|
Tournoi du 14-12-09
lu 14 dec 09
1 54,68 9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 53,99 5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
~ 53,99 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
4 53,03 4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean
5 51,65 3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel
6 51,52 10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
7 51,24 2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 49,17 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie
9 48,07 6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
10 47,52 12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
11 43,39 8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques
12 41,74 7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,68 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
2 57,30 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
3 53,86 13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
4 53,31 16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard
5 52,89 22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick
6 50,41 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 49,17 23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
8 47,93 18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY
9 46,56 19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne
10 44,63 24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
11 44,08 15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
12 41,18 21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 15 68.18
2 NS 4P S+1 650 20 90.91
3 NS 3S W-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 2K N+3 150 6 27.27
6 NS 3S S+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
8 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
9 NS 2P E+3 -200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %10 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
11 NS 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18
14 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09
15 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 3K N = 110 14 63.64
18 NS 2P W+1 -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 15 68.18
20 NS 1S W-1 100 10 45.45
21 NS 1S W = -90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %22 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 18.18
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 13.64
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 4.55
27 NS 3C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 16 72.73
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
30 NS 1S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82
32 NS 3P E-2 200 18 81.82
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 392,0 / 726 = 53,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 % 1 NS 1K S+1 90 8 36.36
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 4C E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
6 NS 5T N+1 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 18.18
8 NS 5K S-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 4P E = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %10 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
11 NS 6S E-2 100 19 86.36
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %13 NS 5P N = 650 15 68.18
14 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
15 NS 3C N+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 1S N+1 120 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18
20 NS 2S W-1 100 10 45.45
21 NS 3C W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %22 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00
23 NS 2C N = 110 18 81.82
24 NS 4P S = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91
26 NS 2P N = 110 8 36.36
27 NS 4C W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %28 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 27.27
29 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 9.09
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 4C N-2 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 3C W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
Total : 372,0 / 726 = 51,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 % 1 NS 5KcS-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 3P S+1 170 8 36.36
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82
8 NS 4P N = 420 18 81.82
9 NS 3P E = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 19 86.36
11 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09
15 NS 4CcN = 790 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 40.91
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %19 NS 3S N = 400 3 13.64
20 NS 2K W-1 100 10 45.45
21 NS 1C W+1 -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %22 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
23 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45
24 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 13.64
26 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %28 NS 2S N+3 210 21 95.45
29 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %31 NS 5KcW = -550 0 0.00
32 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45
33 NS 4C W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 375,0 / 726 = 51,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 22 100.00
2 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 6K N-1 -100 2 9.09
6 NS 4C S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
8 NS 4P N = 420 18 81.82
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %10 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
11 NS 6K E = -920 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %13 NS 5P N = 650 15 68.18
14 NS 3P W-2 100 19 86.36
15 NS 2C N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
17 NS 3K N-1 -50 9 40.91
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 9 40.91
20 NS 2S W = -120 4 18.18
21 NS 3T N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %22 NS 3S S = 400 15 68.18
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 27.27
24 NS 4PcS = 590 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 13.64
26 NS 3P N = 140 16 72.73
27 NS 2C W = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 16 72.73
29 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %31 NS 6KcE-1 100 22 100.00
32 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45
33 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 385,0 / 726 = 53,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 % 1 NS 1K S+2 110 15 68.18
