|
Tournoi du 15-02-10
1 57,96 8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 57,78 5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
3 56,30 4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
4 55,37 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
5 52,04 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
6 50,19 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine
7 45,19 7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
8 42,78 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
9 41,85 3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
10 40,56 1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,30 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 55,00 13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy
3 54,63 20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon
4 54,07 18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
5 52,59 19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 47,22 17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 46,85 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 46,30 14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
9 45,19 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 36,85 15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
PAIRE Nr : 1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 33.33
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
5 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 % 7 NS 2T E-1 100 5 27.78
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 8 44.44
9 NS 3P S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %10 NS 6S E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %13 NS 3P E = -140 4 22.22
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 6P E = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
17 NS 2P E+3 -200 11 61.11
18 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3T S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %25 NS 6TcW-1 200 14 77.78
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 1SxN+2 960 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %28 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
29 NS 4T S-2 -200 3 16.67
30 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 219,0 / 540 = 40,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 % 1 NS 1S N-2 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 15 83.33
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 % 7 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
8 NS Pass Passe 12 66.67
9 NS 4P S-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 38.89
11 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33
12 NS 5PcW-4 800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %13 NS 3C S = 140 14 77.78
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %16 NS 4C E-2 200 16 88.89
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 16 88.89
18 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %19 NS 6P N = 980 17 94.44
20 NS 6C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 4K E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %25 NS 4T W = -130 9 50.00
26 NS 2S N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 3P E-2 200 15 83.33
30 NS 3S W = -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 33.33
3 NS 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3C W+2 -200 7 38.89
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 % 7 NS 1S W-1 100 5 27.78
8 NS 6S W+1 -1020 0 0.00
9 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
11 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 3P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %13 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 6P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %16 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78
18 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 3S N+3 690 18 100.00
21 NS 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %22 NS 1P S+1 110 6 33.33
23 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
26 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S N+2 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %28 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00
29 NS 3TcS = 670 18 100.00
30 NS 3S W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 226,0 / 540 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 % 1 NS 2PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 15 83.33
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 2 11.11
5 NS 3C W+2 -200 7 38.89
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 % 7 NS 2K N+1 110 10 55.56
8 NS 5P W = -450 10 55.56
9 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %10 NS 6K W-3 300 18 100.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
12 NS 3C N+2 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %13 NS 3P E-1 100 12 66.67
14 NS 6P N = 980 18 100.00
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %16 NS 3C E-1 200 16 88.89
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
18 NS 3P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4P S+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 5T S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %22 NS 1S W-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %25 NS 5T W = -600 5 27.78
26 NS 2S N = 120 18 100.00
27 NS 2S N = 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %28 NS 4P E-2 100 16 88.89
29 NS 4T S-2 -200 3 16.67
30 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 304,0 / 540 = 56,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 % 1 NS 1ScN-1 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 % 7 NS 3TcE-2 500 18 100.00
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 33.33
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %10 NS 6S W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 88.89
12 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %13 NS 4P W-2 200 18 100.00
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %16 NS 1P W-1 100 10 55.56
17 NS 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
18 NS 2P W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3K E-1 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %22 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
23 NS 3C N = 140 14 77.78
24 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %25 NS 4CcS = 590 18 100.00
26 NS 2S N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 2S N = 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 3P E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 2T E+1 -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 % 1 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
2 NS 2P N-2 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 61.11
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 % 7 NS 3S W-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 6S E-1 50 15 83.33
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 38.89
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 4 22.22
12 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %13 NS 2P E = -110 10 55.56
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 6P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %16 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
17 NS 2CcN = 470 18 100.00
18 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %19 NS 6P N = 980 17 94.44
20 NS 6C N-1 -100 3 16.67
21 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %22 NS 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
23 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 4C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %25 NS 5T W = -600 5 27.78
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 2S N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 3CcS-2 -500 0 0.00
30 NS 3S E = -400 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 % 1 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 11.11
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 33.33
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 % 4 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 22.22
