|
Tournoi du 15-10-12
1 61,64 7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 59,79 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
3 57,41 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 53,17 2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian
5 50,26 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 42,33 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
7 39,42 6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
8 35,98 4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques
9 0,00 9 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 68,15 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 58,93 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 53,27 17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
4 48,51 11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 47,32 16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 46,73 15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
7 45,83 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 44,64 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 36,61 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
PAIRE Nr : 1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 1 7.14
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 21.43
3 NS 3K N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 7.14
5 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
6 NS 5KcS-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
9 NS 4P W-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %10 NS 4K S = 130 12 85.71
11 NS 1K W+3 -130 0 0.00
12 NS 3S N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 28.57
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 57.14
15 NS 2C S+1 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %16 NS 3P E-2 200 12 85.71
17 NS 3T N-1 -50 4 28.57
18 NS 3TcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %19 NS 6K S-1 -50 2 14.29
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14 100.00
21 NS 3S S+4 720 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %22 NS 2P S = 110 14 100.00
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %25 NS 2S N = 120 4 28.57
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
27 NS 3C N-2 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 160,0 / 378 = 42,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 3P N = 140 10 71.43
3 NS 3C E-3 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 % 4 NS 4C E-2 200 14 100.00
5 NS 3S N = 600 6 42.86
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 % 7 NS 3K S = 110 13 92.86
8 NS 2TcN-2 -300 0 0.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %10 NS 3PcW+1 -930 1 7.14
11 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00
12 NS 1C N+1 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 28.57
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 6 42.86
17 NS 4PcS+1 690 13 92.86
18 NS 3C E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 10 71.43
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 64.29
21 NS 3S N+2 660 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %22 NS 3P S-3 -150 5 35.71
23 NS 6P W = -1430 1 7.14
24 NS 5TcS-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %25 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
26 NS 3S E-1 100 9 64.29
27 NS 2C N+1 140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 201,0 / 378 = 53,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 % 4 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 71.43
5 NS 4P S+2 680 14 100.00
6 NS 4C E-2 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 64.29
9 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %10 NS 3P W = -140 7 50.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
12 NS 3CcN-1 -200 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 57.14
15 NS 3K E-2 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %16 NS 2P W = -110 1 7.14
17 NS 4PcS = 590 10 71.43
18 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 10 71.43
20 NS 3S N = 600 9 64.29
21 NS 3S S+1 630 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %22 NS 3KcE = -670 0 0.00
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 4 28.57
24 NS 2T S+2 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 7.14
26 NS 3S E-1 100 9 64.29
27 NS 3C N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 190,0 / 378 = 50,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 4CcE-2 300 14 100.00
3 NS 2P E-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 % 4 NS 3P W+2 -200 8 57.14
5 NS 4P S = 620 9 64.29
6 NS 5TcN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
8 NS 3K E+2 -150 4 28.57
9 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 71.43
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 1C N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57
14 NS 3C E-2 100 2 14.29
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %16 NS 2TcN+1 280 14 100.00
17 NS 4PcN-1 -100 2 14.29
18 NS 2P N = 110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %19 NS 4K S+1 150 4 28.57
20 NS 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
21 NS 4P N = 620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %22 NS 4PcS-3 -500 2 14.29
23 NS 6P W = -1430 1 7.14
24 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %25 NS 2TcW-2 500 14 100.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 2 14.29
27 NS 3S S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 136,0 / 378 = 35,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 13 92.86
2 NS 3P N = 140 10 71.43
3 NS 2K W-2 200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 5 35.71
5 NS 4P S+1 650 12 85.71
6 NS 3S W = -600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 14 100.00
9 NS 4P W = -620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %10 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 28.57
11 NS 3C S = 140 7 50.00
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57
14 NS 2CcE-3 500 13 92.86
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %16 NS 3T N = 110 10 71.43
17 NS 6P S-4 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 2P N+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %19 NS 4C N+1 450 10 71.43
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 64.29
21 NS 3S S+2 660 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %22 NS 2K E = -90 10 71.43
23 NS 6P W-1 100 13 92.86
24 NS 3P W-1 50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %25 NS 2S N+1 150 6 42.86
26 NS 3S E-1 100 9 64.29
27 NS 3S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 226,0 / 378 = 59,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 1 7.14
2 NS 3C E-2 100 6 42.86
3 NS 2C E-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 5 35.71
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 5C E-1 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 % 7 NS 2C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 9 64.29
