|
Tournoi du 12-09-11
1 61,44 7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
2 57,89 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 56,46 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
4 55,78 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 55,57 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 53,87 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 48,96 10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
8 47,61 9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
9 47,43 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
10 46,65 13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi
11 41,80 12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane
12 39,81 1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé
13 36,72 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 67,13 19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
2 64,06 15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
3 55,54 21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 53,06 23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
5 53,02 22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
6 50,39 20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
7 49,81 17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 48,98 16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
9 43,67 26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline
10 43,44 18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne
11 42,43 24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
12 42,02 25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
13 36,46 14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude
PAIRE Nr : 1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 13 65.00
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 12 60.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 25.00
6 NS 1P S+2 140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 40.00
8 NS 2P N+1 140 14 70.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 11 55.00
11 NS 6S W-2 100 18 90.00
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
14 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 10.00
15 NS 5CcE-1 100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %16 NS 5C S = 450 2.3 11.50
17 NS 3K S-2 -100 2.3 11.50
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 18,83 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %19 NS 2S E = -120 2.3 11.50
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 1T E+1 -90 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 20,67 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 10.00
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 45.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %25 NS 2K W+1 -110 15.5 77.50
26 NS 5K E = -600 8.9 44.50
27 NS 1S W = -90 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 6 30.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 25.00
6 NS 2C N = 110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 % 7 NS 5P E+1 -680 8 40.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 19 95.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %10 NS 3S E = -600 17 85.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
14 NS 1T S = 70 12 60.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %16 NS 6S N+1 1020 14.4 72.00
17 NS 2P S+1 140 13.3 66.50
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %19 NS 2S E-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 1P N+3 170 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %22 NS 3S W = -600 8 40.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 20 100.00
24 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %25 NS 2K W+1 -110 15.5 77.50
26 NS 4C W = -620 3.4 17.00
27 NS 1S W = -90 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 4.5 22.50
29 NS 2P N+1 140 14.4 72.00
30 NS 4C N = 420 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
Total : 300,1 / 540 = 55,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 % 7 NS 6PcE = -1660 0 0.00
8 NS 3K N = 110 10 50.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %10 NS 5T E = -600 17 85.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 10.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %16 NS 6S N+1 1020 14.4 72.00
17 NS 3C E-1 50 6.7 33.50
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %19 NS 2S E = -120 2.3 11.50
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 1T E-2 100 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 26,17 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %22 NS 3S E = -600 8 40.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 14 70.00
24 NS 1PcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %25 NS 4K W = -130 6.7 33.50
26 NS 5K E = -600 8.9 44.50
27 NS 2S W = -120 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %28 NS 2S N+1 150 13.3 66.50
29 NS 4CcN-4 -1100 0.1 0.50
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %31 NS 4P E = -420 2 10.00
32 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 5.00
33 NS 3P W = -140 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
Total : 198,3 / 540 = 36,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 % 1 NS 3C E-1 50 7 35.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 25.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 2P N+2 170 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %16 NS 5K S+2 440 0.1 0.50
17 NS 4T S+1 150 16.6 83.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %19 NS 2S E-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 2P N+2 170 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 10.00
23 NS 3S E-1 100 17 85.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %25 NS 2K W+2 -130 6.7 33.50
26 NS 3S W = -600 8.9 44.50
27 NS 1S E-1 50 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %28 NS 3P S = 140 11.1 55.50
29 NS 2C N = 110 7.8 39.00
30 NS 5CcS-2 -300 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 33,50 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 40.00
32 NS 2S S+2 180 14 70.00
33 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 256,1 / 540 = 47,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 13 65.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 30.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 14 70.00
6 NS 1P S+3 170 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %13 NS 3S E = -600 18 90.00
14 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 10.00
15 NS 4PcS = 790 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %16 NS 6S N+1 1020 14.4 72.00
17 NS 1S N = 90 10 50.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %19 NS 2S E = -120 2.3 11.50
20 NS 4C E = -620 18.8 94.00
21 NS 2P N+2 170 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 61,00 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %22 NS 4K E = -130 18 90.00
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 10.00
