|
Tournoi du 12-11-12
1 61,48 2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian
2 60,74 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 60,19 4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
4 56,67 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,00 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
~ 50,00 10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 43,33 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 40,19 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 39,44 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
10 37,96 7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,48 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 57,59 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
~ 57,59 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 54,07 11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 52,04 16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
6 48,33 15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
7 46,67 18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 44,07 12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 43,52 19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France
10 34,63 14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 6P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 8 44.44
5 NS 2S N = 120 6 33.33
6 NS 3T W+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 % 7 NS 2PcW-1 200 18 100.00
8 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
9 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %10 NS 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56
12 NS 6KcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %13 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56
15 NS 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
18 NS 6S E = -990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 18 100.00
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %22 NS 4K N = 130 6 33.33
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 2C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %25 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 6T S = 920 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00
2 NS 6P E-2 100 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 14 77.78
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 % 7 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
9 NS 1S N+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %10 NS 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 5C S = 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 2C N+3 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22
17 NS 2T S+1 110 12 66.67
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %19 NS 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
20 NS 5K E-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3K E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %22 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
23 NS 3C W = -140 2 11.11
24 NS 2C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 7TcS = 1630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %28 NS 2K E-2 100 16 88.89
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 % 1 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 6ScW-1 100 17 94.44
3 NS 2K N+2 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
5 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
9 NS 6K N-4 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %10 NS 2C W = -110 17 94.44
11 NS 3T W+3 -170 16 88.89
12 NS 5C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78
14 NS 2T S+1 110 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %16 NS 2C S+2 170 2 11.11
17 NS 3T S-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 6S E+1 -1020 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %19 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
20 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33
21 NS 4P W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 3CcW-1 200 15 83.33
24 NS 3C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %25 NS 2P S-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 16 88.89
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.56
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
2 NS 6P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 % 4 NS 4P S = 620 14 77.78
5 NS 2S N+1 150 8 44.44
6 NS 4T W-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 7 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22
8 NS 2T S = 90 14 77.78
9 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %10 NS 3K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 2S W+2 -180 14 77.78
12 NS 6KcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %13 NS 2PcE-3 800 17 94.44
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
18 NS 5S E+2 -520 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %19 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 5K E-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 4P E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %22 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 2C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
26 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 6T N = 920 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %28 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 3C N = 140 14 77.78
30 NS 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 325,0 / 540 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
3 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 4 NS 4K W-1 100 4 22.22
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 8 44.44
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
9 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %10 NS 2S S-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 6KcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %13 NS 3S S = 600 7 38.89
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 17 94.44
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33
18 NS 5S E+1 -490 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %19 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
20 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 16.67
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %22 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
23 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 2C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %25 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
26 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %28 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
2 NS 4K E+1 -150 6 33.33
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 % 4 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 % 7 NS 2P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 1S N+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %10 NS 1C W+2 -140 14 77.78
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 5KcE-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %13 NS 2PcE-2 500 4 22.22
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %16 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
18 NS 4P E = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %19 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
20 NS 3C W-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 1P W+2 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %22 NS 1PcW-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 4CcW-2 500 18 100.00
24 NS 3C W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %25 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 5P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %28 NS 2S E-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 328,0 / 540 = 60,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 6P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 2C E = -110 9 50.00
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %10 NS 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56
12 NS 5K E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %13 NS 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78
15 NS 2C N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %16 NS 4C S = 420 6 33.33
17 NS 3T S-2 -100 2 11.11
18 NS 4P E = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %19 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
20 NS 4TcN-1 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %22 NS 3S S = 400 10 55.56
23 NS 3C W-2 200 15 83.33
24 NS 1S N = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 4S W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 16 88.89
29 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
30 NS 2S E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 205,0 / 540 = 37,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 5K W-1 50 11 61.11
3 NS 3T S+1 130 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 % 4 NS 5KcW-3 800 18 100.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
6 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 % 7 NS 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
8 NS 3T S+1 130 18 100.00
9 NS 3P W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 %10 NS 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 5KcE-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %13 NS 2PcE-3 800 17 94.44
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 5.56
15 NS 2C N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33
18 NS 6K E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %19 NS 3C S+1 170 7 38.89
20 NS 4T N = 130 13 72.22
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %22 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3T S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
26 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
27 NS 6T S+1 940 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %28 NS 2K E-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 3C N = 140 14 77.78
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 1 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 5.56
2 NS 4P E = -420 4 22.22
3 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 8 44.44
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
6 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 % 7 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67
8 NS 2T S = 90 14 77.78
9 NS 2ScE-1 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %10 NS 2C W = -110 17 94.44
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
12 NS 5K E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 %13 NS 2S S+1 150 0 0.00
14 NS 2T S+3 150 8 44.44
15 NS 3C N+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %19 NS 4C S = 420 13 72.22
20 NS 3S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 3C W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %25 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 4P N+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %28 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 2C N+1 140 14 77.78
30 NS 3T W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,04 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56
3 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 48,33 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 14 77.78
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
6 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine : 34,63 % 7 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
8 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France : 43,52 %10 NS 2K N-2 -200 6 33.33
11 NS 2P S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 46,67 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
14 NS 1CcE-1 100 4 22.22
15 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 57,59 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
17 NS 1S S = 90 10 55.56
