|
Tournoi du 13-06-11
1 62,22 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 56,11 6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
3 55,74 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
~ 55,74 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 52,59 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
6 51,67 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
7 48,89 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 44,81 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
9 41,30 9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle
10 30,93 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,22 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 56,48 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
3 53,89 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 52,96 12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
5 50,00 17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
6 49,81 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
7 48,52 18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine
8 47,59 14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude
9 43,15 13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger
10 40,37 11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 14 77.78
2 NS 3K E-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 6P S = 980 13 72.22
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 NS 2P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %13 NS 3K S+1 130 17 94.44
14 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %16 NS 3C W-1 100 9 50.00
17 NS 6KcN-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %19 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
20 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %22 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 1S W-1 100 4 22.22
24 NS 4K E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
26 NS 3C W+2 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %28 NS 5TcS-2 -500 2 11.11
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
30 NS 5CcE = -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 % 1 NS 1S E = -90 2 11.11
2 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 2P S = 110 4 22.22
6 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 % 7 NS 5PcW-1 200 18 100.00
8 NS 6P N+1 1010 18 100.00
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %13 NS 2P S-2 -200 4 22.22
14 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 9 50.00
17 NS 3K N+2 150 13 72.22
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %19 NS 3C W-2 200 12 66.67
20 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %22 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
23 NS 2S W-1 100 4 22.22
24 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
26 NS 3C W+2 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %28 NS 5P E-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 2T W = -90 9 50.00
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 % 1 NS 2C S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 % 4 NS 3ScE-2 500 18 100.00
5 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
6 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %10 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
14 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 5C S-2 -100 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %19 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 NS 3T W+2 -150 6 33.33
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %22 NS 2P N+2 170 2 11.11
23 NS 3S W-4 400 17 94.44
24 NS 4K E = -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %25 NS 4K N = 130 0 0.00
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 27.78
27 NS 2PcW+1 -570 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %28 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33
29 NS 2T W = -90 9 50.00
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 167,0 / 540 = 30,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 NS 2S E-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 3K W-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
6 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %13 NS 3K S = 110 14 77.78
14 NS 5P N+1 480 11 61.11
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %16 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %19 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33
20 NS 2T W+1 -110 10 55.56
21 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 4P E-3 300 14 77.78
24 NS 3C S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
26 NS 4K N-2 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %28 NS 5CcW-2 300 17 94.44
29 NS 3T W-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 4CcE+1 -690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 % 1 NS 2P S+2 170 17 94.44
2 NS 2K E = -90 8 44.44
3 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
5 NS 1P S+2 140 11 61.11
6 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 6P N = 980 13 72.22
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %10 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
14 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %16 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78
17 NS 4K N+1 150 13 72.22
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %19 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
20 NS 3S E = -600 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %22 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 2S W-2 200 10 55.56
24 NS 3C S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %25 NS 4PcN = 590 18 100.00
26 NS 5C W = -650 5 27.78
27 NS 3P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %28 NS 5P E = -450 4 22.22
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 4CcS+2 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 301,0 / 540 = 55,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 % 1 NS 2T N-1 -50 4 22.22
2 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
3 NS 2P S+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 % 4 NS 2T W = -90 8 44.44
5 NS 1ScN+3 780 18 100.00
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 2 11.11
8 NS 6P N = 980 13 72.22
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %10 NS 1S W = -90 16 88.89
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %13 NS 3P S-3 -300 2 11.11
14 NS 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
15 NS 3C E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 5K N = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %19 NS 3S S = 400 16 88.89
20 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %22 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 3S W-2 200 10 55.56
24 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %25 NS 3CcW-2 500 16 88.89
26 NS 4KcN-2 -500 10 55.56
27 NS 2PcW+1 -570 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %28 NS 5CcW-1 100 11 61.11
29 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
30 NS 3C E+2 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 NS 2S W-2 100 13 72.22
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 % 4 NS 2S E-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 3P S+1 170 16 88.89
6 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
8 NS 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
