|
Tournoi du 18-03-10
1 58,33 7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 54,17 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
3 53,70 6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
4 52,31 4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
5 50,46 2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
6 50,00 5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine
7 45,60 8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette
8 42,82 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine
9 42,59 9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,56 15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
~ 55,56 16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
3 55,09 18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
4 51,85 14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
5 51,62 17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
6 48,15 10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis
7 45,83 12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert
8 44,44 11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine
9 41,90 13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe
PAIRE Nr : 1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 25.00
2 NS 3K E-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2C N-4 -200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 2C S = 110 15 93.75
6 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 % 7 NS 5C E+1 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 2C S+1 140 10 62.50
9 NS 4PcN-3 -500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %10 NS 3TcS-2 -500 0 0.00
11 NS 2K N-2 -100 1 6.25
12 NS 4PcN+1 990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %13 NS 6CcW-2 500 14 87.50
14 NS 5C N+2 510 14 87.50
15 NS 5KcW-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %16 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 37.50
17 NS 3S S = 400 4 25.00
18 NS 4P W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %19 NS 6PcS-6 -1400 0 0.00
20 NS 3P W-2 200 16 100.00
21 NS 2P E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %22 NS 4C S-3 -150 2 12.50
23 NS 2C S-2 -200 2 12.50
24 NS 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %25 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 4P N+1 650 13 81.25
27 NS 4C E = -420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
Total : 185,0 / 432 = 42,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 % 1 NS 3P W+1 -140 8 50.00
2 NS 2C S = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 4TcN-5 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
5 NS 3K E-1 50 8 50.00
6 NS 5PcS-2 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 2C N+1 140 10 62.50
9 NS 3PcN = 530 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %10 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 37.50
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 1 6.25
12 NS 4PcN+1 990 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %13 NS 5TcS-2 -500 3 18.75
14 NS 5PcW-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 5KcW-1 100 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %16 NS 3C N-3 -150 4 25.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
18 NS 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %19 NS 3T W+1 -130 6 37.50
20 NS 3K S = 110 14 87.50
21 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %22 NS 3C S+1 170 10 62.50
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 7 43.75
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %25 NS 2C S+3 200 14 87.50
26 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 4C W = -420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 218,0 / 432 = 50,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 % 1 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
5 NS 4K E-1 50 8 50.00
6 NS 4PcS+1 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 93.75
8 NS 2C S+1 140 10 62.50
9 NS 2S E-2 200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %10 NS 2C E-2 200 16 100.00
11 NS 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
12 NS 5CcN = 850 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %13 NS 3TcN = 670 16 100.00
14 NS 5PcW-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 5K W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %16 NS 2K E-1 100 14 87.50
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 1 6.25
18 NS 3S W = -400 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %19 NS 3T W = -110 8 50.00
20 NS 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 2C S+1 140 13 81.25
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %25 NS 1S S = 90 4 25.00
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 6.25
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
Total : 234,0 / 432 = 54,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 % 1 NS 4C E-2 100 14 87.50
2 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
3 NS 2S W = -120 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 % 4 NS 2C N+3 200 6 37.50
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 12.50
6 NS 6CcW-1 200 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 93.75
8 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00
9 NS 3PcN-2 -300 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %10 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 37.50
11 NS 1S N+2 150 13 81.25
12 NS 6C W-3 150 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %13 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 37.50
14 NS 4C N+1 450 12 75.00
15 NS 5TcS = 750 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %16 NS 2K E = -90 10 62.50
17 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
18 NS 4C W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %19 NS 4P S-3 -150 3 18.75
20 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
21 NS 2P E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %22 NS 4C S = 420 12 75.00
23 NS 3CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %25 NS 2K S+3 150 10 62.50
26 NS 4P N+1 650 13 81.25
27 NS 4C E = -420 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
Total : 226,0 / 432 = 52,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 % 1 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 37.50
2 NS 2C S = 110 13 81.25
3 NS 2S W+2 -180 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
