|
Tournoi du 13-07-09
Duplicate du Lu 13 juillet 2009
1 61,38 7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
2 58,71 8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
3 55,36 1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
4 51,34 6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
5 50,67 3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy
6 46,65 2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
7 45,09 4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 42,41 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS
9 38,39 5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,90 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 57,34 15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 53,37 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 50,79 13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne
5 45,44 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
~ 45,44 17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
7 43,65 10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
8 42,06 11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard
9 0,00 18 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 % 1 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 7.14
2 NS 2C E-2 100 14 100.00
3 NS 2P S = 110 14 100.00
4 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
18 - : 0,00 % 5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 % 9 NS 4C W-3 300 14 100.00
10 NS 2P N-1 -100 5 35.71
11 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
12 NS 2PcN+1 870 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %13 NS 2C W-3 300 13 92.86
14 NS 4C E = -420 4 28.57
15 NS 3C W-1 50 2 14.29
16 NS 3P N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 NS 4C W-1 50 14 100.00
19 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %21 NS 1C E+2 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 2C W+3 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 5 35.71
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71
27 NS 2K E = -90 6 42.86
28 NS 2C E = -110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %29 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
30 NS 3P W-1 50 8 57.14
31 NS 2P E-1 50 14 100.00
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %33 NS 5CcE-1 100 14 100.00
34 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
35 NS 3S E-2 200 14 100.00
36 NS 6S E-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 248,0 / 448 = 55,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 % 1 NS 2K N = 90 8 57.14
2 NS 1S S-3 -300 2 14.29
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
4 NS 5KcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
8 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 % 9 NS 4P E-2 200 11 78.57
10 NS 3T E-1 100 9 64.29
11 NS 2S W = -120 2 14.29
12 NS 3C E-3 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
18 - : 0,00 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 NS Pass Passe 12 85.71
19 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43
20 NS 2P N+2 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %21 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 42.86
24 NS 3C E+2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 5 35.71
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71
27 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 28.57
28 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %29 NS 4K W-1 100 8 57.14
30 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 14.29
31 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 71.43
32 NS 5P W = -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %33 NS 3PcN-1 -100 5 35.71
34 NS 3C W-1 50 13 92.86
35 NS 2S W-1 100 11 78.57
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 209,0 / 448 = 46,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 % 1 NS 2K N = 90 8 57.14
2 NS 2ScN-2 -500 0 0.00
3 NS 3PcN-1 -100 10 71.43
4 NS 5T N-2 -200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 % 5 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 4 28.57
7 NS 2C W+4 -230 14 100.00
8 NS 5KcE-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 % 9 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
10 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 2C N = 110 14 100.00
12 NS 2P N+1 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %13 NS 3T N = 110 1 7.14
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
15 NS 4PcS-3 -800 0 0.00
16 NS 3TcE-1 200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %17 NS 3S E-1 50 14 100.00
18 NS 3C W = -140 6 42.86
19 NS 1S S+1 120 14 100.00
20 NS 4P N = 620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
18 - : 0,00 %21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %25 NS 3S N+3 490 13 92.86
26 NS 3P E-1 100 13 92.86
27 NS 3ScW-1 100 13 92.86
28 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %29 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 1P W+1 -110 4 28.57
31 NS 2P E = -110 3 21.43
32 NS 6TcN-4 -800 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %33 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
34 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
35 NS 2S E-1 100 11 78.57
36 NS 6K W-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 227,0 / 448 = 50,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 % 1 NS 2S W = -120 1 7.14
2 NS 2T S = 90 12 85.71
3 NS 2P S-3 -150 4 28.57
4 NS 3C E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 % 5 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 28.57
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
7 NS 4C W+2 -680 1 7.14
8 NS 4K E = -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 % 9 NS 1S E = -90 3 21.43
10 NS 3S E-1 100 9 64.29
11 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
12 NS 3PcN-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 4 28.57
14 NS 3P N-1 -50 12 85.71
15 NS 3P S = 140 4 28.57
16 NS 3P N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %17 NS 3S E = -400 11 78.57
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 28.57
20 NS 3P N+1 170 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %21 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %25 NS 3S N+3 490 13 92.86
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71
27 NS 3K E-2 100 13 92.86
28 NS 4T N+2 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
18 - : 0,00 %29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %33 NS 4C E-1 50 12 85.71
34 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
35 NS 2S E = -120 2 14.29
36 NS 6K W = -1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 202,0 / 448 = 45,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
