|
Tournoi du 13-08-09
hubert
1 60,93 10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
2 57,59 7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis
3 55,37 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 54,26 1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc
5 53,15 2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
6 50,93 3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules
7 48,52 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
8 41,48 4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
9 38,89 5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine
~ 38,89 8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,44 20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 63,52 17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe
3 61,67 14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
4 52,96 19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
5 50,74 12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
~ 50,74 18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert
7 46,48 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard
8 41,30 16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo
9 36,85 11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves
10 31,30 13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène
PAIRE Nr : 1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N+2 690 13 72.22
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
6 NS 3P S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
8 NS 5C W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %10 NS 2C S-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
12 NS 2S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %13 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 6K W = -920 1 5.56
15 NS 5K E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 22.22
17 NS 5KcS-3 -500 7 38.89
18 NS 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %19 NS 2CcW-3 800 16 88.89
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %22 NS 3C E-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
24 NS 1S S+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %28 NS 3P N+1 170 17 94.44
29 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 3P S+3 230 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S S+2 660 5 27.78
3 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 % 4 NS 3K N = 110 7 38.89
5 NS 3KcW = -470 2 11.11
6 NS 3P N+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 3C W = -140 10 55.56
9 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %10 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
11 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %13 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56
15 NS 2C S+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 1 5.56
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %19 NS 2CcW-4 1100 18 100.00
20 NS 3T W-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %22 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 38.89
24 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %25 NS 4CcW-1 200 16 88.89
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
27 NS 2K W = -90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %28 NS 3K N+2 150 14 77.78
29 NS 2KcE = -180 6 33.33
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 % 1 NS 3S S-1 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
3 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 % 4 NS 2K N+3 150 17 94.44
5 NS 2P S-2 -200 5 27.78
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 % 7 NS 4K E-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 4C S+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %10 NS 2C S-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 2C S+1 170 18 100.00
12 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %13 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 5 27.78
15 NS 5K E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %16 NS 3S S-2 -100 4 22.22
17 NS 5KcS-3 -500 7 38.89
18 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %19 NS 2C W-4 400 8 44.44
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 38.89
24 NS 3KcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %25 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22
27 NS 2S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %28 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
29 NS 3T N-3 -300 2 11.11
30 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 3S S+2 660 5 27.78
3 NS 4PcS-6 -1400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 % 4 NS 3K N+2 150 17 94.44
5 NS 3K W = -110 8 44.44
6 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 13 72.22
8 NS 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
9 NS 4C S+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %10 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %13 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 27.78
15 NS 4K E = -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %16 NS 3K N+2 150 9 50.00
17 NS 5KcS-2 -300 13 72.22
18 NS 3T N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %19 NS 3T S+2 150 2 11.11
20 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 3S N = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %22 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
24 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %25 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
26 NS 3S W+3 -690 2 11.11
27 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %28 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
29 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11
2 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
3 NS 2C S-4 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 % 4 NS 2K N+2 130 12 66.67
5 NS 3PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 % 7 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
8 NS 4PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
9 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %10 NS 2T W = -90 12 66.67
11 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
12 NS 2S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 6K W = -920 1 5.56
15 NS 5KcW = -550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 1 5.56
18 NS 4T N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %19 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
21 NS 5T S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %22 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 38.89
24 NS 3S S-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %25 NS 4CcW-2 500 18 100.00
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 13 72.22
27 NS 3T W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %28 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
29 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
3 NS 3C E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 % 4 NS 2K N+2 130 12 66.67
5 NS 1S N = 90 17 94.44
6 NS 4T W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 4 22.22
8 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89
9 NS 3C S = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %10 NS 2CcN+1 870 18 100.00
11 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
14 NS 3S E-1 50 18 100.00
15 NS 4C S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %16 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 22.22
17 NS 5T E+2 -440 10 55.56
18 NS 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78
21 NS 4P N+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %22 NS 3CcW-1 200 18 100.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
24 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %25 NS 3C W = -140 4 22.22
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
27 NS 2S W = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %28 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
29 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 % 4 NS 2K N+1 110 7 38.89
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
6 NS 2S W-4 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00
8 NS 2C W+2 -170 7 38.89
9 NS 3P W-2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %10 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
11 NS 2C S = 110 14 77.78
12 NS 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %13 NS 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
14 NS 3K W+3 -170 15 83.33