2 NS 4P N+1 650 20 90.91
3 NS 2T S = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 9.09
6 NS 6T N = 920 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 18.18
8 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %10 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 9.09
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 3P W-2 100 19 86.36
15 NS 5KcW-2 300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18
20 NS 3P E-2 200 16 72.73
21 NS 2S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %22 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 27.27
24 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 22 100.00
26 NS 2P N = 110 8 36.36
27 NS 1C W+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %28 NS 2S N-2 -200 6 27.27
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 16 72.73
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 3P E-1 100 14 63.64
33 NS 4P E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 392,0 / 726 = 53,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 4PcS-1 -200 1 4.55
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 6K N = 1370 21 95.45
6 NS 5T N+1 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82
8 NS 2P S+1 140 3 13.64
9 NS 3P E+2 -200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 7K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 22 100.00
14 NS 2P W-1 50 13 59.09
15 NS 4C N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S-4 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 3P W+1 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91
20 NS 2S W = -120 4 18.18
21 NS 2C W = -110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %22 NS 2K N+1 110 6 27.27
23 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45
24 NS 2P S+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %25 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
26 NS 4K W-1 100 4 18.18
27 NS 4C W-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %28 NS 2S N+3 210 21 95.45
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 3K N = 110 16 72.73
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 349,0 / 726 = 48,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 5P N-2 -200 1 4.55
3 NS 2C N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
6 NS 4T N+1 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 % 7 NS 3P N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82
9 NS 3P E = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00
15 NS 4P W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %16 NS 4P E-2 200 20 90.91
17 NS 3S N = 400 20 90.91
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %19 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 3S E-3 300 21 95.45
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %22 NS 3S N+1 430 20 90.91
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 27.27
24 NS 2P S+3 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 3 13.64
26 NS 2P N = 110 8 36.36
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 4.55
29 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45
30 NS 2S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 303,0 / 726 = 41,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 2ScE-2 300 10 45.45
3 NS 2C E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82
6 NS 3S N+2 460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 % 7 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 18.18
8 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
9 NS 2P E+3 -200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00
11 NS 7K E-2 100 19 86.36
12 NS 3S N+2 660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 3C S-2 -100 6 27.27
15 NS 2C N+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 22.73
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 21 95.45
20 NS 2P E-2 200 16 72.73
21 NS 1S S = 90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %22 NS 2C W-2 200 10 45.45
23 NS 3C N-4 -400 0 0.00
24 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %25 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64
26 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
27 NS 1C W+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 4.55
29 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
30 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 3,03 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %31 NS 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82
32 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 315,0 / 726 = 43,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 15 68.18
2 NS 4P S+1 650 20 90.91
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 6K N = 1370 21 95.45
6 NS 4C S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 18 81.82
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 5K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %13 NS 5P N = 650 15 68.18
14 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
15 NS 5C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %16 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
18 NS 2S E+3 -210 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %19 NS 4C S = 420 6 27.27
20 NS 3S W-3 300 21 95.45
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %22 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 27.27
24 NS 2P S+3 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %25 NS 3S E = -600 19 86.36
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 4.55
27 NS 3C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55
29 NS 2S W-1 100 18 81.82
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %31 NS 5C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 397,0 / 726 = 54,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 % 1 NS 3K N = 110 15 68.18
2 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
3 NS 3T N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 4S N-1 -100 2 9.09
6 NS 4C N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 % 7 NS 3S N+2 660 18 81.82
8 NS 3P N+1 170 8 36.36
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64
11 NS 6S E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18
14 NS 2P E = -110 2 9.09
15 NS 3C N = 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %16 NS 3P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 4P N-2 -100 5 22.73
18 NS 2P E+1 -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %19 NS 3S N = 400 3 13.64
20 NS 2S E-2 200 16 72.73
