|
Tournoi du 14-06-12
1 63,93 6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 54,93 9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
3 54,40 11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
4 52,87 1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
5 51,13 12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric
6 50,73 10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
7 48,93 2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
8 48,53 4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
~ 48,53 3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François
10 46,27 5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
11 42,47 7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
12 37,27 8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane
PAIRE Nr : 1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 4 40.00
2 EO 3T S-1 -100 8 80.00
3 EO 3K E+1 -130 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 8 80.00
5 NS 4P E-4 200 0 0.00
6 NS 2P N = 110 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 3.8 38.00
8 EO 4C E-3 150 1.4 14.00
9 EO 5T N = 400 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 EO 3S S = 400 4 40.00
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %13 EO 3K N = 110 3.8 38.00
14 EO 4P E+2 -480 7.4 74.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 30.00
17 NS 4CcE-2 300 4 40.00
18 NS 4C N+1 650 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %19 NS 2P S = 110 6.2 62.00
20 NS 2K S+3 150 3.8 38.00
21 NS 5C N+1 680 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3P S = 140 4 40.00
27 EO 6T N = 920 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %28 NS 4C W = -420 9.8 98.00
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.4 14.00
30 NS 3T S-1 -50 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %31 EO 2S W+1 -150 7.4 74.00
32 EO 3K W-1 100 7.4 74.00
33 EO 3K S+1 130 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
Total : 158,6 / 300 = 52,87 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 100.00
2 EO 2C W = -110 10 100.00
3 EO 3CcN-3 -500 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 8 80.00
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4 40.00
6 EO 5TcS-1 -100 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 % 7 NS 2P N+2 170 9.8 98.00
8 NS 2P W-1 50 2.6 26.00
9 NS 3S S+3 490 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 4 40.00
12 EO 2P S = 110 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %13 EO 2K N+1 110 3.8 38.00
14 EO 2C W+5 -260 2.6 26.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %16 EO 1T E+2 -110 4 40.00
17 EO 4P S+3 510 0 0.00
18 EO 3S S = 600 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 1.4 14.00
24 NS 2S W = -120 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %25 NS 2S W-1 100 6 60.00
26 NS 3P N = 140 6 60.00
27 NS 3S N+3 490 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %28 EO 4C W = -420 0.2 2.00
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 8.6 86.00
30 EO 3T S-1 -50 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %31 NS 2S W+2 -180 0.2 2.00
32 NS 5K W-3 300 8.6 86.00
33 NS 5K S-1 -50 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
Total : 146,8 / 300 = 48,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 2 20.00
2 NS 2C W-1 50 5 50.00
3 NS 3C N-4 -200 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 % 4 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 80.00
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4 40.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 8.6 86.00
8 EO 4C E-1 50 7.4 74.00
9 EO 3S S+2 460 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 NS 3S S = 400 6 60.00
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %16 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 3 30.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %19 EO 1S S-1 -50 9.8 98.00
20 EO 3K S+2 150 6.2 62.00
21 EO 4C N+1 650 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 78,00 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 7.4 74.00
24 NS 3KcS-3 -500 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 6 60.00
26 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 20.00
27 NS 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %28 NS 4C W+1 -450 3.8 38.00
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 1.4 14.00
30 NS 3K E = -110 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %31 EO 2S W+2 -180 9.8 98.00
32 EO 5K W-3 300 1.4 14.00
33 EO 5K S-1 -50 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
Total : 145,6 / 300 = 48,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 8 80.00
2 EO 2C W-1 50 5 50.00
3 EO 3C N-4 -200 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 % 4 NS 4T W-3 300 10 100.00
5 NS 4C S+1 650 6 60.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 % 7 EO 4P N-1 -100 8.6 86.00
8 EO 4C E-3 150 1.4 14.00
9 EO 3S S+2 460 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 4 40.00
12 EO 3KcE-3 500 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %13 NS 2K N+1 110 6.2 62.00
14 NS 2C W+5 -260 7.4 74.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %16 EO 4K S-2 -100 2 20.00
17 EO 4P S+2 480 3 30.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 0.2 2.00
20 EO 3P E-2 200 2.6 26.00
21 EO 5C N = 650 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %25 NS 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00
26 NS 3P S = 140 6 60.00
27 NS 3S S+3 490 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %28 NS 4C W+1 -450 3.8 38.00
29 NS 4T E = -130 5 50.00
30 NS 2K E+1 -110 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %31 NS 2S W = -120 7.4 74.00
32 NS 3K W-1 100 2.6 26.00
33 NS 3C N = 140 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
