|
Tournoi du 15-08-11
1 56,71 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
2 53,01 3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
3 52,78 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
4 51,39 6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
5 49,54 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
6 49,31 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
7 48,61 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
8 45,60 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina
9 43,06 2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,72 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 58,80 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
3 56,94 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
4 54,17 18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal
5 52,08 13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David
6 44,68 12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia
7 43,29 10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
8 40,74 11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
9 39,58 14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 NS 3T N = 110 10 62.50
3 NS 7S N = 1520 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 3 18.75
5 NS 6T N-2 -200 2 12.50
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 % 7 NS 5CcS = 850 12 75.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 5 31.25
9 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %10 NS 1S E+3 -180 10 62.50
11 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 1 6.25
15 NS 4P S+1 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %16 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50
17 NS 1S N+2 150 14 87.50
18 NS 3T N+1 130 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %19 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
20 NS 3K N = 110 11 68.75
21 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %22 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 12.50
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 81.25
24 NS 2S W+3 -210 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %25 NS 3K N+2 150 12 75.00
26 NS 5T E-1 100 9 56.25
27 NS 4C N-2 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 197,0 / 432 = 45,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 6.25
2 NS 4P E-1 50 6 37.50
3 NS 6S S+1 1020 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 3 18.75
5 NS 5KcW-1 100 7 43.75
6 NS 3K W+2 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 % 7 NS 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N+3 490 14 87.50
9 NS 4C N = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %10 NS 2S E+1 -150 12 75.00
11 NS 1S E-3 150 16 100.00
12 NS 5K N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %13 NS 5P N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
15 NS 4P N+1 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %16 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 4TcN-1 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
20 NS 2T E+1 -110 2 12.50
21 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %22 NS 1T N = 70 10 62.50
23 NS 2K E+1 -110 7 43.75
24 NS 2S E+1 -150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %25 NS 2T E-2 200 16 100.00
26 NS 4T E = -130 1 6.25
27 NS 4C N-3 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 186,0 / 432 = 43,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 % 1 NS 3C W+2 -200 16 100.00
2 NS 2P E = -110 2 12.50
3 NS 6S N+1 1020 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 % 4 NS 3C N = 140 3 18.75
5 NS 4C E-2 100 7 43.75
6 NS 5K E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 % 7 NS 4CcS+1 990 14 87.50
8 NS 3S N+3 490 14 87.50
9 NS 4C N = 420 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %10 NS 3S E = -600 2 12.50
11 NS 3S E-2 100 13 81.25
12 NS 3S S+1 630 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 14 87.50
14 NS 4C E-1 50 9 56.25
15 NS 5P S = 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 14 87.50
17 NS 2T W-3 150 14 87.50
18 NS 3T N = 110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
20 NS 2K N+1 110 11 68.75
21 NS 4C E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %22 NS 2CcE = -670 0 0.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 18.75
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %25 NS 2K N+4 170 14 87.50
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 5 31.25
27 NS 4P E = -420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 229,0 / 432 = 53,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 6 37.50
3 NS 3S N+2 460 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 14 87.50
5 NS 4C E-2 100 7 43.75
6 NS 6K E-1 100 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 % 7 NS 4C S+2 680 8 50.00
8 NS 6S N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 5CcN-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %10 NS 3S E = -600 2 12.50
11 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 14 87.50
14 NS 2T S = 90 12 75.00
15 NS 4P S+1 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 10 62.50
17 NS 1S W-2 100 6 37.50
18 NS 3S N = 600 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %19 NS 3P W-2 200 14 87.50
20 NS 2T E = -90 6 37.50
21 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %22 NS 1S S+1 120 16 100.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 81.25
24 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %25 NS 2K N+2 130 9 56.25
26 NS 4T E = -130 1 6.25
27 NS 3S W-1 50 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 213,0 / 432 = 49,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 1 6.25
2 NS 2S N = 120 12 75.00
3 NS 6S N+1 1020 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 % 4 NS 3C N+1 170 10 62.50