5 NS 2C S = 110 15 93.75
6 NS 5PcS-1 -100 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 4KcE-1 100 2 12.50
9 NS 3PcN-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %10 NS 2C E = -110 2 12.50
11 NS 3T E-4 200 16 100.00
12 NS 6CcW-3 500 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %13 NS 3S W-2 200 11 68.75
14 NS 6C N = 980 16 100.00
15 NS 5TcS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %16 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 75.00
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 1 6.25
18 NS 4P E-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %19 NS 2P S = 110 16 100.00
20 NS 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 2P E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %22 NS 5C S-1 -50 5 31.25
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 7 43.75
24 NS 3S W = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %25 NS 2C N = 110 6 37.50
26 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 5C W = -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
Total : 216,0 / 432 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 10 62.50
2 NS 2P W-3 150 16 100.00
3 NS 3T S-2 -100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 16 100.00
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
6 NS 4PcN+1 690 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 3P S = 140 10 62.50
9 NS 4PcN-2 -300 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %10 NS 2T S = 90 11 68.75
11 NS 1S N = 90 4 25.00
12 NS 6PcN-1 -200 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %13 NS 4C E-1 100 8 50.00
14 NS 5PcE-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 6T S-1 -100 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %16 NS 2CcS-1 -100 8 50.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
18 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %19 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 62.50
20 NS 2P W-1 100 10 62.50
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %22 NS 2PcW-3 800 16 100.00
23 NS 2S E = -120 4 25.00
24 NS 2K W+2 -130 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %25 NS 2C N+3 200 14 87.50
26 NS 4P S+1 650 13 81.25
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 232,0 / 432 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 % 1 NS 3S W-3 150 16 100.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 8 50.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 % 4 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 3T W-1 50 8 50.00
6 NS 5PcS = 650 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 3C S = 140 10 62.50
9 NS 3P N = 530 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %10 NS 2T N = 90 11 68.75
11 NS 1S N+2 150 13 81.25
12 NS 7CcW-4 800 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %13 NS 4CcW = -790 0 0.00
14 NS 5PcW-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 5T S = 600 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %16 NS 2P W+2 -170 1 6.25
17 NS 4P N+2 480 14 87.50
18 NS 5C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %19 NS 4P S-3 -150 3 18.75
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 6.25
21 NS 4P E-1 50 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 %22 NS 3S N+4 520 14 87.50
23 NS 2CcS = 670 16 100.00
24 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %25 NS 2C S+3 200 14 87.50
26 NS 4P N = 620 6 37.50
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
Total : 252,0 / 432 = 58,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 % 1 NS 2K W-1 50 12 75.00
2 NS 2P E = -110 3 18.75
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 12.50
5 NS 1S W = -90 4 25.00
6 NS 5PcS-2 -300 3 18.75 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 % 7 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 43.75
8 NS 2C N+1 140 10 62.50
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %10 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 37.50
11 NS 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
12 NS 6PcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %13 NS 3PcW-1 200 11 68.75
14 NS 5PcW-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 5K W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %16 NS 4T W-2 200 16 100.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 9 56.25
18 NS 3K E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %19 NS 1C N = 80 14 87.50
20 NS 2P W = -110 5 31.25
21 NS 4PcE-2 300 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,92 %
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 %22 NS 4C S-4 -200 0 0.00
23 NS 2C S+1 140 13 81.25
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 %25 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 12.50
26 NS 4P N+1 650 13 81.25
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 197,0 / 432 = 45,60 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude
17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard : 51,62 % 1 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 12.50
2 NS 3K E = -110 3 18.75
3 NS 2S W+2 -180 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme : 55,56 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 11 68.75
5 NS 1S W-2 100 12 75.00
6 NS 5C W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy : 55,56 % 7 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
8 NS 2P S+1 140 10 62.50
9 NS 3PcN-3 -500 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul : 51,85 %10 NS 2C E-1 100 14 87.50
11 NS 2S N = 120 8 50.00
12 NS 5PcN = 850 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe : 41,90 %13 NS 5TcS-2 -500 3 18.75
14 NS 5PcW-2 300 5 31.25
15 NS 5K W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert : 45,83 %16 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 6.25
17 NS 3S S+3 490 16 100.00
18 NS 4C W-2 100 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine : 44,44 %19 NS 2C N-1 -50 12 75.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 6.25
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis : 48,15 %22 NS 4T N = 130 8 50.00
23 NS 2C S = 110 10 62.50
24 NS 3S E = -400 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,09 %25 NS 3K S+1 130 8 50.00
26 NS 5P N-1 -100 1 6.25
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 184,0 / 432 = 42,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 HALLEUX Jean François -FRAITURE Louis
