|
Tournoi du 16-01-12
16jan2012
1 57,41 A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 53,15 A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 52,22 A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
4 50,74 A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine
5 50,00 A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques
~ 50,00 A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis
~ 50,00 A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 48,52 A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
9 46,85 A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
10 45,74 A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
11 45,37 A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,96 a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
2 59,07 a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 57,22 a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
4 54,81 a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 52,59 a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 52,41 a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand
7 49,81 a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
8 42,96 a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
9 40,37 a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
10 39,81 a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
11 37,96 a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 % 1 NS 3ScE-7 1700 18 100.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 % 4 NS 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 38.89
6 NS 5P S+1 480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 3K S+2 150 6 33.33
9 NS 2S S = 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %10 NS 2P S = 110 14 77.78
11 NS 2S N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 NS 5PcS-5 -1100 4 22.22
15 NS 2C N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %16 NS 4C S = 420 3 16.67
17 NS 3C W = -140 9 50.00
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %19 NS 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %22 NS 4K S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 5T N+1 620 0 0.00
24 NS 6T S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %25 NS 6S S = 990 18 100.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %28 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 2P S+1 140 14 77.78
30 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 % 4 NS 1S N+3 180 13 72.22
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 5K S = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %10 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 2P E-2 100 13 72.22
12 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 NS 6TcS-3 -500 10 55.56
15 NS 4C N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 15 83.33
17 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %19 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 33.33
20 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44
21 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %22 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89
23 NS 3S S+3 690 8 44.44
24 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %25 NS 6CcN-1 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %28 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %31 NS 4C E = -420 12 66.67
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 1ScE+1 -280 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 % 1 NS 4C N+2 480 9 50.00
2 NS 6P S-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 % 7 NS 2S S-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2S S+1 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00
12 NS 1K E+2 -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %13 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 14 77.78
15 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 8 44.44
17 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %19 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
21 NS 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %22 NS 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
23 NS 3S N+2 660 2 11.11
24 NS 4PcW-2 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %25 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %28 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 2P S+1 140 14 77.78
30 NS 6S E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %31 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 88.89
32 NS 3P E+2 -200 16 88.89
33 NS 3TcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 253,0 / 540 = 46,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 % 1 NS 4S S-4 -200 0 0.00
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 % 4 NS 1S N+3 180 13 72.22
5 NS 3S W+3 -490 7 38.89
6 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %10 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
11 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
12 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 NS 5KcN-4 -800 6 33.33
15 NS 4C N = 620 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 10 55.56
17 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 22.22
18 NS 3P N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
20 NS 4P W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %22 NS 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
23 NS 3S S+3 690 8 44.44
24 NS 5C N = 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %25 NS 5C N = 450 9 50.00
26 NS 3PcS = 730 18 100.00
27 NS 3K N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %28 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 2K E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 3K W = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 1 NS 4C S+1 450 4 22.22
2 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 4 NS 1S N+3 180 13 72.22
5 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00
6 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %13 NS 4P E = -620 1 5.56
14 NS 5CcE-1 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 15 83.33
17 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 5CcW = -650 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %19 NS 4P E-2 200 18 100.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %22 NS 3P S = 140 4 22.22
23 NS 3S S+3 690 8 44.44
24 NS 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 NS 4C E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 2S S+2 180 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %28 NS 2CcE = -470 0 0.00
29 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %31 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
32 NS 5P W = -650 5 27.78
33 NS 3TcS-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 % 1 NS 5C S+1 480 9 50.00
2 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11
6 NS 4C S+2 480 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
8 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %10 NS 3T E = -110 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %16 NS 4C N = 420 3 16.67
17 NS 3C E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
20 NS 2C W = -110 8 44.44
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %22 NS 4K S = 130 2 11.11
23 NS 3S N+3 690 8 44.44
24 NS 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %28 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
29 NS 2C S = 110 9 50.00
30 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %31 NS 5C E = -450 6 33.33
32 NS 4P E = -620 13 72.22
33 NS 4KcW-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 % 1 NS 6C S+1 1010 16 88.89
2 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 % 4 NS 1S N+3 180 13 72.22
5 NS 5C W = -450 18 100.00
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %10 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
11 NS 4C S-4 -200 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 NS 6KcS-7 -1700 1 5.56
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %19 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
20 NS 3P W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %22 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89
23 NS 6S S = 1440 18 100.00
24 NS 5T N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %25 NS 6T N = 920 15 83.33
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 3K N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %28 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 2S E+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 % 1 NS 6C S = 980 14 77.78
2 NS 3S N+1 630 15 83.33
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 % 4 NS 2CcE-1 200 18 100.00
5 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
6 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 % 7 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