9 NS 4P E+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %10 NS 3C W-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %13 NS 4K S = 130 17 94.44
14 NS 3K S+1 130 0 0.00
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %16 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78
17 NS 5K N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %19 NS 2S S+1 150 9 50.00
20 NS 3T W+1 -130 8 44.44
21 NS 3P W+3 -230 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %22 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
23 NS 3S W-1 100 4 22.22
24 NS 5KcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
26 NS 5T E = -600 8 44.44
27 NS 3K S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 %28 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
29 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 % 1 NS 2P S+2 170 17 94.44
2 NS 3S W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
6 NS 4C N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %13 NS 1C W+2 -140 8 44.44
14 NS 6P N = 980 18 100.00
15 NS 4C E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %16 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 NS 4K N = 130 10 55.56
18 NS 4P E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %19 NS 2S S+1 150 9 50.00
20 NS 5T W-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 5P W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %22 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
23 NS 4P E-4 400 17 94.44
24 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
26 NS 5TcE+1 -950 2 11.11
27 NS 2S S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %28 NS 6P E-3 150 14 77.78
29 NS 3T W-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 4CcW+2 -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 336,0 / 540 = 62,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 1 5.56
3 NS 3P S = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 % 4 NS 2K N-3 -300 0 0.00
5 NS 2P S+1 140 11 61.11
6 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
8 NS 4P N+1 450 5 27.78
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 NS 1S N+1 120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 %13 NS 2PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
14 NS 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
15 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %16 NS 4C W-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 5K N = 400 17 94.44
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %19 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 16.67
20 NS 3C W-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
23 NS 4P E-2 200 10 55.56
24 NS 5K E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
26 NS 3PcS-1 -200 15 83.33
27 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 8 44.44
29 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 56,48 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 NS 2S E = -120 5 27.78
3 NS 3P S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,22 % 4 NS 3T W = -110 4 22.22
5 NS 2K E-1 50 2 11.11
6 NS 4CcN-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude : 47,59 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 12 66.67
8 NS 6P N = 980 13 72.22
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 49,81 %10 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 5P E = -450 9 50.00
12 NS 2P E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine : 48,52 %13 NS 2C W = -110 12 66.67
14 NS 4P N+1 450 3 16.67
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 50,00 %16 NS 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 5K N-1 -50 7 38.89
18 NS 4P E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger : 43,15 %19 NS 4PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 5T W-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 4P W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,96 %22 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
23 NS 2S W = -120 0 0.00
24 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke : 40,37 %25 NS 5K N = 400 2 11.11
26 NS 4CcW+1 -990 0 0.00
27 NS 3PcW = -530 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %28 NS 6CcW-2 300 17 94.44
29 NS 3T W-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 ROEGIERS Marga -BRYLSKI Elke
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 4 22.22
2 EO 3K E-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 % 4 EO 3ScE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 7 EO 5PcW-1 200 0 0.00
8 EO 6P N+1 1010 0 0.00
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %10 EO 3P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 4P E+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %13 EO 3P S-3 -300 16 88.89
14 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
15 EO 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %16 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22
17 EO 5K N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %19 EO 2S S+1 150 9 50.00
20 EO 5T W-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 5P W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
23 EO 4P E-2 200 8 44.44
24 EO 5K E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %25 EO 5K N = 400 16 88.89
26 EO 4CcW+1 -990 18 100.00
27 EO 3PcW = -530 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %28 EO 5CcW-2 300 1 5.56
29 EO 3T W-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 4CcE+1 -690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 218,0 / 540 = 40,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 % 1 EO 2C S-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 2P S = 110 14 77.78
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 6P S = 980 5 27.78
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %10 EO 1S W = -90 2 11.11
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %13 EO 4K S = 130 1 5.56
14 EO 3K S+1 130 18 100.00
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %16 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 4K N = 130 8 44.44
18 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %19 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %22 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 2S W = -120 18 100.00
24 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
26 EO 4K N-2 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %28 EO 5P E = -450 14 77.78
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 4CcS+2 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 WARNIER François -ARICKX Roger
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 % 1 EO 1S E = -90 16 88.89
2 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 2C N-1 -100 18 100.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %10 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %13 EO 1C W+2 -140 10 55.56
14 EO 6P N = 980 0 0.00
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %16 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 5K N = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %19 EO 4PcN-2 -300 18 100.00
20 EO 5T W-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
23 EO 4P E-3 300 4 22.22
24 EO 3C S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %25 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
26 EO 5C W = -650 13 72.22
27 EO 3P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %28 EO 5CcW-1 100 7 38.89
29 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