5 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 % 7 NS 3S W-4 400 16 88.89
8 NS 7C W-3 150 18 100.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 11.11
11 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 3P W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
14 NS 6C S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 6P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %16 NS 1S E-2 200 16 88.89
17 NS 2K E+3 -150 14 77.78
18 NS 2C N+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4S S = 630 6 33.33
21 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %22 NS 1S N = 90 1 5.56
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %25 NS 4T W = -130 9 50.00
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 1S N+2 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 %28 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
29 NS 3T S-1 -100 6 33.33
30 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 % 4 NS 4C E-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3C E = -140 15 83.33
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 % 7 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
8 NS 6S E-1 50 15 83.33
9 NS 4P S-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
12 NS 4P W-4 200 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 6PcW-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %16 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
17 NS 3P E+2 -200 11 61.11
18 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3K W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %22 NS 1S S+3 180 16 88.89
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %25 NS 5T E-1 100 12 66.67
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S N+3 490 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %28 NS 4P E-1 50 11 61.11
29 NS 2P E-1 200 15 83.33
30 NS 3ScE-1 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 % 1 NS 2P S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 NS 2K E = -90 18 100.00
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 17 94.44
5 NS 3C W = -140 15 83.33
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 % 7 NS 3C S-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 6S E+1 -990 2 11.11
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %10 NS 6S W-2 200 16 88.89
11 NS 2T S-2 -100 1 5.56
12 NS 4PcW-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 %13 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22
14 NS 4C S+1 450 2 11.11
15 NS 6P E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %16 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 22.22
17 NS 4PcW+1 -690 0 0.00
18 NS 3P W-1 50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 4 22.22
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %25 NS 4P E-3 300 16 88.89
26 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %28 NS 4P E = -420 2 11.11
29 NS 3P E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 4C W-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 45,19 % 1 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
3 NS 4C N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre : 36,85 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 17 94.44
5 NS 4C W-1 50 18 100.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier : 46,30 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
8 NS 5S W+2 -520 4 22.22
9 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 52,59 %10 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
11 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 5.56
12 NS 4PcN-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo : 54,07 %13 NS 2C S+2 170 16 88.89
14 NS 4P N+2 480 10 55.56
15 NS 4P E = -420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,22 %16 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 5 27.78
18 NS 3C N+1 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy : 55,00 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3T S = 110 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 61,30 %22 NS 1S N = 90 1 5.56
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 4C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,85 %25 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
27 NS 3S N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon : 54,63 %28 NS 4P E-3 150 18 100.00
29 NS Pass 100 10 55.56
30 NS 3S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 281,0 / 540 = 52,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 66.67
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3C W+2 -200 11 61.11
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 % 7 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
8 EO Pass Passe 6 33.33
9 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %10 EO 6S W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
12 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %13 EO 2P E = -110 8 44.44
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 6P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %16 EO 1S E-2 200 2 11.11
17 EO 2K E+3 -150 4 22.22
18 EO 2C N+1 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3K W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 14 77.78
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 3S N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %28 EO 4P E-2 100 2 11.11
29 EO 4T S-2 -200 15 83.33
30 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 66.67
3 EO 3S S+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 % 7 EO 2T E-1 100 13 72.22
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 10 55.56
9 EO 3P S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 11 61.11
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 14 77.78
12 EO 3P W = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
14 EO 6C S-1 -50 18 100.00
15 EO 6P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
17 EO 3P E+2 -200 7 38.89
18 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 6C N-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %22 EO 1S N = 90 17 94.44
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %25 EO 5T W = -600 13 72.22
26 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00
27 EO 2S N = 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 3P E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 331,0 / 540 = 61,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MATELART Marc -CASSART Guy
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 % 1 EO 1S N-2 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 3 16.67
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 18 100.00
5 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 % 7 EO 1S W-1 100 13 72.22
8 EO 6S W+1 -1020 18 100.00
9 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 16 88.89
11 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 3P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 6PcW-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %16 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 77.78
17 EO 4PcW+1 -690 18 100.00
18 EO 3P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3T S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %22 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %25 EO 4CcS = 590 0 0.00
26 EO 2S N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 2S N = 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 3CcS-2 -500 18 100.00
30 EO 3S E = -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 ARICKX Roger -CLERIN François-Xavier
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 1 5.56
5 EO 3C W = -140 3 16.67
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
8 EO 5S W+2 -520 14 77.78
9 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %10 EO 6K W-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
12 EO 3C N+2 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %13 EO 3C S = 140 4 22.22
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %16 EO 1P W-1 100 8 44.44
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
18 EO 2P W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
21 EO 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %22 EO 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
