|
Tournoi du 13-12-10
1 70,74 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 57,41 6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
3 53,89 1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
4 50,93 7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
5 49,63 9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 47,41 2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse
7 46,48 10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges
8 43,52 5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
9 42,04 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
10 37,96 3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,78 18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
2 53,89 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 53,52 17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
~ 53,52 20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 52,78 15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 51,30 19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
7 50,93 13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 48,89 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
9 39,26 12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
10 38,15 16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
2 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
5 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 % 7 NS 5T N = 600 11 61.11
8 NS 2PcE-4 800 18 100.00
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %10 NS 2K W+2 -130 10 55.56
11 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 3C W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 3K E-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
21 NS 3P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %22 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67
23 NS 2T S+3 150 2 11.11
24 NS 4K N = 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %25 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78
26 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
27 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %28 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
29 NS 3S E = -600 16 88.89
30 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
2 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 % 4 NS 2K W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 7 NS 6T N = 1370 18 100.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 1 5.56
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %10 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 3K S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
14 NS 5K E-2 100 8 44.44
15 NS 5CcE-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 4K E-2 100 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
21 NS 3C N = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %22 NS 1S S = 90 1 5.56
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %25 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 2C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %28 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
29 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
30 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 % 1 NS 3P W-2 100 16 88.89
2 NS 2P W+2 -170 11 61.11
3 NS 4P W-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
5 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 % 7 NS 5T N+1 620 16 88.89
8 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %10 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %13 NS 3P S = 140 2 11.11
14 NS 4K E = -130 0 0.00
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %16 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11
17 NS 2P S-2 -100 1 5.56
18 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %19 NS 4C E-1 100 18 100.00
20 NS 5K N-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 2C S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %22 NS 1S S = 90 1 5.56
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 4P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %25 NS 4C N+3 510 3 16.67
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %28 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
29 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 205,0 / 540 = 37,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
3 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 % 4 NS 3C E-2 200 18 100.00
5 NS 1S S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 NS 1P W+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N = 400 1 5.56
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %10 NS 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 11.11
12 NS 3C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %13 NS 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %16 NS 5P S = 450 12 66.67
17 NS 2C N = 110 18 100.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 3K N+1 130 6 33.33
21 NS 3C S+1 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %22 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67
23 NS 5P S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %25 NS 3S S+4 520 6 33.33
26 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
27 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %28 NS 3C W+2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
30 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
2 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 % 4 NS 1S W-1 100 15 83.33
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 % 7 NS 5T N = 600 11 61.11
8 NS 4S N = 430 7 38.89
9 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %10 NS 2S E = -120 15 83.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
12 NS 3K S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
14 NS 5T S-2 -100 2 11.11
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 4K E-1 50 9 50.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %19 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %22 NS 3T S = 110 5 27.78
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 4C E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %25 NS 4C N+2 480 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
27 NS 3K S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %28 NS 3K S-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
3 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 11 61.11
5 NS 3S S-2 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 1S S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 % 7 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %10 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 55.56
11 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %13 NS 2P S+2 170 4 22.22
14 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
21 NS 1S S+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %22 NS 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %25 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78
26 NS 3S N+1 630 13 72.22
27 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %28 NS 1S S = 90 16 88.89
29 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
30 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
3 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 % 4 NS 1S W = -90 11 61.11
5 NS 2S S-2 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00
11 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22
12 NS 3P W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %13 NS 3S N+3 690 18 100.00
14 NS 5T S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %16 NS 6P S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3K E-2 100 15 83.33
18 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %19 NS 4C E = -620 4 22.22
20 NS 6S N-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %22 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89
