|
Tournoi du 14-01-13
1 59,63 4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
2 58,70 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 54,07 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
~ 54,07 10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 53,15 5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 50,93 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
7 47,78 2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne
8 46,11 7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
9 44,81 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 44,63 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 36,11 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
12 0,00 12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 66,30 23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 65,02 15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 59,05 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 56,48 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
5 49,59 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
6 48,77 22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
7 46,09 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
8 43,00 16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
9 42,39 24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
10 40,95 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph
11 40,53 19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
12 39,30 18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
2 NS 3C S-2 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 2C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
6 NS 1C W = -80 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 % 7 NS Pass Passe 16 88.89
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %10 NS 4C N = 620 2 11.11
11 NS 4T W = -130 1 5.56
12 NS 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %13 NS 3C E = -140 6 33.33
14 NS 5KcW-1 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 1 5.56
17 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 4C W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %19 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
20 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
21 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %22 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22
23 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
24 NS 3S S = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
26 NS 3C E-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 6T E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %28 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00
29 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
Total : 195,0 / 540 = 36,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
6 NS 1C W = -80 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 7 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 33.33
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %10 NS 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
11 NS 5T W-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %13 NS 3P S = 140 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00
15 NS 3C E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %16 NS 1S E-1 100 1 5.56
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %19 NS 4P N = 420 17 94.44
20 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 2P S+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %22 NS 2P E-2 200 9 50.00
23 NS 1P S = 80 8 44.44
24 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %25 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 12 66.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %28 NS 2T E-1 50 6 33.33
29 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 NS 3C E = -140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %31 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E = -90 0 0.00
33 NS 3S E = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 % 1 NS 2T S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
3 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 1S W = -90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
11 NS 4T W = -130 1 5.56
12 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %13 NS 4CcE-2 500 13 72.22
14 NS 4T E+1 -150 12 66.67
15 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %19 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
20 NS 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
21 NS 3P S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %22 NS 1K E-1 100 0 0.00
23 NS 1P S-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %25 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
27 NS 3T E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %28 NS 2C W-1 50 6 33.33
29 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %31 NS 3K E+1 -130 13 72.22
32 NS 1S E-2 200 16 88.89
33 NS 2S E = -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
2 NS 2P E = -110 8 44.44
3 NS 3P N+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 % 4 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78
6 NS 2C W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %10 NS 2CcS+4 1470 18 100.00
11 NS 4C E-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %13 NS 4CcE-2 500 13 72.22
14 NS 4T E+1 -150 12 66.67
15 NS 2P S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %16 NS 1S E-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 16 88.89
18 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %19 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
20 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 4K E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %22 NS 2T S+2 130 4 22.22
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 3 16.67
24 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %28 NS 2C W-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89
30 NS 3S W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %31 NS 2C S-1 -100 17 94.44
32 NS 2K S = 90 6 33.33
33 NS 2S W+3 -210 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 322,0 / 540 = 59,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
2 NS 3P W = -140 5 27.78
3 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P E-1 50 18 100.00
6 NS 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 % 7 NS 2C W = -110 14 77.78
8 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %13 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
14 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78
15 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
17 NS 5KcW-3 500 18 100.00
18 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %19 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
20 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 2T W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %22 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
24 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %25 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
26 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
27 NS 6T E-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %28 NS 3T E-2 100 11 61.11
29 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %31 NS 2K E+3 -150 7 38.89
32 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
33 NS 3S W = -400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
2 NS 3CcS-1 -200 1 5.56
3 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 9 50.00
6 NS 3S W-3 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
8 NS 1S W = -90 17 94.44
9 NS 1S W-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %10 NS 4C S+1 650 8 44.44
11 NS 5TcW-1 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3S W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 3P S+1 170 6 33.33
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %19 NS 1S N+3 180 14 77.78
20 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 3P S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %22 NS 2T N+2 130 4 22.22
23 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
24 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %25 NS 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
26 NS 2KcN-2 -500 0 0.00
27 NS 6T W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %28 NS 3TcE-2 300 18 100.00
29 NS 2K N+1 110 4 22.22
30 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %31 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 38.89
32 NS 2T E-1 100 10 55.56
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 % 1 NS 2T W-2 100 12 66.67
2 NS 3C S = 140 18 100.00
3 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
6 NS 4P E-3 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 1 5.56
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %10 NS 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
11 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3P E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %13 NS 5T N-2 -200 4 22.22
14 NS 4T E+1 -150 12 66.67
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %19 NS 4P N = 420 17 94.44
20 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
21 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %22 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
23 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67
24 NS 3S N = 400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %25 NS 3ScE+1 -950 0 0.00
26 NS 3C E = -140 12 66.67
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %28 NS 2P W-1 50 6 33.33
