|
Tournoi du 15-09-11
1 63,10 7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
2 55,06 3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
3 53,27 5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
4 49,70 6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
5 48,51 2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
6 43,15 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François
7 37,20 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 54,46 8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
2 52,08 13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
3 50,89 11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
4 49,11 14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina
5 48,21 9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
6 47,62 10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
~ 47,62 12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 % 1 NS 1PcW+1 -260 2 16.67
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 25.00
3 NS 3S S = 400 4 33.33
4 NS 3S E = -600 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 % 5 NS 3C E-2 100 12 100.00
6 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
7 NS 5T N+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 % 9 NS 2C S = 110 2 16.67
10 NS 3P W+2 -200 7 58.33
11 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00
12 NS 2S E-2 100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 %13 NS 2C S-1 -100 3 25.00
14 NS 4T N-1 -50 9 75.00
15 NS 3S E-3 150 11 91.67
16 NS 2T S+2 130 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 %17 NS 5CcS-1 -100 9 75.00
18 NS 1S E+3 -180 9 75.00
19 NS 3S S = 400 0 0.00
20 NS 5T W+1 -620 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 %21 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 33.33
22 NS 2C S-1 -50 0 0.00
23 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 NS 3P N+1 170 4 33.33
27 NS 3T S-1 -50 2 16.67
28 NS 4P S+2 680 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 145,0 / 336 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 % 1 NS 2P W-1 50 12 100.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 10 83.33
3 NS 3S N+2 460 11 91.67
4 NS 4P W = -620 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 % 5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 58.33
6 NS 7C N-2 -100 0 0.00
7 NS 5T N+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 % 9 NS 2C S = 110 2 16.67
10 NS 2P W+3 -200 7 58.33
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 33.33
12 NS 1S E = -90 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 %13 NS 1S W = -90 6 50.00
14 NS 3K E = -110 6 50.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 7 58.33
16 NS 2P N+1 140 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 %17 NS 5CcN-1 -100 9 75.00
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 25.00
19 NS 5C N+1 480 9 75.00
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 %21 NS 3S N = 600 9 75.00
22 NS 2P S = 110 2 16.67
23 NS 2C E-1 100 10 83.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 NS 5P N-1 -100 0 0.00
27 NS 3T S-1 -50 2 16.67
28 NS 4P S+2 680 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 25.00
3 NS 2S N+3 210 0 0.00
4 NS 4P W = -620 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 16.67
6 NS 4C N+1 450 3 25.00
7 NS 5T S+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 % 9 NS 2CcN+2 670 12 100.00
10 NS 3P E+1 -170 12 100.00
11 NS 6S W-2 100 11 91.67
12 NS 3C N = 140 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,92 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 %13 NS 2C S+2 170 12 100.00
14 NS 5KcW-1 100 12 100.00
15 NS 3P E-3 150 11 91.67
16 NS 2P N+1 140 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 %17 NS 4P W = -420 4 33.33
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 25.00
19 NS 5C N+1 480 9 75.00
20 NS 5T W = -600 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 %21 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 33.33
22 NS 2C S+1 140 6 50.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 5 41.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 %25 NS 4T S-2 -100 2 16.67
26 NS 4P N = 620 8 66.67
27 NS 4K S-1 -50 2 16.67
28 NS 4P S+2 680 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 185,0 / 336 = 55,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 % 1 NS 3TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 25.00
3 NS 3S S = 400 4 33.33
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,58 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 16.67
6 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
7 NS 5T S+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 % 9 NS 2C S = 110 2 16.67
10 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 33.33
12 NS 1S E = -90 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 %13 NS 2C S-1 -100 3 25.00
14 NS 4T S-1 -50 9 75.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 7 58.33
16 NS 1S S+2 150 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 %17 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 6 50.00
19 NS 3S N+2 460 3 25.00
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 %21 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
22 NS 1S W-2 200 12 100.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 5 41.67
24 NS 2S S-1 -50 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 %25 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
26 NS 2P N+2 170 4 33.33
27 NS 3C W-2 100 7 58.33
28 NS 4P S+2 680 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 125,0 / 336 = 37,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 NS 2S E = -120 8 66.67
3 NS 3S S = 400 4 33.33
4 NS 4P W-1 100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 % 5 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 16.67
6 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
7 NS 5T S+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 % 9 NS 1S E-2 200 6 50.00
