|
Tournoi du 18-02-13
1 65,19 4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel
2 62,59 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 60,37 11 -
4 51,85 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 50,00 10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
6 49,44 2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
7 46,11 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
8 45,00 8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian
9 44,63 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
10 39,07 9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
11 35,74 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,48 13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy
2 57,78 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
3 56,48 17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 53,89 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
5 53,70 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
6 52,78 19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
7 51,30 18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
8 46,11 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 45,56 22 -
10 43,52 15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
11 27,41 21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
2 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
3 NS 4T N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
22 - : 45,56 % 4 NS 90 8 44.44
5 NS -130 10 55.56
6 NS -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 2S S = 120 15 83.33
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %10 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 14 77.78
12 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %13 NS 5CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
14 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11
15 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 12 66.67
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %19 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
20 NS 6P E = -1430 3 16.67
21 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %22 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
23 NS 2CcE = -670 2 11.11
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %25 NS 1P E+1 -110 12 66.67
26 NS 2C N = 110 16 88.89
27 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78
29 NS 3CcW+1 -930 0 0.00
30 NS 2S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 % 4 NS 1P S+2 140 14 77.78
5 NS 2S S-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
8 NS 2S S = 120 15 83.33
9 NS Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
22 - : 45,56 %10 NS -120 2 11.11
11 NS -130 12 66.67
12 NS 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 3K S = 110 18 100.00
15 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 18 100.00
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
20 NS 6P E = -1430 3 16.67
21 NS 3S N+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
23 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
24 NS 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %25 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 1 5.56
27 NS 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %28 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
29 NS 2C E = -110 4 22.22
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %31 NS 4C N = 620 7 38.89
32 NS 4P E = -620 5 27.78
33 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 % 1 NS 5P E = -450 7 38.89
2 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
3 NS 3P W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 % 7 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %10 NS 2S E = -120 2 11.11
11 NS 3T W+2 -150 7 38.89
12 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
15 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 - : 45,56 %16 NS 420 8 44.44
17 NS -400 9 50.00
18 NS -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %19 NS 4P E-1 100 17 94.44
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 44.44
21 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00
26 NS 3T E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3C S-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %28 NS 5C N-2 -200 4 22.22
29 NS 2C E-1 100 10 55.56
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
33 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 241,0 / 540 = 44,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 % 1 NS 4P E = -420 16 88.89
2 NS 4K E-1 50 12 66.67
3 NS 4TcN-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 55.56
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 1S N-3 -150 7 38.89
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %13 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
14 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
15 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
17 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
18 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %19 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22
21 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
22 - : 45,56 %22 NS 400 16 88.89
23 NS 630 17 94.44
24 NS 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %25 NS 2P E = -110 12 66.67
26 NS 2S W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %28 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
29 NS 3K S = 110 13 72.22
30 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
33 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 352,0 / 540 = 65,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
2 NS 3K E = -110 5 27.78
3 NS 3T N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 % 4 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 % 7 NS 4TcE-2 500 12 66.67
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 2P E+3 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %13 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
14 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89
15 NS 5K N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 12 66.67
17 NS 2S E+3 -210 14 77.78
18 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %19 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
20 NS 6P E-1 100 18 100.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %22 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %25 NS 1P E+1 -110 12 66.67
26 NS 3K E-2 200 18 100.00
