|
Tournoi du 18-07-11
1 58,50 10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
2 56,58 12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François
3 54,49 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,14 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
5 51,19 1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert
6 51,03 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 50,56 4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques
8 49,57 6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
9 49,32 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
10 43,95 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
11 42,63 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
12 40,08 5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 58,58 18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
2 57,76 14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 57,53 22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 57,26 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
5 56,09 20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
6 54,05 17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
7 48,27 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 47,12 24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis
9 45,19 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 42,49 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
11 39,63 21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
12 35,99 13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 % 1 NS 1S N+3 180 17 94.44
2 NS 5PcE-3 500 18 100.00
3 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 5K E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 % 7 NS 4K W = -130 6 33.33
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2C E-2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22
11 NS 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
12 NS 3CcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %13 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56
15 NS 2K E+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %16 NS 3S N+2 460 17.9 99.44
17 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22
18 NS 3S E-2 100 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %19 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %22 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 5K N = 600 4.6 25.56
27 NS 2C E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
Total : 248,8 / 486 = 51,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
5 NS 2T N = 90 13 72.22
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 % 7 NS 2C N+1 140 18 100.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 18 100.00
9 NS 2S N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 5.56
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11
12 NS 5TcS-2 -500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %13 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56
15 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %16 NS 4C N = 420 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4C S+1 450 16.8 93.33
18 NS 3S E-1 50 15.7 87.22 µ Tbl = 70,74 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %19 NS 3KcN-3 -500 3 16.67
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 6S E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %22 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 2P N = 110 5 27.78
24 NS 3S E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 0.1 0.56
26 NS 6K N = 1370 17.9 99.44
27 NS 2C E = -110 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %28 NS 5K W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 NS 5T W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 248,0 / 486 = 51,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 % 7 NS 4CcN-1 -200 1 5.56
8 NS 4K N+1 150 12 66.67
9 NS 2C W-3 300 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %10 NS 4P E = -620 12 66.67
11 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
14 NS 5P W-2 100 18 100.00
15 NS 2T S+1 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 14.6 81.11
17 NS 4C S+1 450 16.8 93.33
18 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,81 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %19 NS 3KcN-3 -500 3 16.67
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 6S E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %22 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
24 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %25 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 5K S = 600 4.6 25.56
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 19,26 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
30 NS 4T E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 3C W = -140 1 5.56
33 NS 5K S-2 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 264,8 / 486 = 54,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
3 NS 2K S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %10 NS 2T W = -90 18 100.00
11 NS 3PcE-2 300 18 100.00
12 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
15 NS 2K E+1 -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %16 NS 4C N+1 450 14.6 81.11
17 NS Pass Passe 2.3 12.78
18 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 37,59 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %19 NS 3K N-3 -150 16 88.89
20 NS 1S S = 90 16 88.89
21 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
23 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
24 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 2TcW = -180 0.1 0.56
27 NS 3C E+2 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33
29 NS 4C E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 4CcN+1 690 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %31 NS 5CcW-1 100 0 0.00
32 NS 2C W = -110 4 22.22
33 NS 3CcW-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 245,7 / 486 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 % 1 NS 1S S+2 150 13 72.22
2 NS 4PcE-1 100 11 61.11
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.56
5 NS 2P W-1 50 10 55.56
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %13 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %16 NS 2T N = 90 0.1 0.56
17 NS 3P W-1 50 4.6 25.56
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,37 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %19 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 66.67
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 2 11.11
23 NS 2C N = 110 5 27.78
24 NS 2P N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %25 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 5K N = 600 4.6 25.56
27 NS 3C E+2 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 17 94.44
29 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
30 NS 4T W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %31 NS 2P S+3 200 3 16.67
32 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
33 NS 4P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 194,8 / 486 = 40,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 % 1 NS 1S S+3 180 17 94.44
2 NS 3P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 NS 3T E+2 -150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
5 NS 2T N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 5K E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 % 7 NS 5K E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3CcW-2 300 16 88.89
9 NS 3CcE-4 1100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %16 NS 4C N = 420 5.7 31.67
