|
Tournoi du 13-09-10
1 59,44 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 57,41 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
3 54,07 3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette
4 53,70 7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 50,19 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 49,44 9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
7 46,67 1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean
8 45,19 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
9 42,59 5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse
10 41,30 2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,89 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 58,33 15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
3 56,67 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 53,89 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 51,67 12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy
6 51,48 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
7 48,52 17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 43,33 18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal
9 39,44 11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
10 37,78 13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
PAIRE Nr : 1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 % 1 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 38.89
2 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
3 NS 5P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 % 4 NS 2T S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2CcS = 470 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
8 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 22.22
9 NS 1P E+3 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %10 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 3C S+1 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %13 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
14 NS 4T N-1 -50 1 5.56
15 NS 1S E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %16 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
18 NS 2T E = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %19 NS 2K W-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
21 NS 4PcE-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
23 NS 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
24 NS 4C S+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %25 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 50.00
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
27 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 % 4 NS 2T S-1 -100 4 22.22
5 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
6 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
8 NS 3C W = -140 1 5.56
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
12 NS 4C N-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 2T N+2 130 16 88.89
15 NS 2T W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %16 NS 1S E = -90 5 27.78
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
18 NS 2P N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %19 NS 1S E-3 300 17 94.44
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
21 NS 3P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %22 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78
23 NS 3S S+3 690 12 66.67
24 NS 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
26 NS 3K W+3 -170 14 77.78
27 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 5KcN-1 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1S S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
3 NS 4PcN = 590 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 % 4 NS 1P S+1 110 18 100.00
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 3P W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 % 7 NS 3T S+1 130 18 100.00
8 NS 4CcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %10 NS 6K N-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
12 NS 2S N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3P S = 140 18 100.00
15 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56
18 NS 1S N-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %19 NS 1S W-3 300 17 94.44
20 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
21 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %22 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00
23 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
24 NS 4P N+3 510 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %28 NS 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
29 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 NS 3K W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 % 1 NS 4K W+2 -170 4 22.22
2 NS 3P W-1 50 14 77.78
3 NS 3PcS+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 % 4 NS 1S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4CcS-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 7 NS 3T N = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 4CcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %10 NS 5K S = 600 8 44.44
11 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %13 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3KcE-1 100 11 61.11
15 NS 1S E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %16 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44
17 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33
18 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %19 NS 2T S+1 110 14 77.78
20 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %22 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2 11.11
23 NS 6KcS = 1540 14 77.78
24 NS 5P N+2 510 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %25 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 33.33
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
29 NS 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 % 1 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 38.89
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 22.22
3 NS 3PcS+1 630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 3C W = -140 1 5.56
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %10 NS 5S S = 660 18 100.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
12 NS 2S N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %13 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
18 NS 1S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 1 5.56
20 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %22 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2 11.11
23 NS 4C S+2 680 7 38.89
24 NS 5C S+1 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 2K S+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 5KcN-1 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 2P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 230,0 / 540 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 % 1 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 55.56
2 NS 1P W = -80 12 66.67
3 NS 5PcS-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 % 4 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56
5 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
6 NS 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 22.22
8 NS 3K S+1 130 17 94.44
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %10 NS 5S S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 2S N+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %13 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3P S-1 -50 1 5.56
15 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 11 61.11
17 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33
18 NS 3C S-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %19 NS 2T S = 90 6 33.33
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
23 NS 5C S+1 680 7 38.89
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %25 NS 4K W+1 -150 3 16.67
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
27 NS 3S S+2 460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
29 NS 4K N = 130 18 100.00
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89