5 NS 4KcE = -510 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 % 7 NS 5CcN+1 1050 16 100.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 9 56.25
9 NS 5C N = 450 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %10 NS 3PcN-1 -200 8 50.00
11 NS 1S E-2 100 13 81.25
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 14 87.50
14 NS 2P E-1 50 9 56.25
15 NS 4P N+2 680 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 6.25
17 NS 2T E-2 100 6 37.50
18 NS 1S N+2 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 6 37.50
20 NS 2C N+1 140 15 93.75
21 NS 4C E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %22 NS 1S N = 90 13 81.25
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %25 NS 3K N+1 130 9 56.25
26 NS 3P E-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 245,0 / 432 = 56,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 14 87.50
2 NS 4P E-3 150 15 93.75
3 NS 3S N+4 520 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 % 4 NS 3C S+1 170 10 62.50
5 NS 5KcW-2 300 13 81.25
6 NS 5K E+1 -620 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 % 7 NS 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 5 31.25
9 NS 3PcE-1 200 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %10 NS 3S E = -600 2 12.50
11 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S S+1 630 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %13 NS 3P N+3 230 2 12.50
14 NS 3PcW-1 100 14 87.50
15 NS 5P S = 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 6.25
17 NS 2C W-2 100 6 37.50
18 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %19 NS 2PcE-1 200 14 87.50
20 NS 2C S+1 140 15 93.75
21 NS 4CcE-1 100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 89,58 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %22 NS 1S N = 90 13 81.25
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 81.25
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %25 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 5T E-1 100 9 56.25
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
Total : 222,0 / 432 = 51,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 NS 2T N+3 150 15 93.75
3 NS 4S S+3 520 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 % 4 NS 2C N+1 140 3 18.75
5 NS 5TcN = 750 16 100.00
6 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 % 7 NS 4CcS = 790 10 62.50
8 NS 3S N+2 460 9 56.25
9 NS 4PcE-1 200 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %10 NS 2S E = -120 14 87.50
11 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
14 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
15 NS 4P S+1 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 14 87.50
17 NS 1S N = 90 2 12.50
18 NS 3S N = 600 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 25.00
21 NS 4C E = -420 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 %22 NS 2C W = -110 4 25.00
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 7 43.75
24 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %25 NS 4C N-2 -100 3 18.75
26 NS 2K S+1 110 12 75.00
27 NS 4C N-3 -150 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
Total : 210,0 / 432 = 48,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 8 50.00
2 NS 3K S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 6T S+1 940 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 % 4 NS 3C S+1 170 10 62.50
5 NS 6K W-2 100 7 43.75
6 NS 4K E+1 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 % 7 NS 4C S = 620 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+3 490 14 87.50
9 NS 4PcE-2 500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %10 NS 2S E-1 100 16 100.00
11 NS 1S E = -90 4 25.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
14 NS 3CcE-2 300 16 100.00
15 NS 4P S+2 680 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %16 NS 4P N = 420 6 37.50
17 NS 1S S+1 120 10 62.50
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %19 NS 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
20 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00
21 NS 4CcE-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 %22 NS 2T N-2 -100 6 37.50
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 18.75
24 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 %25 NS 2K N+1 110 6 37.50
26 NS 3P W-2 200 15 93.75
27 NS 3PcE+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 214,0 / 432 = 49,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,72 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 NS 3P E-1 50 6 37.50
3 NS 7P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François : 56,94 % 4 NS 3S N+1 630 16 100.00
5 NS 6KcW-2 300 13 81.25
6 NS 6K E-2 200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 58,80 % 7 NS 4C S+1 650 4 25.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 2 12.50
9 NS 4PcE-2 500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier : 39,58 %10 NS 2TcS-2 -500 6 37.50
11 NS 3K W-1 50 10 62.50
12 NS 3S S+1 630 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David : 52,08 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 7 43.75
14 NS 3P W = -140 1 6.25
15 NS 4P S+1 650 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia : 44,68 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 14 87.50
17 NS 2T W-3 150 14 87.50
18 NS 1S N+1 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne : 40,74 %19 NS 2P W-2 200 14 87.50
20 NS 3T E-1 100 8 50.00
21 NS 3C E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent : 43,29 %22 NS 1S W = -90 8 50.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 13 81.25
24 NS 3S W = -400 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,17 %25 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 18.75