17 NS 3C S+3 230 6.8 37.78
18 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,81 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %19 NS 2C S-4 -200 7 38.89
20 NS 3P E = -140 5 27.78
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %22 NS 3C W+3 -230 18 100.00
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 2K W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %25 NS 2P N+2 170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 5K N+1 620 10.1 56.11
27 NS 2C E+3 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
29 NS 3C E+1 -170 5 27.78
30 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %31 NS 2P S+3 200 3 16.67
32 NS 3C W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 3PcW = -530 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 240,9 / 486 = 49,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 % 1 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
2 NS 2S W-2 100 11 61.11
3 NS 2S E+3 -210 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 % 4 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
5 NS 2C E-4 200 18 100.00
6 NS 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 % 7 NS 4K W = -130 6 33.33
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 1S N+3 180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %10 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 5.56
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %19 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 66.67
20 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 15 83.33
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %25 NS 3P N = 140 4.6 25.56
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14.6 81.11
27 NS 2C E+2 -170 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 33.33
29 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56
30 NS 4P E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %31 NS 5CcW-3 500 6 33.33
32 NS 3C W = -140 1 5.56
33 NS 4PcE = -590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 213,6 / 486 = 43,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
2 NS 3PcE = -530 0 0.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 5 27.78
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 2K S+2 130 8 44.44
9 NS 3P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 16 88.89
11 NS 3PcE-1 100 14 77.78
12 NS 4CcW-1 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 9 50.00
14 NS 2P E+3 -200 16 88.89
15 NS 2T S+1 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 15 83.33
23 NS 2C N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3PcN-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 5K N+1 620 10.1 56.11
27 NS 3C E+2 -200 7.9 43.89 µ Tbl = 58,15 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %28 NS 4P W = -420 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E = -620 1 5.56
30 NS 5T W-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 3T S = 110 10 55.56
33 NS 4K S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 253,4 / 486 = 52,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
2 NS 4K N = 130 16 88.89
3 NS 3S W = -600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 % 7 NS 4C N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 2K N = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %10 NS 4C E+1 -650 6 33.33
11 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 27.78
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 2 11.11
15 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 35,99 %16 NS 4C S = 420 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22
18 NS 3S E = -400 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %25 NS 3P N+1 170 13.4 74.44
26 NS 3S N+1 630 14.6 81.11
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 54,07 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11
29 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 4C N+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 3C W-1 100 7 38.89
33 NS 4PcW-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 207,2 / 486 = 42,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 % 1 NS 1S N+2 150 13 72.22
2 NS 3K N = 110 14 77.78
3 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 % 4 NS 3S S+2 660 12 66.67
5 NS 2T N-1 -100 5 27.78
6 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 % 7 NS 3CcN-1 -200 1 5.56
8 NS 4T N+1 150 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %10 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
11 NS 2C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %13 NS 4C S+1 650 13 72.22
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56
15 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %16 NS 4C N = 420 5.7 31.67
17 NS 4C S = 420 11.2 62.22
18 NS 3T W = -110 13.4 74.44 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %19 NS 2C S-4 -200 7 38.89
20 NS 2P E = -110 13 72.22
21 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 %28 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67
29 NS 3C E = -140 11 61.11
30 NS 3C N+2 200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 4C E-4 400 18 100.00
33 NS 5PcE-2 300 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
Total : 284,3 / 486 = 58,50 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon
22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,53 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 5 27.78
2 NS 3P W = -140 3 16.67
3 NS 2T E+2 -130 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 % 4 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.56
5 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
6 NS 6K E-3 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 % 7 NS 4K W = -130 6 33.33
8 NS 3T N+2 150 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %10 NS 2C E+3 -200 14 77.78
11 NS 5TcN-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 4T S = 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56
15 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 11.2 62.22
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 0.1 0.56
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 27,22 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %19 NS 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 27.78
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 48,27 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 3CcW-1 200 14 77.78
33 NS 4K S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 239,7 / 486 = 49,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François
24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis : 47,12 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 0 0.00
2 NS 3P E-1 50 7 38.89
3 NS 2KcS-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 54,05 % 4 NS 3S N+2 660 12 66.67
5 NS 1S N = 90 13 72.22
6 NS 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 39,63 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 1S N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 57,76 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
11 NS 2P E-2 100 14 77.78
12 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 58,58 %13 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 10 55.56
15 NS 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean : 57,26 %19 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 66.67
20 NS 4P E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 6P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,19 %22 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
23 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67