3 NS 3P S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 4C W-1 50 6 33.33
9 NS 5TcS-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %10 NS 5K N = 600 8 44.44
11 NS 4C S = 420 16 88.89
12 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %13 NS 3C W-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 NS 1S E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %16 NS 2C N = 110 14 77.78
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
18 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %19 NS 3K W = -110 1 5.56
20 NS 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %22 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2 11.11
23 NS 5C S+1 680 7 38.89
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %25 NS 3CcS = 530 17 94.44
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 2K N+1 110 16 88.89
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 % 1 NS 5KcW = -550 0 0.00
2 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 4 NS 1S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
8 NS 4K S = 130 17 94.44
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 2C S = 110 7 38.89
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %13 NS 3T N = 110 18 100.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 14 77.78
15 NS 1ScE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
18 NS 2P S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %19 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 22.22
20 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 3P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
23 NS 6KxS = 1830 18 100.00
24 NS 4C N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %25 NS 3CcS = 530 17 94.44
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
29 NS 5KcN-1 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 321,0 / 540 = 59,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 1 NS 3PcS-3 -500 2 11.11
2 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89
3 NS 5P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 22.22
5 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
6 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 22.22
8 NS 4CcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
11 NS 3PcW-4 800 18 100.00
12 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 %13 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
14 NS 3K E-1 50 6 33.33
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %16 NS 1S E-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
18 NS 3P S-2 -200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %19 NS 7P E-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %22 NS 2C S = 110 8 44.44
23 NS 6CcS = 1660 16 88.89
24 NS 5C S+2 510 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %25 NS 5C N-3 -150 3 16.67
26 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
27 NS 3K S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 2S S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 58,89 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
2 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 4 NS 2T W = -90 8 44.44
5 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3KcE = -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 51,48 % 7 NS 3T S = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 4CcW-1 100 11 61.11
9 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 56,67 %10 NS 5K N = 600 8 44.44
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 11.11
12 NS 3S N = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal : 43,33 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
14 NS 3KcE-1 100 11 61.11
15 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 48,52 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 11 61.11
17 NS 3P S = 140 6 33.33
18 NS 2K W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François : 37,78 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 10 55.56
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
21 NS 4P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy : 51,67 %22 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
24 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,44 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 9 50.00
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 17 94.44
27 NS 3S S+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 53,89 %28 NS 3S S = 600 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 NS 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 % 1 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 61.11
2 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
3 EO 5P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 % 4 EO 1P S+1 110 0 0.00
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 3P W-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
8 EO 3C W = -140 17 94.44
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %10 EO 5S S = 660 0 0.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
12 EO 2S N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %13 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 94.44
15 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %16 EO 2C N = 110 4 22.22
17 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
18 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %19 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 77.78
20 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 3P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %22 EO 2C S = 110 10 55.56
23 EO 6CcS = 1660 2 11.11
24 EO 5C S+2 510 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 9 50.00
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
27 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
29 EO 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 de Bergeyck Christine -LAMBEAUX Guy
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
3 EO 4PcN = 590 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 % 4 EO 2T S-1 -100 14 77.78
5 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
6 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
8 EO 5K S-2 -100 14 77.78
9 EO 1P E+3 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %10 EO 5S S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 2S N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %13 EO 3C W-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 EO 1S E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
17 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
18 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %19 EO 7P E-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %22 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %25 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 66.67
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 5KcN-1 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 2P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 279,0 / 540 = 51,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GEUDVERT Albert -WARNIER François
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 EO 3C S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 % 4 EO 2T S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2CcS = 470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 % 7 EO 3T S+1 130 0 0.00
8 EO 4CcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %10 EO 5K N = 600 10 55.56
11 EO 4C S = 420 2 11.11
12 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %13 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 4 22.22
15 EO 1ScE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %16 EO 1S E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
18 EO 3P S-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
21 EO 4P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %22 EO 4CcS-1 -100 16 88.89
23 EO 6KcS = 1540 4 22.22
24 EO 5P N+2 510 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 2K S+1 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
29 EO 4K N = 130 0 0.00
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 1 EO 5KcW = -550 18 100.00
2 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44
