|
Tournoi du 19-07-10
1 60,27 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo
2 56,70 5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean
3 55,13 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
4 50,67 6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques
~ 50,67 4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques
6 45,09 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 41,29 2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard
8 40,18 3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 55,13 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 52,23 12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
3 52,01 11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 50,22 13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 49,78 16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
6 49,33 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
7 48,44 9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
8 42,86 15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
PAIRE Nr : 1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 1S E-4 200 14 100.00
3 NS 4P N+2 480 14 100.00
4 NS 3PcN-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 % 5 NS 3P E-1 50 12 85.71
6 NS 3P E-1 100 4 28.57
7 NS 3C S = 140 13 92.86
8 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 % 9 NS 3K E-2 200 14 100.00
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 42.86
11 NS 1C S+3 170 11 78.57
12 NS 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 10 71.43
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 21.43
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 64.29
16 NS 2C S+1 140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 %17 NS 4P S+2 480 9 64.29
18 NS 4PcE = -590 1 7.14
19 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 85.71
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 %21 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
22 NS 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
24 NS 2C S = 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 %25 NS 3K W-1 100 6 42.86
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 21.43
27 NS 3S S+1 430 8 57.14
28 NS 2K W = -90 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 %29 NS 2S E-1 100 8 57.14
30 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57
31 NS 3S E = -400 12 85.71
32 NS 3S S+2 460 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,36 %
Total : 270,0 / 448 = 60,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 12 85.71
2 NS 1S E-1 50 0 0.00
3 NS 3P S+1 170 3 21.43
4 NS 3S E-2 200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 % 5 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 21.43
6 NS 2P E-1 100 4 28.57
7 NS 3C S-1 -100 1 7.14
8 NS 1S E = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 % 9 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 35.71
10 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
11 NS 1C S+3 170 11 78.57
12 NS 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 %13 NS 4P N = 620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 21.43
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 64.29
16 NS 2P W+3 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 %17 NS 5K W-1 50 2 14.29
18 NS 3P E = -140 10 71.43
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 %21 NS 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57
22 NS 2P E+2 -170 12 85.71
23 NS 3C W = -140 5 35.71
24 NS 2K N+2 130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 21.43
27 NS 3S S+1 430 8 57.14
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 %29 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00
30 NS 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 185,0 / 448 = 41,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 % 1 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 14.29
2 NS 1S N+3 180 12 85.71
3 NS 5P N-1 -50 0 0.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 % 5 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 21.43
6 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
7 NS 2K W = -90 6 42.86
8 NS 1S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 % 9 NS 4C W-1 100 10 71.43
10 NS 3K W+3 -170 1 7.14
11 NS 2S S = 120 4 28.57
12 NS 3S E = -400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 %13 NS 4C S = 620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 21.43
15 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57
16 NS 3P E+2 -200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,64 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 %17 NS 3P S+3 230 4 28.57
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 50.00
19 NS 4P W-1 100 14 100.00
20 NS 2S E-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 %21 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 14.29
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 64.29
24 NS 1S S = 90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 85.71
27 NS 3S S = 400 2 14.29
28 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 %29 NS 3T E-2 200 14 100.00
30 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57
31 NS 3C E+2 -200 14 100.00
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
Total : 180,0 / 448 = 40,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 % 1 NS 5CcW-2 300 14 100.00
2 NS 3K E-2 100 3 21.43
3 NS 4P N = 420 9 64.29
4 NS 3P W-3 300 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 % 5 NS 3K W-1 50 12 85.71
6 NS 3C E-1 100 4 28.57
7 NS 2T N-1 -100 1 7.14
8 NS 1S E = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 % 9 NS 3K E-1 100 10 71.43
10 NS 4CcE-1 200 8 57.14
11 NS 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
12 NS 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 12 85.71
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 71.43
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 64.29
16 NS 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 %17 NS 5P N = 450 6 42.86
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00
19 NS 4P W+3 -710 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 %21 NS 1S W+4 -210 8 57.14
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 2S E = -120 9 64.29
24 NS 1S S+2 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 3 21.43
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
28 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 %29 NS 1P S+1 110 11 78.57
30 NS 3P W-3 150 14 100.00
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S+1 430 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 227,0 / 448 = 50,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 % 1 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 14.29
2 NS 2S S = 120 8 57.14
3 NS 2P N+2 170 3 21.43
4 NS 4CcE-3 800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 % 5 NS 2K W-1 50 12 85.71
6 NS 2K N+3 150 10 71.43
7 NS 3C S = 140 13 92.86
8 NS 1S E-3 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 % 9 NS 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
11 NS 3S N = 400 14 100.00
12 NS 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 %13 NS 4P N = 620 3 21.43
14 NS 2T S+1 110 14 100.00
15 NS 4P S = 620 14 100.00
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 %17 NS 4PcS+2 790 14 100.00
18 NS 4PcE = -590 1 7.14
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 %21 NS 3S W-1 50 14 100.00