8 NS 5K S = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %10 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 5.56
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %13 NS 3S W-2 200 16 88.89
14 NS 6KcN-7 -1700 1 5.56
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %16 NS 4C N = 420 3 16.67
17 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 NS 3S S+3 690 8 44.44
24 NS 5CcN = 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %25 NS 6C N-1 -50 3 16.67
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 27.78
27 NS 3S S = 400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %28 NS 3C W-2 100 4 22.22
29 NS 3T E-1 100 6 33.33
30 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %31 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
32 NS 4P W-1 100 18 100.00
33 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 % 1 NS 3K N+2 150 2 11.11
2 NS 3S S+2 660 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 11.11
5 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
6 NS 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 % 7 NS 2P N+1 140 17 94.44
8 NS 5K S = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 1S S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %10 NS 1P N+2 140 16 88.89
11 NS 2S S-2 -100 5 27.78
12 NS 3S E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
14 NS 5KcN-3 -500 10 55.56
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %16 NS 4C N = 420 3 16.67
17 NS 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 NS 5C W = -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %19 NS 3P E-1 100 11 61.11
20 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44
21 NS 2S N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %25 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
27 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 %28 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
29 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
30 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %31 NS 3C E+2 -200 14 77.78
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00
2 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
3 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 % 4 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 % 7 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 5K S = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %10 NS 1S W+5 -240 6 33.33
11 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11
12 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %13 NS 4P E-1 100 8 44.44
14 NS 5C E-3 150 18 100.00
15 NS 2C N+3 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 15 83.33
17 NS 2S E-1 50 15 83.33
18 NS 4C W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %19 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
20 NS 4P E-1 100 12 66.67
21 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard : 42,96 %22 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 NS 3S N+4 720 16 88.89
24 NS 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 %28 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %31 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 33.33
32 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 27.78
33 NS 2T S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,07 % 1 NS 4C S+2 480 9 50.00
2 NS 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 5S E = -460 15 83.33
6 NS 5P S+2 510 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 57,22 % 7 NS 3T S-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 4P N+1 450 18 100.00
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 54,81 %10 NS 3T E+2 -150 8 44.44
11 NS 3P W-2 100 13 72.22
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 52,59 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
14 NS 5TcS-3 -500 10 55.56
15 NS 4C N+1 650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie : 62,96 %16 NS 4C N+2 480 15 83.33
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 11.11
18 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga : 37,96 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 11 61.11
20 NS 4P W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 39,81 %22 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89
23 NS 4C S+3 710 14 77.78
24 NS 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,37 %25 NS 6T N = 920 15 83.33
26 NS 3C W = -140 5 27.78
27 NS 2P S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand : 52,41 %31 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
32 NS 4P W = -620 13 72.22
33 NS 4P S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 PIETQUIN Joseph -COLLET Edgard
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 % 1 EO 3ScE-7 1700 0 0.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 % 4 EO 1S N+3 180 5 27.78
5 EO 5C W = -450 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 5K S = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %10 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %13 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 4 22.22
15 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %16 EO 4C N = 420 15 83.33
17 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 EO 5C W = -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
20 EO 4P W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 EO 3S N+4 720 2 11.11
24 EO 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 EO 4C E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 2S S+2 180 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %31 EO 5C E = -450 12 66.67
32 EO 4P E = -620 5 27.78
33 EO 4KcW-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 % 1 EO 6C S+1 1010 2 11.11
2 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 % 4 EO 1S N+3 180 5 27.78
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 5K S = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
12 EO 1K E+2 -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
14 EO 5KcN-3 -500 8 44.44
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 8 44.44
17 EO 2S E+1 -150 14 77.78
18 EO 3P N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %19 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
20 EO 4P E-1 100 6 33.33
21 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %22 EO 3P S = 140 14 77.78
23 EO 3S S+3 690 10 55.56
24 EO 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %25 EO 6T N = 920 3 16.67
26 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
27 EO 2P S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %28 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
29 EO 2C S = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 1S E+2 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 218,0 / 540 = 40,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 % 4 EO 2CcE-1 200 0 0.00
5 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
6 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 % 7 EO 2S S-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %10 EO 1P N+2 140 2 11.11
11 EO 2S S-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 EO 5KcN-4 -800 12 66.67
15 EO 4C N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 16.67
17 EO 2S E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %19 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %22 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11
23 EO 4C S+3 710 4 22.22
24 EO 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %28 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 2P S+1 140 4 22.22
30 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 215,0 / 540 = 39,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 POULAERT Gilbert -ROEGIERS Marga
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 % 1 EO 6C S = 980 4 22.22
2 EO 3S N+1 630 3 16.67
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
8 EO 5K S = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 1S S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %10 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
11 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
12 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 EO 5C E-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 2C N+3 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 16.67
17 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 5CcW = -650 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 7 38.89
20 EO 4P W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %22 EO 4K S = 130 16 88.89
23 EO 3S N+3 690 10 55.56
24 EO 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %25 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %28 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 2S E+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %31 EO 4C E = -420 6 33.33