3 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
5 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
6 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 4CcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %10 EO 5K S = 600 10 55.56
11 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 2T N+2 130 2 11.11
15 EO 2T W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44
17 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
18 EO 1S N-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %19 EO 1S W-3 300 1 5.56
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
21 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
23 EO 5C S+1 680 11 61.11
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %25 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 50.00
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 1 5.56
27 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 2K N+1 110 2 11.11
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 % 1 EO 3PcS-3 -500 16 88.89
2 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11
3 EO 5P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 4 EO 2T W = -90 10 55.56
5 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 3KcE = -670 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 % 7 EO 3T N = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 4CcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %13 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %16 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
18 EO 2P N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %19 EO 2T S = 90 12 66.67
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %22 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
24 EO 4P N+3 510 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %25 EO 3CcS = 530 1 5.56
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11
3 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 % 4 EO 1S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4CcS-2 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 3C W = -140 17 94.44
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %10 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 4C S-3 -150 18 100.00
12 EO 3C S+1 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %13 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
14 EO 3K E-1 50 12 66.67
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 7 38.89
17 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67
18 EO 3C S-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %19 EO 1S E-3 300 1 5.56
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
21 EO 3P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %22 EO 4CcS-1 -100 16 88.89
23 EO 5C S+1 680 11 61.11
24 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
29 EO 5KcN-1 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 318,0 / 540 = 58,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 % 1 EO 4K W+2 -170 14 77.78
2 EO 3P W-1 50 4 22.22
3 EO 3PcS+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 77.78
8 EO 3K S+1 130 1 5.56
9 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 3PcW-4 800 0 0.00
12 EO 4P S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %13 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
14 EO 4T N-1 -50 17 94.44
15 EO 1S E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 7 38.89
17 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67
18 EO 2K W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 %19 EO 3K W = -110 17 94.44
20 EO 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %22 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22
23 EO 3S S+3 690 6 33.33
24 EO 4P N+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %25 EO 3CcS = 530 1 5.56
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %28 EO 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
29 EO 5K N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 EO 3K W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -DAPHNE Chantal
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 % 1 EO 3K W+1 -130 11 61.11
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 77.78
3 EO 3PcS+1 630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 % 4 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44
5 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
6 EO 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 % 7 EO 3T S = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 4C W-1 50 12 66.67
9 EO 5TcS-2 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %10 EO 6K N-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
12 EO 2S N+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3KcE-1 100 7 38.89
15 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %16 EO 1S E = -90 13 72.22
17 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
18 EO 2T E = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %19 EO 2T S+1 110 4 22.22
20 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
23 EO 6KxS = 1830 0 0.00
24 EO 4C N+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
26 EO 3K W+3 -170 4 22.22
27 EO 3S S+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 2S S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 % 1 EO 4C S-2 -100 8 44.44
2 EO 1P W = -80 6 33.33
3 EO 5PcS-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 77.78
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
8 EO 4K S = 130 1 5.56
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %10 EO 5K N = 600 10 55.56
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 16 88.89
12 EO 3S N = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00
15 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %16 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56
17 EO 3P S = 140 12 66.67
18 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %19 EO 2K W-1 100 8 44.44
20 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
21 EO 4PcE-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %22 EO 4CcS-1 -100 16 88.89
23 EO 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
24 EO 5C S+1 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 %25 EO 5C N-3 -150 15 83.33
26 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
27 EO 3K S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 5KcN-1 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 1S S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,70 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
2 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11
3 EO 3P S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 59,44 % 4 EO 1S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 4K E-1 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,44 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 77.78
8 EO 4CcW-1 100 7 38.89
9 EO 4P E = -620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 41,30 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
11 EO 2C S = 110 11 61.11
12 EO 4C N-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,41 %13 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
14 EO 3KcE-1 100 7 38.89
15 EO 1S E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 CASSART Guy -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 54,07 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44
18 EO 1S N-2 -200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 LEJEUNE Fernand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,59 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 17 94.44
20 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 VERBOIS Léon -PETIT Jean : 46,67 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
23 EO 4C S+2 680 11 61.11
24 EO 4C S+2 480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 45,19 %25 EO 4K W+1 -150 15 83.33
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
27 EO 3S S+2 460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %28 EO 3S S = 600 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 50.00
30 EO 1S S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
|
|