|
Tournoi du 18-06-12
1 62,46 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
2 57,00 10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 56,94 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
4 52,11 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
5 51,96 4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
6 46,15 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 46,06 2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
8 42,98 5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon
9 42,54 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
10 41,76 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
11 0,00 11 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,02 19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 57,83 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
3 54,96 17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard
4 54,01 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
5 53,48 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
6 52,24 15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
7 48,87 22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 44,77 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 43,62 21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques
10 42,57 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
11 34,79 18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
PAIRE Nr : 1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 5T E = -400 5.7 31.67
3 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7.9 43.89
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 15.7 87.22
8 NS 1S W+2 -150 11.2 62.22
9 NS 4P N+3 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %10 NS 3K W = -110 10.1 56.11
11 NS 3T S-2 -100 4.6 25.56
12 NS 5TcS-1 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2C E+2 -170 13.4 74.44
15 NS 3C N+1 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %19 NS 3S E = -600 14.6 81.11
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
21 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %22 NS 3P W+1 -170 12.3 68.33
23 NS 3S W-1 100 15.7 87.22
24 NS 5C N+2 510 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11.2 62.22
26 NS 6S E+1 -1470 0.1 0.56
27 NS 2S E+2 -180 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %28 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 281,4 / 540 = 52,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 % 4 NS 3S N-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 3S E = -400 13.4 74.44
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 55,93 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 % 7 NS 2C E+3 -200 2.3 12.78
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.56
9 NS 4P N+2 480 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 NS 5TcN-1 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %13 NS 6P N = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 2C E+5 -260 9 50.00
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %16 NS 2P E-1 100 0.1 0.56
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C E = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 4.6 25.56
20 NS 3C N+1 170 10.1 56.11
21 NS 2S E = -120 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %22 NS 5T E-2 200 17.9 99.44
23 NS 2S E-2 200 17.9 99.44
24 NS 6C N+1 1010 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 97,41 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %25 NS 3S E+3 -690 0.1 0.56
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 1T E+1 -90 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 44.44
29 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
30 NS 4P N+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %31 NS 3S E = -400 3.4 18.89
32 NS 4C E-1 100 6.8 37.78
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 248,7 / 540 = 46,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 % 1 NS 1S W+2 -150 13.4 74.44
2 NS 2P W+2 -170 12.3 68.33
3 NS 3S N = 400 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 0.1 0.56
8 NS 3S W-2 100 16.8 93.33
9 NS 3C S+3 230 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %10 NS 2C N-2 -200 1.2 6.67
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 0.1 0.56
15 NS 2P E = -110 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %16 NS 2S S+2 180 2.3 12.78
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C W = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.56
20 NS 4C S = 620 17.9 99.44
21 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %22 NS 3P W+1 -170 12.3 68.33
23 NS 3T E = -110 10.1 56.11
24 NS 5C N+1 480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11.2 62.22
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %28 NS 2S W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 5C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %31 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 NS 2P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 43,70 %
Total : 225,5 / 540 = 41,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 6.67
6 NS 4P E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %10 NS 3K W = -110 10.1 56.11
11 NS 4P S = 420 15.7 87.22
12 NS 5TcS-1 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 4P E = -420 5.7 31.67
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 16.8 93.33
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C W = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %19 NS 3S E = -600 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3PcW-1 200 13.4 74.44
21 NS 2S E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %22 NS 3P W+1 -170 12.3 68.33
23 NS 1S W = -90 13.4 74.44
24 NS 6C N = 980 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.4 18.89
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 17.9 99.44
27 NS 1T E = -70 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %28 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
29 NS 5K S-3 -300 1 5.56
30 NS 5CcW-2 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %31 NS 3S W+1 -430 0.1 0.56
32 NS 3PcN-1 -100 0.1 0.56
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
Total : 280,6 / 540 = 51,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 % 1 NS 2K E+2 -130 15.7 87.22
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 12.3 68.33
3 NS 4P N = 420 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7.9 43.89
6 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.6 25.56
9 NS 5P N+2 510 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 0.1 0.56
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 2.3 12.78
15 NS 3P W = -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 8,70 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %16 NS 3S S+1 430 4.6 25.56
17 NS 3S S+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 6C W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2C N+1 140 6.8 37.78
21 NS 2S E-2 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %22 NS 4P E = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 1S W+1 -120 5.7 31.67
24 NS 6P S = 980 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %25 NS 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %28 NS 4CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
30 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %31 NS 3S W = -400 3.4 18.89