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 75.00
2 EO 3K E-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2C N-4 -200 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 100.00
6 EO 4PcN+1 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 2C N+1 140 6 37.50
9 EO 3PcN = 530 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %10 EO 2T N = 90 5 31.25
11 EO 1S N+2 150 3 18.75
12 EO 7CcW-4 800 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %13 EO 3TcN = 670 0 0.00
14 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 5K W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %16 EO 4T W-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
18 EO 3K E = -110 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %19 EO 4P S-3 -150 13 81.25
20 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
21 EO 2P E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %22 EO 4T N = 130 8 50.00
23 EO 2C S = 110 6 37.50
24 EO 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %25 EO 2C N = 110 10 62.50
26 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 5C W = -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
Total : 208,0 / 432 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 SOENENS Anita -VANAVERMATE Martine
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 6 37.50
2 EO 2P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 3T S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
5 EO 3K E-1 50 8 50.00
6 EO 5PcS-2 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 3C S = 140 6 37.50
9 EO 3P N = 530 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %10 EO 2C E-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
12 EO 5CcN = 850 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %13 EO 3PcW-1 200 5 31.25
14 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 5K W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %16 EO 2K E = -90 6 37.50
17 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
18 EO 4C W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 39,58 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %19 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 25.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 93.75
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %22 EO 5C S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 9 56.25
24 EO 3S W = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %25 EO 3S N-4 -200 16 100.00
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 18.75
27 EO 4C E = -420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
Total : 192,0 / 432 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 WARNIER François -GEUDVERT Albert
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 % 1 EO 3P W+1 -140 8 50.00
2 EO 2C S = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 4TcN-5 -1100 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 % 4 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 3T W-1 50 8 50.00
6 EO 5PcS = 650 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 1 6.25
8 EO 2C S+1 140 6 37.50
9 EO 2S E-2 200 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %10 EO 2T N-1 -100 10 62.50
11 EO 1S N+1 120 8 50.00
12 EO 6PcN-2 -500 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %13 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 62.50
14 EO 4C N+1 450 4 25.00
15 EO 5TcS = 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %16 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 93.75
17 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
18 EO 4C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %19 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
20 EO 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 2P E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %22 EO 4C S-3 -150 14 87.50
23 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 87.50
24 EO 3S E = -400 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %25 EO 2C N+3 200 2 12.50
26 EO 4P S+1 650 3 18.75
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 198,0 / 432 = 45,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ROUSSEAU Willy -JOBE Philippe
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 % 1 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
5 EO 4K E-1 50 8 50.00
6 EO 4PcS+1 690 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 2C N+1 140 6 37.50
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %10 EO 2T N-1 -100 10 62.50
11 EO 1S N+2 150 3 18.75
12 EO 6C W-3 150 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %13 EO 5TcS-2 -500 13 81.25
14 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 5K W-1 50 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %16 EO 3C N-1 -50 4 25.00
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 93.75
18 EO 4P E-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 52,08 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %19 EO 6PcS-6 -1400 16 100.00
20 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 2P E = -110 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %22 EO 2PcW-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 2S E = -120 12 75.00
24 EO 2K W+2 -130 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %25 EO 2C S+3 200 2 12.50
26 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 4C W = -420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 181,0 / 432 = 41,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BABIKOW Georges -DE WULF Jean-Paul
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 % 1 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 100.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 8 50.00
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 1S W = -90 12 75.00
6 EO 5PcS-2 -300 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 81,25 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 1 6.25
8 EO 4T W = -130 16 100.00
9 EO 3PcN-2 -300 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %10 EO 2C E-1 100 2 12.50
11 EO 2S N = 120 8 50.00
12 EO 5PcN = 850 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %13 EO 3S W-2 200 5 31.25
14 EO 6C N = 980 0 0.00
15 EO 5TcS-1 -200 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,75 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %16 EO 2P W+1 -140 10 62.50
17 EO 3S S = 400 12 75.00