24 NS 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 42,49 %28 NS 3K W+2 -150 14 77.78
29 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 27.78
30 NS 4PcE-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent : 56,09 %31 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
32 NS 4C W-2 200 14 77.78
33 NS 4P W-3 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 275,0 / 486 = 56,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 % 1 EO 1S N+3 180 1 5.56
2 EO 5PcE-3 500 0 0.00
3 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 % 4 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
5 EO 2C E-4 200 0 0.00
6 EO 3K E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 % 7 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
9 EO 2S N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 2 11.11
11 EO 3PcE-1 100 4 22.22
12 EO 4CcW-1 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
14 EO 5P W-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 2T S+1 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %16 EO 4C S = 420 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78
18 EO 3S E = -400 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %19 EO 3K N-3 -150 2 11.11
20 EO 1S S = 90 2 11.11
21 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %25 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 5K N = 600 13.4 74.44
27 EO 3C E+2 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %31 EO 2P S+3 200 15 83.33
32 EO 3C W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 3PcW = -530 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 174,9 / 486 = 35,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 % 1 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
2 EO 2S W-2 100 7 38.89
3 EO 2S E+3 -210 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
5 EO 2T N = 90 5 27.78
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 2K S+2 130 10 55.56
9 EO 3P S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 50.00
11 EO 2P E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
15 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 3.4 18.89
17 EO Pass Passe 15.7 87.22
18 EO 1S E+2 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 62,41 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %19 EO 2C S-4 -200 11 61.11
20 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 16 88.89
23 EO 2C N = 110 13 72.22
24 EO 2P N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 18 100.00
29 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 72.22
30 EO 4T W = -130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
Total : 280,7 / 486 = 57,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -VANDAM Jean
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 13 72.22
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 % 7 EO 4CcN-1 -200 17 94.44
8 EO 4K N+1 150 6 33.33
9 EO 2C W-3 300 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %10 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 66.67
11 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
15 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %16 EO 4C N = 420 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78
18 EO 3T W = -110 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %19 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 33.33
20 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 6P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %25 EO 2P N+2 170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 5K N+1 620 7.9 43.89
27 EO 2C E+3 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %31 EO 5CcW-3 500 12 66.67
32 EO 3C W = -140 17 94.44
33 EO 4PcE = -590 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 278,3 / 486 = 57,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
2 EO 3PcE = -530 18 100.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 % 7 EO 4C N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2K N = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %10 EO 2T W = -90 0 0.00
11 EO 3PcE-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %13 EO 4C S+1 650 5 27.78
14 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44
15 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %16 EO 2T N = 90 17.9 99.44
17 EO 3P W-1 50 13.4 74.44
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,63 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %19 EO 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %22 EO 3C W+3 -230 0 0.00
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 2K W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 5K N = 600 13.4 74.44
27 EO 2C E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %28 EO 3K W+2 -150 4 22.22
29 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 72.22
30 EO 4PcE-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 206,5 / 486 = 42,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
5 EO 1S N = 90 5 27.78
6 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %10 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 50.00
11 EO 2C W-1 50 9 50.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %13 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 16 88.89
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 6.8 37.78
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.9 99.44
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 72,78 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %19 EO 2C S-4 -200 11 61.11
20 EO 3P E = -140 13 72.22
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %22 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %25 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 18.89
27 EO 2C E+2 -170 4.6 25.56 µ Tbl = 39,63 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %28 EO 5K W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 EO 5T W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 3T S = 110 8 44.44
33 EO 4K S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 262,7 / 486 = 54,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 STEED Adrian -de TERWANGNE Philippe
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
2 EO 4K N = 130 2 11.11
3 EO 3S W = -600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 % 7 EO 3CcN-1 -200 17 94.44
8 EO 4T N+1 150 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %13 EO 3S S-1 -100 18 100.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44
15 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 %16 EO 4C N = 420 12.3 68.33
17 EO 3C S+3 230 11.2 62.22
18 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,19 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %19 EO 3S E = -600 18 100.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 3 16.67
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 17.9 99.44
26 EO 6K N = 1370 0.1 0.56
27 EO 2C E = -110 1.2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %28 EO 4P W = -420 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44
30 EO 5T W-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 3C W = -140 17 94.44
33 EO 5K S-2 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 284,7 / 486 = 58,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
3 EO 2K S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 % 4 EO 3S S+2 660 6 33.33
5 EO 2T N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 3K E+1 -130 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %10 EO 2C E+3 -200 4 22.22
11 EO 5TcN-3 -500 18 100.00
12 EO 4T S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %16 EO 3S N+2 460 0.1 0.56