30 EO 3C E+2 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -NELIS Claude
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 % 1 EO 2P S+2 170 1 5.56
2 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 % 4 EO 2K N-3 -300 18 100.00
5 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 6P N = 980 5 27.78
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %13 EO 2P S-2 -200 14 77.78
14 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %16 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22
17 EO 4K N+1 150 5 27.78
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %19 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
20 EO 3T W+2 -150 12 66.67
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %22 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 3S W-2 200 8 44.44
24 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
26 EO 3C W+2 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W = -110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %28 EO 5TcS-3 -800 18 100.00
29 EO 2P S-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 17 94.44
3 EO 3P S = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 % 4 EO 3T W = -110 14 77.78
5 EO 2K E-1 50 16 88.89
6 EO 4CcN-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 6P N-1 -50 18 100.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
14 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 9 50.00
17 EO 3K N+2 150 5 27.78
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %19 EO 3S S = 400 2 11.11
20 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %22 EO 2P N+2 170 16 88.89
23 EO 3S W-4 400 1 5.56
24 EO 4K E = -130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
26 EO 5T E = -600 10 55.56
27 EO 3K S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %28 EO 5TcS-2 -500 16 88.89
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
30 EO 5CcE = -650 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
3 EO 3P S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 6P N = 980 5 27.78
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 EO 2P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %13 EO 2PcS-2 -500 18 100.00
14 EO 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
15 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 5K N = 400 1 5.56
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %19 EO 3C W-2 200 6 33.33
20 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %22 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
23 EO 3S W-1 100 14 77.78
24 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %25 EO 4K N = 130 18 100.00
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 13 72.22
27 EO 2PcW+1 -570 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %28 EO 6P E-3 150 4 22.22
29 EO 3T W-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 4CcW+2 -790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 EO 2S E-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 3K W-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
5 EO 1P S+2 140 7 38.89
6 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 16 88.89
8 EO 6P N = 980 5 27.78
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %13 EO 3K S+1 130 1 5.56
14 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %16 EO 3K E+2 -150 18 100.00
17 EO 5K N-1 -50 11 61.11
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 %19 EO 2S S+1 150 9 50.00
20 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 55.56
21 EO 3P W+3 -230 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %22 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
23 EO 2S W-1 100 14 77.78
24 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
26 EO 5TcE+1 -950 16 88.89
27 EO 2S S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %28 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67
29 EO 2T W = -90 9 50.00
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 de VIRON Baudouin -de Bergeyck Christine
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 % 1 EO 2P S+2 170 1 5.56
2 EO 2K E = -90 10 55.56
3 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 % 4 EO 2T W = -90 10 55.56
5 EO 1ScN+3 780 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
8 EO 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
9 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %10 EO 2P N-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %13 EO 2C W = -110 6 33.33
14 EO 4P N+1 450 15 83.33
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %16 EO 3C W-1 100 9 50.00
17 EO 6KcN-2 -300 18 100.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %19 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67
20 EO 2T W+1 -110 8 44.44
21 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 %22 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
23 EO 4P E-4 400 1 5.56
24 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
26 EO 3C W+2 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 10 55.56
29 EO 1S N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 % 1 EO 2T N-1 -50 14 77.78
2 EO 2S E = -120 13 72.22
3 EO 2P S+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 % 4 EO 2S E-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 3P S+1 170 2 11.11
6 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 6 33.33
8 EO 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 5P E = -450 9 50.00
12 EO 2P E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
14 EO 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %16 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %19 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
20 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %22 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 2S W-2 200 8 44.44
24 EO 3C S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
26 EO 3PcS-1 -200 3 16.67
27 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %28 EO 5P E-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 2T W = -90 9 50.00
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 52,59 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 9 50.00
2 EO 2S W-2 100 5 27.78
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,22 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 2P S+1 140 7 38.89
6 EO 4C N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 STEED Mercédès -COULIE Joelle : 41,30 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
8 EO 4P N+1 450 13 72.22
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 55,74 %10 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 5P W = -450 9 50.00
12 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,67 %13 EO 3K S = 110 4 22.22
14 EO 5P N+1 480 7 38.89
15 EO 4C E = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Josef : 30,93 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 77.78
17 EO 5C S-2 -100 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 55,74 %19 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
20 EO 3S E = -600 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 48,89 %22 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
23 EO 1S W-1 100 14 77.78
24 EO 4K E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 56,11 %25 EO 3CcW-2 500 2 11.11
26 EO 4KcN-2 -500 8 44.44
27 EO 2PcW+1 -570 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 44,81 %28 EO 6CcW-2 300 1 5.56
29 EO 3T W-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
|
|