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %25 NS 2K W+2 -130 6.7 33.50
26 NS 4K E = -130 15.5 77.50
27 NS 1S W-1 50 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %28 NS 2P S+2 170 16.6 83.00
29 NS 2C N+1 140 14.4 72.00
30 NS 5T E-3 150 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %31 NS 3C E-1 50 14 70.00
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 55.00
33 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 312,6 / 540 = 57,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 % 1 NS 4CcE-4 800 18 90.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 2P N+1 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 % 4 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.00
5 NS 3P E-2 100 16 80.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 40.00
8 NS 4T W-4 200 16 80.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %16 NS 5S N+2 520 4.5 22.50
17 NS 4T N+1 150 16.6 83.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %19 NS 2C W-3 300 19.9 99.50
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 3P N+1 170 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %22 NS 3S W = -600 8 40.00
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 25.00
24 NS 1S W-1 50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %25 NS 2K W+3 -150 2.3 11.50
26 NS 4C W = -620 3.4 17.00
27 NS 3T W = -110 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 17,00 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %28 NS 2S N = 120 4.5 22.50
29 NS 3PcN-1 -200 2.3 11.50
30 NS 5T E-2 100 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 26,17 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %31 NS 4PcW-3 500 19 95.00
32 NS 3S S+2 460 19 95.00
33 NS 2K E = -90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 290,9 / 540 = 53,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 10.00
2 NS 6P E = -980 1 5.00
3 NS 2P N+1 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 % 4 NS 1S W-3 300 20 100.00
5 NS 4C N+1 650 20 100.00
6 NS 1P S+3 170 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 % 7 NS 4K E-1 100 20 100.00
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 20.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %10 NS 3S W = -600 17 85.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 3S S+2 660 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %19 NS 2S E-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 1S S+1 120 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %22 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 60.00
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 25.00
24 NS 3S W = -400 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %25 NS 3K W = -110 15.5 77.50
26 NS 4C W-1 100 18.8 94.00
27 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %28 NS 1P N+4 200 19.9 99.50
29 NS 1P N+3 170 18.8 94.00
30 NS 5TcE-3 500 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %31 NS 4P E = -420 2 10.00
32 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00
33 NS 3P W-1 50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 331,8 / 540 = 61,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 % 1 NS 3TcW-5 1100 20 100.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 % 4 NS 2S W-2 200 17 85.00
5 NS 3C S+2 200 18 90.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 % 7 NS 5CcS-2 -500 15 75.00
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 20.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 25.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %13 NS 3S E = -600 18 90.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 20 100.00
15 NS 6PcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %22 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 10.00
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 45.00
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %25 NS 2K W+1 -110 15.5 77.50
26 NS 3K E+2 -150 13.3 66.50
27 NS 1S W = -90 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 62,83 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %28 NS 2S N = 120 4.5 22.50
29 NS 2C N = 110 7.8 39.00
30 NS 4CcS-2 -300 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 %31 NS 3KcW-3 500 19 95.00
32 NS 3S S+2 460 19 95.00
33 NS 3PcW-1 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
Total : 301,2 / 540 = 55,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 % 1 NS 3P S-1 -50 2 10.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 12 60.00
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 40.00
8 NS 3K N+1 130 12 60.00
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %10 NS 5T E+1 -620 11 55.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 2C E-2 100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
14 NS 1S N = 90 14 70.00
15 NS 5P N = 650 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude : 36,46 %16 NS 6S S+1 1020 14.4 72.00
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 4.5 22.50
18 NS 3S S+2 660 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %25 NS 3K W = -110 15.5 77.50
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 0.1 0.50
27 NS 2S W-1 50 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 4.5 22.50
29 NS 2P S+2 170 18.8 94.00
30 NS 6TcW-3 500 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %31 NS 3T S-1 -100 12 60.00
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 55.00
33 NS 2P W+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 257,1 / 540 = 47,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 % 1 NS 3C E-1 50 7 35.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 % 4 NS 2S W-1 100 12 60.00
5 NS 3S E = -400 11 55.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 % 7 NS 5CcS-2 -500 15 75.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 19 95.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %10 NS 6T E = -1370 1 5.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
14 NS 2S S = 120 16 80.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %16 NS 7P N = 1510 19.9 99.50
17 NS 2C E = -110 0.1 0.50
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %19 NS 2S E-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 3P N-1 -100 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 33,50 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %28 NS 2S S = 120 4.5 22.50
29 NS 2C N = 110 7.8 39.00
30 NS 5TcE-2 300 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 %31 NS 2P W = -110 10 50.00
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 30.00
33 NS 4P W-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 264,4 / 540 = 48,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 % 1 NS 3P S = 140 13 65.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 30.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 25.00
6 NS 2P S+1 140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 % 7 NS 6P E = -1430 2 10.00