23 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
24 NS 2P W = -110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %25 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 2C W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 %28 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 5.56
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
30 NS 5KcW-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 % 1 NS 2ScE-4 800 18 100.00
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
3 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 4 NS 3T S-1 -100 7 38.89
5 NS 2S S = 120 18 100.00
6 NS 1S S = 90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 % 7 NS 5T N = 600 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89
9 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 %10 NS 4K E+2 -170 0 0.00
11 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22
12 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
14 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
18 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %19 NS 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
20 NS 4C S = 620 8 44.44
21 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %22 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 4K S = 130 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %25 NS 6S N = 990 8 44.44
26 NS 3S N+2 660 18 100.00
27 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00
29 NS 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00
30 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
Total : 382,0 / 540 = 70,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 1 NS 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 11 61.11
3 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 % 4 NS 3T S-1 -100 7 38.89
5 NS 2S S-2 -200 3 16.67
6 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 % 7 NS 5T N = 600 11 61.11
8 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %10 NS 2K W+2 -130 10 55.56
11 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22
12 NS 4T S = 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S = 400 13 72.22
15 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %16 NS 4P S = 420 4 22.22
17 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 5.56
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %19 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 66.67
20 NS 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
21 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %22 NS 3T S = 110 5 27.78
23 NS 4P S+1 650 17 94.44
24 NS 4P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %25 NS 6C N+1 1010 14 77.78
26 NS 5S N-1 -100 3 16.67
27 NS 2C W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %28 NS 2C W = -110 10 55.56
29 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22
30 NS 5KcE-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges
16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 38,15 % 1 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS Pass Passe 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,78 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
5 NS 1S S = 90 16 88.89
6 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,89 % 7 NS 3PcW = -730 2 11.11
8 NS 3S S+2 460 14 77.78
9 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 51,30 %10 NS 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22
11 NS 4C E-1 50 18 100.00
12 NS 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François : 57,78 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 14 77.78
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier : 53,52 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 5 27.78
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,93 %19 NS 2C E+2 -170 12 66.67
20 NS 5C S = 650 15 83.33
21 NS 4C S = 620 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,26 %22 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
23 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 53,89 %25 NS 4C N+3 510 3 16.67
26 NS 3S N = 600 8 44.44
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,52 %28 NS 3K S-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
30 NS 4KcE = -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
2 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
5 EO 2K S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 7 EO 6T N = 1370 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 17 94.44
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %10 EO 2S E = -120 3 16.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 3K S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %13 EO 2P S+2 170 14 77.78
14 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %16 EO 6P S-1 -50 18 100.00
17 EO 3K E-2 100 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %19 EO 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
20 EO 4C S = 620 10 55.56
21 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %22 EO 3T S = 110 13 72.22
23 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
24 EO 4P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %25 EO 4C N+3 510 15 83.33
26 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %28 EO 3C W+2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
30 EO 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 1 EO 3P W-2 100 2 11.11
2 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 38.89
3 EO 4P W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 4 EO 2K W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 % 7 EO 5T N = 600 7 38.89
8 EO 2PcE-4 800 0 0.00
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %10 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 44.44
11 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %13 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
14 EO 5T S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
18 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %19 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
21 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %22 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %25 EO 3S S+4 520 12 66.67
26 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
27 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %28 EO 3K S-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 STIENON Annie -MOSSERAY Bernadette
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
2 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
5 EO 1S S-2 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 % 7 EO 5T N+1 620 2 11.11
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78
12 EO 3P W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %13 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %16 EO 4P S = 420 14 77.78
17 EO 1S N-2 -100 17 94.44
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %19 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 33.33
20 EO 5C S = 650 3 16.67
21 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %22 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33
23 EO 5P S-1 -100 18 100.00
24 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %25 EO 4C N+2 480 18 100.00
26 EO 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
27 EO 3K S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %28 EO 1S S = 90 2 11.11
29 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
30 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 % 1 EO 2ScE-4 800 0 0.00
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
3 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 4 EO 3T S-1 -100 11 61.11
5 EO 2S S-2 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 % 7 EO 3PcW = -730 16 88.89
8 EO 3S S+2 460 4 22.22
