|
Tournoi du 14-09-09
cas
1 63,52 7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 61,48 3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René
3 58,33 5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
4 57,96 9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude
5 52,78 10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
6 45,74 2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
7 44,63 8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
8 44,07 1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
9 36,85 4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
10 34,63 6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,67 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
2 55,00 19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René
3 51,48 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
4 49,44 15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie
5 49,07 14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande
6 48,33 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
~ 48,33 20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean
8 47,78 18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques
9 47,59 13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
10 41,30 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
PAIRE Nr : 1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 6C S = 1430 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 % 4 NS 1C N+2 140 5 27.78
5 NS 2K E = -90 14 77.78
6 NS 1K S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 % 7 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 2P W-2 100 8 44.44
9 NS 2P W-2 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %10 NS 2T N+1 110 4 22.22
11 NS 5PcW-1 100 2 11.11
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %13 NS 2K N = 90 3 16.67
14 NS 6S W-1 50 18 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %16 NS 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
18 NS 4PcE-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %19 NS 3P W = -140 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
21 NS 1S W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
23 NS 2C N+4 230 10 55.56
24 NS 5C N = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %25 NS 1S N-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 1S W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 2 11.11
30 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 % 1 NS 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22
2 NS 6C N+1 1460 18 100.00
3 NS 2C E+4 -230 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 % 4 NS 1C N+2 140 5 27.78
5 NS 3T N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 % 7 NS 3PcN-1 -200 6 33.33
8 NS 4T S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %10 NS 3K W-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 6PcW-4 800 16 88.89
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %13 NS 2S N+2 180 10 55.56
14 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
15 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 2P N = 110 10 55.56
18 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %19 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
21 NS 1S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %22 NS 2P W-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 2P E-1 100 1 5.56
24 NS 3S N+2 460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3P S = 140 2 11.11
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 7 38.89
29 NS 4T E-1 100 4 22.22
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 6C N = 1430 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 3K E-1 50 16 88.89
6 NS 2T W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 % 7 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %10 NS 1S E-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 4C S+1 450 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %13 NS 1ScE-2 500 12 66.67
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 16 88.89
15 NS 2S E = -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %16 NS 4K S-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %19 NS 3P E = -140 14 77.78
20 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 2T S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %22 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
23 NS 3PcE-2 500 14 77.78
24 NS 2C N+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
26 NS 4PcS = 790 18 100.00
27 NS 1S W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %28 NS 3S S = 600 2 11.11
29 NS 2S E-3 300 18 100.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
2 NS 4C S+2 680 3 16.67
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 2 11.11
5 NS 1S N = 90 18 100.00
6 NS 1T S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 % 7 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1 5.56
8 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %10 NS 1K W = -70 0 0.00
11 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %13 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
14 NS 5C E+1 -480 11 61.11
15 NS 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %16 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11
17 NS 3K N-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %22 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 2P E-1 100 1 5.56
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %25 NS 1S N = 90 7 38.89
26 NS 3S W-2 200 6 33.33
27 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 5K S-3 -300 0 0.00
30 NS 5K S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 1 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00
2 NS 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3T N = 110 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 2 11.11
11 NS 6PcE-5 1100 18 100.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 16 88.89
14 NS 5C E+1 -480 11 61.11
15 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %16 NS 2S N+1 150 16 88.89
17 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
18 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %19 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S E-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 1S E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %22 NS 2P E-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 3C N+2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 4C N+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %25 NS 1S N = 90 7 38.89
26 NS 3S E-2 200 6 33.33
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %28 NS 3S N+3 690 18 100.00
29 NS 2K N+2 130 15 83.33
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 315,0 / 540 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
3 NS 4CcE+1 -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 2T W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
8 NS 1P W-1 50 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %10 NS 3T N+1 130 7 38.89
11 NS 4P W-1 100 2 11.11
12 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %13 NS 2K N = 90 3 16.67
14 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %16 NS 2PcN+2 -1070 0 0.00
17 NS 3K N-2 100 6 33.33
18 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %19 NS 2P W+3 -200 0 0.00
20 NS 5S W-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %22 NS 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00
23 NS 3P E-2 200 7 38.89
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %25 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 3S W-2 200 6 33.33
27 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 14 77.78
29 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 187,0 / 540 = 34,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 % 1 NS 5KcN-1 -100 17 94.44
2 NS 4C N+2 680 3 16.67
3 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67
5 NS 2S N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 1K N-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 % 7 NS 4P N-2 -200 6 33.33
8 NS 3T N+1 130 16 88.89
9 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 5C N = 450 13 72.22
12 NS 2S E = -120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %13 NS 1ScE-3 800 18 100.00
