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
3 54,02 4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
4 52,46 8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
5 48,44 7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
6 47,99 3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 47,77 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
8 41,29 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 40,62 5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,18 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 61,83 18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 54,91 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 52,68 17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis
5 48,21 13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 47,32 15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
7 42,41 16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique
8 39,51 10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
9 37,95 12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 % 1 NS 5K N-1 -50 3 21.43
2 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 1S E+3 -180 14 100.00
4 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 % 5 NS 4K E-1 50 3 21.43
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 7.14
7 NS 4P E-2 200 10 71.43
8 NS 2S W = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 % 9 NS 4P S+1 450 13 92.86
10 NS 4P W = -620 12 85.71
11 NS 5P E+1 -480 6 42.86
12 NS 5T W-2 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 %13 NS 2C N+1 140 14 100.00
14 NS 1C W+1 -110 5 35.71
15 NS 3PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 %17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 92.86
18 NS 3C W-1 50 5 35.71
19 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29
20 NS 3S W-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %21 NS 4P N = 620 5 35.71
22 NS 5P W+1 -680 4 28.57
23 NS 2K E+2 -130 5 35.71
24 NS 3S N+2 460 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 12 85.71
26 NS 3S S+1 630 12 85.71
27 NS 2K N-2 -100 3 21.43
28 NS 6C N+1 1460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %29 NS 2C S+2 170 8 57.14
30 NS 3P W-3 150 13 92.86
31 NS 4P N+3 710 10 71.43
32 NS 4C S+2 480 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,36 %
Total : 255,0 / 448 = 56,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 % 5 NS 4T E-1 50 3 21.43
6 NS 2P W = -110 6 42.86
7 NS 4C E-1 100 3 21.43
8 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
10 NS 2T E+2 -130 14 100.00
11 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 8 57.14
14 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
15 NS 2S W = -120 4 28.57
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 %17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3PcE-2 300 14 100.00
19 NS 4P W = -620 1 7.14
20 NS 5KcW-2 500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 %21 NS 4P N = 620 5 35.71
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
23 NS 3P W-2 200 13 92.86
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2S S+1 150 8 57.14
27 NS 1S W = -90 6 42.86
28 NS 6C N+1 1460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %29 NS 3C S+1 170 8 57.14
30 NS 2P W-1 50 2 14.29
31 NS 2P N+5 260 2 14.29
32 NS 4C N = 420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %33 NS 4TcS-3 -500 1 7.14
34 NS 1T W+2 -110 2 14.29
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
36 NS 4T S = 130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
Total : 185,0 / 448 = 41,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 21.43
2 NS 1P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
4 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 % 9 NS 4P S+1 450 13 92.86
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
11 NS 5P W+1 -480 6 42.86
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2K S+1 110 14 100.00
15 NS 2PcN-1 -200 2 14.29
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 %17 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W-3 150 12 85.71
19 NS 3C E-2 200 13 92.86
20 NS 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 %21 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 7.14
22 NS 6TcS = 1090 14 100.00
23 NS 3P W-1 100 8 57.14
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 %25 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 4K N-3 -150 0 0.00
28 NS 7C N = 2210 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 %29 NS 3P N+3 230 14 100.00
30 NS 3P W-3 150 13 92.86
31 NS 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
32 NS 2C S+3 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 %33 NS 4TcS-3 -500 1 7.14
34 NS 1T W+1 -90 6 42.86
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
36 NS 3P N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 215,0 / 448 = 47,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 % 1 NS 4P N+1 450 10 71.43
2 NS 1S S+1 120 12 85.71
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
4 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 % 5 NS 5K N = 600 12 85.71
6 NS 3P W-1 100 12 85.71
7 NS 4C E-3 300 14 100.00
8 NS 2T S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %13 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57
14 NS 3T S-2 -100 9 64.29
15 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %17 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
18 NS 2C W-2 100 9 64.29
19 NS 4PcE-1 200 13 92.86
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 %21 NS 4P N+1 650 10 71.43
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 7.14
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 12 85.71
26 NS 3S S+2 660 14 100.00
27 NS 3K N = 110 13 92.86
28 NS 6S S+1 1470 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 89,29 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 %29 NS 3C S-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 3P W-2 100 8 57.14
31 NS 5P N+2 710 10 71.43
32 NS 3K S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 %33 NS 4C E+2 -480 4 28.57
34 NS 3K W = -110 2 14.29
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
Total : 242,0 / 448 = 54,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 % 1 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43
2 NS 3T N-1 -100 4 28.57
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
