|
Tournoi du 19-04-10
1 60,19 7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
2 58,15 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
3 55,56 1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon
4 55,37 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 52,78 9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 51,85 6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques
7 44,44 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 43,15 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
9 40,74 3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
10 37,78 2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,00 14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
2 62,59 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
3 55,37 11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,59 12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean
5 50,74 15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
~ 50,74 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
7 46,48 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
8 44,07 17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
9 40,19 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
10 32,22 19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé
PAIRE Nr : 1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 % 1 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 % 4 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 88.89
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 % 7 NS 3K E-1 100 3 16.67
8 NS 4TcE-1 100 10 55.56
9 NS 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
11 NS 4K E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 2S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 NS 4C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %16 NS 4T N = 130 11 61.11
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 77.78
18 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 11.11
21 NS 2C E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
24 NS 3C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %25 NS 2S N = 120 2 11.11
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
27 NS 6C N+1 1010 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %28 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 16.67
29 NS 3PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
30 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 300,0 / 540 = 55,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67
3 NS 2K W+2 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 4K N+1 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 % 7 NS 2CcS = 670 18 100.00
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 16.67
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44
11 NS 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
12 NS 4T N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %13 NS 2T W+1 -110 3 16.67
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
15 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %16 NS 1C E-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 16.67
18 NS 2C N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 5T E-2 200 18 100.00
21 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %22 NS 4C N = 420 2 11.11
23 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
24 NS 3K N = 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %25 NS 2C N = 110 0 0.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22
27 NS 5P W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %28 NS 5K W-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 5T S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 % 1 NS 2S S = 120 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E = -90 16 88.89
3 NS 3K W+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 % 4 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 % 7 NS 3C S = 140 9 50.00
8 NS 2K N+1 110 14 77.78
9 NS 5CcN-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 4 22.22
11 NS 3S E-1 50 4 22.22
12 NS 3T N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %13 NS 1C N+1 110 15 83.33
14 NS 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 NS 4C E-2 100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %16 NS 3T N+1 130 11 61.11
17 NS 2T E+2 -130 6 33.33
18 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %19 NS Pass Passe 0 0.00
20 NS 5T E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 3T E-1 100 12 66.67
24 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 0 0.00
27 NS 4PcE-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %28 NS 5K W-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 38.89
30 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 220,0 / 540 = 40,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 1 NS 3C W-2 100 10 55.56
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 NS 3K W+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2S E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 % 7 NS 1C S+2 140 9 50.00
8 NS 2K N-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 4C N+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
11 NS 4K E = -130 0 0.00
12 NS 4T N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 3S W-1 50 7 38.89
15 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %16 NS 3T N+1 130 11 61.11
17 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89
18 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 4K E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 3S W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 4PcS-1 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %25 NS 3C N = 140 6 33.33
26 NS 4C E = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 5P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %28 NS 6K W-2 100 15 83.33
29 NS 3CcN-1 -200 3 16.67
30 NS 3T S+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
3 NS 2K W+2 -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
6 NS 4P S+3 510 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 % 7 NS 1C S+1 110 6 33.33
8 NS 2K N = 90 8 44.44
9 NS 2C S+3 200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
11 NS 5K E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 3T N-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %13 NS 3K W = -110 3 16.67
14 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 3C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %16 NS 3P W = -140 1 5.56
17 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
18 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 4K E = -130 2 11.11
21 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 2T E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %25 NS 3C N = 140 6 33.33
26 NS 4P W = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 5P W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %28 NS 5K W-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 5K E-2 200 18 100.00
30 NS 4T S = 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 18 100.00
2 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 11.11
3 NS 3C S-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 % 4 NS 2C W+2 -170 0 0.00
5 NS 2S E = -120 11 61.11
6 NS 3CcW-2 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 % 7 NS 3K E-2 200 14 77.78
8 NS 3K N = 110 14 77.78
9 NS 2C N+2 170 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %10 NS 4P N+1 650 1 5.56
11 NS 5K E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %13 NS 2T W+2 -130 0 0.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
15 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %16 NS 2C E-3 300 18 100.00
17 NS 1K N-2 -100 12 66.67
18 NS 1S S+1 120 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 10 55.56
21 NS 2T W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %22 NS 4C N+2 480 16 88.89
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 22.22
27 NS 6CcN+1 1310 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %28 NS 4K W = -130 3 16.67
29 NS 3CcN-1 -200 3 16.67
30 NS 2P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 % 1 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67
3 NS 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 % 4 NS 3C W-1 100 18 100.00
5 NS 1T E = -70 16 88.89
6 NS 4P S+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 % 7 NS 3KcE-2 500 16 88.89
8 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