10 NS 2P W+3 -200 7 58.33
11 NS 3S E = -400 8 66.67
12 NS 1S E-1 50 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 %13 NS 3C S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4K W = -130 3 25.00
15 NS 5K W = -400 3 25.00
16 NS 3T S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 %17 NS 4P W = -420 4 33.33
18 NS 1S E+3 -180 9 75.00
19 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
20 NS 4C E-2 200 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 %21 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 33.33
22 NS 2C S+1 140 6 50.00
23 NS 1S W = -90 5 41.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 %25 NS 2P N = 110 11 91.67
26 NS 3P S+1 170 4 33.33
27 NS 3K S = 110 10 83.33
28 NS 6P S = 1430 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 179,0 / 336 = 53,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 25.00
3 NS 3S S+1 430 8 66.67
4 NS 4P W = -620 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 % 5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 58.33
6 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
7 NS 3T N+3 170 0 0.00
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 % 9 NS 3P E-3 300 9 75.00
10 NS 2P W+4 -230 2 16.67
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 33.33
12 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 75.00
14 NS 5TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 5K W = -400 3 25.00
16 NS 2P N+1 140 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 %17 NS 5P E-1 50 12 100.00
18 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
19 NS 3S N+2 460 3 25.00
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 %21 NS 3S N+1 630 12 100.00
22 NS 2P N+2 170 10 83.33
23 NS 1S W = -90 5 41.67
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 %25 NS 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 NS 4PcN = 790 11 91.67
27 NS 1ScE-1 100 7 58.33
28 NS 6P S = 1430 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 167,0 / 336 = 49,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 52,08 % 1 NS 3T S-2 -100 10 83.33
2 NS 2S W-2 100 12 100.00
3 NS 3S S+2 460 11 91.67
4 NS 4P W = -620 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria : 47,62 % 5 NS 6S E-1 50 10 83.33
6 NS 4C N+1 450 3 25.00
7 NS 5T S+1 620 7 58.33
8 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 50,89 % 9 NS 1S E-3 300 9 75.00
10 NS 2P E+3 -200 7 58.33
11 NS 6C E-2 100 11 91.67
12 NS 2S E-1 50 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude : 47,62 %13 NS 2C S = 110 9 75.00
14 NS 4K W = -130 3 25.00
15 NS 4KxW+1 -920 0 0.00
16 NS 2P N+1 140 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 48,21 %17 NS 4P W = -420 4 33.33
18 NS 2P W = -110 12 100.00
19 NS 4C N+2 480 9 75.00
20 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian : 54,46 %21 NS 3S N = 600 9 75.00
22 NS 1C S+2 140 6 50.00
23 NS 1S W-2 200 12 100.00
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina : 49,11 %25 NS 1T S+2 110 11 91.67
26 NS 4PcN = 790 11 91.67
27 NS 2ScE-3 500 12 100.00
28 NS 5P S = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 212,0 / 336 = 63,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 de TERWANGNE Philippe -STEED Adrian
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 % 1 EO 1PcW+1 -260 10 83.33
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 75.00
3 EO 3S S = 400 8 66.67
4 EO 3S E = -600 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 83.33
6 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
7 EO 5T S+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 % 9 EO 2C S = 110 10 83.33
10 EO 2P W+3 -200 5 41.67
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 66.67
12 EO 1S E = -90 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 %13 EO 2C S = 110 3 25.00
14 EO 5TcS-2 -300 12 100.00
15 EO 5K W = -400 9 75.00
16 EO 2P N+1 140 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 %17 EO 4P W = -420 8 66.67
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 75.00
19 EO 5C N+1 480 3 25.00
20 EO 5T W = -600 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 %21 EO 3S N = 600 3 25.00
22 EO 1C S+2 140 6 50.00
23 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 %25 EO 3C W = -140 12 100.00
26 EO 2P N+2 170 8 66.67
27 EO 3C W-2 100 5 41.67
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 183,0 / 336 = 54,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 EO 2S E = -120 4 33.33
3 EO 3S S = 400 8 66.67
4 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 % 5 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 41.67
6 EO 7C N-2 -100 12 100.00
7 EO 5T N+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+2 -480 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 % 9 EO 3P E-3 300 3 25.00
10 EO 2P W+4 -230 10 83.33
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 66.67
12 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 %13 EO 2C S+2 170 0 0.00
14 EO 5KcW-1 100 0 0.00
15 EO 3P E-3 150 1 8.33
16 EO 2P N+1 140 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 %17 EO 4P W = -420 8 66.67
18 EO 2P W = -110 0 0.00
19 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 %21 EO 3S N-2 -200 12 100.00
22 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 7 58.33
24 EO 2S S-1 -50 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 EO 3P N+1 170 8 66.67
27 EO 3T S-1 -50 10 83.33
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 162,0 / 336 = 48,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLET Claudine -NELIS Claude
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 % 1 EO 2P W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 2 16.67
3 EO 3S N+2 460 1 8.33
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 % 5 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 41.67
6 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
7 EO 3T N+3 170 12 100.00
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 % 9 EO 2CcN+2 670 0 0.00