15 NS 4CcS = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
17 NS 5PcW+1 -750 4 22.22
18 NS 2T N+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
20 NS 3K W = -110 5 27.78
21 NS 4P N+3 710 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %22 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
27 NS 3T W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 %28 NS 4P N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67
30 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 % 1 NS 3S N = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 6S N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 3C E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 % 4 NS 3K N+1 130 12 66.67
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 27.78
6 NS 1P N+2 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
8 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
9 NS 4T N = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44
11 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %13 NS 2S N-3 -300 6 33.33
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
15 NS 3C N+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %16 NS 3K N+2 150 9 50.00
17 NS 5KcN-2 -300 13 72.22
18 NS 4TcN-1 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
20 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %22 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
24 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %25 NS 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
26 NS 1PcS-6 -1700 0 0.00
27 NS 2CcN-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %28 NS 2P N+2 170 17 94.44
29 NS 2CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 210,0 / 540 = 38,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
3 NS 3C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 % 4 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 % 7 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 33.33
8 NS 5KcN-2 -300 4 22.22
9 NS 4C S = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %10 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
11 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 %13 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 55.56
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
15 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44
17 NS 5K S-3 -150 16 88.89
18 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %19 NS 3S N = 400 8 44.44
20 NS 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78
21 NS 3S N+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %25 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 33.33
27 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %28 NS 4K N = 130 2 11.11
29 NS 4C W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 3P S+3 230 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo : 41,30 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 12 66.67
2 NS 3S N+3 690 13 72.22
3 NS 4C E-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard : 46,48 % 4 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 2T N = 90 17 94.44
6 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 61,67 % 7 NS 4P W+2 -680 0 0.00
8 NS 4K N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 NS 3C S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude : 52,96 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 55.56
12 NS 3S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert : 50,74 %13 NS 3P E = -140 14 77.78
14 NS 4K W+2 -170 15 83.33
15 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe : 63,52 %16 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 5KcS-1 -100 18 100.00
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène : 31,30 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78
20 NS 3K W-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 4P N+2 680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 50,74 %22 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 7 38.89
24 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves : 36,85 %25 NS 3C W-1 100 11 61.11
26 NS 6S W-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 3T W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 64,44 %28 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
29 NS 3P S-2 -200 4 22.22
30 NS 2S N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 329,0 / 540 = 60,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 DELCARTE Emile -RAIMOND Yves
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N+2 690 5 27.78
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 % 4 EO 2K N+3 150 1 5.56
5 EO 2P S-2 -200 13 72.22
6 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 3C W = -140 8 44.44
9 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %10 EO 2T W = -90 6 33.33
11 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
12 EO 2S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 4C S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
17 EO 5PcW+1 -750 14 77.78
18 EO 2T N+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %19 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
20 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %25 EO 3C W-1 100 7 38.89
26 EO 6S W-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3T W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %28 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
29 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 % 1 EO 3S S-1 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
3 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 % 4 EO 3K N = 110 11 61.11
5 EO 3KcW = -470 16 88.89
6 EO 3P N+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
8 EO 5C W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %10 EO 2CcN+1 870 0 0.00
11 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %13 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
14 EO 3K W+3 -170 3 16.67
15 EO 4CcS = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %16 EO 3K N+2 150 9 50.00
17 EO 5KcN-2 -300 5 27.78
18 EO 4TcN-1 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %19 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22
21 EO 3S N+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %22 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 61.11
24 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
26 EO 3S W+3 -690 16 88.89
27 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %28 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
29 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDERHULST Jacques -MICHAUX Hélène
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S S+2 660 13 72.22
3 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
6 EO 3P S+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 % 7 EO 4K E-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 4C S+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %10 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
11 EO 2C S = 110 4 22.22
12 EO 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %13 EO 2S N-3 -300 12 66.67
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
15 EO 3C N+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56
17 EO 5K S-3 -150 2 11.11
18 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22
20 EO 3K W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %22 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
24 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %25 EO 4CcW-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 5 27.78
27 EO 3T W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %28 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
29 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 169,0 / 540 = 31,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 % 1 EO 3S N = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 6S N-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 3C E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 % 4 EO 3S S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
6 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 % 7 EO 4P W+2 -680 18 100.00
8 EO 4K N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 EO 3C S+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %10 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 4CcS-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %13 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44