Total : 145,6 / 300 = 48,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 % 1 NS 4PcW-2 300 10 100.00
2 NS 2C W-3 150 10 100.00
3 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 % 4 EO 4T W-3 300 0 0.00
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4 40.00
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 4 40.00
12 EO 3C S+1 170 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 0.2 2.00
14 EO 3C W+3 -230 0.2 2.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 14,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %16 NS 3S E-2 200 10 100.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 7 70.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %19 EO 2P S = 110 3.8 38.00
20 EO 2K S+3 150 6.2 62.00
21 EO 5C N+1 680 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 38,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 2.6 26.00
24 EO 2P E = -110 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %25 EO 2S W-1 100 4 40.00
26 EO 3P N = 140 4 40.00
27 EO 3S N+3 490 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %28 NS 4C W+1 -450 3.8 38.00
29 NS 3T W-1 100 7.4 74.00
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %31 NS 2S W = -120 7.4 74.00
32 NS 3P E-1 100 2.6 26.00
33 NS 4C N-1 -50 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
Total : 138,8 / 300 = 46,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 6 60.00
2 NS 3C W-2 100 8 80.00
3 NS 3C N-3 -150 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 6 60.00
5 NS 4C S+1 650 6 60.00
6 NS 5TcS-1 -100 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 6 60.00
12 NS 4C S = 620 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %13 EO 2C E-1 100 7.4 74.00
14 EO 4P E+2 -480 7.4 74.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %16 EO 4C E = -620 7 70.00
17 EO 3CcE-1 100 8 80.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 9 90.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 9.8 98.00
20 NS 3P E-2 200 7.4 74.00
21 NS 5C N = 650 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 66,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 8.6 86.00
24 EO 2S W = -120 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 4 40.00
26 EO 3C N-3 -300 10 100.00
27 EO 6T N = 920 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %28 EO 4C W+1 -450 6.2 62.00
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 8.6 86.00
30 EO 3K E = -110 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 62,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %31 NS 2S W+1 -150 2.6 26.00
32 NS 3K W-1 100 2.6 26.00
33 NS 3K S+1 130 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
Total : 191,8 / 300 = 63,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00
3 NS 3CcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 20.00
5 NS 5C S = 650 6 60.00
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 % 7 NS 3P N = 140 6.2 62.00
8 NS 2P W-1 50 2.6 26.00
9 NS 1P S+1 110 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 4 40.00
12 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %13 NS 2K N = 90 0.2 2.00
14 NS 4P W+2 -480 2.6 26.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %16 EO 4C E = -620 7 70.00
17 EO 4CcE-2 300 6 60.00
18 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %19 EO 2P S = 110 3.8 38.00
20 EO 2P E = -110 9.8 98.00
21 EO 5C N = 650 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 7.4 74.00
24 NS 2P E = -110 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 74,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %25 EO 3S W-1 100 4 40.00
26 EO 3P S-1 -100 8 80.00
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %31 EO 2S W = -120 2.6 26.00
32 EO 3K W-1 100 7.4 74.00
33 EO 3C N = 140 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
Total : 127,4 / 300 = 42,47 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 % 1 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 2C W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 2C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 % 4 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 20.00
5 NS 4C S+1 650 6 60.00
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 6.2 62.00
8 NS 4C E-3 150 8.6 86.00
9 NS 5T N = 400 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %10 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
11 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
12 NS 2C S = 110 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %13 EO 2K N = 90 9.8 98.00
14 EO 4P W+2 -480 7.4 74.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %16 NS 5KcS-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 2.6 26.00
24 EO 3P E = -140 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %25 NS 3S W-1 100 6 60.00
26 NS 3C N-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 6T N = 920 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %28 EO 4C W+1 -450 6.2 62.00
29 EO 4T E = -130 5 50.00
30 EO 2K E+1 -110 3.8 38.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %31 EO 1S W+1 -120 2.6 26.00
32 EO 5K W-3 300 1.4 14.00
33 EO 4C N-2 -100 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 46,00 %
Total : 111,8 / 300 = 37,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 4 40.00
2 EO 2C W-1 50 5 50.00
3 EO 1P W+3 -170 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 4 40.00
5 EO 4C S+1 650 4 40.00
6 EO 5TcS-1 -100 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 1.4 14.00
8 NS 4C E-3 150 8.6 86.00
9 NS 3S S+2 460 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 100.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 6 60.00
12 NS 2P S = 110 3 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %13 NS 3K N = 110 6.2 62.00
14 NS 4P E+2 -480 2.6 26.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %16 EO 5KcS-4 -800 10 100.00