18 NS 7TcE = -1630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 61,48 %19 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 4T N = 130 13 72.22
21 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 44,07 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 44.44
24 NS 2C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 54,07 %25 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 3S S = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 57,59 %28 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
29 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 6P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
5 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 % 7 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
9 EO 1S N+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %10 EO 2S S-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 6KcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %13 EO 2PcE-2 500 14 77.78
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %16 EO 4C S = 420 12 66.67
17 EO 3T S-2 -100 16 88.89
18 EO 4P E = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %19 EO 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
20 EO 4T N = 130 5 27.78
21 EO 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %25 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 3S S = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %28 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 3C N = 140 4 22.22
30 EO 2S E+3 -210 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 COLLIN Jean-Marie -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 % 1 EO 4C S-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 6ScW-1 100 1 5.56
3 EO 2K N+2 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 4 22.22
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 % 7 EO 2PcW-1 200 0 0.00
8 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00
9 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %10 EO 1C W+2 -140 4 22.22
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 5KcE-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %13 EO 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 2C N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67
18 EO 6K E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %19 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
20 EO 3S E-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 2C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
26 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 6T N = 920 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %28 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
2 EO 6P E-2 100 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 10 55.56
5 EO 2S N = 120 12 66.67
6 EO 3T W+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
9 EO 6K N-4 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %10 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44
12 EO 5K E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %13 EO 2PcE-3 800 1 5.56
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44
15 EO 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 100.00
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %19 EO 4P N-3 -150 18 100.00
20 EO 4T N = 130 5 27.78
21 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %22 EO 4C S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 2C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %25 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
26 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %28 EO 2S E-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ROLIN Claude -de Bergeyck Christine
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 5K W-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 3T S+1 130 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
6 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 7 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
8 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %10 EO 3K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 22.22
12 EO 6KcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 2C N+3 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67
18 EO 5S E+1 -490 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %19 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
20 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67
21 EO 4P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %22 EO 1PcW-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 4CcW-2 500 0 0.00
24 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %25 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 6T S = 920 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 2 11.11
29 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
30 EO 2S E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
Total : 187,0 / 540 = 34,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 % 1 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 4P E = -420 14 77.78
3 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 4 22.22
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
6 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 % 7 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78
8 EO 2T S = 90 4 22.22
9 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %10 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 5KcE-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %13 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
17 EO 2T S+1 110 6 33.33
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %19 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
20 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 1P W+2 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 3CcW-1 200 3 16.67
24 EO 3C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00
26 EO 4S W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
3 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 % 4 EO 4P S = 620 4 22.22
5 EO 2S N+1 150 10 55.56
6 EO 4T W-2 200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 10 55.56
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
9 EO 4CcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %10 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44
12 EO 6KcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %13 EO 2S S+1 150 18 100.00
14 EO 2T S+3 150 10 55.56
15 EO 3C N+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %16 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
17 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
18 EO 4P E = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %19 EO 3C S+1 170 11 61.11
20 EO 5K E-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3K E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %22 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
23 EO 3C W-2 200 3 16.67
24 EO 1S N = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %28 EO 2K E-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 3C N = 140 4 22.22
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
2 EO 6P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 % 4 EO 4K W-1 100 14 77.78
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 % 7 EO 2P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 1S N+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %10 EO 2C W = -110 1 5.56
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 5K E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %13 EO 3S S = 600 11 61.11
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 94.44
15 EO 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 9 50.00
17 EO 1S S = 90 8 44.44
18 EO 7TcE = -1630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 %19 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
20 EO 4TcN-1 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %22 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
23 EO 3C W = -140 16 88.89
24 EO 2C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
26 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 6T S+1 940 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 2 11.11
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44
3 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 % 4 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 2C E = -110 9 50.00
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %10 EO 2C W = -110 1 5.56
11 EO 3T W+3 -170 2 11.11
12 EO 5C S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
14 EO 1CcE-1 100 14 77.78
15 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78
17 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
18 EO 6S E = -990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %19 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 5K E-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 4P E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 %22 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 3T S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %25 EO 2P S-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
27 EO 7TcS = 1630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %28 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 2C N+1 140 4 22.22
30 EO 3T W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LIGOT Xavier -HENNEKINNE Marie France
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
2 EO 4K E+1 -150 12 66.67
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 % 7 EO 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
8 EO 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
9 EO 3P W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %10 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 2P S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22
14 EO 2T S+1 110 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 1 5.56
17 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
18 EO 5S E+2 -520 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %22 EO 3S S = 400 8 44.44
23 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
24 EO 2C W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 %25 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 4P N+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %28 EO 2K E-2 100 2 11.11
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 17 94.44
30 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 COOLEN Josef -VERBOIS Léon : 37,96 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 17 94.44
2 EO 6P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 EO 2P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 56,67 % 4 EO 5KcW-3 800 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
6 EO 4PcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 50,00 % 7 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33
8 EO 2T S = 90 4 22.22
9 EO 2ScE-1 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 61,48 %10 EO 2K N-2 -200 12 66.67
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
12 EO 5C S = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 60,19 %13 EO 2PcE-3 800 1 5.56
14 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22
15 EO 2C N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 39,44 %16 EO 2C S+2 170 16 88.89
17 EO 3T S-3 -150 18 100.00
18 EO 6S E+1 -1020 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
5 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 40,19 %19 EO 4C S = 420 5 27.78
20 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 83.33
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,33 %22 EO 4K N = 130 12 66.67
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 55.56
24 EO 2C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 60,74 %25 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 5P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 50,00 %28 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
29 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
|
|