|
Tournoi du 12-03-12
1 63,52 A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 59,26 A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 56,11 A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 53,89 A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 48,15 A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 47,22 A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
7 47,04 A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 44,81 A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
9 43,15 A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
10 36,85 A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,11 a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
2 55,56 a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 52,59 a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 52,22 a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude
5 50,37 a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
6 47,78 a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 47,59 a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
8 46,30 a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 44,07 a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 42,41 a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard
PAIRE Nr : A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 % 1 NS 2C S-3 -150 9 50.00
2 NS 6C E+1 -1010 0 0.00
3 NS 3T S = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
5 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 1K W+3 -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 % 7 NS 4P S = 620 18 100.00
8 NS 4C N+2 480 16 88.89
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 5PcE-2 300 6 33.33
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E = -110 15 83.33
18 NS 3P S+2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %19 NS 2S S-2 -100 8 44.44
20 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
21 NS 1P S = 80 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %22 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
23 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
24 NS 4P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %25 NS 6K E-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
27 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22
29 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 4C W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 320,0 / 540 = 59,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
2 NS 4C E = -420 17 94.44
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 18 100.00
5 NS 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 % 7 NS 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
8 NS 4C N+3 510 18 100.00
9 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 5K N = 400 11 61.11
12 NS 4PcE-5 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
14 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
15 NS 4C N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %16 NS 1S N = 90 0 0.00
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
20 NS 2S N-2 -200 4 22.22
21 NS 4TcN = 710 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %22 NS 1T N = 70 8 44.44
23 NS 2P N-1 -100 12 66.67
24 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %25 NS 4P W+2 -680 2 11.11
26 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %28 NS 3C W+2 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
30 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 14 77.78
3 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 % 4 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
5 NS 4P N = 620 12 66.67
6 NS 2K W+2 -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 % 7 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 6T N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 4S W+1 -660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 5K N = 400 11 61.11
12 NS 3C S+3 230 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 1S E = -90 18 100.00
18 NS 5K E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %19 NS 3C E-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 3KcN-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %22 NS 2K S-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 4C E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %25 NS 6P W-1 100 17 94.44
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
27 NS 3K N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %28 NS 3PcN-1 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
30 NS 6K E = -920 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 % 1 NS 2C N-3 -150 9 50.00
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 % 4 NS 3T S+1 130 2 11.11
5 NS 3P N = 140 7 38.89
6 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 % 7 NS 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %10 NS 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89
11 NS 5K N = 400 11 61.11
12 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
15 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
18 NS 5K W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %19 NS 3TcN-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
21 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %22 NS 2T N = 90 13 72.22
23 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %25 NS 5K E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
27 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
29 NS 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
30 NS 6K E = -920 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 1 NS 3T E+1 -130 14 77.78
2 NS 4C E = -420 17 94.44
3 NS 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 13 72.22
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 4K E = -130 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 % 7 NS 3P N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 NS 6T N-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 5KcN = 550 17 94.44
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
15 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
18 NS 3P N = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %19 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
20 NS 3T N = 110 17 94.44
21 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
24 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %25 NS 3P E+2 -200 14 77.78
26 NS 2C E-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %28 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 5S E+1 -490 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 % 1 NS 3T W+1 -130 14 77.78
2 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 3T S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 4 NS 3C E-3 300 10 55.56
5 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
6 NS 2T E+1 -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 % 7 NS 4CcE-2 500 16 88.89
8 NS 6S S-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 6C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %10 NS 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89
11 NS 6K N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 4C S = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
18 NS 5K E-3 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %19 NS 3C E-2 200 17 94.44
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %22 NS 2T N-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %25 NS 4P W = -620 8 44.44
26 NS 2T N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %28 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 11.11
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
2 NS 6T W+1 -940 6 33.33
3 NS 2T S+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 % 4 NS 2P N+1 140 5 27.78
5 NS 3TcW-2 300 10 55.56
6 NS 5K E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 7 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 6S S-1 -50 4 22.22