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 11 61.11
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %16 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00
17 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
18 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %19 NS 2P E+2 -170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33
21 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %22 NS 3P E = -140 3 16.67
23 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
24 NS 4C N+2 480 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 10 55.56
26 NS 4P N = 620 15 83.33
27 NS 2P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 NS 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
30 NS 3K E+3 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 343,0 / 540 = 63,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 % 1 NS 2P E+2 -170 13 72.22
2 NS 2P E+2 1430 12 66.67
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 % 4 NS 2K S+3 150 8 44.44
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 NS 1K S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 % 7 NS 4PcN-2 -500 1 5.56
8 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
9 NS 5P N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 %10 NS 3T N+1 130 7 38.89
11 NS 5PcW-2 300 7 38.89
12 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %13 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44
14 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
15 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %16 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11
17 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S W-1 100 15 83.33
21 NS 1S W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %22 NS 3P W-2 200 17 94.44
23 NS 2C N+2 170 4 22.22
24 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %25 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
26 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 14 77.78
29 NS 2P N = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 7 38.89
2 NS 6C N = 1430 12 66.67
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 % 4 NS 2S S+2 180 10 55.56
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 NS 2T W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 % 7 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 2S N+1 150 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %10 NS 2K W-2 200 13 72.22
11 NS 4PcW-1 100 2 11.11
12 NS 3S W = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 %13 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 11 61.11
15 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %16 NS 1S N = 90 14 77.78
17 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %22 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
23 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89
24 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %25 NS 3C E-2 200 16 88.89
26 NS 3S W-4 400 10 55.56
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 14 77.78
29 NS 3K S = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 41,30 % 1 NS 5KcN-1 -100 17 94.44
2 NS 6C N = 1430 12 66.67
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 49,44 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
5 NS 2S N-2 -200 4 22.22
6 NS 2T W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande : 49,07 % 7 NS 4PcN-1 -200 6 33.33
8 NS 3T S = 110 12 66.67
9 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René : 55,00 %10 NS 1S W-4 400 18 100.00
11 NS 4PcE-2 300 7 38.89
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques : 47,78 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 6C E = -980 3 16.67
15 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 51,48 %16 NS 3K S-2 -100 6 33.33
17 NS 2P N-1 -50 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne : 47,59 %19 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 77.78
20 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
21 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand : 61,67 %22 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
23 NS 2P W-3 300 12 66.67
24 NS 3S S = 400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques : 48,33 %25 NS 3P S = 140 12 66.67
26 NS 4C E-5 500 12 66.67
27 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean : 48,33 %28 NS 3S N+1 630 7 38.89
29 NS 3K S = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 4C E = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VOLCHER Jacques
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 6C S = 1430 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00
5 EO 3K E-1 50 2 11.11
6 EO 2T W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 % 7 EO 3PcN-1 -200 12 66.67
8 EO 4T S-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 16 88.89
11 EO 6PcE-5 1100 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %13 EO 2K N = 90 15 83.33
14 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %16 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
17 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
18 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S W-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 1S W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %22 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11
24 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %25 EO 3P S = 140 6 33.33
26 EO 4C E-5 500 6 33.33
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 18 100.00
29 EO 5K S-3 -300 18 100.00
30 EO 5K S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 REGNIER Franz -BRIOT Fernand
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 6C N = 1430 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 % 4 EO 1C N+2 140 13 72.22
5 EO 3T N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 % 7 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 2P W-2 100 10 55.56
9 EO 2P W-2 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %10 EO 3T N+1 130 11 61.11
11 EO 4P W-1 100 16 88.89
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %13 EO 1ScE-3 800 0 0.00
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7 38.89
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %16 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89
17 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00
21 EO 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %22 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
23 EO 2P W-3 300 6 33.33
24 EO 3S S = 400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %25 EO 1S N = 90 11 61.11
26 EO 3S W-2 200 12 66.67
27 EO 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %28 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
29 EO 2K N+2 130 3 16.67
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 333,0 / 540 = 61,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 de NICOLAS Bernard -BEYNE Anne
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 % 1 EO 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78
2 EO 6C N+1 1460 0 0.00
3 EO 2C E+4 -230 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 % 4 EO 1C N+2 140 13 72.22
5 EO 2K E = -90 4 22.22
6 EO 1K S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 % 7 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 5C N = 450 5 27.78
12 EO 2S E = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %13 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56
14 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %16 EO 1S N = 90 4 22.22
17 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %19 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
21 EO 2S S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %22 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 2P E-1 100 17 94.44
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %25 EO 1S N = 90 11 61.11
26 EO 3S E-2 200 12 66.67
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 4 22.22
29 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 SAMBREE Arlette -QUINCHON Fernande
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 % 1 EO 2P E+2 -170 5 27.78
2 EO 2P E+2 1430 6 33.33