4 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 % 5 NS 4T E-2 100 6 42.86
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 7.14
7 NS 3P W-1 100 3 21.43
8 NS 2T S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
10 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 28.57
11 NS 1C E+2 -140 14 100.00
12 NS 3T W = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3C W-1 50 5 35.71
19 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 42.86
20 NS 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %21 NS 4P N+1 650 10 71.43
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 71.43
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 1 7.14
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %25 NS 1S S+1 120 2 14.29
26 NS 2S S = 120 6 42.86
27 NS 2K N+1 110 13 92.86
28 NS 6C N+1 1460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 %29 NS 3C S = 140 3 21.43
30 NS 2P W-1 50 2 14.29
31 NS 5K S-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 1S N = 90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 %33 NS 3T S-2 -100 12 85.71
34 NS 2C W = -110 2 14.29
35 NS 3S E = -600 11 78.57
36 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
Total : 182,0 / 448 = 40,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 14 100.00
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 2 14.29
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
4 NS 2C W = -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 % 5 NS 4C S+1 650 14 100.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 12 85.71
7 NS 4C E-1 100 3 21.43
8 NS 2C E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
10 NS 4P W+2 -680 2 14.29
11 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 35.71
14 NS 2T S-2 -100 9 64.29
15 NS 3S W-3 150 11 78.57
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 %21 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 7.14
22 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 5 35.71
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 12 85.71
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 4K N-2 -100 3 21.43
28 NS 3S S+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %29 NS 2C S+1 140 3 21.43
30 NS 3P W-2 100 8 57.14
31 NS 4P N+3 710 10 71.43
32 NS 4C S+1 450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %33 NS 5C E-2 100 14 100.00
34 NS 1C W = -80 8 57.14
35 NS 3S E = -600 11 78.57
36 NS 2P N+1 140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
Total : 214,0 / 448 = 47,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 6 42.86
2 NS 1P W-3 150 14 100.00
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 28.57
4 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 % 5 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
6 NS 2T W+1 -110 6 42.86
7 NS 4C E-2 200 10 71.43
8 NS 3P E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 % 9 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
10 NS 2CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
11 NS 3P W+3 -230 12 85.71
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 %13 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57
14 NS 1P S-1 -50 12 85.71
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 42.86
16 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 %17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3ScS-3 -800 0 0.00
19 NS 5KcN-3 -500 4 28.57
20 NS 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 %25 NS 3S S = 400 6 42.86
26 NS 3S S = 600 10 71.43
27 NS 3K N-1 -50 8 57.14
28 NS 6C N+1 1460 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 %29 NS 4T W-2 200 12 85.71
30 NS 2P W-2 100 8 57.14
31 NS 6S S+1 1470 14 100.00
32 NS 3K S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %33 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 71.43
34 NS 3P S = 140 10 71.43
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
36 NS 2P N = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 217,0 / 448 = 48,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 % 1 NS 5P S = 450 10 71.43
2 NS 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
4 NS 2S N+1 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 % 5 NS 2C S+3 200 9 64.29
6 NS 4P W-1 100 12 85.71
7 NS 4C E-2 200 10 71.43
8 NS 3T S-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
11 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 14.29
14 NS 1C W+1 -110 5 35.71
15 NS 3S W-3 150 11 78.57
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 %17 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 2 14.29
19 NS 4P W = -620 1 7.14
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 39,51 %21 NS 4P N+1 650 10 71.43
22 NS 3P W+3 -230 12 85.71
23 NS 2C S+1 140 10 71.43
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 %29 NS 3C S+1 170 8 57.14
30 NS 2P W-1 50 2 14.29
31 NS 5K N = 600 4 28.57
32 NS 2C N+3 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 %33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
34 NS 2S W-3 150 12 85.71
35 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 28.57
36 NS 3P N = 140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 235,0 / 448 = 52,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis : 52,68 % 1 NS 6S S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
4 NS 3T S = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique : 42,41 % 5 NS 3C S+2 200 9 64.29
6 NS 2P W = -110 6 42.86
7 NS 3P W-1 100 3 21.43
8 NS 3K W-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 47,32 % 9 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
11 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
12 NS 5T W-2 100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 54,91 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 35.71
14 NS 3T S-3 -150 2 14.29
15 NS 3S W-4 200 14 100.00
16 NS 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,21 %17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 92.86
18 NS 3C W-2 100 9 64.29
19 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29
20 NS 3S E = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,95 %21 NS 4P N+2 680 14 100.00
22 NS 5P W+1 -680 4 28.57
23 NS 4TcW-1 200 13 92.86
24 NS 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 65,18 %25 NS 3S N = 400 6 42.86
26 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 14.29