15 EO 2C S+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 17 94.44
18 EO 4T N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %19 EO 2C W-4 400 10 55.56
20 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
21 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %22 EO 3CcW-1 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
24 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %28 EO 4P N-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 333,0 / 540 = 61,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -COLLET Edgard
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
3 EO 3C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 % 4 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 2T N = 90 1 5.56
6 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 5 27.78
8 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
9 EO 4C S+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
14 EO 6K W = -920 17 94.44
15 EO 5KcW = -550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 17 94.44
18 EO 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %19 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
20 EO 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22
21 EO 4P N+2 680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 61.11
24 EO 3KcN-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
27 EO 3T W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %28 EO 3P N+1 170 1 5.56
29 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33
30 EO 3P S+3 230 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DELCARTE Jérôme -HUBLET Carlo
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
3 EO 4C E-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 % 4 EO 3K N+2 150 1 5.56
5 EO 3K W = -110 10 55.56
6 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 % 7 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
8 EO 4PcN-3 -500 18 100.00
9 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %10 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
12 EO 2S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %13 EO 2P W+2 -170 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
15 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %16 EO 3S N-2 -100 14 77.78
17 EO 5T E+2 -440 8 44.44
18 EO 3K W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %19 EO 2CcW-4 1100 0 0.00
20 EO 3T W-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %22 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
27 EO 2S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %28 EO 2P N+2 170 1 5.56
29 EO 2CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MARCHAL Christian -MULLER Philippe
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 3S S+2 660 13 72.22
3 EO 4PcS-6 -1400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 % 4 EO 2K N+2 130 6 33.33
5 EO 3PcS-2 -500 18 100.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 14 77.78
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11
9 EO 3C S = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %10 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
11 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %13 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 6K W = -920 17 94.44
15 EO 5K E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %16 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
17 EO 5KcS-1 -100 0 0.00
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 %19 EO 3S N = 400 10 55.56
20 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
21 EO 4P N+3 710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %22 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 61.11
24 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %25 EO 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
26 EO 1PcS-6 -1700 18 100.00
27 EO 2CcN-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %28 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
29 EO 3T N-3 -300 16 88.89
30 EO 4P S+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PETITJEAN Christian -PETITJEAN Robert
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89
2 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
3 EO 2C S-4 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 4 EO 2K N+2 130 6 33.33
5 EO 1S N = 90 1 5.56
6 EO 4T W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 9 50.00
8 EO 2C W+2 -170 11 61.11
9 EO 3P W-2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %10 EO 2C S-1 -100 10 55.56
11 EO 2C S+1 170 0 0.00
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %13 EO 3P E = -140 4 22.22
14 EO 4K W+2 -170 3 16.67
15 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 14 77.78
17 EO 5KcS-3 -500 11 61.11
18 EO 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %19 EO 3T S+2 150 16 88.89
20 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 3S N = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 %22 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
24 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %25 EO 4CcW-1 200 2 11.11
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78
27 EO 2K W = -90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %28 EO 4K N = 130 16 88.89
29 EO 4C W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 3P S+3 230 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 SOENENS Anita -NELIS Claude
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S N+3 690 5 27.78
3 EO 3C E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 % 4 EO 2K N+1 110 11 61.11
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
6 EO 2S W-4 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
8 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
9 EO 4T N = 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 8 44.44
12 EO 3S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %13 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 72.22
15 EO 5K E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %16 EO 3K N+2 150 9 50.00
17 EO 5KcS-2 -300 5 27.78
18 EO 3T N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %19 EO 2CcW-3 800 2 11.11
20 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
21 EO 3S N+2 660 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %22 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 11 61.11
24 EO 3S S-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 %25 EO 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
27 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %28 EO 3K N+2 150 4 22.22
29 EO 2KcE = -180 12 66.67
30 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
7 TIRMARCHE Quentin -GODEFROIT Jean-Louis : 57,59 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 6 33.33
2 EO 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 DAVID Jeannine -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 38,89 % 4 EO 3K N+1 130 6 33.33
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 72.22
6 EO 1P N+2 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 de WASSEIGE Claude -MICHIELS Marc : 48,52 % 7 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 66.67
8 EO 5KcN-2 -300 14 77.78
9 EO 4C S = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 53,15 %10 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
11 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
12 EO 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VOLCHER Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 41,48 %13 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 72.22
15 EO 4K E = -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 DOPCHIE Thierry -BERNARD Jules : 50,93 %16 EO 3S S-2 -100 14 77.78
17 EO 5KcS-3 -500 11 61.11
18 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 PIRET Martine -COLLET Claudine : 38,89 %19 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 3K W = -110 13 72.22
21 EO 5T S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
1 CASSART Guy -MATELART Marc : 54,26 %22 EO 3C E-1 100 4 22.22
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
24 EO 1S S+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %25 EO 3C W = -140 14 77.78
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 66.67
27 EO 2S W = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 60,93 %28 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
29 EO 3P S-2 -200 14 77.78
30 EO 2S N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 348,0 / 540 = 64,44 %
|
|