18 EO 4P W-1 50 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %19 EO 2C N-2 -100 6 37.50
20 EO 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %22 EO 3C S+1 170 6 37.50
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 56.25
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %25 EO 2C S+3 200 2 12.50
26 EO 4P N = 620 10 62.50
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 47,92 %
Total : 224,0 / 432 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CORCEOVEI Horia -CASSART Guy
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 % 1 EO 2K W-1 50 4 25.00
2 EO 2P E = -110 13 81.25
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 % 4 EO 2C N+3 200 10 62.50
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 87.50
6 EO 6CcW-1 200 6 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 % 7 EO 6C E = -1430 16 100.00
8 EO 2P S+1 140 6 37.50
9 EO 3PcN-3 -500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 %10 EO 2C E = -110 14 87.50
11 EO 3T E-4 200 0 0.00
12 EO 6CcW-3 500 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %13 EO 6CcW-2 500 2 12.50
14 EO 5C N+2 510 2 12.50
15 EO 5KcW-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 18,75 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %16 EO 2CcS-1 -100 8 50.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
18 EO 4C W = -420 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %19 EO 3T W+1 -130 10 62.50
20 EO 3K S = 110 2 12.50
21 EO 3S W = -400 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %22 EO 3S N+4 520 2 12.50
23 EO 2CcS = 670 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %25 EO 1S S = 90 12 75.00
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 93.75
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
Total : 240,0 / 432 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 HUBLET Carlo -DELCARTE Jérôme
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 % 1 EO 4C E-2 100 2 12.50
2 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 100.00
3 EO 2S W = -120 4 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
5 EO 1S W-2 100 4 25.00
6 EO 5C W-1 100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,42 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 4KcE-1 100 14 87.50
9 EO 3PcN-1 -100 8 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 %10 EO 3TcS-2 -500 16 100.00
11 EO 2K N-2 -100 15 93.75
12 EO 4PcN+1 990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %13 EO 4C E-1 100 8 50.00
14 EO 5PcE-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 6T S-1 -100 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 68,75 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %16 EO 3C N-3 -150 12 75.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 7 43.75
18 EO 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %19 EO 4P S-3 -150 13 81.25
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 93.75
21 EO 4P E-1 50 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 68.75
23 EO 2C S+1 140 3 18.75
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 31,25 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %25 EO 2C S-1 -50 14 87.50
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 18.75
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 240,0 / 432 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CAMUS Colette -COLLET Edgard
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 % 1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 87.50
2 EO 3K E = -110 13 81.25
3 EO 2S W+2 -180 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 5 31.25
5 EO 2C S = 110 1 6.25
6 EO 5PcS-1 -100 10 62.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 % 7 EO 5C E+1 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 2C S+1 140 6 37.50
9 EO 4PcN-3 -500 15 93.75 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 %10 EO 2T S = 90 5 31.25
11 EO 1S N = 90 12 75.00
12 EO 6PcN-1 -200 14 87.50 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %13 EO 5TcS-2 -500 13 81.25
14 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 5KcW-1 100 5 31.25 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %16 EO 2P W+2 -170 15 93.75
17 EO 4P N+2 480 2 12.50
18 EO 5C W-2 100 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %19 EO 3T W = -110 8 50.00
20 EO 2P W-1 100 6 37.50
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %22 EO 4C S-4 -200 16 100.00
23 EO 2C S+1 140 3 18.75
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %25 EO 2K S+3 150 6 37.50
26 EO 4P N+1 650 3 18.75
27 EO 4C E = -420 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
Total : 223,0 / 432 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
5 VAN DOOREN André -COLLET Christine : 50,00 % 1 EO 3P W+1 -170 10 62.50
2 EO 2C S = 110 3 18.75
3 EO 2S W+2 -180 9 56.25 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 CLERIN François-Xavier -COLLET Claudine : 42,82 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 87.50
5 EO 2C S = 110 1 6.25
6 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,58 %
6 MARTIN Nathalie -MARTIN Hubert : 53,70 % 7 EO 4C E+2 -680 9 56.25
8 EO 3P S = 140 6 37.50
9 EO 4PcN-2 -300 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
2 DUTRIFOY Pol -BRIOT Fernand : 50,46 %10 EO 2T N-1 -100 10 62.50
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 15 93.75
12 EO 4PcN+1 990 1 6.25 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
7 BONMARIAGE François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,33 %13 EO 4CcW = -790 16 100.00
14 EO 5PcW-2 300 11 68.75
15 EO 5T S = 600 2 12.50 µ Tbl = 60,42 %
3 DEWART Léon -HUBERT Charles : 54,17 %16 EO 2K E-1 100 2 12.50
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 15 93.75
18 EO 3S W = -400 13 81.25 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -SALFI Huguette : 45,60 %19 EO 1C N = 80 2 12.50
20 EO 2P W = -110 11 68.75
21 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,08 %
4 CHANTRAINE René -VUYTS Michèle : 52,31 %22 EO 4C S = 420 4 25.00
23 EO 3CcS-3 -800 16 100.00
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 7 43.75 µ Tbl = 56,25 %
9 MICHIELS Marc -de WASSEIGE Claude : 42,59 %25 EO 3K S+1 130 8 50.00
26 EO 5P N-1 -100 15 93.75
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 11 68.75 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 238,0 / 432 = 55,09 %
|
|