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 5 31.25
27 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 228,0 / 432 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HUBLET Carlo -LIBERT Laurent
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 EO 3T N = 110 6 37.50
3 EO 7S N = 1520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 % 4 EO 3C S+1 170 6 37.50
5 EO 5KcW-2 300 3 18.75
6 EO 5K E+1 -620 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 % 7 EO 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N+3 490 2 12.50
9 EO 4C N = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %10 EO 2S E = -120 2 12.50
11 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 2 12.50
14 EO 4C E-1 50 7 43.75
15 EO 5P S = 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %16 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50
17 EO 1S S+1 120 6 37.50
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %19 EO 3P W-2 200 2 12.50
20 EO 2T E = -90 10 62.50
21 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %22 EO 1S W = -90 8 50.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 3 18.75
24 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %25 EO 3K N+1 130 7 43.75
26 EO 3P E-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 187,0 / 432 = 43,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 ROEGIERS Marga -MACAUX Lucienne
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 2 12.50
2 EO 4P E-3 150 1 6.25
3 EO 3S N+4 520 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 13 81.25
5 EO 5KcW-1 100 9 56.25
6 EO 3K W+2 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 % 7 EO 4CcS = 790 6 37.50
8 EO 3S N+2 460 7 43.75
9 EO 4PcE-1 200 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 87.50
11 EO 3S E-2 100 3 18.75
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
14 EO 3CcE-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S+2 680 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 6 37.50
17 EO 1S W-2 100 10 62.50
18 EO 3S N = 600 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %19 EO 2P W-2 200 2 12.50
20 EO 3T E-1 100 8 50.00
21 EO 3C E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %22 EO 1S N = 90 3 18.75
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 100.00
24 EO 3S E = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %25 EO 3K N+2 150 4 25.00
26 EO 5T E-1 100 7 43.75
27 EO 4C N-2 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 176,0 / 432 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MULLER Philippe -DIMITRIU Pia
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 93.75
2 EO 4P E-1 50 10 62.50
3 EO 6S S+1 1020 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 % 4 EO 2C N+1 140 13 81.25
5 EO 5TcN = 750 0 0.00
6 EO 3S W+3 -690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 % 7 EO 4CcS+1 990 2 12.50
8 EO 3S N+3 490 2 12.50
9 EO 4C N = 420 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %10 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 2 12.50
14 EO 2T S = 90 4 25.00
15 EO 4P S+1 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 12.50
17 EO 2T W-3 150 2 12.50
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 10 62.50
20 EO 2C N+1 140 1 6.25
21 EO 4C E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %22 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 87.50
23 EO 1S W = -90 3 18.75
24 EO 2S W+3 -210 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %25 EO 4C N-3 -150 16 100.00
26 EO 5T E-1 100 7 43.75
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
Total : 193,0 / 432 = 44,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 POULAERT Gilbert -VAGMAN David
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 EO 2T N+3 150 1 6.25
3 EO 4S S+3 520 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 13 81.25
5 EO 4C E-2 100 9 56.25
6 EO 5K E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 % 7 EO 4C S = 620 16 100.00
8 EO 3S N+3 490 2 12.50
9 EO 4PcE-2 500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 87.50
11 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
14 EO 3P W = -140 15 93.75
15 EO 4P S+1 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 93.75
17 EO 2T E-2 100 10 62.50
18 EO 1S N+2 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %19 EO 2P W = -110 16 100.00
20 EO 3K N = 110 5 31.25
21 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %22 EO 1S N = 90 3 18.75
23 EO 1S W = -90 3 18.75
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %25 EO 2T E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4T E = -130 15 93.75
27 EO 4C N-3 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 225,0 / 432 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PARMENTIER Richard -CLERIN François-Xavier
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 % 1 EO 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00
2 EO 2P E = -110 14 87.50
3 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 % 4 EO 3C S+1 170 6 37.50
5 EO 6K W-2 100 9 56.25
6 EO 4K E+1 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 % 7 EO 4C S+2 680 8 50.00
8 EO 6S N-1 -50 16 100.00
9 EO 5CcN-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %10 EO 2TcS-2 -500 10 62.50
11 EO 3K W-1 50 6 37.50
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 2 12.50
14 EO 2P E-1 50 7 43.75
15 EO 4P N+2 680 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %16 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50
17 EO 1S N+2 150 2 12.50
18 EO 3T N+1 130 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %19 EO 2PcE-1 200 2 12.50
20 EO 2C S+1 140 1 6.25
21 EO 4CcE-1 100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 10,42 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %22 EO 1T N = 70 6 37.50