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 3S W = 100 14 100.00
24 NS 2K N+1 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 %25 NS 2P N = 110 8 57.14
26 NS 2P E = -110 10 71.43
27 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86
28 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 %29 NS 3T E = -110 2 14.29
30 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 14.29
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S = 400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
Total : 254,0 / 448 = 56,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 NS 2K E-3 150 10 71.43
3 NS 4P N = 420 9 64.29
4 NS 2C E-3 300 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 % 5 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 42.86
6 NS 3P W-2 200 12 85.71
7 NS 1P W = -80 10 71.43
8 NS 1S E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 % 9 NS 3S E-1 100 10 71.43
10 NS 4K W+1 -150 4 28.57
11 NS 1C S+1 110 2 14.29
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 %13 NS 4S S = 630 8 57.14
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 64.29
16 NS 3C S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 %17 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 13 92.86
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 %21 NS 3S W = -400 5 35.71
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 1P N-2 -200 2 14.29
24 NS 2K N+2 130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 57.14
27 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86
28 NS 2S W = -120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,79 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 %29 NS 1P S = 80 6 42.86
30 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,79 %
Total : 227,0 / 448 = 50,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 % 1 NS 5C W-2 100 10 71.43
2 NS 2C N = 110 6 42.86
3 NS 4P N = 420 9 64.29
4 NS 3KcS = 670 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 % 5 NS 3P E = -140 8 57.14
6 NS 4K S = 130 8 57.14
7 NS 2T W = -90 6 42.86
8 NS 1S E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 % 9 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 35.71
10 NS 4P S+1 620 12 85.71
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 %13 NS 5KcE-3 800 14 100.00
14 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 21.43
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 7.14
16 NS 2P E+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 %17 NS 5P N+1 480 9 64.29
18 NS 4P E-1 50 13 92.86
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 %21 NS 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71
24 NS 2C S+1 140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 %25 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 1P E = -80 14 100.00
27 NS 3S S+1 430 8 57.14
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 %29 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 28.57
30 NS 2S E-1 50 7 50.00
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S = 400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
Total : 247,0 / 448 = 55,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,23 % 1 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 14.29
2 NS 1S E-2 100 3 21.43
3 NS 4P S = 420 9 64.29
4 NS 3C E-4 400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle : 49,33 % 5 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
6 NS 2KcS+2 380 14 100.00
7 NS 1S E = -90 6 42.86
8 NS 1S E-4 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,22 % 9 NS 3K E = -110 2 14.29
10 NS 3K E+3 -170 1 7.14
11 NS 2C N+1 140 7 50.00
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques : 48,44 %13 NS 4C S = 620 3 21.43
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,86 %17 NS 4P N+3 510 12 85.71
18 NS 4P E = -420 4 28.57
19 NS 4P W = -620 6 42.86
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand : 52,01 %21 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
22 NS 4P E = -620 5 35.71
23 NS 2K W+1 -110 12 85.71
24 NS 1S S+2 150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,13 %25 NS 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 21.43
27 NS 4P N = 420 4 28.57
28 NS 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard : 49,78 %29 NS 2P S = 110 11 78.57
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 28.57
31 NS 4C E = -420 5 35.71
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 202,0 / 448 = 45,09 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 PARMENTIER Richard -COLOT Jacques
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 1S E-4 200 0 0.00
3 EO 4P N+2 480 0 0.00
4 EO 3PcN-1 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 % 5 EO 2K W-1 50 2 14.29
6 EO 2K N+3 150 4 28.57
7 EO 3C S = 140 1 7.14
8 EO 1S E-3 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,07 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 % 9 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 64.29
10 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
11 EO 1C S+3 170 3 21.43
12 EO 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 %17 EO 3P S+3 230 10 71.43
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 50.00
19 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 %21 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29
24 EO 2C S+1 140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 78.57
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 100.00
28 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 %29 EO 1P S = 80 8 57.14
30 EO 2P W = -110 14 100.00
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,21 %
Total : 217,0 / 448 = 48,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 % 1 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 85.71
2 EO 2S S = 120 6 42.86
3 EO 2P N+2 170 11 78.57
4 EO 4CcE-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 % 5 EO 2P E+3 -200 11 78.57
6 EO 2P E-1 100 10 71.43
7 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 92.86
8 EO 1S E = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,93 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 % 9 EO 3S E-1 100 4 28.57
10 EO 4K W+1 -150 10 71.43
11 EO 1C S+1 110 12 85.71
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 %13 EO 4C S = 620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 78.57
15 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43
16 EO 3P E+2 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,36 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 %17 EO 5P N+1 480 5 35.71
18 EO 4P E-1 50 1 7.14
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 %21 EO 1S W+4 -210 6 42.86
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 2S E = -120 5 35.71
24 EO 1S S+2 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 78.57
27 EO 4P N = 420 10 71.43
28 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 %29 EO 2S E-1 100 6 42.86
30 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43
31 EO 3S E = -400 2 14.29
32 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,64 %
Total : 247,0 / 448 = 55,13 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MATELART Marc -BRIOT Fernand
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 % 1 EO 5CcW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 3K E-2 100 11 78.57
3 EO 4P N = 420 5 35.71