29 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89
30 NS 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %31 NS 5KcE = -550 2 11.11
32 NS 2PcN+2 670 18 100.00
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
2 NS 3P W-1 50 12 66.67
3 NS 3K S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 % 4 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 16.67
6 NS 3K E-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
8 NS 1S E = -90 17 94.44
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %10 NS 4C S+2 680 15 83.33
11 NS 3C E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %13 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 11.11
14 NS 4PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 4P S+1 450 13 72.22
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %22 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67
24 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %25 NS 2S E-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2P S-3 -300 2 11.11
27 NS 3T E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %28 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
29 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89
30 NS 3C E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %31 NS 4KcE+1 -610 0 0.00
32 NS 2P N+2 170 14 77.78
33 NS 2T W+3 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 16 88.89
2 NS 2C S = 110 15 83.33
3 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 % 4 NS 2S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
6 NS 3ScW-3 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 2P S = 110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
11 NS 4T W-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %13 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89
14 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78
15 NS 3C E = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
17 NS 5K E-2 100 4 22.22
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 5C W-2 200 13 72.22
21 NS 3P S+2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 3C E = -140 12 66.67
27 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
29 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
30 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %31 NS 2K E+2 -130 13 72.22
32 NS 2S S-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 2C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 % 1 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
2 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 55.56
3 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 % 4 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
5 NS 4P W = -420 9 50.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 % 7 NS 2C W+3 -200 4 22.22
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 1S W-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
11 NS 5TcW-1 100 14 77.78
12 NS 4P W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %13 NS 3T N+1 130 8 44.44
14 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78
15 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
20 NS 5PcE-1 200 13 72.22
21 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 56,48 %22 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78
23 NS 1P S+1 110 16 88.89
24 NS 3S S+3 490 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %28 NS 2K W = -90 2 11.11
29 NS 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 %31 NS 2C S-1 -100 17 94.44
32 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
33 NS 3T W+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 % 1 NS 2P E-1 50 5 27.78
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
3 NS 4P N+2 480 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 3P W+2 -200 12 66.67
6 NS 3K E-2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
9 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 8 44.44
11 NS 5TcW-1 100 14 77.78
12 NS 4C W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
14 NS 5T E = -400 5 27.78
15 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 13 72.22
17 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 4C W = -620 2 11.11
21 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %22 NS 3K E-2 200 9 50.00
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %25 NS 3S E = -600 6 33.33
26 NS 3C E = -140 12 66.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 66,30 %31 NS 3K E+2 -150 7 38.89
32 NS 3P S-1 -50 3 16.67
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 -
24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude : 42,39 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,05 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 49,59 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph : 40,95 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 39,30 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline : 48,77 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 65,02 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger : 40,53 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte : 43,00 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,09 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
2 EO 3C S-2 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 2C W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
6 EO 4P E-3 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 % 7 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 66.67
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %10 EO 4C S+2 680 3 16.67
11 EO 3C E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %13 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 27.78
14 EO 4T E+1 -150 6 33.33
15 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
17 EO 5K E-2 100 14 77.78
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %19 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
20 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 4K E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %22 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 1P S+1 110 2 11.11
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %25 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
27 EO 6T E-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %31 EO 3K E+2 -150 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E-1 100 8 44.44
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -COOLEN Joseph
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 % 1 EO 2T W-2 100 6 33.33
2 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
3 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
6 EO 1C W = -80 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
8 EO 1S E = -90 1 5.56
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %13 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11
14 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22
15 EO 3C E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %16 EO 1S E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 2 11.11
18 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
20 EO 5PcE-1 200 5 27.78
21 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %22 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %25 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
26 EO 3C E = -140 6 33.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %28 EO 3TcE-2 300 0 0.00
29 EO 2K N+1 110 14 77.78
30 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 199,0 / 486 = 40,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 4 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
6 EO 3K E-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
11 EO 4T W-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %13 EO 4CcE-2 500 5 27.78
14 EO 4T E+1 -150 6 33.33
15 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %22 EO 3K E-2 200 9 50.00
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %25 EO 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
26 EO 2KcN-2 -500 18 100.00
27 EO 6T W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %28 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00
29 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %31 EO 5KcE = -550 16 88.89
32 EO 2PcN+2 670 0 0.00
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 316,0 / 486 = 65,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Charlotte
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
2 EO 3P W-1 50 6 33.33
3 EO 3K S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 2P S = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %10 EO 2CcS+4 1470 0 0.00
11 EO 4C E-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %13 EO 3T N+1 130 10 55.56
14 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22
15 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
17 EO 5KcW-3 500 0 0.00
18 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
21 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %22 EO 2T N+2 130 14 77.78
23 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
26 EO 3C E-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 6T E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %31 EO 3K E+2 -150 11 61.11
32 EO 2T E = -90 18 100.00
33 EO 3S E = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 209,0 / 486 = 43,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 % 1 EO 2T S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
3 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
11 EO 5TcW-1 100 4 22.22
12 EO 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %13 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