27 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
22 - : 45,56 %28 NS 620 18 100.00
29 NS 300 17 94.44
30 NS 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
33 NS 3P E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine
22 - : 45,56 % 1 NS -450 7 38.89
2 NS -110 5 27.78
3 NS 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 % 4 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78
6 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 % 7 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
8 NS 2S S-1 -50 7 38.89
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %10 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 11.11
11 NS 1S E+3 -180 2 11.11
12 NS 5C W = -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %16 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %19 NS 4P W-1 100 17 94.44
20 NS 6P E+1 -1460 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %22 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89
23 NS 2CcE+1 -870 0 0.00
24 NS 3K S+1 130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %25 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
26 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %28 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
29 NS 5T N-4 -400 2 11.11
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %31 NS 4C N = 620 7 38.89
32 NS 4PcW = -790 0 0.00
33 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 193,0 / 540 = 35,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
2 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 3P E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 % 4 NS 1P S+2 140 14 77.78
5 NS 2K W+1 -110 16 88.89
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
22 - : 45,56 % 7 NS -100 6 33.33
8 NS 150 18 100.00
9 NS -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %10 NS 2K E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2C S = 110 18 100.00
12 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
15 NS 3S N+1 630 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %19 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 44.44
21 NS 3S N+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %22 NS 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %25 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
26 NS 2C N-1 -100 6 33.33
27 NS 4PcE-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %28 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 22.22
29 NS 3T N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %31 NS 4C N = 620 7 38.89
32 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
33 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 1 NS 5P E = -450 7 38.89
2 NS 4KcE-1 100 15 83.33
3 NS 3T N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 % 4 NS 3P S = 140 14 77.78
5 NS 3K W+1 -130 10 55.56
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 16 88.89
8 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %10 NS 2S E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2T W+3 -150 7 38.89
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
22 - : 45,56 %13 NS -200 2 11.11
14 NS -140 5 27.78
15 NS -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %16 NS 2C S+3 200 2 11.11
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 16 88.89
18 NS -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %22 NS 3P N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 27.78
24 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %25 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
26 NS 1S W = -90 8 44.44
27 NS 2T S+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %28 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
29 NS 3K S = 110 13 72.22
30 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %31 NS 4C N = 620 7 38.89
32 NS 3S E = -600 10 55.56
33 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
2 NS 4T N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4T N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 % 4 NS 3TcE+1 -870 0 0.00
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 7 NS 3ScS = 750 18 100.00
8 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %10 NS 3K E-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2C S-3 -150 7 38.89
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
22 - : 45,56 %19 NS -650 2 11.11
20 NS -650 13 72.22
21 NS 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %25 NS 1P E+2 -140 4 22.22
26 NS 2S E = -120 1 5.56
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 %28 NS 5C N-2 -200 4 22.22
29 NS 4T N-1 -100 7 38.89
30 NS 2S S+1 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %31 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
33 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 % 1 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89
2 NS 5K E-2 100 15 83.33
3 NS 4T N-2 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 % 4 NS 1P S+2 140 14 77.78
5 NS 3T S-3 -300 2 11.11
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 33.33
8 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2P E+2 -170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %10 NS 2K E = -90 6 33.33
11 NS 3CcS-4 -800 0 0.00
12 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
14 NS Pass Passe 11 61.11
15 NS 3S N+2 660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %16 NS 3S N = 400 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
18 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %19 NS 4P W+1 -650 2 11.11
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 8 44.44
21 NS 3S N+2 660 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,11 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 3S N = 600 14 77.78
24 NS 400 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 %28 NS 3C N+3 230 16 88.89
29 NS 3P W-3 300 17 94.44
30 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33
32 NS 4P W = -620 5 27.78
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques : 27,41 % 1 NS . 18 100.00
2 NS . 10 55.56
3 NS . 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,70 % 4 NS . 6 33.33
5 NS . 18 100.00
6 NS . 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 52,78 % 7 NS . 10 55.56
8 NS . 10 55.56
9 NS . 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René : 51,30 %10 NS . 8 44.44
11 NS . 16 88.89
12 NS . 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 56,48 %13 NS . 10 55.56
14 NS . 14 77.78