18 - : 0,00 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 % 5 NS 5C S-1 -100 4 28.57
6 NS 3S N = 400 4 28.57
7 NS 4C W+2 -680 1 7.14
8 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 % 9 NS 1S W = -90 3 21.43
10 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 14.29
11 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
12 NS 2S W+1 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %13 NS 2P E-2 200 10 71.43
14 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 64.29
15 NS 2P S+2 170 6 42.86
16 NS 4T W-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 28.57
20 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %21 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 3P S = 140 7 50.00
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 42.86
24 NS 3C W+2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %25 NS 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
26 NS 2P E = -110 10 71.43
27 NS 2K E-1 50 9 64.29
28 NS 3T N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %29 NS 3P N = 140 11 78.57
30 NS 3S E-1 50 8 57.14
31 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 71.43
32 NS 5P W = -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %33 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
34 NS 3C W = -140 3 21.43
35 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
36 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 19,64 %
Total : 172,0 / 448 = 38,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 8 57.14
2 NS 1C E = -80 8 57.14
3 NS 3S W-1 100 12 85.71
4 NS 3C E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 % 5 NS 2C S+1 140 8 57.14
6 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
18 - : 0,00 % 9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 7 50.00
14 NS 4C E-1 50 14 100.00
15 NS 3S N+1 630 12 85.71
16 NS 3KcE-3 800 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %17 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 28.57
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %21 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 42.86
24 NS 3C W+2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 5 35.71
26 NS 4P E-1 100 13 92.86
27 NS 3S W = -400 2 14.29
28 NS 4T N+2 170 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %29 NS 3K E = -110 4 28.57
30 NS 3S E-2 100 13 92.86
31 NS 2P E = -110 3 21.43
32 NS 5KcN-2 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %33 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
34 NS 3C W = -140 3 21.43
35 NS 2T W+1 -110 4 28.57
36 NS 5K W+1 -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
Total : 230,0 / 448 = 51,34 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 13 92.86
2 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 8 57.14
4 NS 3K S = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 % 5 NS 3S S+2 660 14 100.00
6 NS 3S N+2 460 14 100.00
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
8 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 % 9 NS 4C W-2 200 11 78.57
10 NS 3C W-3 300 14 100.00
11 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
12 NS 4C E-2 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %13 NS 3T N = 110 1 7.14
14 NS 4C E = -420 4 28.57
15 NS 4P S = 620 10 71.43
16 NS 5T W-3 300 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
18 - : 0,00 %17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %21 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 35.71
22 NS 2P N+2 170 13 92.86
23 NS 2T E+1 -110 14 100.00
24 NS 4K S+1 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 5 35.71
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00
28 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 %29 NS 2P N+3 200 14 100.00
30 NS 3S E-1 50 8 57.14
31 NS 2P E = -110 3 21.43
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %33 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
34 NS Pass Passe 8 57.14
35 NS 1S W = -90 8 57.14
36 NS 5T W+1 -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 275,0 / 448 = 61,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 13 92.86
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 42.86
3 NS 5T E = -600 2 14.29
4 NS 4T S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 % 5 NS 4C S = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 % 9 NS 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
10 NS 2C W-2 200 12 85.71
11 NS 4T W+1 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %13 NS 2C W-3 300 13 92.86
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 64.29
15 NS 2P S+3 200 8 57.14
16 NS 5TcW-3 800 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %17 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 28.57
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
19 NS 1S S = 90 10 71.43
20 NS 1S W-3 300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %21 NS 2C E = -110 12 85.71
22 NS 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 42.86
24 NS 4K S = 130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
18 - : 0,00 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 %29 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
31 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 71.43
32 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 %33 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
34 NS 2S E-1 50 13 92.86
35 NS 1T S-2 -100 6 42.86
36 NS 6K W-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 263,0 / 448 = 58,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS
17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 45,44 % 1 NS 2S S-2 -100 4 28.57
2 NS 2C E-1 50 10 71.43
3 NS 3C E = -140 6 42.86
4 NS 5KcS-1 -200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 61,90 % 5 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 28.57
6 NS 3S N = 400 4 28.57
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 57,34 % 9 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
10 NS 3K S-1 -100 5 35.71
11 NS 3S W-1 50 8 57.14
12 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,37 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 7 50.00
14 NS 4C E = -420 4 28.57
15 NS 3PcS+2 1130 14 100.00
16 NS 4TcW-4 1100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne : 50,79 %17 NS 3S E = -400 11 78.57
18 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 42.86
19 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 28.57
20 NS 3P N = 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 45,44 %21 NS 3T S = 110 14 100.00
22 NS 2P S = 110 2 14.29
23 NS 2T W+2 -130 6 42.86
24 NS 3C W+2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard : 42,06 %25 NS 3T N = 110 0 0.00