32 NS 3PcS = 530 17.9 99.44
33 NS 6TcE+1 -1190 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 232,1 / 540 = 42,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 6.67
6 NS 5KcE-3 800 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 4K E = -130 13.4 74.44
9 NS 4P N+2 480 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %10 NS 1P W+2 -140 5.7 31.67
11 NS 6S S-3 -150 1.2 6.67
12 NS 4C S-4 -400 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4T N-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 4.6 25.56
20 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.56
21 NS 1S E-1 50 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %22 NS 3P W+1 -170 12.3 68.33
23 NS 3T E+2 -150 2.3 12.78
24 NS 4C N+2 480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.4 18.89
26 NS 4P E+3 -710 15.7 87.22
27 NS 2P W = -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %28 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %31 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
33 NS 5T E+2 -440 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 45,74 %
Total : 229,7 / 540 = 42,54 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.56
3 NS 2S N+3 210 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 10,93 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 % 4 NS 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 7.9 43.89
6 NS 4P E = -620 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 15.7 87.22
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.6 25.56
9 NS 4P N+2 480 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 50,19 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %10 NS 2K W = -90 13.4 74.44
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 4P E = -420 5.7 31.67
15 NS 3P E = -140 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %19 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
20 NS 4P W-3 300 15.7 87.22
21 NS 2S E-2 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %22 NS 4P W = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.56
24 NS 4C N+2 480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 12,78 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %25 NS 3S E = -600 11.2 62.22
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 1S E+2 -150 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %28 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
29 NS 3S S = 600 14 77.78
30 NS 5CcW-2 300 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %31 NS 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
33 NS 3T E+3 -170 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
Total : 249,2 / 540 = 46,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 16.8 93.33
3 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 2K W+3 -150 16.8 93.33
6 NS 3K E-1 100 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 15.7 87.22
8 NS 5KcE-1 100 16.8 93.33
9 NS 6P N = 980 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %10 NS 2CcN-1 -200 1.2 6.67
11 NS 4P S = 420 15.7 87.22
12 NS 5T S-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %13 NS 4P S+2 680 3.4 18.89
14 NS 5C W-1 50 17.9 99.44
15 NS 3C N+1 170 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %16 NS 3S S+3 490 16.8 93.33
17 NS 3S N = 400 0.1 0.56
18 NS 4C W-2 100 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %22 NS 4P W = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 2S W = -120 5.7 31.67
24 NS 6C N+1 1010 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %25 NS 5C E-3 300 17.9 99.44
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 2K N-1 -50 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 80,93 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %28 NS 3T S-2 -200 2 11.11
29 NS 5K S-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 5P S = 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11
32 NS 3P N-1 -50 3.4 18.89
33 NS 5T E+2 -440 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
Total : 337,3 / 540 = 62,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5.7 31.67
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 16.8 93.33
3 NS 3S N+2 460 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
5 NS 3K W+2 -150 16.8 93.33
6 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.6 25.56
9 NS 4P N+2 480 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %10 NS 3K W-1 100 15.7 87.22
11 NS 4P S = 420 15.7 87.22
12 NS 4C S-2 -200 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %13 NS 5P N+1 680 3.4 18.89
14 NS 3C W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
15 NS 4C S+1 650 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C W = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %19 NS 3S E = -600 14.6 81.11
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 3.4 18.89
21 NS 2S E-2 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %25 NS 3S W = -600 11.2 62.22
26 NS 6P E = -1430 7.9 43.89
27 NS 1T E+2 -110 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 %28 NS 2S W = -120 8 44.44
29 NS 4C N-3 -300 1 5.56
30 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %31 NS 3S W-2 100 17.9 99.44
32 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 307,5 / 540 = 56,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 % 1 NS 3K E = -110 17.9 99.44
2 NS 3S W = -400 5.7 31.67
3 NS 3S N = 400 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 14.6 81.11
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 7.9 43.89
6 NS 4P E = -620 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 % 7 NS 3C W-1 100 7.9 43.89
8 NS 3K E+3 -170 9 50.00
9 NS 5P N+1 480 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %10 NS 2C N = 110 17.9 99.44
11 NS 6P N-3 -150 1.2 6.67
12 NS 5T S-1 -100 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %13 NS 6P S = 1430 12.3 68.33
14 NS 3C W+1 -170 13.4 74.44
15 NS 4P E-4 200 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %16 NS 3S S+2 460 10.1 56.11
17 NS 3S N+1 430 10.1 56.11
18 NS 4C W = -420 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %19 NS 3S E = -600 14.6 81.11
20 NS 3C S+1 170 10.1 56.11
21 NS 3S E-2 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,83 %22 NS 4P W = -620 3.4 18.89
23 NS 3T W = -110 10.1 56.11
24 NS 5C S+1 480 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 4P S+1 450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 14.6 81.11
32 NS 2P N = 110 12.3 68.33
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
Total : 307,8 / 540 = 57,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 -
21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,62 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,01 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 62,02 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 34,79 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard : 54,96 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,48 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 52,24 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,57 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 44,77 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,87 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 5T E = -400 12.3 68.33
3 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 % 4 EO 3K S+2 150 9 50.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 10.1 56.11