9 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %10 NS 2P W+1 -140 7 50.00
11 NS 5C S-2 -100 2 14.29
12 NS 2S N-3 -300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %13 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
14 NS 3CcE-3 500 13 92.86
15 NS 3P S = 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %16 NS 1P E+1 -110 1 7.14
17 NS 4PcS+1 690 13 92.86
18 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %19 NS 6K S-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 3K N+1 130 2 14.29
21 NS 3C S+3 230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %22 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
24 NS 2T S+2 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 7.14
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 28.57
27 NS 4C N-3 -150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 149,0 / 378 = 39,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 3P N = 140 10 71.43
3 NS 2K N = 90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 % 4 NS 3C E = -140 12 85.71
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 4C E-2 200 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 % 7 NS 3K S = 110 13 92.86
8 NS 2K E+3 -150 4 28.57
9 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %10 NS 3PcW+1 -930 1 7.14
11 NS 3C S+1 170 11 78.57
12 NS 3C E-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %13 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57
14 NS 3S S = 400 8 57.14
15 NS 2P N = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 42.86
17 NS 4P S = 420 7 50.00
18 NS 3P N+1 170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %19 NS 5C S = 450 10 71.43
20 NS 2P N+2 170 4 28.57
21 NS 3S N+2 660 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 5 35.71
23 NS 6P W-1 100 13 92.86
24 NS 2T S+2 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %25 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
26 NS 3S W-1 100 9 64.29
27 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 233,0 / 378 = 61,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 % 1 NS 3S E-2 100 13 92.86
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 21.43
3 NS 1S S = 90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 % 4 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 7.14
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 5K S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 % 7 NS 3K S-1 -100 2 14.29
8 NS 2T N-2 -100 12 85.71
9 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %10 NS 3K S+2 150 14 100.00
11 NS 2C S+2 170 11 78.57
12 NS 3P N-2 -200 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 28.57
14 NS 3CcE-2 300 4 28.57
15 NS 2P S+1 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %16 NS 2K S-1 -50 6 42.86
17 NS 4P S = 420 7 50.00
18 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 10 71.43
20 NS 3S S = 600 9 64.29
21 NS 3S S+3 690 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 12 85.71
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 8 57.14
24 NS 2T S+2 130 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 %25 NS 3S N = 400 10 71.43
26 NS 3S E-2 200 14 100.00
27 NS 4K S-2 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 217,0 / 378 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 -
17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude : 53,27 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,32 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 46,73 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 68,15 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 36,61 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,64 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 48,51 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,93 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 45,83 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 378 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 92.86
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 78.57
3 EO 3K N-4 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 9 64.29
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 14 100.00
6 EO 5C E-1 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 % 7 EO 3K S = 110 1 7.14
8 EO 2TcN-2 -300 14 100.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %10 EO 3PcW+1 -930 13 92.86
11 EO 3C S+1 170 3 21.43
12 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %13 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43
14 EO 3S S = 400 6 42.86
15 EO 3K E-2 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %16 EO 2K S-1 -50 8 57.14
17 EO 4P S = 420 7 50.00
18 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %19 EO 4K S+1 150 10 71.43
20 EO 2C E-1 100 14 100.00
21 EO 4P N = 620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
9 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %25 EO 2S N+1 150 8 57.14
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 35.71
27 EO 3S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 198,0 / 336 = 58,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CASSART Guy -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 92.86
2 EO 3C E-2 100 8 57.14
3 EO 2C E-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 % 4 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N = 600 8 57.14
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 % 7 EO 3K S = 110 1 7.14
8 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 71.43
9 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %10 EO 3P W = -140 7 50.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
12 EO 3CcN-1 -200 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 71.43
14 EO 3CcE-2 300 10 71.43
15 EO 2P S+1 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %16 EO 2TcN+1 280 0 0.00
17 EO 4PcN-1 -100 12 85.71
18 EO 2P N = 110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
9 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %22 EO 2K E = -90 4 28.57
23 EO 6P W-1 100 1 7.14
24 EO 3P W-1 50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %25 EO 2S N = 120 10 71.43
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00
27 EO 3C N-2 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 3P N = 140 4 28.57
3 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 % 4 EO 3C E = -140 2 14.29
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 4C E-2 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 5 35.71
9 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %10 EO 3K S+2 150 0 0.00
11 EO 2C S+2 170 3 21.43
12 EO 3P N-2 -200 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %13 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43
14 EO 3C E-2 100 12 85.71
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 4 28.57
20 EO 3S S = 600 5 35.71
21 EO 3S S+2 660 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %22 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 92.86