27 NS 2K N = 90 10 71.43
28 NS 6S S+1 1470 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 61,83 %33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
34 NS 4TcW-2 300 14 100.00
35 NS 3S E-2 200 14 100.00
36 NS 3P N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 271,0 / 448 = 60,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 % 1 EO 5K N-1 -50 11 78.57
2 EO 1S S-2 -200 14 100.00
3 EO 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
4 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 % 5 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 2 14.29
7 EO 4C E-1 100 11 78.57
8 EO 2C E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
10 EO 2T E+2 -130 0 0.00
11 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43
14 EO 1P S-1 -50 2 14.29
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 57.14
16 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %17 EO 4C S-2 -100 14 100.00
18 EO 3S W-3 150 2 14.29
19 EO 3C E-2 200 1 7.14
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 %21 EO 4P N+1 650 4 28.57
22 EO 3P W+3 -230 2 14.29
23 EO 2C S+1 140 4 28.57
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 2 14.29
26 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
27 EO 3K N = 110 1 7.14
28 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 10,71 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 %33 EO 3T S-2 -100 2 14.29
34 EO 2C W = -110 12 85.71
35 EO 3S E = -600 3 21.43
36 EO 4P N-2 -200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
Total : 177,0 / 448 = 39,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 12 85.71
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
4 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 % 5 EO 4T E-1 50 11 78.57
6 EO 2P W = -110 8 57.14
7 EO 4C E-1 100 11 78.57
8 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 % 9 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 100.00
10 EO 2CcN-3 -800 14 100.00
11 EO 3P W+3 -230 2 14.29
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 14 100.00
14 EO 2K S+1 110 0 0.00
15 EO 2PcN-1 -200 12 85.71
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 %17 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 85.71
19 EO 4P W = -620 13 92.86
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %21 EO 4P N+1 650 4 28.57
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 92.86
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 %25 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 2K N = 90 4 28.57
28 EO 6S S+1 1470 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 %29 EO 3C S = 140 11 78.57
30 EO 2P W-1 50 12 85.71
31 EO 5K S-2 -200 14 100.00
32 EO 1S N = 90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
Total : 292,0 / 448 = 65,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 % 5 EO 3T E = -110 14 100.00
6 EO 2T W+1 -110 8 57.14
7 EO 4C E-2 200 4 28.57
8 EO 3P E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 % 9 EO 4P S+1 450 1 7.14
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
11 EO 5P W+1 -480 8 57.14
12 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 85.71
14 EO 1C W+1 -110 9 64.29
15 EO 3S W-3 150 3 21.43
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %17 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71
18 EO 2C W-2 100 5 35.71
19 EO 4PcE-1 200 1 7.14
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 %21 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
22 EO 5P W+1 -680 10 71.43
23 EO 4TcW-1 200 1 7.14
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 %25 EO 1S S+1 120 12 85.71
26 EO 2S S = 120 8 57.14
27 EO 2K N+1 110 1 7.14
28 EO 6C N+1 1460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 %29 EO 2C S+2 170 6 42.86
30 EO 3P W-3 150 1 7.14
31 EO 4P N+3 710 4 28.57
32 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,64 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 %33 EO 5C E-2 100 0 0.00
34 EO 1C W = -80 6 42.86
35 EO 3S E = -600 3 21.43
36 EO 2P N+1 140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
Total : 170,0 / 448 = 37,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 8 57.14
2 EO 1P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 71.43
4 EO 3S S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
11 EO 5KcN-4 -800 14 100.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43
14 EO 3T S-2 -100 5 35.71
15 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 %17 EO 4C S+1 450 1 7.14
18 EO 3C W-2 100 5 35.71
19 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71
20 EO 3S E = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 %21 EO 4P N+1 650 4 28.57
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 28.57
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 92.86
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 2 14.29
26 EO 3S S+1 630 2 14.29
27 EO 2K N-2 -100 11 78.57
28 EO 6C N+1 1460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 %29 EO 2C S+1 140 11 78.57
30 EO 3P W-2 100 6 42.86
31 EO 4P N+3 710 4 28.57
32 EO 4C S+1 450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %33 EO 4TcS-3 -500 13 92.86
34 EO 1T W+2 -110 12 85.71
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
36 EO 4T S = 130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
Total : 216,0 / 448 = 48,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 78.57
2 EO 1P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
4 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 % 5 EO 2C S+3 200 5 35.71
6 EO 4P W-1 100 2 14.29
7 EO 4C E-2 200 4 28.57
8 EO 3T S-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 64.29
14 EO 3T S-3 -150 12 85.71
15 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 %17 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3C W-1 50 9 64.29
19 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 57.14
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 %21 EO 4P N = 620 9 64.29
22 EO 5P W+1 -680 10 71.43
23 EO 2K E+2 -130 9 64.29
24 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 2 14.29
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 4K N-2 -100 11 78.57
28 EO 3S S+4 720 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %29 EO 3C S+1 170 6 42.86
30 EO 2P W-1 50 12 85.71
31 EO 2P N+5 260 12 85.71