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 1ScE+1 -280 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 205,0 / 540 = 37,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 VAN DAMME JEAN -TIELEMANS Jean-Marie
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 % 1 EO 4C N+2 480 9 50.00
2 EO 6P S-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 88.89
5 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
6 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %10 EO 1S W+5 -240 12 66.67
11 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89
12 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %13 EO 4P E = -620 17 94.44
14 EO 5CcE-1 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 16.67
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 16 88.89
18 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
20 EO 2C W = -110 10 55.56
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %22 EO 4K S-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 5T N+1 620 18 100.00
24 EO 6T S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %25 EO 6T N = 920 3 16.67
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 3K N-1 -50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %28 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %31 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
32 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
33 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 % 1 EO 3K N+2 150 16 88.89
2 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 % 4 EO 1S N+3 180 5 27.78
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 61.11
6 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 % 7 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 5K S = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
14 EO 5TcS-3 -500 8 44.44
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %16 EO 4C N = 420 15 83.33
17 EO 3C E-1 50 3 16.67
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %19 EO 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %22 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11
23 EO 6S S = 1440 0 0.00
24 EO 5T N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %25 EO 6CcN-1 -100 18 100.00
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %28 EO 3C W-2 100 14 77.78
29 EO 3T E-1 100 12 66.67
30 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %31 EO 3C E+1 -170 2 11.11
32 EO 3P E+2 -200 2 11.11
33 EO 3TcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 % 1 EO 4S S-4 -200 18 100.00
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 % 7 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %10 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 55.56
11 EO 3P W-2 100 5 27.78
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %16 EO 4C S = 420 15 83.33
17 EO 3C W = -140 9 50.00
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %19 EO 3P E+1 -170 18 100.00
20 EO 3P W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %22 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11
23 EO 3S S+3 690 10 55.56
24 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %25 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %28 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 2P S+1 140 4 22.22
30 EO 6S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %31 EO 3C E+2 -200 4 22.22
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 296,0 / 540 = 54,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00
2 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 % 4 EO 1S N+3 180 5 27.78
5 EO 6S W = -990 18 100.00
6 EO 4P S+1 450 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 % 7 EO 3T S-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 %10 EO 3T E = -110 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 13 72.22
12 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 EO 5PcS-5 -1100 14 77.78
15 EO 2C N+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %19 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 66.67
20 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56
21 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %22 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
23 EO 3S S+3 690 10 55.56
24 EO 5CcN = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %25 EO 6C N-1 -50 15 83.33
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 72.22
27 EO 5KcN-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %28 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
29 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
30 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 3K W = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 309,0 / 540 = 57,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 % 1 EO 4C S+1 450 14 77.78
2 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 5S E = -460 3 16.67
6 EO 5P S+2 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 % 7 EO 2P N+1 140 1 5.56
8 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 %10 EO 2P S = 110 4 22.22
11 EO 2S N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 EO 6KcS-7 -1700 17 94.44
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %16 EO 4C N+2 480 3 16.67
17 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00
18 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %22 EO 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
23 EO 3S N+2 660 16 88.89
24 EO 4PcW-2 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %25 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
26 EO 3C W = -140 13 72.22
27 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %28 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 2K E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %31 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
32 EO 4P W+1 -650 13 72.22
33 EO 2T S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 de TERWANGNE Philippe -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 % 1 EO 4C S+2 480 9 50.00
2 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 % 4 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89
6 EO 4C S+2 480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 3K S+2 150 12 66.67
9 EO 2S S = 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 %10 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 94.44
11 EO 4C S-4 -200 18 100.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %13 EO 4P E-1 100 10 55.56
14 EO 6TcS-3 -500 8 44.44
15 EO 4C N = 620 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %16 EO 4C N = 420 15 83.33
17 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %19 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
21 EO 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %25 EO 5C N = 450 9 50.00
26 EO 3PcS = 730 0 0.00
27 EO 3K N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 48,52 %28 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %31 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 66.67
32 EO 5P W = -650 13 72.22
33 EO 3TcS-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 DELTOUR Emile -BRIOT Fernand
A.6 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 57,41 % 1 EO 5C S+1 480 9 50.00
2 EO 4P S = 620 9 50.00
3 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 MOSSERAY Bernadette -ROSOUX Louis : 50,00 % 4 EO 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
5 EO 3S W+3 -490 11 61.11
6 EO 5P S+1 480 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.7 LIBERT Laurent -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 50,00 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 45,37 %10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 2P E-2 100 5 27.78
12 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 CASSART Guy -KINET Martine : 50,74 %13 EO 3S W-2 200 2 11.11
14 EO 6KcN-7 -1700 17 94.44
15 EO 4C N+1 650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 LAENENS René -BIOURGE Gabrielle : 46,85 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 10 55.56
17 EO 3C E = -140 9 50.00
18 EO 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.9 DEWART Léon -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,15 %19 EO 3P E-1 100 7 38.89
20 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56
21 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,00 %22 EO 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
23 EO 3S S+3 690 10 55.56
24 EO 5C N = 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.5 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 45,74 %28 EO 2CcE = -470 18 100.00
29 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 52,22 %31 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
32 EO 4P W = -620 5 27.78
33 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
|
|