9 NS 4C N+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
11 NS 5K E-1 50 4 22.22
12 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %13 NS 2C N = 110 15 83.33
14 NS 2S W-1 50 7 38.89
15 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %16 NS 3C E = -140 1 5.56
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 3K E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 1S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %22 NS 3KcE-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 4P S = 620 18 100.00
24 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
26 NS 4P W = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 5P E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 %28 NS 3S E-5 250 18 100.00
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 325,0 / 540 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 % 1 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
3 NS 2K W+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2S E = -120 11 61.11
6 NS 4P S+3 510 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 % 7 NS 3K E-1 100 3 16.67
8 NS 2K N+1 110 14 77.78
9 NS 4C N+1 450 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
11 NS 3PcS = 530 18 100.00
12 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %13 NS 3C S-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 2S W-2 100 13 72.22
15 NS 3C E-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %16 NS 3T N+1 130 11 61.11
17 NS 2CcS = 470 18 100.00
18 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 NS 4T E = -130 2 11.11
21 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 2K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %25 NS 2C N+2 170 13 72.22
26 NS 4P W = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 4C S+3 510 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %28 NS 4K W = -130 3 16.67
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 3S S+2 460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33
2 NS 2P W = -110 12 66.67
3 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 % 4 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 3 16.67
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 % 7 NS 2K E = -90 0 0.00
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 4PcW-1 200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %10 NS 4P N+2 680 10 55.56
11 NS 5K E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 7 38.89
14 NS 3S E-3 150 17 94.44
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %16 NS 2C E-1 100 5 27.78
17 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67
18 NS 3T E-2 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %19 NS 5PcN+1 750 18 100.00
20 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
21 NS 1S E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %22 NS 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %25 NS 1S S+3 180 18 100.00
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 18 100.00
27 NS 5PcE-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %28 NS 4K E = -130 3 16.67
29 NS 4K W-1 100 16 88.89
30 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 40,19 % 1 NS 3K S = 110 12 66.67
2 NS 2P W-1 50 18 100.00
3 NS 4K W = -130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga : 50,74 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 13 72.22
5 NS 2S E = -120 11 61.11
6 NS 4P S+2 480 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 65,00 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 16.67
9 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé : 32,22 %10 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44
11 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
12 NS 1S S+1 120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,48 %13 NS 1S E = -90 10 55.56
14 NS 2S W-3 150 17 94.44
15 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse : 44,07 %16 NS 3C E-2 200 16 88.89
17 NS 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
18 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 62,59 %19 NS 3P N+2 200 2 11.11
20 NS 3K E = -110 7 38.89
21 NS 1S E = -90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean : 52,59 %22 NS 2C N+4 230 0 0.00
23 NS 2TcE = -180 2 11.11
24 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile : 55,37 %25 NS 2C N+1 140 6 33.33
26 NS 4P W = -620 12 66.67
27 NS 5PcW-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 50,74 %28 NS 5K W-1 50 10 55.56
29 NS 4K E = -130 7 38.89
30 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 STEED Adrian -VANDAM Cécile
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 % 1 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 % 4 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 % 7 EO 2CcS = 670 0 0.00
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 83.33
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
11 EO 5K E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %13 EO 2T W+2 -130 18 100.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
15 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %16 EO 3C E = -140 17 94.44
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
18 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 4T E = -130 16 88.89
21 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %25 EO 2C N+1 140 12 66.67
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 5PcW-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %28 EO 6K W-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 3CcN-1 -200 15 83.33
30 EO 3T S+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 HALLEUX Jean François -VANDAM Jean
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 % 1 EO 2S S = 120 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E = -90 2 11.11
3 EO 3K W+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 4K N+1 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 % 7 EO 3K E-1 100 15 83.33
8 EO 4TcE-1 100 8 44.44
9 EO 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
11 EO 5K E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 2S W-1 50 11 61.11
15 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %16 EO 3T N+1 130 7 38.89
17 EO 2CcS = 470 0 0.00
18 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %19 EO 5PcN+1 750 0 0.00
20 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 1S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %22 EO 2C N+4 230 18 100.00
23 EO 2TcE = -180 16 88.89
24 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %25 EO 3C N = 140 12 66.67
26 EO 4C E = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 5P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %28 EO 5K W-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 5K E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 4T S = 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 284,0 / 540 = 52,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33
3 EO 2K W+2 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 % 4 EO 2P N-1 -100 2 11.11
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 % 7 EO 3C S = 140 9 50.00
8 EO 2K N+1 110 4 22.22
9 EO 5CcN-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
11 EO 5K E-1 50 14 77.78
12 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %13 EO 3C S-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 2S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 3C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %16 EO 2C E-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33
18 EO 3T E-2 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %19 EO 3P N+2 200 16 88.89
20 EO 3K E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 4PcS-1 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %25 EO 3C N = 140 12 66.67
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 5P W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %28 EO 4K W = -130 15 83.33
29 EO 3CcN-1 -200 15 83.33
30 EO 2P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 338,0 / 540 = 62,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 % 1 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
3 EO 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 83.33
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 15 83.33
9 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %10 EO 4P N+1 650 17 94.44
11 EO 4K E = -130 18 100.00