6 EO 4P E = -620 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 % 7 EO 2C E+3 -200 15.7 87.22
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 17.9 99.44
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 82,96 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %10 EO 2CcN-1 -200 16.8 93.33
11 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 12.78
12 EO 5T S-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 17.9 99.44
15 EO 2P E = -110 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C W = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3PcW-1 200 4.6 25.56
21 EO 2S E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 33,52 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %22 EO 4P W = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 3T W = -110 7.9 43.89
24 EO 5C S+1 480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 68,70 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %25 EO 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %31 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
33 EO 5T E+2 -440 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 54,26 %
Total : 312,3 / 540 = 57,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 4P W = -420 17.9 99.44
3 EO 2S N+3 210 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 89,07 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 % 4 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 3S E = -400 4.6 25.56
6 EO 4P E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 44,07 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 2.3 12.78
8 EO 5KcE-1 100 1.2 6.67
9 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %10 EO 2C N-2 -200 16.8 93.33
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %13 EO 5P N+1 680 14.6 81.11
14 EO 3C W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
15 EO 4C S+1 650 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 35,74 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 1.2 6.67
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C W = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3.4 18.89
20 EO 3C S+1 170 7.9 43.89
21 EO 3S E-2 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %22 EO 4P E = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 1S W+1 -120 12.3 68.33
24 EO 6P S = 980 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
11 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %28 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 217,6 / 486 = 44,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 2K W+3 -150 1.2 6.67
6 EO 3K E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 17,04 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 17.9 99.44
8 EO 3S W-2 100 1.2 6.67
9 EO 3C S+3 230 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %10 EO 3K W-1 100 2.3 12.78
11 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 12.78
12 EO 4C S-2 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 31,30 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 4P E = -420 12.3 68.33
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C W = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2C N+1 140 11.2 62.22
21 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 14.6 81.11
26 EO 4P E+3 -710 2.3 12.78
27 EO 2P W = -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %28 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %31 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
33 EO 3T E+3 -170 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
Total : 206,9 / 486 = 42,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 1.2 6.67
3 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.4 74.44
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 64,26 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %10 EO 3K W = -110 7.9 43.89
11 EO 4P S = 420 2.3 12.78
12 EO 5TcS-1 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 3C W+1 -170 4.6 25.56
15 EO 4P E-4 200 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %16 EO 3S S+1 430 13.4 74.44
17 EO 3S S+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 6C W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %22 EO 3P W+1 -170 5.7 31.67
23 EO 3T E+2 -150 15.7 87.22
24 EO 4C N+2 480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %25 EO 3S E = -600 6.8 37.78
26 EO 6S E+1 -1470 17.9 99.44
27 EO 2S E+2 -180 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %28 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
29 EO 3S S = 600 4 22.22
30 EO 5CcW-2 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %31 EO 3S E = -400 14.6 81.11
32 EO 4C E-1 100 11.2 62.22
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 253,9 / 486 = 52,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 % 1 EO 1S W+2 -150 4.6 25.56
2 EO 2P W+2 -170 5.7 31.67
3 EO 3S N = 400 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 3K W+2 -150 1.2 6.67
6 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %10 EO 2C N = 110 0.1 0.56
11 EO 6P N-3 -150 16.8 93.33
12 EO 5T S-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 17.9 99.44
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 15.7 87.22
15 EO 3P W = -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 91,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 13.4 74.44
20 EO 2P W = -110 17.9 99.44
21 EO 1S E-1 50 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %22 EO 3P W+1 -170 5.7 31.67
23 EO 3S W-1 100 2.3 12.78
24 EO 5C N+2 510 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %25 EO 3S E = -600 6.8 37.78
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 1S E+2 -150 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 55.56
29 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
30 EO 4P N+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89
32 EO 3P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 EO 5T E+2 -440 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 259,9 / 486 = 53,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 WARNIER François -COLLET Edgard
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 1.2 6.67
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.8 93.33
6 EO 4P E-1 100 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 % 7 EO 3C W-1 100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3K E+3 -170 9 50.00
9 EO 5P N+1 480 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
11 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4T N-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3.4 18.89
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
21 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %22 EO 4P W = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 3S W = -600 17.9 99.44
24 EO 4C N+2 480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 87,22 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %25 EO 3S E+3 -690 17.9 99.44
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 1T E+1 -90 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %28 EO 3T S-2 -200 16 88.89
29 EO 5K S-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 5P S = 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %31 EO 2S W = -120 9 50.00
32 EO 2P N-1 -50 14.6 81.11
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