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 100.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %19 NS 3K W-1 100 2.6 26.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 9.8 98.00
21 NS 5C N+1 680 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 2.6 26.00
24 EO 3KcS-3 -500 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %25 EO 2S W = -120 8 80.00
26 EO 2PcN+1 870 0 0.00
27 EO 6T N = 920 2 20.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %31 EO 2S W = -120 2.6 26.00
32 EO 3P E-1 100 7.4 74.00
33 EO 4C N-1 -50 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
Total : 164,8 / 300 = 54,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 % 1 EO 2S S+1 150 4 40.00
2 EO 3C W-2 100 2 20.00
3 EO 3C N-3 -150 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 2 20.00
5 EO 4P E-4 200 10 100.00
6 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 % 7 EO 3P N = 140 3.8 38.00
8 EO 2P W-1 50 7.4 74.00
9 EO 1P S+1 110 9.8 98.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 6 60.00
12 NS 3C S+1 170 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 %16 NS 1T E+2 -110 6 60.00
17 NS 4P S+3 510 10 100.00
18 NS 3S S = 600 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %19 EO 3K W-1 100 7.4 74.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 0.2 2.00
21 EO 5C N+1 680 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,40 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 NS 5K N = 600 1.4 14.00
24 NS 2K S-3 -150 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %25 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 100.00
26 EO 3P S = 140 4 40.00
27 EO 3S S+3 490 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric : 51,13 %28 EO 4C W+1 -450 6.2 62.00
29 EO 3C N = 140 0.2 2.00
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %31 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.4 74.00
32 NS 5K W-3 300 8.6 86.00
33 NS 4C N-2 -100 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 54,00 %
Total : 152,2 / 300 = 50,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN DOOREN André -de TERWANGNE Philippe
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 6 60.00
2 NS 2C W-1 50 5 50.00
3 NS 1P W+3 -170 4 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 8 80.00
5 EO 5C S = 650 4 40.00
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 % 7 EO 2P N+2 170 0.2 2.00
8 EO 2P W-1 50 7.4 74.00
9 EO 3S S+3 490 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 26,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %10 EO 6C E = -1430 10 100.00
11 EO 3T N+1 130 10 100.00
12 EO 2C S = 110 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %13 NS 2C E-1 100 2.6 26.00
14 NS 4P E+2 -480 2.6 26.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 0.2 2.00 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %16 NS 4K S-2 -100 8 80.00
17 NS 4P S+2 480 7 70.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 6 60.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 %19 NS 1S S-1 -50 0.2 2.00
20 NS 3K S+2 150 3.8 38.00
21 NS 4C N+1 650 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 22,00 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %22 EO 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 EO 5K N = 600 8.6 86.00
24 EO 2K S-3 -150 7.4 74.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 10 100.00
26 NS 3P S = 140 6 60.00
27 NS 6T N = 920 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %28 EO 4C W+1 -450 6.2 62.00
29 EO 3T W-1 100 2.6 26.00
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 8.6 86.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
Total : 163,2 / 300 = 54,40 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MARCHAL Christian -DELFORGE Frédéric
1 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,87 % 1 NS 2S S+1 150 6 60.00
2 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 20.00
3 NS 3K E+1 -130 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 48,93 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 20.00
5 NS 4C S+1 650 6 60.00
6 NS 5TcS-1 -100 7 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 MICHIELS Marc -WARNIER François : 48,53 % 7 NS 4P N-1 -100 1.4 14.00
8 NS 4C E-1 50 2.6 26.00
9 NS 3S S+2 460 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 34,00 %
4 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,53 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 50.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 6 60.00
12 NS 3KcE-3 500 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
5 CLERIN François-Xavier -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,27 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 9.8 98.00
14 NS 3C W+3 -230 9.8 98.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 6.2 62.00 µ Tbl = 86,00 %
6 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 63,93 %16 NS 4C E = -620 3 30.00
17 NS 3CcE-1 100 2 20.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 10.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
7 HUBERT Charles -DEWART Léon : 42,47 %19 NS 2P S = 110 6.2 62.00
20 NS 2P E = -110 0.2 2.00
21 NS 5C N = 650 2.6 26.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
8 FRAITURE Louis -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 37,27 %22 NS 4P S+1 450 5 50.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 7.4 74.00
24 NS 3P E = -140 5 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,00 %
9 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 54,93 %25 NS 2S W = -120 2 20.00
26 NS 2PcN+1 870 10 100.00
27 NS 6T N = 920 8 80.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 50,73 %28 NS 4C W+1 -450 3.8 38.00
29 NS 3C N = 140 9.8 98.00
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 1.4 14.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 153,4 / 300 = 51,13 %
|
|