9 EO 3S W+3 -690 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %10 EO 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 16 88.89
12 EO 3C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
14 EO 5K E-2 100 10 55.56
15 EO 5CcE-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 4K E-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %19 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 5K N-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 2C S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %22 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %25 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22
26 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
27 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %28 EO 2P N-2 -200 17 94.44
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
30 EO 5KcW-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
3 EO 4CcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
5 EO 1S S = 90 2 11.11
6 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N = 400 17 94.44
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %10 EO 4K E+2 -170 18 100.00
11 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78
12 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %13 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
14 EO 5T S-2 -100 16 88.89
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 4K E-2 100 3 16.67
18 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
21 EO 1S S+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %22 EO 1S S = 90 17 94.44
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 4P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %25 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 2C W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %28 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
29 EO 3S E = -600 2 11.11
30 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 % 1 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO Pass Passe 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 % 4 EO 3C E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 1S S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 EO 1P W+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 7 EO 5T N = 600 7 38.89
8 EO 4S N = 430 11 61.11
9 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %10 EO 2K W+2 -130 8 44.44
11 EO 5TcN-4 -800 18 100.00
12 EO 3C W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
21 EO 3C N = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %22 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11
23 EO 4P S+1 650 1 5.56
24 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %25 EO 4C N+3 510 15 83.33
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
29 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
30 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -CLERIN François-Xavier
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 38.89
3 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 4 EO 1S W-1 100 3 16.67
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 % 7 EO 4PcE = -790 18 100.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %10 EO 2K W+2 -130 8 44.44
11 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78
12 EO 4T S = 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %13 EO 3S N = 600 10 55.56
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 72.22
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 6S N-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %22 EO 1S S = 90 17 94.44
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 2P W = -110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %25 EO 6S N = 990 10 55.56
26 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
27 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %28 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
29 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 de WASSEIGE Claude -WARNIER François
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
2 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 7 38.89
5 EO 3S S-2 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 1S S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %10 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 4 22.22
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33
17 EO 3K E-1 50 9 50.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3K N+1 130 12 66.67
21 EO 3C S+1 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 %22 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 4K S = 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %25 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 2C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %28 EO 2C W = -110 8 44.44
29 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78
30 EO 5KcE-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
3 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 % 4 EO 1S W = -90 7 38.89
5 EO 2S S-2 -200 15 83.33
6 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 % 7 EO 5T N = 600 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11
9 EO 3S E+1 -630 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %10 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78
11 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00
12 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %13 EO 3P S = 140 16 88.89
14 EO 4K E = -130 18 100.00
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %16 EO 5P S = 450 6 33.33
17 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %19 EO 4C E = -620 14 77.78
20 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 3P W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %22 EO 3T S = 110 13 72.22
23 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
24 EO 4C E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 %25 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22
26 EO 5S N-1 -100 15 83.33
27 EO 2C W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %28 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
29 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
30 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 COLOT Jacques -FRAITURE Louis : 50,93 % 1 EO 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
2 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
3 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 70,74 % 4 EO 3T S-1 -100 11 61.11
5 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
6 EO 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 49,63 % 7 EO 5T N = 600 7 38.89
8 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 GRAFF Fernande -WUYARD Alphonse : 47,41 %10 EO 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
12 EO 3K S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -MASSAUX Jacques : 42,04 %13 EO 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 27.78
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 DACHET Gérard -POULAERT Gilbert : 37,96 %16 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89
17 EO 2P S-2 -100 17 94.44
18 EO 3S N-4 -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLET Claudine : 43,52 %19 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 33.33
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4C S = 620 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 53,89 %22 EO 3T S+1 130 6 33.33
23 EO 2T S+3 150 16 88.89
24 EO 4K N = 130 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 57,41 %25 EO 6C N+1 1010 4 22.22
26 EO 3S N+1 630 5 27.78
27 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -BABIKOW Georges : 46,48 %28 EO 3K S-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
30 EO 4KcE = -510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 289,0 / 540 = 53,52 %
|
|