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 % 4 EO 2S S+2 180 8 44.44
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 EO 2T W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 % 7 EO 4PcN-1 -200 12 66.67
8 EO 3T S = 110 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %10 EO 1K W = -70 18 100.00
11 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %13 EO 2S N+2 180 8 44.44
14 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %16 EO 2S N+1 150 2 11.11
17 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
18 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %19 EO 3P E = -140 4 22.22
20 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 2T S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %22 EO 2S E+3 -210 18 100.00
23 EO 3P E-2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %25 EO 1S N-3 -150 18 100.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 100.00
27 EO 1S W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 EO 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
30 EO 3K E+3 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DAPHNE Chantal -COLLIN Jean-Marie
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 6C N = 1430 6 33.33
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
5 EO 2S N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 2T W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 % 7 EO 4PcN-2 -500 17 94.44
8 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %10 EO 3T N+1 130 11 61.11
11 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 61.11
12 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 2 11.11
14 EO 5C E+1 -480 7 38.89
15 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
18 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %19 EO 2P W+3 -200 18 100.00
20 EO 5S W-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 2T S = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %22 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
23 EO 3PcE-2 500 4 22.22
24 EO 2C N+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 8 44.44
26 EO 4P N = 620 3 16.67
27 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 16 88.89
30 EO 3S W+3 -490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 % 1 EO 5KcN-1 -100 1 5.56
2 EO 6C N = 1430 6 33.33
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 16 88.89
5 EO 1S N = 90 0 0.00
6 EO 1T S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3T N = 110 6 33.33
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %10 EO 2T N+1 110 14 77.78
11 EO 5PcW-1 100 16 88.89
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %13 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7 38.89
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %16 EO 2PcN+2 -1070 18 100.00
17 EO 3K N-2 100 12 66.67
18 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %19 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
21 EO 1S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %22 EO 3P E = -140 15 83.33
23 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
24 EO 4C N+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 4PcS = 790 0 0.00
27 EO 1S W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 4 22.22
29 EO 2P N = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 223,0 / 540 = 41,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
2 EO 4C S+2 680 15 83.33
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 EO 2S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 1P W-1 50 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %10 EO 2K W-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 4PcW-1 100 16 88.89
12 EO 3S W = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %13 EO 2K N = 90 15 83.33
14 EO 6S W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %16 EO 3K S-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 %19 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67
21 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %22 EO 2P W-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 2P E-1 100 17 94.44
24 EO 3S N+2 460 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %25 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
26 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %28 EO 3S S = 600 16 88.89
29 EO 2S E-3 300 0 0.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 FICHELLE Marcel -WILLEMS Jacques
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 % 1 EO 4PcE = -590 18 100.00
2 EO 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 2T W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 7 EO 4P N-2 -200 12 66.67
8 EO 3T N+1 130 2 11.11
9 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %10 EO 1S E-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 4C S+1 450 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 6C E = -980 15 83.33
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %16 EO 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 2P N = 110 8 44.44
18 EO 4PcE-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 %22 EO 3P W-2 200 1 5.56
23 EO 2C N+2 170 14 77.78
24 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3P S = 140 16 88.89
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 4 22.22
29 EO 3K S = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 VERBOIS Léon -LAENENS René
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 11 61.11
2 EO 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
3 EO 4CcE+1 -990 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33
5 EO 2S N-2 -200 14 77.78
6 EO 1K N-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 % 7 EO 4PcN-2 -500 17 94.44
8 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
9 EO 5P N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %10 EO 1S W-4 400 0 0.00
11 EO 4PcE-2 300 11 61.11
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %13 EO 1ScE-2 500 6 33.33
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 2 11.11
15 EO 2S E = -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %16 EO 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89
17 EO 3K N-3 -150 18 100.00
18 EO 4P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %19 EO 3P W = -140 4 22.22
20 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
21 EO 1S W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %22 EO 2P E-1 100 7 38.89
23 EO 3C N+2 200 11 61.11
24 EO 4C N+2 480 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 %25 EO 3C E-2 200 2 11.11
26 EO 3S W-4 400 8 44.44
27 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 11 61.11
29 EO 4T E-1 100 14 77.78
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MATELART Marc -PETIT Jean
7 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 63,52 % 1 EO 5KcN-1 -100 1 5.56
2 EO 4C N+2 680 15 83.33
3 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
8 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 44,63 % 4 EO 2K S+3 150 10 55.56
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 EO 1K S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -de WASSEIGE Claude : 57,96 % 7 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 45,74 %10 EO 3K W-2 200 5 27.78
11 EO 6PcW-4 800 2 11.11
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 36,85 %13 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
14 EO 5C E+1 -480 7 38.89
15 EO 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 CASSART Guy -CHANTRAINE René : 61,48 %16 EO 4K S-2 -100 12 66.67
17 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 58,33 %19 EO 2P E+2 -170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S E-1 100 3 16.67
21 EO 1S E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 WARNIER François -GOFFINET Marcel : 44,07 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
23 EO 2C N+4 230 8 44.44
24 EO 5C N = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 COLLET Claudine -MASSAUX Jacques : 34,63 %25 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 3S W-2 200 12 66.67
27 EO 2P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 52,78 %28 EO 3S N+1 630 11 61.11
29 EO 3K S = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 4C E = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
|
|