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %22 NS 3S N = 400 15 68.18
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 6 27.27
24 NS 3P N+1 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %25 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64
26 NS 2S E-2 200 22 100.00
27 NS 3C E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %28 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 45.45
29 NS 2S E+1 -150 14 63.64
30 NS 3S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 %31 NS 4C N-1 -100 18 81.82
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 374,0 / 726 = 51,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 15 68.18
2 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 5K N+1 620 16 72.73
6 NS 5T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82
8 NS 3P S = 140 3 13.64
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %10 NS 2S N+1 150 8 36.36
11 NS 7S E-3 150 22 100.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 8 36.36
15 NS 2C N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 %16 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
17 NS 4P S-3 -150 2 9.09
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 21 95.45
20 NS 2S W = -120 4 18.18
21 NS 1KcE-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 8 36.36
23 NS 2P W-1 100 16 72.73
24 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91
26 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
27 NS 2S S-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 53,86 %28 NS 2C S+2 170 16 72.73
29 NS 3S W = -600 10 45.45
30 NS 1S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %31 NS 4CcS-2 -500 2 9.09
32 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 357,0 / 726 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe
24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard : 44,63 % 1 NS 1K S+2 110 15 68.18
2 NS 5P N-1 -100 5 22.73
3 NS 2PcE+2 -1070 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 58,68 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 12 54.55
5 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
6 NS 3S N+3 490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger : 41,18 % 7 NS 3S S+2 660 18 81.82
8 NS 4CcW-2 300 12 54.55
9 NS 4P E = -620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,30 %10 NS 5P S = 650 19 86.36
11 NS 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 NS 3S N+3 690 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY : 47,93 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 15 68.18
14 NS 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
15 NS 4CcN = 790 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick : 52,89 %16 NS 3P E = -140 2 9.09
17 NS Pass Passe 12 54.55
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga : 44,08 %19 NS 5S S = 460 15 68.18
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E = -90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne : 46,56 %22 NS 3TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
23 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 NS 2P S+2 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 49,17 %25 NS 4P E = -620 14 63.64
26 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
27 NS 1C W+2 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard : 53,31 %28 NS 4S N-2 -200 6 27.27
29 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45
30 NS 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 50,41 %31 NS 4C S-2 -200 9 40.91
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
Total : 345,0 / 726 = 47,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 7 31.82
2 EO 4P S+1 650 2 9.09
3 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
6 EO 4T N+1 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 81.82
8 EO 5K S-1 -50 22 100.00
9 EO 4P E = -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
11 EO 7K E-2 100 3 13.64
12 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91
15 EO 4CcN = 790 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %16 EO 5TcN-4 -800 22 100.00
17 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
18 EO 2S E+3 -210 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 13 59.09
20 EO 2S W = -120 18 81.82
21 EO 3T N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %22 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 72.73
24 EO 3P N+1 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 2P N = 110 14 63.64
27 EO 1C W+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 6 27.27
29 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55
30 EO 1S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 3K N = 110 6 27.27
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 391,0 / 726 = 53,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BEYNE Anne -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 5P N-2 -200 21 95.45
3 EO 2C N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 22 100.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
6 EO 5T N+1 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 81.82
8 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
9 EO 2P E+3 -200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %10 EO 5P S = 650 3 13.64
11 EO 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %13 EO 5P N = 650 7 31.82
14 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
15 EO 5C N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
17 EO 3K N-1 -50 13 59.09
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %19 EO 3S N = 400 19 86.36
20 EO 2S E-2 200 6 27.27
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %22 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 72.73
24 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09
26 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
27 EO 2S S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %28 EO 2S N+3 210 1 4.55
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18
32 EO 3P E-2 200 4 18.18
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 416,0 / 726 = 57,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 EVRARD Armand -ROEGIERS Marga
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 % 1 EO 1K S+1 90 14 63.64
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 4C E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18
8 EO 4P N = 420 4 18.18
9 EO 3P E = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 5K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %13 EO 5P N = 650 7 31.82
14 EO 3P W-2 100 3 13.64