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 20.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %10 NS 3S E = -600 17 85.00
11 NS 5S E-3 150 20 100.00
12 NS 4P N = 620 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 %13 NS 3S E = -600 18 90.00
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 45.00
15 NS 6PcS-1 -200 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %16 NS 6P S+1 1010 8.9 44.50
17 NS 5T N = 400 19.9 99.50
18 NS 3S S+1 630 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 75,67 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %19 NS 2C W-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E = -620 18.8 94.00
21 NS 2P N+2 170 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 16 80.00
23 NS 6P E-1 100 17 85.00
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,43 %31 NS 4C E-2 100 16 80.00
32 NS 3S N-3 -150 1 5.00
33 NS 2K E = -90 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 304,9 / 540 = 56,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane
25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,02 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 10.00
2 NS 6P E = -980 1 5.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 % 4 NS 2S W-2 200 17 85.00
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 25.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 % 7 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 40.00
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 20.00
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 64,06 %10 NS 6T E = -1370 1 5.00
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.00
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 5,00 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00
14 NS 1S W = -90 6 30.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 12.2 61.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 7.8 39.00
21 NS 1T E-2 100 5.6 28.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 20 100.00
23 NS 4C E = -620 12 60.00
24 NS 2K E+3 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %28 NS 1P S+3 170 16.6 83.00
29 NS 2C N = 110 7.8 39.00
30 NS 3S E-1 50 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %31 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 30.00
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 30.00
33 NS 3K E-1 50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 225,7 / 540 = 41,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi
22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon : 53,02 % 1 NS 2P S+1 140 13 65.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 60.00
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline : 43,67 % 4 NS 2S E+1 -150 1 5.00
5 NS 3S E = -400 11 55.00
6 NS 3KcE-2 500 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 67,13 % 7 NS 4CcS-1 -200 18 90.00
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 20.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 53,06 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 40.00
11 NS 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 NS 2S N = 120 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 48,98 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 60.00
14 NS 2P N+1 140 18 90.00
15 NS 5K N-1 -100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,39 %16 NS 6K N+1 940 6.7 33.50
17 NS 1S N = 90 10 50.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 39,00 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,81 %22 NS 2S W+1 -150 14 70.00
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 55,54 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.50
26 NS 2P W-1 100 18.8 94.00
27 NS 2S E-1 50 16.6 83.00 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne : 43,44 %31 NS 4P W = -420 2 10.00
32 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 30.00
33 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 251,9 / 540 = 46,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 de Bergeyck Christine -ROLIN Claude
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 7 35.00
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 % 4 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
6 EO 1P S+3 170 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 % 7 EO 5P E+1 -680 12 60.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 75.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 90.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %16 EO 6S S+1 1020 5.6 28.00
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 15.5 77.50
18 EO 3S S+2 660 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %19 EO 2S E-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 2P N+2 170 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %25 EO 2K W+2 -130 13.3 66.50
26 EO 4K E = -130 4.5 22.50
27 EO 1S W-1 50 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %31 EO 4PcW-3 500 1 5.00
32 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.00
33 EO 2K E = -90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 196,9 / 540 = 36,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 90.00
2 EO 6P E = -980 19 95.00
3 EO 2P N+1 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 14 70.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 75.00
6 EO 2C N = 110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 % 7 EO 5CcS-2 -500 5 25.00
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 80.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %10 EO 6T E = -1370 19 95.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 95.00
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 95,00 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
14 EO 1S N = 90 6 30.00
15 EO 5P N = 650 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %16 EO 5K S+2 440 19.9 99.50
17 EO 4T S+1 150 3.4 17.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %19 EO 2S E-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 3P N-1 -100 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 66,50 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %22 EO 4K E = -130 2 10.00
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 90.00
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %28 EO 2S N = 120 15.5 77.50
29 EO 3PcN-1 -200 17.7 88.50
30 EO 5T E-2 100 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 73,83 %
Total : 345,9 / 540 = 64,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 % 4 EO 2S W-2 200 3 15.00
5 EO 3C S+2 200 2 10.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 % 7 EO 6PcE = -1660 20 100.00
8 EO 3K N = 110 10 50.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 9 45.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 2C E-2 100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
14 EO 2P N+1 140 2 10.00
15 EO 5K N-1 -100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %16 EO 7P N = 1510 0.1 0.50
17 EO 2C E = -110 19.9 99.50