23 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %25 EO 6TcW-1 200 4 22.22
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 1SxN+2 960 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %28 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
29 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 66.67
30 EO 3T E+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DOUMONT Hervé -TELLIN Jean-Pierre
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 1 EO 2P S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 2K E = -90 0 0.00
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 1 5.56
5 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 % 7 EO 2K N+1 110 8 44.44
8 EO 5P W = -450 8 44.44
9 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 4P W-4 200 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %13 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %16 EO 4C E-2 200 2 11.11
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 2 11.11
18 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %19 EO 6P N = 980 1 5.56
20 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %22 EO 1P S+1 110 12 66.67
23 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
24 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %25 EO 4T W = -130 9 50.00
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S N+2 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %28 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
29 EO 4T S-2 -200 15 83.33
30 EO 3T W+1 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 199,0 / 540 = 36,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 % 1 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 16 88.89
5 EO 3C W+2 -200 11 61.11
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 % 7 EO 3TcE-2 500 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 66.67
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %10 EO 6S E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2C S+1 140 2 11.11
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %13 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78
14 EO 4C S+1 450 16 88.89
15 EO 6P E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %16 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
17 EO 2CcN = 470 0 0.00
18 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %19 EO 6P N = 980 1 5.56
20 EO 6C N-1 -100 15 83.33
21 EO 4K E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %22 EO 1S N = 90 17 94.44
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %25 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44
26 EO 2K S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 1S N+2 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 2P E-1 200 3 16.67
30 EO 3ScE-1 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 % 1 EO 2PcS-2 -300 18 100.00
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 3 16.67
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 7 EO 3S W-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 6S E-1 50 3 16.67
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %10 EO 6S W-2 200 2 11.11
11 EO 2T S-2 -100 17 94.44
12 EO 4PcW-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %13 EO 3P E = -140 14 77.78
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 6P E = -980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %16 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22
18 EO 3C N+1 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4S S = 630 12 66.67
21 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %25 EO 5T E-1 100 6 33.33
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S N+3 490 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %28 EO 4P E+1 -450 18 100.00
29 EO 3TcS = 670 0 0.00
30 EO 3S W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HALLEUX Jean François -HUBLET Carlo
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 % 1 EO 1ScN-1 -100 2 11.11
2 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3C W+1 -170 7 38.89
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 % 7 EO 3S W-4 400 2 11.11
8 EO 7C W-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00
11 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
12 EO 3P W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %13 EO 2C S+2 170 2 11.11
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 4P E = -420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %16 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
17 EO 2P E+3 -200 7 38.89
18 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4P S+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 5T S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 %22 EO 1S S+3 180 2 11.11
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %25 EO 4T W = -130 9 50.00
26 EO 2S N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %28 EO 4P E = -420 16 88.89
29 EO 3P E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 4C W-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 292,0 / 540 = 54,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 EVRARD Armand -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 % 1 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
2 EO 2P N-2 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 % 4 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 77.78
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 % 7 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
8 EO 6S E-1 50 3 16.67
9 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %10 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
11 EO 1S N-2 -100 17 94.44
12 EO 4PcN-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %13 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
14 EO 4P N+2 480 8 44.44
15 EO 6P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %16 EO 3C E-1 200 2 11.11
17 EO 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
18 EO 3P W-1 50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3T S = 110 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
23 EO 3C N = 140 4 22.22
24 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 %25 EO 4P E-3 300 2 11.11
26 EO 3S N-1 -100 7 38.89
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %28 EO 4P E-1 50 7 38.89
29 EO 3P E-2 200 3 16.67
30 EO 3S W = -400 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 BRIOT Fernand -VERBOIS Léon
7 GEUDVERT Marcelle -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,19 % 1 EO 2S E+1 -150 16 88.89
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 12 66.67
3 EO 4C N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 57,96 % 4 EO 4C E-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3C E = -140 3 16.67
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,78 % 7 EO 3C S-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 6S E+1 -990 16 88.89
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 55,37 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 11 61.11
11 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67
12 EO 5PcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
4 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 56,30 %13 EO 3P E-1 100 6 33.33
14 EO 6P N = 980 0 0.00
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 41,85 %16 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 72.22
18 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
5 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,78 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3K E-1 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 COLOT Jacques -PARMENTIER Richard : 40,56 %22 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 FRAITURE Louis -COLLET Claudine : 50,19 %25 EO 5T W = -600 13 72.22
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
27 EO 2S N+1 150 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
10 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 52,04 %28 EO 4P E-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO Pass 100 8 44.44
30 EO 3S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
|
|