23 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 56.25
24 EO 2S E+1 -150 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %25 EO 4C N-2 -100 13 81.25
26 EO 2K S+1 110 4 25.00
27 EO 4C N-3 -150 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 171,0 / 432 = 39,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 8 50.00
2 EO 3K S-2 -200 16 100.00
3 EO 6T S+1 940 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 2 12.50
5 EO 4C E-2 100 9 56.25
6 EO 6K E-1 100 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 % 7 EO 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 14 87.50
9 EO 4PcE-2 500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 %10 EO 3PcN-1 -200 8 50.00
11 EO 1S E-2 100 3 18.75
12 EO 3S N+2 660 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 15 93.75
15 EO 4P S+1 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 93.75
17 EO 2C W-2 100 10 62.50
18 EO 3S S-3 -300 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
20 EO 2T E+1 -110 14 87.50
21 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %22 EO 2C W = -110 12 75.00
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 9 56.25
24 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %25 EO 2K N+4 170 2 12.50
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 11 68.75
27 EO 4P E = -420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 254,0 / 432 = 58,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -WARNIER François
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 10 62.50
3 EO 3S N+2 460 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 % 4 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
5 EO 6KcW-2 300 3 18.75
6 EO 6K E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,25 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 % 7 EO 5CcN+1 1050 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 7 43.75
9 EO 5C N = 450 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 %10 EO 1S E+3 -180 6 37.50
11 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %13 EO 3P N+3 230 14 87.50
14 EO 3PcW-1 100 2 12.50
15 EO 5P S = 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %16 EO 4P N = 420 10 62.50
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 16 100.00
18 EO 4TcN-1 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 75.00
21 EO 4C E = -420 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %22 EO 2CcE = -670 16 100.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 81.25
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,75 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %25 EO 2K N+1 110 10 62.50
26 EO 3P W-2 200 1 6.25
27 EO 3PcE+1 -630 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 246,0 / 432 = 56,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 8 50.00
2 EO 3P E-1 50 10 62.50
3 EO 7P S-3 -150 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 % 4 EO 3C N+1 170 6 37.50
5 EO 4KcE = -510 16 100.00
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 % 7 EO 5CcS = 850 4 25.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 11 68.75
9 EO 5KcN-3 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 %10 EO 3S E = -600 14 87.50
11 EO 1S E = -90 12 75.00
12 EO 3S S+1 630 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %13 EO 5P N-1 -100 16 100.00
14 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
15 EO 4P N+1 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 12.50
17 EO 1S N = 90 14 87.50
18 EO 3S N = 600 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
20 EO 2K N+1 110 5 31.25
21 EO 4C E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %22 EO 2T N-2 -100 10 62.50
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 13 81.25
24 EO 2S W+2 -180 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %25 EO 2K N+2 130 7 43.75
26 EO 4T E = -130 15 93.75
27 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
Total : 258,0 / 432 = 59,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LEFEBVRE Michel -COURTOIS Chantal
5 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 56,71 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 15 93.75
2 EO 2S N = 120 4 25.00
3 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -DESSY Lina : 45,60 % 4 EO 3C N = 140 13 81.25
5 EO 6T N-2 -200 14 87.50
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
6 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 51,39 % 7 EO 4C S+1 650 12 75.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 11 68.75
9 EO 3PcE-1 200 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 PETITJEAN Christian -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 43,06 %10 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 25.00
11 EO 1S E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 5K N-3 -300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 48,61 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 9 56.25
14 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
15 EO 4P S+1 650 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 53,01 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 12.50
17 EO 2T W-3 150 2 12.50
18 EO 3T N = 110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 49,54 %19 EO 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
20 EO 2S E = -120 16 100.00
21 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 BRIOT Marie-Louise -MASSAUX Jacques : 49,31 %22 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 3 18.75
24 EO 3S W = -400 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 52,78 %25 EO 3S S-2 -100 13 81.25
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 11 68.75
27 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 234,0 / 432 = 54,17 %
|
|