12 EO 4T N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %13 EO 2T W+1 -110 15 83.33
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
15 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %16 EO 3P W = -140 17 94.44
17 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
18 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %19 EO Pass Passe 18 100.00
20 EO 5T E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %22 EO 4C N+2 480 2 11.11
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %25 EO 2S N = 120 16 88.89
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
27 EO 6C N+1 1010 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %28 EO 3S E-5 250 0 0.00
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 2P N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 351,0 / 540 = 65,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 DACHET Gérard -ROEGIERS Marga
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33
3 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
5 EO 2S E = -120 7 38.89
6 EO 4P S+2 480 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 % 7 EO 1C S+2 140 9 50.00
8 EO 2K N-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
11 EO 3PcS = 530 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %13 EO 3K W = -110 15 83.33
14 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78
15 EO 3C E-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %16 EO 1C E-1 100 13 72.22
17 EO 2S W+1 -150 15 83.33
18 EO 2C N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 44.44
21 EO 2T W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 3T E-1 100 6 33.33
24 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 5P E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %28 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 83.33
29 EO 3PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
30 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 % 1 EO 3K S = 110 6 33.33
2 EO 2P W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 4K W = -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2S E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 7 EO 1C S+1 110 12 66.67
8 EO 2K N = 90 10 55.56
9 EO 2C S+3 200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
11 EO 4K E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 61.11
14 EO 3S E-3 150 1 5.56
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %16 EO 2C E-3 300 0 0.00
17 EO 1K N-2 -100 6 33.33
18 EO 1S S+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 5T E-2 200 0 0.00
21 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %22 EO 3KcE-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
24 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 18 100.00
27 EO 4PcE-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %28 EO 4K W = -130 15 83.33
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 de WASSEIGE Claude -WUYARD Alphonse
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 % 1 EO 3C W-2 100 8 44.44
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 EO 3K W+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 5 27.78
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
6 EO 4P S+3 510 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 % 7 EO 3K E-2 200 4 22.22
8 EO 3K N = 110 4 22.22
9 EO 2C N+2 170 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %10 EO 4P N+2 680 8 44.44
11 EO 5K E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 2S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 EO 4C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %16 EO 3C E-2 200 2 11.11
17 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
18 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 3K E = -110 11 61.11
21 EO 1S E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %22 EO 4C N = 420 16 88.89
23 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
24 EO 3K N = 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
26 EO 4P W = -620 6 33.33
27 EO 4C S+3 510 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %28 EO 5K W-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 61.11
30 EO 2P E = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 238,0 / 540 = 44,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
3 EO 2K W+2 -130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 % 4 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 100.00
5 EO 2S E = -120 7 38.89
6 EO 3CcW-2 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 % 7 EO 3KcE-2 500 2 11.11
8 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 14 77.78
11 EO 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
12 EO 3T N-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %13 EO 1S E = -90 8 44.44
14 EO 2S W-3 150 1 5.56
15 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %16 EO 4T N = 130 7 38.89
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 4 22.22
18 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 4K E-1 100 4 22.22
21 EO 3S W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 2K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %25 EO 2C N = 110 18 100.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78
27 EO 5P W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %28 EO 4K E = -130 15 83.33
29 EO 4K W-1 100 2 11.11
30 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 TELLIN Jean-Pierre -DOUMONT Hervé
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
2 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 88.89
3 EO 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 % 4 EO 3C W-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 1T E = -70 2 11.11
6 EO 4P S+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 % 7 EO 3K E-1 100 15 83.33
8 EO 2K N+1 110 4 22.22
9 EO 4C N+1 450 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56
11 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
12 EO 1S S+1 120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %13 EO 1C N+1 110 3 16.67
14 EO 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 EO 4C E-2 100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %16 EO 3T N+1 130 7 38.89
17 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11
18 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 3T E+1 -130 16 88.89
21 EO 2C E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 2T E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 %25 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
27 EO 5PcE-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %28 EO 5K W-2 100 3 16.67
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 5T S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 174,0 / 540 = 32,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
7 GELISSEN Edouard -DAPHNE Chantal : 60,19 % 1 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 100.00
2 EO 2P W = -110 6 33.33
3 EO 2K W+1 -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 58,15 % 4 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
5 EO 2S E = -120 7 38.89
6 EO 4P S+3 510 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,78 % 7 EO 2K E = -90 18 100.00
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 4PcW-1 200 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
2 ARICKX Roger -DELHEZ Jacques : 37,78 %10 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56
11 EO 3S E-1 50 14 77.78
12 EO 4T N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -EVRARD Armand : 43,15 %13 EO 2C N = 110 3 16.67
14 EO 3S W-1 50 11 61.11
15 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VANDERBISSE Julia -BOUVY Claire : 40,74 %16 EO 3T N+1 130 7 38.89
17 EO 2T E+2 -130 12 66.67
18 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 44,44 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 9 50.00
20 EO 4K E = -130 16 88.89
21 EO 1S E = -90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
1 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -DEWART Léon : 55,56 %22 EO 4C N+1 450 9 50.00
23 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
24 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
6 WARNIER François -MASSAUX Jacques : 51,85 %25 EO 2C N+2 170 5 27.78
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 77.78
27 EO 6CcN+1 1310 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,37 %28 EO 5K W-1 50 8 44.44
29 EO 4K E = -130 11 61.11
30 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
|
|