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 55,50 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 1T E-2 100 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 20.00
23 EO 6P E-1 100 3 15.00
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %25 EO 2K W+3 -150 17.7 88.50
26 EO 4C W = -620 16.6 83.00
27 EO 3T W = -110 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 83,00 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %31 EO 4P E = -420 18 90.00
32 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00
33 EO 3P W-1 50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 264,5 / 540 = 48,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 % 1 EO 3TcW-5 1100 0 0.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 60.00
8 EO 3K N+1 130 8 40.00
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 75.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 2P N+2 170 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
14 EO 2S S = 120 4 20.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %16 EO 6S N+1 1020 5.6 28.00
17 EO 1S N = 90 10 50.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %19 EO 2C W-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E = -620 1.2 6.00
21 EO 2P N+2 170 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %22 EO 2S W+1 -150 6 30.00
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 20 100.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %25 EO 2K W+1 -110 4.5 22.50
26 EO 5K E = -600 11.1 55.50
27 EO 1S W = -90 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 44,50 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %28 EO 1P S+3 170 3.4 17.00
29 EO 2C N = 110 12.2 61.00
30 EO 3S E-1 50 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CRUYSMANS Marie-Noëlle -VOORTMAN Fabienne
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 % 4 EO 2S W-2 200 3 15.00
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 75.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %10 EO 6T E = -1370 19 95.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %13 EO 3S E = -600 2 10.00
14 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 90.00
15 EO 4PcS = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %16 EO 6P S+1 1010 11.1 55.50
17 EO 5T N = 400 0.1 0.50
18 EO 3S S+1 630 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 24,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %19 EO 2C W-3 300 0.1 0.50
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 3P N+1 170 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 90.00
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 55.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %25 EO 3K W = -110 4.5 22.50
26 EO 4C W-1 100 1.2 6.00
27 EO 3S E = -400 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 15.5 77.50
29 EO 2P N+1 140 5.6 28.00
30 EO 4C N = 420 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %31 EO 4P W = -420 18 90.00
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 70.00
33 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 234,6 / 540 = 43,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 % 1 EO 3P S-1 -50 18 90.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 % 7 EO 4CcS-1 -200 2 10.00
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 16 80.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
14 EO 1S W = -90 14 70.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %16 EO 5S N+2 520 15.5 77.50
17 EO 4T N+1 150 3.4 17.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %19 EO 2S E = -120 17.7 88.50
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 1T E+1 -90 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 79,33 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %22 EO 2S W+2 -180 8 40.00
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 75.00
24 EO 3S W = -400 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %25 EO 2K W+1 -110 4.5 22.50
26 EO 4C W = -620 16.6 83.00
27 EO 1S W = -90 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %28 EO 2S N = 120 15.5 77.50
29 EO 2C N = 110 12.2 61.00
30 EO 4CcS-2 -300 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %31 EO 4P E = -420 18 90.00
32 EO 3S S-3 -150 19 95.00
33 EO 3P W = -140 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
Total : 362,5 / 540 = 67,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 % 1 EO 3C E-1 50 13 65.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 8 40.00
5 EO 3S E = -400 9 45.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %10 EO 3S E = -600 3 15.00
11 EO 5S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %16 EO 6K N+1 940 13.3 66.50
17 EO 1S N = 90 10 50.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 61,00 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %19 EO 2S E-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 1S S+1 120 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 4C E = -620 8 40.00
24 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %25 EO 2K W+1 -110 4.5 22.50
26 EO 3K E+2 -150 6.7 33.50
27 EO 1S W = -90 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 37,17 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %28 EO 2S N+1 150 6.7 33.50
29 EO 4CcN-4 -1100 19.9 99.50
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %31 EO 3T S-1 -100 8 40.00
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 45.00
33 EO 2P W+3 -200 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
Total : 272,1 / 540 = 50,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 % 1 EO 3C E-1 50 13 65.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 70.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 6 30.00
6 EO 1P S+3 170 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 % 7 EO 6P E = -1430 18 90.00
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 16 80.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
14 EO 2S S-2 -100 18 90.00
15 EO 5CcE-1 100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %19 EO 2S E-1 100 7.8 39.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 1P N+3 170 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 90.00
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 55.00
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19.9 99.50
26 EO 2P W-1 100 1.2 6.00
27 EO 2S E-1 50 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 15.5 77.50
29 EO 2P S+2 170 1.2 6.00
30 EO 6TcW-3 500 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 %31 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 70.00
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 70.00
33 EO 3K E-1 50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 299,9 / 540 = 55,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 WARNIER François -VERBOIS Léon
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 % 1 EO 2P S+1 140 7 35.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 70.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 75.00