10 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
11 EO 6S W-2 100 1 8.33
12 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,08 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 %13 EO 2C S = 110 3 25.00
14 EO 4K W = -130 9 75.00
15 EO 4KxW+1 -920 12 100.00
16 EO 2P N+1 140 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 %17 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 100.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 6 50.00
19 EO 3S N+2 460 9 75.00
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 %21 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 66.67
22 EO 2C S-1 -50 12 100.00
23 EO 2C S-2 -200 12 100.00
24 EO 3S S-3 -150 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 %25 EO 2P N = 110 1 8.33
26 EO 3P S+1 170 8 66.67
27 EO 3K S = 110 2 16.67
28 EO 6P S = 1430 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 160,0 / 336 = 47,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 75.00
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4 33.33
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 83.33
6 EO 4C N+1 450 9 75.00
7 EO 5T S+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 % 9 EO 1S E-3 300 3 25.00
10 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 41.67
11 EO 6C E-2 100 1 8.33
12 EO 2S E-1 50 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 %13 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 75.00
14 EO 4T S-1 -50 3 25.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 41.67
16 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 %17 EO 5CcS-1 -100 3 25.00
18 EO 1S E+3 -180 3 25.00
19 EO 3S S = 400 12 100.00
20 EO 5T W+1 -620 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 %21 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 66.67
22 EO 2C S+1 140 6 50.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 7 58.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 EO 5P N-1 -100 12 100.00
27 EO 3T S-1 -50 10 83.33
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MARCHAL Christian -SALME Victoria
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 6 50.00
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 75.00
3 EO 2S N+3 210 12 100.00
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 % 5 EO 6S E-1 50 2 16.67
6 EO 4C N+1 450 9 75.00
7 EO 5T S+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 % 9 EO 2C S = 110 10 83.33
10 EO 4P E+1 -650 12 100.00
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 66.67
12 EO 1S E = -90 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 %13 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 75.00
14 EO 4T N-1 -50 3 25.00
15 EO 3S E-3 150 1 8.33
16 EO 2T S+2 130 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 %17 EO 4P W = -420 8 66.67
18 EO 1S E+3 -180 3 25.00
19 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
20 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 %21 EO 3S N = 600 3 25.00
22 EO 2P S = 110 10 83.33
23 EO 2C E-1 100 2 16.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 %25 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 50.00
26 EO 4PcN = 790 1 8.33
27 EO 1ScE-1 100 5 41.67
28 EO 6P S = 1430 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
Total : 160,0 / 336 = 47,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 % 1 EO 3T S-2 -100 2 16.67
2 EO 2S W-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 3S S+2 460 1 8.33
4 EO 4P W = -620 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 % 5 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 83.33
6 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
7 EO 5T S+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 % 9 EO 2C S = 110 10 83.33
10 EO 3P W+2 -200 5 41.67
11 EO 6S W = -990 12 100.00
12 EO 2S E-2 100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 %13 EO 3C S-2 -200 12 100.00
14 EO 4K W = -130 9 75.00
15 EO 5K W = -400 9 75.00
16 EO 3T S = 110 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 %17 EO 5CcN-1 -100 3 25.00
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 75.00
19 EO 5C N+1 480 3 25.00
20 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 %21 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
22 EO 2P N+2 170 2 16.67
23 EO 1S W = -90 7 58.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 %25 EO 4T S-2 -100 10 83.33
26 EO 4P N = 620 4 33.33
27 EO 4K S-1 -50 10 83.33
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 MOLS Bruno -DESSY Lina
4 de WASSEIGE Ariane -CLERIN François-Xavier : 37,20 % 1 EO 3TcS-2 -300 12 100.00
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 75.00
3 EO 3S S = 400 8 66.67
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,42 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HALLEUX Jean François : 43,15 % 5 EO 3C E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N+2 480 3 25.00
7 EO 5T N+1 620 5 41.67
8 EO 4P E+1 -450 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
5 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 53,27 % 9 EO 1S E-2 200 6 50.00
10 EO 2P W+3 -200 5 41.67
11 EO 3S E = -400 4 33.33
12 EO 1S E-1 50 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 MATELART Marc -de VIRON Baudouin : 48,51 %13 EO 1S W = -90 6 50.00
14 EO 3K E = -110 6 50.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 5 41.67
16 EO 2P N+1 140 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 49,70 %17 EO 5P E-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E+3 -490 12 100.00
19 EO 3S N+2 460 9 75.00
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
3 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 55,06 %21 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 66.67
22 EO 2C S+1 140 6 50.00
23 EO 1S W = -90 7 58.33
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 63,10 %25 EO 1T S+2 110 1 8.33
26 EO 4PcN = 790 1 8.33
27 EO 2ScE-3 500 0 0.00
28 EO 5P S = 650 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
|
|