14 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22
15 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 2S S-3 -150 18 100.00
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %19 EO 1S N+3 180 4 22.22
20 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 3P S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %22 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78
23 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
24 EO 3S S = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %25 EO 3ScE+1 -950 18 100.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 6 33.33
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %28 EO 2T E-1 50 12 66.67
29 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 EO 3C E = -140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %31 EO 4KcE+1 -610 18 100.00
32 EO 2P N+2 170 4 22.22
33 EO 2T W+3 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 287,0 / 486 = 59,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 2 11.11
2 EO 2C S = 110 3 16.67
3 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 % 4 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22
6 EO 2C W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 % 7 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 77.78
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 1S W-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 3P S+1 170 12 66.67
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %19 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
20 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
21 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %22 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
23 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33
24 EO 3S N = 400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %25 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
26 EO 3C E = -140 6 33.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %28 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
29 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11
30 EO 3C E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %31 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 27.78
32 EO 1S E-2 200 2 11.11
33 EO 2S E = -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 191,0 / 486 = 39,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -ARICKX Roger
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
2 EO 2P E = -110 10 55.56
3 EO 3P N+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 9 50.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 % 7 EO 2C W = -110 4 22.22
8 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
11 EO 5TcW-1 100 4 22.22
12 EO 4C W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 17 94.44
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 4C W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %19 EO 4P N = 420 1 5.56
20 EO 4C W = -620 16 88.89
21 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2P S-3 -300 16 88.89
27 EO 3T E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %28 EO 2C W-1 50 12 66.67
29 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %31 EO 2K E+2 -130 5 27.78
32 EO 2S S-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 2C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 197,0 / 486 = 40,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 % 1 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00
2 EO 3C S-1 -100 8 44.44
3 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3P E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %10 EO 4C S+1 650 10 55.56
11 EO 5TcW-1 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3S W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %13 EO 3C E = -140 12 66.67
14 EO 5KcW-1 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %19 EO 4P N = 420 1 5.56
20 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 2P S+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %22 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22
23 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %25 EO 3S E = -600 12 66.67
26 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
27 EO 3T E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
29 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
30 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 224,0 / 486 = 46,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
2 EO 3P W = -140 13 72.22
3 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 33.33
6 EO 3K E-2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 %10 EO 4C N = 620 16 88.89
11 EO 4T W = -130 17 94.44
12 EO 4P W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %13 EO 5T N-2 -200 14 77.78
14 EO 4T E+1 -150 6 33.33
15 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %16 EO 1S E-1 100 17 94.44
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %22 EO 1K E-1 100 18 100.00
23 EO 1P S-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 3C E = -140 6 33.33
27 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %28 EO 2C W-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11
30 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %31 EO 2C S-1 -100 1 5.56
32 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
33 EO 3T W+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 241,0 / 486 = 49,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VERBOIS Léon -HAEDENS Jacqueline
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
3 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 % 4 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 4P W = -420 9 50.00
6 EO 3S W-3 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 % 7 EO Pass Passe 2 11.11
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 1S W = -90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %10 EO 3C N+1 170 18 100.00
11 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %13 EO 3P S = 140 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 3C E = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %19 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
20 EO 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
21 EO 3P S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %25 EO 2S E-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 54,07 %28 EO 2K W = -90 16 88.89
29 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %31 EO 2K E+3 -150 11 61.11
32 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
33 EO 3S W = -400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 237,0 / 486 = 48,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 % 1 EO 2P E-1 50 13 72.22
2 EO 3CcS-1 -200 17 94.44
3 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,11 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 4P W+1 -450 15 83.33
6 EO 1C W = -80 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 17 94.44
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
9 EO 2P S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %10 EO 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
11 EO 5T W-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 4P E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %13 EO 3S S-3 -300 16 88.89
14 EO 4PcS-3 -500 18 100.00
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 4P S = 420 9 50.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 5C W-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 3P S+2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %22 EO 2T S+2 130 14 77.78
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 15 83.33
24 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %28 EO 3T E-2 100 7 38.89
29 EO 2S S = 120 9 50.00
30 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %31 EO 3K E+2 -150 11 61.11
32 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 83.33
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 358,0 / 540 = 66,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 DELHEZ Jacques -NELIS Claude
12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 de NICOLAS Bernard -PIETQUIN Joseph : 54,07 % 4 EO 2S E-1 100 4 22.22
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
6 EO 3ScW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 1S W = -90 1 5.56
9 EO 1S W-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,81 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 10 55.56
11 EO 4T W = -130 17 94.44
12 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 44,63 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 5T E = -400 13 72.22
15 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 50,93 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 5 27.78
17 EO 4P S+1 450 5 27.78
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 de LAMINNE Nathalie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,15 %19 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
20 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
21 EO 2T W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 GROSFILS Colette -PAQUET Anne : 47,78 %22 EO 2P E-2 200 9 50.00
23 EO 1P S = 80 10 55.56
24 EO 3S S+3 490 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 46,11 %28 EO 2P W-1 50 12 66.67
29 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11
30 EO 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 BEYNE Anne -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,63 %31 EO 2C S-1 -100 1 5.56
32 EO 2K S = 90 12 66.67
33 EO 2S W+3 -210 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 206,0 / 486 = 42,39 %
|
|