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
27 NS 3S W-1 50 9 64.29
28 NS 4T N+1 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 43,65 %29 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 14.29
30 NS 4P W-2 100 13 92.86
31 NS 2P E = -110 3 21.43
32 NS 5PcW = -850 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
18 - : 0,00 %33 NS BYE 0 0.00
34 NS BYE 0 0.00
35 NS BYE 0 0.00
36 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 190,0 / 448 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 % 1 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 92.86
2 EO 2C E-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
4 EO 3C E+1 -170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 % 5 EO 2C S+1 140 6 42.86
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 % 9 EO 4P E-2 200 3 21.43
10 EO 3T E-1 100 5 35.71
11 EO 2S W = -120 12 85.71
12 EO 3C E-3 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %13 EO 3T N = 110 13 92.86
14 EO 4C E = -420 10 71.43
15 EO 4P S = 620 4 28.57
16 EO 5T W-3 300 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %17 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 3C W = -140 8 57.14
19 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
20 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %21 EO 2C E = -110 2 14.29
22 EO 2P N+1 140 7 50.00
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 8 57.14
24 EO 4K S = 130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %25 EO 3S N+3 490 1 7.14
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29
27 EO 3K E-2 100 1 7.14
28 EO 4T N+2 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %29 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 85.71
30 EO 4P W-2 100 1 7.14
31 EO 2P E = -110 11 78.57
32 EO 5PcW = -850 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
34 EO 3C W = -140 11 78.57
35 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 100.00
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 80,36 %
Total : 220,0 / 504 = 43,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 PETIT Jean -COLLET Edgard
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 6 42.86
2 EO 1C E = -80 6 42.86
3 EO 3S W-1 100 2 14.29
4 EO 3C E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
8 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 % 9 EO 4C W-2 200 3 21.43
10 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
12 EO 4C E-2 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %13 EO 3T N = 110 13 92.86
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 100.00
15 EO 4PcS-3 -800 14 100.00
16 EO 3TcE-1 200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 71.43
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
19 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57
20 EO 1S W-3 300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %25 EO 3T N = 110 14 100.00
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 100.00
27 EO 3S W-1 50 5 35.71
28 EO 4T N+1 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %29 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 42.86
31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 28.57
32 EO 5P W = -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %33 EO 5CcE-1 100 0 0.00
34 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
35 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
36 EO 6S E-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 212,0 / 504 = 42,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 % 1 EO 2K N = 90 6 42.86
2 EO 1S S-3 -300 12 85.71
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 14 100.00
4 EO 5KcS-2 -500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,14 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 % 5 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
8 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 % 9 EO 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
10 EO 3P N-3 -300 14 100.00
11 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 2P N+1 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %13 EO 2C W-3 300 1 7.14
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 35.71
15 EO 2P S+3 200 6 42.86
16 EO 5TcW-3 800 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %17 EO 3S E = -400 3 21.43
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 71.43
20 EO 3P N+1 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %21 EO 3T S = 110 0 0.00
22 EO 2P S = 110 12 85.71
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 8 57.14
24 EO 3C W+2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %25 EO 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
26 EO 2P E = -110 4 28.57
27 EO 2K E-1 50 5 35.71
28 EO 3T N+2 150 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %29 EO 3P N = 140 3 21.43
30 EO 3P W-1 50 6 42.86
31 EO 2P E-1 50 0 0.00
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
34 EO 3C W = -140 11 78.57
35 EO 2T W+1 -110 10 71.43
36 EO 5K W+1 -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
Total : 229,0 / 504 = 45,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 REGNIER Franz -BEYNE Anne
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 1 7.14
2 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 42.86
4 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 % 5 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 100.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 71.43
7 EO 2C W+4 -230 0 0.00
8 EO 5KcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 % 9 EO 3K S-1 -50 7 50.00
10 EO 2C W-2 200 2 14.29
11 EO 4T W+1 -150 14 100.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 10 71.43
14 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 14.29
15 EO 3P S = 140 10 71.43
16 EO 3P N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %17 EO 3S E = -400 3 21.43
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 71.43
20 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 3P S = 140 7 50.00
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 8 57.14
24 EO 3C W+2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 9 64.29
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29
27 EO 2K E = -90 8 57.14
28 EO 2C E = -110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %29 EO 3K E = -110 10 71.43
30 EO 3S E-2 100 1 7.14
31 EO 2P E = -110 11 78.57
32 EO 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %33 EO 3PcN-1 -100 9 64.29
34 EO 3C W-1 50 1 7.14
35 EO 2S W-1 100 3 21.43
36 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 256,0 / 504 = 50,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 % 1 EO 2K N = 90 6 42.86
2 EO 2ScN-2 -500 14 100.00