6 EO 2P S+1 140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 60.00
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 80.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %10 EO 5T E+1 -620 9 45.00
11 EO 6S W-2 100 2 10.00
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %16 EO 6S N+1 1020 5.6 28.00
17 EO 2P S+1 140 6.7 33.50
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %22 EO 3S E = -600 12 60.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 6 30.00
24 EO 1PcS-4 -800 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 %25 EO 3K W = -110 4.5 22.50
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 19.9 99.50
27 EO 2S W-1 50 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %28 EO 3P S = 140 8.9 44.50
29 EO 2C N = 110 12.2 61.00
30 EO 5CcS-2 -300 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 66,50 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %31 EO 2P W = -110 10 50.00
32 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 70.00
33 EO 4P W-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 286,3 / 540 = 53,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 7 35.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 % 4 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 95.00
5 EO 3P E-2 100 4 20.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 60.00
8 EO 2P N+1 140 6 30.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 60.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 2S N = 120 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 40.00
14 EO 1T S = 70 8 40.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %19 EO 2S E = -120 17.7 88.50
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 12.2 61.00
21 EO 1T E-2 100 14.4 72.00 µ Tbl = 73,83 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %25 EO 2K W+2 -130 13.3 66.50
26 EO 3S W = -600 11.1 55.50
27 EO 1S E-1 50 3.4 17.00 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 %28 EO 2S S = 120 15.5 77.50
29 EO 2C N = 110 12.2 61.00
30 EO 5TcE-2 300 6.7 33.50 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %31 EO 3C E-1 50 6 30.00
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 45.00
33 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 286,5 / 540 = 53,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WILLEMS Jacques
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 % 1 EO 4CcE-4 800 2 10.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 2P N+1 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 8 40.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 75.00
6 EO 1P S+2 140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 % 7 EO 4K E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 16 80.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %10 EO 3S E = -600 3 15.00
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 95.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %13 EO 3S E = -600 2 10.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
15 EO 6PcS-2 -500 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %16 EO 6S N+1 1020 5.6 28.00
17 EO 3C E-1 50 13.3 66.50
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %22 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 90.00
23 EO 3S E-1 100 3 15.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %28 EO 2P S+2 170 3.4 17.00
29 EO 2C N+1 140 5.6 28.00
30 EO 5T E-3 150 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %31 EO 4C E-2 100 4 20.00
32 EO 3S N-3 -150 19 95.00
33 EO 2K E = -90 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 229,1 / 540 = 42,43 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 KREMER Francine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
12 SOENENS Cilette -MORTIAUX Christiane : 41,80 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 90.00
2 EO 6P E = -980 19 95.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
9 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 47,61 % 4 EO 2S W-1 100 8 40.00
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 100.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 % 7 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 60.00
8 EO 4T W-4 200 4 20.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %10 EO 5T E = -600 3 15.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 4P N = 620 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
11 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,46 %13 EO 3S E = -600 2 10.00
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 55.00
15 EO 6PcS-1 -200 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 %19 EO 2S E = -120 17.7 88.50
20 EO 4C E = -620 1.2 6.00
21 EO 2P N+2 170 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 39,00 %
2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,57 %22 EO 3S W = -600 12 60.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 2K E+1 -110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %28 EO 1P N+4 200 0.1 0.50
29 EO 1P N+3 170 1.2 6.00
30 EO 5TcE-3 500 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 60.00
32 EO 2S S+2 180 6 30.00
33 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 226,9 / 540 = 42,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 NEVE Jean-Marie -DE KERCKOVE Pauline
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,89 % 1 EO 3P S = 140 7 35.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 8 40.00
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
13 DE KERCHOVE Baudoin -DE KERCKOVE Marie-Françoi : 46,65 % 4 EO 2S E+1 -150 19 95.00
5 EO 3S E = -400 9 45.00
6 EO 3KcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
10 VAN DIERENDONCK Francis -GILLAIN Françoise : 48,96 % 7 EO 5CcS-2 -500 5 25.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.00
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
7 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 61,44 %10 EO 3S W = -600 3 15.00
11 EO 4C W = -420 10 50.00
12 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 47,43 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 80.00
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 FALLON Christine -NIEUWENHUYS Hervé : 39,81 %16 EO 5C S = 450 17.7 88.50
17 EO 3K S-2 -100 17.7 88.50
18 EO 3S S = 600 13.3 66.50 µ Tbl = 81,17 %
6 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,87 %22 EO 3S W = -600 12 60.00
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 75.00
24 EO 1S W-1 50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
3 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 36,72 %25 EO 4K W = -130 13.3 66.50
26 EO 5K E = -600 11.1 55.50
27 EO 2S W = -120 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 55,78 %31 EO 3KcW-3 500 1 5.00
32 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.00
33 EO 3PcW-1 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
Total : 235,8 / 540 = 43,67 %
|
|