15 EO 2C N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %16 EO 3P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 77.27
18 EO 2P E+1 -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %19 EO 5S S = 460 7 31.82
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 22 100.00
21 EO 1S E = -90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 14 63.64
23 EO 2P W-1 100 6 27.27
24 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %25 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
26 EO 4K W-1 100 18 81.82
27 EO 4C W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 6 27.27
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
30 EO 1S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
Total : 320,0 / 726 = 44,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BRIOT Fernand -GELISSEN Edouard
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 2ScE-2 300 12 54.55
3 EO 2C E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
6 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 4 18.18
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %10 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
11 EO 6K E = -920 22 100.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82
14 EO 2P E = -110 20 90.91
15 EO 3C N = 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 1 4.55
20 EO 2S W = -120 18 81.82
21 EO 1KcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %22 EO 2K N+1 110 16 72.73
23 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55
24 EO 2P S+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 86.36
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 95.45
27 EO 3C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %28 EO 4S N-2 -200 16 72.73
29 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 100.00
33 EO 3C W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
Total : 387,0 / 726 = 53,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 % 1 EO 5KcS-3 -500 22 100.00
2 EO 3P S+1 170 14 63.64
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
6 EO 3S N+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
8 EO 4P N = 420 4 18.18
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 6S E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 3P W-2 100 3 13.64
15 EO 5KcW-2 300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S-3 -150 20 90.91
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09
20 EO 2S W = -120 18 81.82
21 EO 2C W = -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %22 EO 3K N-1 -50 18 81.82
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 86.36
26 EO 2P N = 110 14 63.64
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %28 EO 1S N-2 -200 16 72.73
29 EO 3S W+2 -660 20 90.91
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %31 EO 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18
32 EO 4K N-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 426,0 / 726 = 58,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 COLLET Claudine -PAQUAY
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 7 31.82
2 EO 4P S+1 650 2 9.09
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 6K N-1 -100 20 90.91
6 EO 4C S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18
8 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %10 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 20 90.91
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82
14 EO 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
15 EO 4CcN = 790 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S-4 -200 22 100.00
18 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 7 31.82
20 EO 1S W-1 100 12 54.55
21 EO 1S W = -90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %22 EO 3S N+1 430 2 9.09
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 72.73
24 EO 2P S+3 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09
26 EO 2P N = 110 14 63.64
27 EO 4C W-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 21 95.45
29 EO 3S W+3 -690 22 100.00
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 96,97 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %31 EO 5KcW = -550 22 100.00
32 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55
33 EO 4C W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 348,0 / 726 = 47,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MACAUX Lucienne
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 0 0.00
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 4S N-1 -100 20 90.91
6 EO 4C N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 % 7 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 81.82
8 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18
9 EO 4P E = -620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %10 EO 2S N+1 150 14 63.64
11 EO 7S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
14 EO 2P W-1 50 9 40.91
15 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 3K N = 110 8 36.36
18 EO 2P W+1 -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %19 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 100.00
20 EO 3S E-3 300 1 4.55
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %22 EO 3TcN-3 -500 22 100.00
23 EO 2C N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36
26 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
27 EO 1C W+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %28 EO 2S N+3 210 1 4.55
29 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55
30 EO 1S W+1 -120 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %31 EO 5C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 338,0 / 726 = 46,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 % 1 EO 3K N = 110 7 31.82
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
3 EO 3T N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 20 90.91
6 EO 6T N = 920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18
8 EO 3P S = 140 19 86.36
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 7K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 7 31.82
14 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91
15 EO 4C N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
17 EO 3S N = 400 2 9.09
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82
20 EO 2S W-1 100 12 54.55
21 EO 3C W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %22 EO 2C W-2 200 12 54.55
23 EO 3C N-4 -400 22 100.00
24 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 86.36
26 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45
29 EO 2S W-1 100 4 18.18