Total : 267,1 / 486 = 54,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 10.1 56.11
6 EO 4P E = -620 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.4 74.44
9 EO 5P N+2 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
11 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %16 EO 3S S+2 460 7.9 43.89
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %19 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
20 EO 4P W-3 300 2.3 12.78
21 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %22 EO 5T E-2 200 0.1 0.56
23 EO 2S E-2 200 0.1 0.56
24 EO 6C N+1 1010 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 2,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %25 EO 5C E-3 300 0.1 0.56
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 2K N-1 -50 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 19,07 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %28 EO 2S W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 5C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %31 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.56
32 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 169,1 / 486 = 34,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 % 1 EO 3K E = -110 0.1 0.56
2 EO 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
3 EO 3S N = 400 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 10.1 56.11
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 76,85 %
11 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 %10 EO 1P W+2 -140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 6S S-3 -150 16.8 93.33
12 EO 4C S-4 -400 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2C E+2 -170 4.6 25.56
15 EO 3C N+1 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 13.4 74.44
20 EO 3C N+1 170 7.9 43.89
21 EO 2S E = -120 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %22 EO 4P W = -620 14.6 81.11
23 EO 2S W = -120 12.3 68.33
24 EO 6C N+1 1010 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 52,04 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %25 EO 3S E = -600 6.8 37.78
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 2S E+1 -150 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %28 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
29 EO 4C N-3 -300 17 94.44
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %31 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.9 99.44
32 EO 3PcN-1 -100 17.9 99.44
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
Total : 301,4 / 486 = 62,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 % 1 EO 2K E+2 -130 2.3 12.78
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 5.7 31.67
3 EO 4P N = 420 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
11 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 10.1 56.11
8 EO 4K E = -130 4.6 25.56
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 47,96 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 %10 EO 3K W = -110 7.9 43.89
11 EO 3T S-2 -100 13.4 74.44
12 EO 5TcS-1 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %13 EO 6P S = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 4P E = -420 12.3 68.33
15 EO 3P E = -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %16 EO 2P E-1 100 17.9 99.44
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C E = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 72,59 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %22 EO 3P W+1 -170 5.7 31.67
23 EO 3T E = -110 7.9 43.89
24 EO 5C N+1 480 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %25 EO 3S W = -600 6.8 37.78
26 EO 6P E = -1430 10.1 56.11
27 EO 1T E+2 -110 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %28 EO 2S W = -120 10 55.56
29 EO 5K S-3 -300 17 94.44
30 EO 5CcW-2 300 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 3.4 18.89
32 EO 2P N = 110 5.7 31.67
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
Total : 262,5 / 486 = 54,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 SALFI Huguette -DELHEZ Jacques
11 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
5 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.8 93.33
6 EO 5KcE-3 800 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 2.3 12.78
8 EO 1S W+2 -150 6.8 37.78
9 EO 4P N+3 510 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 23,15 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 %10 EO 2K W = -90 4.6 25.56
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 50.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,41 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %13 EO 6P N = 1430 5.7 31.67
14 EO 2C E+5 -260 9 50.00
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 56,30 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %16 EO 3S S+3 490 1.2 6.67
17 EO 3S N = 400 17.9 99.44
18 EO 4C W-2 100 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.9 99.44
20 EO 4C S = 620 0.1 0.56
21 EO 3S E = -400 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 66,48 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 14.6 81.11
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.56
27 EO 1T E = -70 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
10 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 57,00 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %31 EO 3S W = -400 14.6 81.11
32 EO 3PcS = 530 0.1 0.56
33 EO 6TcE+1 -1190 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
Total : 212,0 / 486 = 43,62 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,54 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 12.3 68.33
2 EO 3S W = -400 12.3 68.33
3 EO 3S N+2 460 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
1 CAMUS Colette -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 52,11 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 3.4 18.89
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 10.1 56.11
6 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,15 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 2.3 12.78
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 13.4 74.44
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 49,81 %
2 COOLEN Josef -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,06 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 12.3 68.33
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 50.00
12 EO 5TcN-1 -200 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 62,46 %13 EO 4P S+2 680 14.6 81.11
14 EO 5C W-1 50 0.1 0.56
15 EO 3C N+1 170 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
3 ROEGIERS Marga -POULAERT Gilbert : 41,76 %16 EO 2S S+2 180 15.7 87.22
17 EO 3S N+1 430 7.9 43.89
18 EO 4C W = -420 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,94 %19 EO 3S E = -600 3.4 18.89
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.6 81.11
21 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
4 VAGMAN David -CASSART Guy : 51,96 %22 EO 3P W+1 -170 5.7 31.67
23 EO 1S W = -90 4.6 25.56
24 EO 6C N = 980 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 COLLET Claudine -VERBOIS Léon : 42,98 %28 EO 4CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
29 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
30 EO 4P S+1 450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
11 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 237,5 / 486 = 48,87 %
|
|