3 EO 3PcN-1 -100 4 28.57
4 EO 5T N-2 -200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 % 5 EO 4C S = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 % 9 EO 1S E = -90 11 78.57
10 EO 3S E-1 100 5 35.71
11 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
12 EO 3PcN-1 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 7 50.00
14 EO 4C E = -420 10 71.43
15 EO 3PcS+2 1130 0 0.00
16 EO 4TcW-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %17 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 100.00
19 EO 1S S-1 -50 10 71.43
20 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %21 EO 1C E+2 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 14 100.00
24 EO 2C W+3 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 9 64.29
26 EO 4P E-1 100 1 7.14
27 EO 3S W = -400 12 85.71
28 EO 4T N+2 170 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %29 EO 4K W-1 100 6 42.86
30 EO 1P W+2 -140 12 85.71
31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 28.57
32 EO 5P W = -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
34 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
35 EO 1S W = -90 6 42.86
36 EO 5T W+1 -620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 269,0 / 504 = 53,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 1 7.14
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 57.14
3 EO 5T E = -600 12 85.71
4 EO 4T S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 % 5 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 71.43
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 100.00
7 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 92.86
8 EO 4K E = -130 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 % 9 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 100.00
10 EO 3K S-1 -100 9 64.29
11 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
12 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 %13 EO 2P E-2 200 4 28.57
14 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 35.71
15 EO 2P S+2 170 8 57.14
16 EO 4T W-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %17 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
19 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 100.00
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 8 57.14
24 EO 3C W+2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 9 64.29
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29
27 EO 1P E+2 -140 10 71.43
28 EO 4P S-3 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %29 EO 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 42.86
31 EO 2P E = -110 11 78.57
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
34 EO Pass Passe 6 42.86
35 EO 2S E-1 100 3 21.43
36 EO 6K W-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 289,0 / 504 = 57,34 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 % 1 EO 2S W = -120 13 92.86
2 EO 2T S = 90 2 14.29
3 EO 2P S-3 -150 10 71.43
4 EO 3C E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 % 5 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 71.43
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 71.43
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 % 9 EO 1S W = -90 11 78.57
10 EO 3T E+1 -130 12 85.71
11 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
12 EO 2S W+1 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 %13 EO 2C W-3 300 1 7.14
14 EO 4C E = -420 10 71.43
15 EO 3C W-1 50 12 85.71
16 EO 3P N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %17 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 57.14
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 14 100.00
20 EO 3P N = 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 2P S+1 140 7 50.00
23 EO 2T W+2 -130 8 57.14
24 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 9 64.29
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 100.00
28 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %29 EO 3P N-2 -200 14 100.00
30 EO 1P W+1 -110 10 71.43
31 EO 2P E = -110 11 78.57
32 EO 6TcN-4 -800 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
34 EO 2S E-1 50 1 7.14
35 EO 1T S-2 -100 8 57.14
36 EO 6K W-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 312,0 / 504 = 61,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 % 1 EO 2S S-2 -100 10 71.43
2 EO 2C E-1 50 4 28.57
3 EO 3C E = -140 8 57.14
4 EO 5KcS-1 -200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 % 5 EO 5C S-1 -100 10 71.43
6 EO 3S N = 400 10 71.43
7 EO 4C W+2 -680 13 92.86
8 EO 4CcS-2 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 % 9 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00
10 EO 2P N-1 -100 9 64.29
11 EO 3S W-1 50 6 42.86
12 EO 2PcN+1 870 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 7 50.00
14 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N+1 630 2 14.29
16 EO 3KcE-3 800 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %17 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 71.43
18 EO Pass Passe 2 14.29
19 EO 1S S = 90 4 28.57
20 EO 2P N+2 170 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 64.29
22 EO 2P N+2 170 1 7.14
23 EO 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
24 EO 4K S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,86 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %25 EO 3S N+3 490 1 7.14
26 EO 3P E-1 100 1 7.14
27 EO 3ScW-1 100 1 7.14
28 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %29 EO 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00
31 EO 1S N-1 -100 4 28.57
32 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %33 EO 4C E-1 50 2 14.29
34 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 100.00
35 EO 2S E = -120 12 85.71
36 EO 6K W = -1370 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 229,0 / 504 = 45,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 -
5 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 38,39 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 MATELART Marc -HALLEUX Jean François : 55,36 % 5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,34 % 9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 46,65 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 61,38 %17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 LIBERT Laurent -CASSART Guy : 50,67 %21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 ANEZO Nathalie -MUSPRATT Jean-Marc : 58,71 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 LAENENS René -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 45,09 %29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS : 42,41 %33 EO BYE 0 0.00
34 EO BYE 0 0.00
35 EO BYE 0 0.00
36 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 504 = 0,00 %
|
|