15 NS . 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain : 57,78 %16 NS . 0 0.00
17 NS . 18 100.00
18 NS . 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %19 NS . 14 77.78
20 NS . 16 88.89
21 NS . 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 53,89 %22 NS . 8 44.44
23 NS . 12 66.67
24 NS . 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy : 61,48 %25 NS . 16 88.89
26 NS . 10 55.56
27 NS . 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
22 - : 45,56 %31 NS . 2 11.11
32 NS . 12 66.67
33 NS . 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 326,0 / 540 = 60,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CLERIN François-Xavier -de WASSEIGE Ariane
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
2 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
3 EO 4T N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 4 EO 1P S+2 140 4 22.22
5 EO 2K W+1 -110 2 11.11
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
8 EO 2S S = 120 3 16.67
9 EO Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %10 EO 2S E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2T W+3 -150 11 61.11
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
15 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %19 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N = 600 4 22.22
24 EO 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %25 EO 1P E+1 -110 6 33.33
26 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
27 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %31 EO 4C N = 620 11 61.11
32 EO 4PcW = -790 18 100.00
33 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 KINET Renée -CASSART Guy
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
2 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 3P E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 % 4 EO 1P S+2 140 4 22.22
5 EO 2S S-4 -400 18 100.00
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 2 11.11
8 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %10 EO 2S E = -120 16 88.89
11 EO 3T W+2 -150 11 61.11
12 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
17 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
18 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 55.56
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %22 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 - : 60,37 %25 EO . 2 11.11
26 EO . 8 44.44
27 EO . 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %28 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
29 EO 5T N-4 -400 16 88.89
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 % 4 EO 3P S = 140 4 22.22
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 44.44
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 % 7 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00
8 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %10 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2C S-3 -150 11 61.11
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %13 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
15 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %16 EO 3S N = 400 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
18 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %19 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
20 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
11 - : 60,37 %22 EO . 10 55.56
23 EO . 6 33.33
24 EO . 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %25 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
26 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22
29 EO 3CcW+1 -930 18 100.00
30 EO 2S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %31 EO 4C N = 620 11 61.11
32 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
33 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 ARICKX Roger -PARMENTIER Richard
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 % 1 EO 5P E = -450 11 61.11
2 EO 4KcE-1 100 3 16.67
3 EO 3T N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 % 7 EO 3ScS = 750 0 0.00
8 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 1S N-3 -150 11 61.11
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89
15 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 6 33.33
17 EO 2S E+3 -210 4 22.22
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 - : 60,37 %19 EO . 4 22.22
20 EO . 2 11.11
21 EO . 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %22 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
23 EO 2CcE+1 -870 18 100.00
24 EO 3K S+1 130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %25 EO 1P E+1 -110 6 33.33
26 EO 2C N = 110 2 11.11
27 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %28 EO 4C N-2 -200 14 77.78
29 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %31 EO 4C N = 620 11 61.11
32 EO 4P E = -620 13 72.22
33 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PETERS Annik -DEVIGNE Alain
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 % 1 EO 5P E = -450 11 61.11
2 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
3 EO 3P W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 % 4 EO 3TcE+1 -870 18 100.00
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %10 EO 2K E = -90 12 66.67
11 EO 3CcS-4 -800 18 100.00
12 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11
15 EO 5K N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 - : 60,37 %16 EO . 18 100.00
17 EO . 0 0.00
18 EO . 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %19 EO 4P W-1 100 1 5.56
20 EO 6P E+1 -1460 18 100.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %22 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11
23 EO 2CcE = -670 16 88.89
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %25 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
26 EO 2C N-1 -100 12 66.67
27 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %28 EO 4P W = -420 18 100.00
29 EO 2C E = -110 14 77.78
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %31 EO 4C N = 620 11 61.11
32 EO 3S E = -600 8 44.44
33 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
2 EO 4T N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 4T N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 44.44
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 - : 60,37 %13 EO . 8 44.44
14 EO . 4 22.22
15 EO . 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %16 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %19 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