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 6K N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 3S N+1 630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %13 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
15 NS 6K S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
18 NS 3P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %19 NS 3P S-3 -150 2 11.11
20 NS 3K N-2 -200 4 22.22
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %22 NS 2K S = 90 13 72.22
23 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
24 NS 4KcN = 510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
27 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 %28 NS 2C W+3 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 2S S+1 150 6 33.33
30 NS 6S E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 % 1 NS 4T W-1 50 18 100.00
2 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 2T S+2 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
6 NS 3K E = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 10 55.56
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 4PcN-2 -300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 4K N+1 150 4 22.22
12 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %13 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3K W+2 -150 18 100.00
15 NS 3S S = 600 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2P E = -110 15 83.33
18 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %19 NS 4T N-2 -100 8 44.44
20 NS 3K N-2 -200 4 22.22
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %22 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
24 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %25 NS 6P W = -1430 0 0.00
26 NS 2TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
27 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %28 NS 2C E+3 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 6ScW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 % 1 NS 3T E+1 -130 14 77.78
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 13 72.22
5 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 % 7 NS 4P S-1 -100 10 55.56
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 3PcS-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %10 NS 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89
11 NS 5K N = 400 11 61.11
12 NS 3S N+4 720 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 %13 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22
15 NS 3S S = 600 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %16 NS 1S N+3 180 18 100.00
17 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
18 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %19 NS 2P S-2 -100 8 44.44
20 NS 3K N-1 -100 14 77.78
21 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %22 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
24 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22
27 NS 2S N+1 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %28 NS 4K E+1 -150 18 100.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 4C W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,30 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 10 55.56
3 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,56 % 4 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 44,07 % 7 NS 3K N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11
9 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 47,59 %10 NS 6S W = -1440 6 33.33
11 NS 5KcN = 550 17 94.44
12 NS 3C S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %13 NS 3S W-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,59 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
18 NS 3P S = 140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,22 %19 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78
20 NS 2P N = 110 17 94.44
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,37 %22 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11
23 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
24 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 61,11 %25 NS 5K E = -600 11 61.11
26 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
27 NS 2P S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard : 42,41 %28 NS 3C W+2 -200 11 61.11
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
30 NS 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 % 1 EO 2C S-3 -150 9 50.00
2 EO 6C E+1 -1010 18 100.00
3 EO 3T S = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 % 4 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
5 EO 4P N = 620 6 33.33
6 EO 2K W+2 -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 % 7 EO 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
8 EO 4C N+3 510 0 0.00
9 EO 6C E = -1430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 5KcN = 550 1 5.56
12 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
18 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %19 EO 4T N-2 -100 10 55.56
20 EO 3K N-2 -200 14 77.78
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %22 EO 2S S-3 -150 18 100.00
23 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00
24 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %25 EO 5K E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
27 EO 2P S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
29 EO 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
30 EO 6K E = -920 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 330,0 / 540 = 61,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 4 22.22
3 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
5 EO 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 % 7 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
8 EO 4C N+2 480 2 11.11
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %10 EO 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11
11 EO 6K N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %13 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
15 EO 6K S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2P E = -110 3 16.67
18 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %19 EO 2P S-2 -100 10 55.56
20 EO 3K N-1 -100 4 22.22
21 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %22 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89
23 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %25 EO 5K E = -600 7 38.89
26 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
27 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %28 EO 3C E+2 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 5S E+1 -490 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 ARICKX Roger -de WASSEIGE Claude
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
2 EO 4C E = -420 1 5.56
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
5 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 1K W+3 -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 % 7 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 6T N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 4S W+1 -660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 6K N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 3S N+1 630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %13 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3K W+2 -150 0 0.00
15 EO 3S S = 600 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %16 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
18 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %19 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22
20 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %22 EO 2T N = 90 5 27.78
23 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %25 EO 3P E+2 -200 4 22.22
26 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %28 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 88.89