17 EO 4C S = 420 6.8 37.78
18 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %19 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 33.33
20 EO 2P E = -110 5 27.78
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %22 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33
24 EO 3P N-2 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 5K N+1 620 7.9 43.89
27 EO 3C E+2 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 41,85 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
30 EO 4T E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 3C W-1 100 11 61.11
33 EO 4PcW-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 219,6 / 486 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 de VIRON Baudouin -LIBERT Laurent
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 % 1 EO 1S N+2 150 5 27.78
2 EO 3K N = 110 4 22.22
3 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 94.44
5 EO 2P W-1 50 8 44.44
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 % 7 EO 4K W = -130 12 66.67
8 EO 3T N+2 150 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %13 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67
14 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44
15 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %19 EO 3KcN-3 -500 15 83.33
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 6S E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 3 16.67
23 EO 2C N-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 3PcN-1 -100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %25 EO 3P N = 140 13.4 74.44
26 EO 5K S = 600 13.4 74.44
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,74 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89
29 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 4C N+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
33 EO 4P W-3 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 272,6 / 486 = 56,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 % 1 EO 1S S+2 150 5 27.78
2 EO 4PcE-1 100 7 38.89
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 % 4 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 94.44
5 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
6 EO 6K E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 1S N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78
11 EO 3P E-1 50 9 50.00
12 EO 3CcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %16 EO 4C N = 420 12.3 68.33
17 EO 4C S+1 450 1.2 6.67
18 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 12.78 µ Tbl = 29,26 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %22 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
24 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 3S N+1 630 3.4 18.89
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.8 93.33 µ Tbl = 45,93 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67
29 EO 4C E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 4CcN+1 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 4C E-4 400 0 0.00
33 EO 5PcE-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
Total : 192,6 / 486 = 39,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 13 72.22
2 EO 3P W = -140 15 83.33
3 EO 2T E+2 -130 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
5 EO 2T N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 5K E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 % 7 EO 4K W = -130 12 66.67
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 2C E-2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 94.44
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
12 EO 4C W = -420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %13 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
14 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44
15 EO 3K E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %19 EO 3KcN-3 -500 15 83.33
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 6S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %25 EO 3P N+1 170 4.6 25.56
26 EO 2TcW = -180 17.9 99.44
27 EO 3C E+2 -200 10.1 56.11 µ Tbl = 60,37 %
10 COURTOIS Chantal -MASSINON Henry : 58,50 %28 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33
29 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
30 EO 3C N+2 200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %31 EO 2P S+3 200 15 83.33
32 EO 4C W-2 200 4 22.22
33 EO 4P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 279,6 / 486 = 57,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 % 1 EO 1S S+3 180 1 5.56
2 EO 3P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 EO 3T E+2 -150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 VAGMAN David -POULAERT Gilbert : 51,19 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
6 EO 5K E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 % 7 EO 4K W = -130 12 66.67
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 1S N+3 180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %10 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 94.44
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89
12 EO 5TcS-2 -500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,14 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 9 50.00
14 EO 2P E+3 -200 2 11.11
15 EO 2T S+1 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %16 EO 4C N+1 450 3.4 18.89
17 EO 4C S+1 450 1.2 6.67
18 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,19 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
23 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
24 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 1 5.56
29 EO 3C E = -140 7 38.89
30 EO 4T W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %31 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
32 EO 3CcW-1 200 4 22.22
33 EO 4K S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 234,6 / 486 = 48,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 COLLET Claudine -ROSOUX Louis
12 NELIS Claude -WARNIER François : 56,58 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 18 100.00
2 EO 3P E-1 50 11 61.11
3 EO 2KcS-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,63 % 4 EO 3S N+2 660 6 33.33
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 49,57 % 7 EO 5K E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3CcW-2 300 2 11.11
9 EO 3CcE-4 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,49 %10 EO 4P E = -620 6 33.33
11 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22
12 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -VERBOIS Léon : 49,32 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 9 50.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 8 44.44
15 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
5 DELHEZ Jacques -COOLEN Josef : 40,08 %19 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 33.33
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 13 72.22
21 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,03 %22 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00
23 EO 2P N = 110 13 72.22
24 EO 3S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 PIETQUIN Joseph -de NICOLAS Bernard : 43,95 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 12 66.67
29 EO 4C E = -620 17 94.44
30 EO 4P E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 FRAITURE Louis -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,56 %31 EO 5CcW-1 100 18 100.00
32 EO 2C W = -110 14 77.78
33 EO 3CcW-2 300 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 229,0 / 486 = 47,12 %
|
|