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 71.43
27 EO 4C N-3 -150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 3P N = 140 4 28.57
3 EO 2K N = 90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 % 4 EO 2P W+2 -170 4 28.57
5 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00
6 EO 4C E-2 200 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 % 7 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 85.71
8 EO 2T N-2 -100 2 14.29
9 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 4 28.57
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 1C N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
9 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %16 EO 3T N = 110 4 28.57
17 EO 6P S-4 -200 14 100.00
18 EO 2P N+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %19 EO 6K S-1 -50 12 85.71
20 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 3S S+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %22 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
24 EO 2T S+2 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %25 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 35.71
27 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 123,0 / 336 = 36,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 4P N-2 -200 14 100.00
3 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 92.86
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 5K S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 14 100.00
8 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 71.43
9 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
9 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %13 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43
14 EO 2CcE-3 500 1 7.14
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %16 EO 3P E-2 200 2 14.29
17 EO 3T N-1 -50 10 71.43
18 EO 3TcS-3 -800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %19 EO 6K S-2 -100 14 100.00
20 EO 3K N+1 130 12 85.71
21 EO 3C S+3 230 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %22 EO 3P S-3 -150 9 64.29
23 EO 6P W = -1430 13 92.86
24 EO 5TcS-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %25 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
26 EO 3S W-1 100 5 35.71
27 EO 2C N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 229,0 / 336 = 68,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 7.14
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 78.57
3 EO 1S S = 90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 % 4 EO 3P W+2 -200 6 42.86
5 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
6 EO 5TcN-5 -1100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
9 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 %10 EO 3P W+1 -170 10 71.43
11 EO 3C S = 140 7 50.00
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 71.43
14 EO 3S S = 400 6 42.86
15 EO 2C S+1 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %16 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 92.86
17 EO 4PcS+1 690 1 7.14
18 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %19 EO 4C N+1 450 4 28.57
20 EO 3S S = 600 5 35.71
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 64.29
23 EO 6P W-1 100 1 7.14
24 EO 2T S+2 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 92.86
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 35.71
27 EO 3C N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00
3 EO 2P E-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
9 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W = -620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 %10 EO 4K S = 130 2 14.29
11 EO 1K W+3 -130 14 100.00
12 EO 3S N-4 -400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %13 EO 3S W = -600 14 100.00
14 EO 3CcE-3 500 1 7.14
15 EO 3P S = 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 8 57.14
17 EO 4PcS+1 690 1 7.14
18 EO 3C E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %19 EO 5C S = 450 4 28.57
20 EO 2P N+2 170 10 71.43
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %22 EO 3KcE = -670 14 100.00
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 71.43
24 EO 2T S+2 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %25 EO 3S N = 400 4 28.57
26 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 4K S-2 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 159,0 / 336 = 47,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 MOSSERAY Bernadette -NELIS Claude
9 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 9 64.29
5 EO 4P S+1 650 2 14.29
6 EO 3S W = -600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
9 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 %10 EO 2P W+1 -140 7 50.00
11 EO 5C S-2 -100 12 85.71
12 EO 2S N-3 -300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 71.43
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 100.00
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 8 57.14
17 EO 4P S = 420 7 50.00
18 EO 3P N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 4 28.57
20 EO 3S N = 600 5 35.71
21 EO 3S S+1 630 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 2 14.29
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 6 42.86
24 EO 2T S+2 130 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %25 EO 2TcW-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 12 85.71
27 EO 3S S-4 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 179,0 / 336 = 53,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 59,79 % 1 EO 3S E-2 100 1 7.14
2 EO 3P N = 140 4 28.57
3 EO 2K W-2 200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
1 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,33 % 4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 92.86
5 EO 4P S = 620 5 35.71
6 EO 5KcS-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,42 % 7 EO 2C W-1 100 7 50.00
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 35.71
9 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
2 COLINET Eric -STEED Adrian : 53,17 %10 EO 3PcW+1 -930 13 92.86
11 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 1C N+1 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
7 LIBERT Laurent -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 61,64 %13 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43
14 EO 3S S = 400 6 42.86
15 EO 2P N = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,26 %16 EO 2P W = -110 13 92.86
17 EO 4PcS = 590 4 28.57
18 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 57,41 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 4 28.57
20 EO 3S S = 600 5 35.71
21 EO 3S S+3 690 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
4 VERBOIS Léon -DELHEZ Jacques : 35,98 %22 EO 4PcS-3 -500 12 85.71
23 EO 6P W = -1430 13 92.86
24 EO 2P E = -110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
9 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 154,0 / 336 = 45,83 %
|
|