29 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 % 1 EO 4T W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 2T S+2 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 5 27.78
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 % 7 EO 3K N-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %10 EO 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11
11 EO 5K N = 400 7 38.89
12 EO 4C S = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
14 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
15 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
18 EO 3P N = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %19 EO 3C E-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 3KcN-2 -500 18 100.00
21 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %22 EO 2T N-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %25 EO 6K E-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
27 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %28 EO 2C W+3 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
30 EO 6S E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 % 1 EO 3T E+1 -130 4 22.22
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 % 4 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 % 7 EO 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
8 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 4K N+1 150 14 77.78
12 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
15 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %16 EO 1S N = 90 18 100.00
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %19 EO 3C E-2 200 1 5.56
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %22 EO 2K S-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
24 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
27 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78
29 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 4C W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44
3 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 % 4 EO 3T S+1 130 16 88.89
5 EO 3P N = 140 11 61.11
6 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 7 EO 3P N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 EO 6T N-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 5PcE-2 300 12 66.67
12 EO 4C S+1 650 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %13 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 3S S = 600 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
18 EO 5K E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
20 EO 2S N-2 -200 14 77.78
21 EO 4TcN = 710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %22 EO 2K S = 90 5 27.78
23 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
24 EO 4KcN = 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %25 EO 6P W-1 100 1 5.56
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
27 EO 3K N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %28 EO 2C E+3 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 6ScW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 % 1 EO 2C N-3 -150 9 50.00
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 8 44.44
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 5 27.78
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 4K E = -130 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 % 7 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 11.11
8 EO 6S S-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 6C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %10 EO 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11
11 EO 5K N = 400 7 38.89
12 EO 3S N+4 720 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
18 EO 3P S = 140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 %19 EO 3P S-3 -150 16 88.89
20 EO 3K N-2 -200 14 77.78
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %22 EO 1T N = 70 10 55.56
23 EO 2P N-1 -100 6 33.33
24 EO 4C E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %25 EO 6P W = -1430 18 100.00
26 EO 2TcN-3 -800 18 100.00
27 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %28 EO 3PcN-1 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 2S S+1 150 12 66.67
30 EO 6K E = -920 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 1 EO 3T E+1 -130 4 22.22
2 EO 4C E = -420 1 5.56
3 EO 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 % 4 EO 3C E-3 300 8 44.44
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
6 EO 2T E+1 -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 % 7 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 6S S-1 -50 14 77.78
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 5K N = 400 7 38.89
12 EO 3C S+3 230 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E = -110 3 16.67
18 EO 3P S+2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %19 EO 3TcN-2 -300 18 100.00
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00
21 EO 2P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 %22 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
24 EO 5KcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %25 EO 4P W+2 -680 16 88.89
26 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %28 EO 4K E+1 -150 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 4C W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 % 1 EO 3T W+1 -130 4 22.22
2 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 3T S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 % 4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 72.22
5 EO 3TcW-2 300 8 44.44
6 EO 5K E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 8 44.44
8 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 4PcN-2 -300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 5KcN = 550 1 5.56
12 EO 3C S+1 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %13 EO 3S W-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
18 EO 5K W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %19 EO 2S S-2 -100 10 55.56
20 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
21 EO 1P S = 80 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
24 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78
27 EO 2S N+1 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %28 EO 3C W+2 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
30 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 BUISSERET Martine -BUISSERET Bernard
A.7 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 44,81 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
2 EO 6T W+1 -940 12 66.67
3 EO 2T S+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 53,89 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
6 EO 3K E = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.9 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 56,11 % 7 EO 4P S-1 -100 8 44.44
8 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89
9 EO 3PcS-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 43,15 %10 EO 6S W = -1440 12 66.67
11 EO 5K N = 400 7 38.89
12 EO 4PcE-5 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.4 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 36,85 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33
15 EO 2S S-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,04 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
17 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
18 EO 5K E-3 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %19 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
20 EO 3T N = 110 1 5.56
21 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 59,26 %22 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
23 EO 2P N = 110 1 5.56
24 EO 4P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,15 %25 EO 4P W = -620 10 55.56
26 EO 2T N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,22 %28 EO 3C W+2 -200 7 38.89
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00
30 EO 5K E+1 -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 229,0 / 540 = 42,41 %
|
|