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
Total : 366,0 / 726 = 50,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 DELHEZ Jacques -ARICKX Roger
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 % 1 EO 1K S+2 110 7 31.82
2 EO 4P N+1 650 2 9.09
3 EO 2T S = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 5K N+1 620 6 27.27
6 EO 5T N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 % 7 EO 3S S+2 660 4 18.18
8 EO 4CcW-2 300 10 45.45
9 EO 4P E = -620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 %10 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
11 EO 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
15 EO 4P W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 1S N+1 120 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 1 4.55
20 EO 2P E-2 200 6 27.27
21 EO 1S S = 90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %22 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
23 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55
24 EO 2P S+2 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %25 EO 3S E = -600 3 13.64
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 95.45
27 EO 3C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %28 EO 2C S+2 170 6 27.27
29 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %31 EO 4C N-1 -100 4 18.18
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 299,0 / 726 = 41,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADIAMANTADIS -COURTOIS Patrick
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 7 31.82
2 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 6K N = 1370 1 4.55
6 EO 5T N+1 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
8 EO 3P N+1 170 14 63.64
9 EO 2P E+3 -200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %10 EO 4P S-1 -100 19 86.36
11 EO 6K E-1 50 11 50.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %13 EO 5P N = 650 7 31.82
14 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
15 EO 3C N+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %16 EO 3P E = -140 20 90.91
17 EO Pass Passe 10 45.45
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %19 EO 3S N = 400 19 86.36
20 EO 2K W-1 100 12 54.55
21 EO 1C W+1 -110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %22 EO 3S N = 400 7 31.82
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 72.73
24 EO 2P S+3 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 86.36
26 EO 3P N = 140 6 27.27
27 EO 2C W = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %28 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 54.55
29 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 36.36
30 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %31 EO 4C S-2 -200 13 59.09
32 EO 3P E-1 100 8 36.36
33 EO 4P E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
Total : 384,0 / 726 = 52,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 4PcS-1 -200 21 95.45
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
1 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 53,99 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 2K N+3 150 16 72.73
6 EO 3S S+3 490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 % 7 EO 3P N-2 -200 22 100.00
8 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18
9 EO 3P E = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %10 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
11 EO 6S E-2 100 3 13.64
12 EO 3S N+3 690 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 3C S-2 -100 16 72.73
15 EO 2C N+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %16 EO 4P E-2 200 2 9.09
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 59.09
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 %19 EO 4C S = 420 16 72.73
20 EO 3S W-3 300 1 4.55
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %22 EO 3S S = 400 7 31.82
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 16 72.73
24 EO 4PcS = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36
26 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
27 EO 1C W+2 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %28 EO 2S N-2 -200 16 72.73
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 6 27.27
30 EO 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %31 EO 4CcS-2 -500 20 90.91
32 EO 3K N-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 357,0 / 726 = 49,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 POULAERT Gilbert -DACHET Gérard
12 MATELART Marc -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 47,52 % 1 EO 1K S+2 110 7 31.82
2 EO 5P N-1 -100 17 77.27
3 EO 2PcE+2 -1070 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 54,68 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 10 45.45
5 EO 6K N = 1370 1 4.55
6 EO 4C S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
6 PARMENTIER Richard -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,07 % 7 EO 3S N+2 660 4 18.18
8 EO 2P S+1 140 19 86.36
9 EO 3P E+2 -200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
3 WILLEMS Jacques -FICHELLE Marcel : 51,65 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 3 13.64
11 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N+2 660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 MOSSERAY Bernadette -STIENON Annie : 49,17 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 63.64
15 EO 2C N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLOT Jacques : 43,39 %16 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
17 EO 4P S-2 -100 17 77.27
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
5 DAPHNE Chantal -PETIT Jean : 53,99 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 7 31.82
20 EO 3P E-2 200 6 27.27
21 EO 2S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 51,24 %22 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
23 EO 2C N = 110 4 18.18
24 EO 4P S = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
10 VANDAM Cécile -STEED Adrian : 51,52 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 36.36
26 EO 2S E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 3C E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
7 de WASSEIGE Claude -SALFI Huguette : 41,74 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 21 95.45
29 EO 3S W = -600 12 54.55
30 EO 2S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -VANDAM Jean : 53,03 %31 EO 6KcE-1 100 0 0.00
32 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55
33 EO 3C W+1 -170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 324,0 / 726 = 44,63 %
|
|