20 EO 6P E = -1430 15 83.33
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %22 EO 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %25 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 17 94.44
27 EO 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %28 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
29 EO 3K S = 110 5 27.78
30 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
33 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LAENENS René
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 % 1 EO 4P E = -420 2 11.11
2 EO 4K E-1 50 6 33.33
3 EO 4TcN-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 % 4 EO 1P S+2 140 4 22.22
5 EO 3T S-3 -300 16 88.89
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 % 7 EO 4TcE-2 500 6 33.33
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 2P E+3 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 - : 60,37 %10 EO . 10 55.56
11 EO . 2 11.11
12 EO . 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 6 33.33
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %19 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 55.56
21 EO 3S N+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
23 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
24 EO 3S S = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %25 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
26 EO 1S W = -90 10 55.56
27 EO 2T S+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %28 EO 5C N-2 -200 14 77.78
29 EO 2C E-1 100 8 44.44
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %31 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
33 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
2 EO 5K E-2 100 3 16.67
3 EO 4T N-2 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 % 4 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 - : 60,37 % 7 EO . 8 44.44
8 EO . 8 44.44
9 EO . 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 88.89
11 EO 1S E+3 -180 16 88.89
12 EO 5C W = -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %13 EO 5CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
14 EO Pass Passe 7 38.89
15 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 88.89
20 EO 6P E = -1430 15 83.33
21 EO 3S N+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %22 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 72.22
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3T E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %28 EO 5C N-2 -200 14 77.78
29 EO 4T N-1 -100 11 61.11
30 EO 2S S+1 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
33 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 % 1 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11
2 EO 3K E = -110 13 72.22
3 EO 3T N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 - : 60,37 % 4 EO . 12 66.67
5 EO . 0 0.00
6 EO . 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 % 7 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
8 EO 2S S-1 -50 11 61.11
9 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 %10 EO 3K E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 4 22.22
12 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
14 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
15 EO 3S N+1 630 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 9 50.00
24 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %25 EO 1P E+2 -140 14 77.78
26 EO 2S E = -120 17 94.44
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %28 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
29 EO 3K S = 110 5 27.78
30 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 4P W = -620 13 72.22
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 COOLEN Joseph -DELHEZ Jacques
11 - : 60,37 % 1 EO . 0 0.00
2 EO . 8 44.44
3 EO . 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 % 4 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22
6 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 66.67
8 EO 2S S = 120 3 16.67
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 %10 EO 2K E-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2C S = 110 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %13 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
14 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N+2 660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %16 EO 2C S+3 200 16 88.89
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 11.11
18 EO -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %19 EO 4P E-1 100 1 5.56
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 55.56
21 EO 3S N+2 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %25 EO 2P E = -110 6 33.33
26 EO 2S W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
10 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,00 %28 EO 3C N+3 230 2 11.11
29 EO 3P W-3 300 1 5.56
30 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67
32 EO 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
33 EO 3P E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 148,0 / 540 = 27,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 -
6 MACAUX Lucienne -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 % 1 EO -450 11 61.11
2 EO -110 13 72.22
3 EO 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 46,11 % 4 EO 90 10 55.56
5 EO -130 8 44.44
6 EO -660 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 51,85 % 7 EO -100 12 66.67
8 EO 150 0 0.00
9 EO -170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 VAGMAN David -CHANTRAINE René : 49,44 %10 EO -120 16 88.89
11 EO -130 6 33.33
12 EO 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 DEMARTY Chantal -STEED Adrian : 45,00 %13 EO -200 16 88.89
14 EO -140 13 72.22
15 EO -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,63 %16 EO 420 10 55.56
17 EO -400 9 50.00
18 EO -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 VERBOIS Léon -PAQUET Anne : 39,07 %19 EO -650 16 88.89
20 EO -650 5 27.78
21 EO 660 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 BRIOT Fernand -MASSAUX Joel : 65,19 %22 EO 400 2 11.11
23 EO 630 1 5.56
24 EO 400 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
5 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,59 %28 EO 620 0 0.00
29 EO 300 1 5.56
30 EO 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 - : 60,37 %31 EO . 16 88.89
32 EO . 6 33.33
33 EO . 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
|
|