32 EO 4C N = 420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 %33 EO 3C E+1 -170 4 28.57
34 EO 3P S = 140 4 28.57
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
36 EO 2P N = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 246,0 / 448 = 54,91 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 % 1 EO 5P S = 450 4 28.57
2 EO 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
4 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 % 5 EO 5K N = 600 2 14.29
6 EO 3P W-1 100 2 14.29
7 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 2T S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
11 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
12 EO 5T W-2 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 %17 EO 4C S+1 450 1 7.14
18 EO 3C W-1 50 9 64.29
19 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71
20 EO 3S W-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 %21 EO 5P N-1 -100 13 92.86
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 9 64.29
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 100.00
26 EO 2S S+1 150 6 42.86
27 EO 1S W = -90 8 57.14
28 EO 6C N+1 1460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 %29 EO 4T W-2 200 2 14.29
30 EO 2P W-2 100 6 42.86
31 EO 6S S+1 1470 0 0.00
32 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %33 EO 4TcS-3 -500 13 92.86
34 EO 1T W+1 -90 8 57.14
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
36 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 212,0 / 448 = 47,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 POULAERT Gilbert -WIBRIN Véronique
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 % 1 EO 4P N+1 450 4 28.57
2 EO 1S S+1 120 2 14.29
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
4 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 % 5 EO 3C S+2 200 5 35.71
6 EO 2P W = -110 8 57.14
7 EO 3P W-1 100 11 78.57
8 EO 3K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
10 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 71.43
11 EO 1C E+2 -140 0 0.00
12 EO 3T W = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 %13 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
14 EO 1C W+1 -110 9 64.29
15 EO 3PcN-2 -500 14 100.00
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %21 EO 4P N = 620 9 64.29
22 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
23 EO 3P W-2 200 1 7.14
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 %25 EO 3S S = 400 8 57.14
26 EO 3S S = 600 4 28.57
27 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 42.86
28 EO 6C N+1 1460 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %29 EO 3P N+3 230 0 0.00
30 EO 3P W-3 150 1 7.14
31 EO 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
32 EO 2C S+3 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 %33 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
34 EO 2S W-3 150 2 14.29
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
36 EO 3P N = 140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 190,0 / 448 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VERBOIS Léon -FRAITURE Louis
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 % 1 EO 6S S-2 -100 14 100.00
2 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
4 EO 3T S = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 % 5 EO 4T E-2 100 8 57.14
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 92.86
7 EO 3P W-1 100 11 78.57
8 EO 2T S = 90 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 % 9 EO 4P S+1 450 1 7.14
10 EO 4P W = -620 2 14.29
11 EO 5P E+1 -480 8 57.14
12 EO 5T W-2 100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 9 64.29
14 EO 2T S-2 -100 5 35.71
15 EO 3S W-3 150 3 21.43
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %17 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00
19 EO 4P W = -620 13 92.86
20 EO 5KcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %25 EO 3S N = 400 8 57.14
26 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 85.71
27 EO 4K N-3 -150 14 100.00
28 EO 7C N = 2210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
8 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,46 %29 EO 3C S+1 170 6 42.86
30 EO 2P W-1 50 12 85.71
31 EO 5K N = 600 10 71.43
32 EO 2C N+3 200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %33 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 71.43
34 EO 3K W = -110 12 85.71
35 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 71.43
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
Total : 236,0 / 448 = 52,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 PETIT Jean -ROGIVAL Brigitte : 40,62 % 1 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57
2 EO 3T N-1 -100 10 71.43
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
4 EO 2C W = -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
1 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 56,92 % 5 EO 4K E-1 50 11 78.57
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 92.86
7 EO 4P E-2 200 4 28.57
8 EO 2S W = -120 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,77 % 9 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
10 EO 4P W+2 -680 12 85.71
11 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,29 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 6 42.86
14 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 100.00
15 EO 2S W = -120 10 71.43
16 EO 4P E = -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 48,44 %17 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3ScS-3 -800 14 100.00
19 EO 5KcN-3 -500 10 71.43
20 EO 3S W = -600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
3 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 47,99 %21 EO 5P N-1 -100 13 92.86
22 EO 6TcS = 1090 0 0.00
23 EO 3P W-1 100 6 42.86
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
4 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 54,02 %29 EO 3C S-1 -100 14 100.00
30 EO 3P W-2 100 6 42.86
31 EO 5P N+2 710 4 28.57
32 EO 3K S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
9 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,49 %33 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
34 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00
35 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
36 EO 3P N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 277,0 / 448 = 61,83 %
|
|