4 EO 3P W-3 300 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 % 5 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 57.14
6 EO 3P W-2 200 2 14.29
7 EO 1P W = -80 4 28.57
8 EO 1S E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 % 9 EO 4C W-1 100 4 28.57
10 EO 3K W+3 -170 13 92.86
11 EO 2S S = 120 10 71.43
12 EO 3S E = -400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,64 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 %13 EO 5KcE-3 800 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 78.57
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 13 92.86
16 EO 2P E+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 %17 EO 5K W-1 50 12 85.71
18 EO 3P E = -140 4 28.57
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 53,57 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 %21 EO 3S W+2 -460 14 100.00
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 2K W+1 -110 2 14.29
24 EO 1S S+2 150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 %25 EO 3K W-1 100 8 57.14
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 78.57
27 EO 3S S+1 430 6 42.86
28 EO 2K W = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,64 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 %29 EO 3T E = -110 12 85.71
30 EO 3C N-2 -100 12 85.71
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S = 400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
Total : 233,0 / 448 = 52,01 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 % 1 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 85.71
2 EO 1S E-2 100 11 78.57
3 EO 4P S = 420 5 35.71
4 EO 3C E-4 400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 % 5 EO 3P E-1 50 2 14.29
6 EO 3P E-1 100 10 71.43
7 EO 3C S = 140 1 7.14
8 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 % 9 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 64.29
10 EO 4P S+1 620 2 14.29
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 100.00
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 2 14.29
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 4 28.57
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 5 35.71
16 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 %17 EO 5KcN-2 -300 14 100.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 1 7.14
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 51,79 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 %21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 85.71
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 5 35.71
24 EO 1S S = 90 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 %25 EO 2P N = 110 6 42.86
26 EO 2P E = -110 4 28.57
27 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14
28 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 %29 EO 3S E = -600 14 100.00
30 EO 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
Total : 234,0 / 448 = 52,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 % 1 EO 5C W-2 100 4 28.57
2 EO 2C N = 110 8 57.14
3 EO 4P N = 420 5 35.71
4 EO 3KcS = 670 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,93 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 % 5 EO 2P E+3 -200 11 78.57
6 EO 2P E = -110 14 100.00
7 EO 2K W = -90 8 57.14
8 EO 1S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 % 9 EO 3K E = -110 12 85.71
10 EO 3K E+3 -170 13 92.86
11 EO 2C N+1 140 7 50.00
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 58,93 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 %13 EO 4P N = 620 11 78.57
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 78.57
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 5 35.71
16 EO 2P W+3 -200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 %17 EO 4PcS+2 790 0 0.00
18 EO 4PcE = -590 13 92.86
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 %21 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 14 100.00
24 EO 2C S = 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 60,71 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 42.86
27 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14
28 EO 2S W = -120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 %29 EO 1P S+1 110 3 21.43
30 EO 3P W-3 150 0 0.00
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S+1 430 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 225,0 / 448 = 50,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 GEUDVERT Albert -GEUDVERT Marcelle
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 % 1 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 85.71
2 EO 1S N+3 180 2 14.29
3 EO 5P N-1 -50 14 100.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 % 5 EO 3S E = -400 14 100.00
6 EO 2KcS+2 380 0 0.00
7 EO 1S E = -90 8 57.14
8 EO 1S E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 % 9 EO 3K E-1 100 4 28.57
10 EO 4CcE-1 200 6 42.86
11 EO 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
12 EO 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 %13 EO 4P N = 620 11 78.57
14 EO 2T S+1 110 0 0.00
15 EO 4P S = 620 0 0.00
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 %17 EO 4P S+2 480 5 35.71
18 EO 4PcE = -590 13 92.86
19 EO 2S E+2 -180 2 14.29
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 46,43 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 %21 EO 3S W = -400 9 64.29
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 1P N-2 -200 12 85.71
24 EO 2K N+2 130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 %25 EO 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 78.57
27 EO 3S S+1 430 6 42.86
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 %29 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 71.43
30 EO 2S E-1 50 7 50.00
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S = 400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 55,36 %
Total : 221,0 / 448 = 49,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 7 50.00
2 EO 2K E-3 150 4 28.57
3 EO 4P N = 420 5 35.71
4 EO 2C E-3 300 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 % 5 EO 3K W-1 50 2 14.29
6 EO 3C E-1 100 10 71.43
7 EO 2T N-1 -100 13 92.86
8 EO 1S E = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 67,86 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 % 9 EO 3K E+1 -130 14 100.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
11 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
12 EO 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,07 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 4 28.57
14 EO 3S N-2 -100 11 78.57
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 5 35.71
16 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 %17 EO 4P N+3 510 2 14.29
18 EO 4P E = -420 10 71.43
19 EO 4P W = -620 8 57.14
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 %21 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43
22 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 14.29
23 EO 3C W = -140 9 64.29
24 EO 2K N+2 130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 1P E = -80 0 0.00
27 EO 3S S+1 430 6 42.86
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 39,29 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 %29 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43
31 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,21 %
Total : 192,0 / 448 = 42,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 DAPHNE Chantal -GELISSEN Edouard
2 ROEGIERS Marga -DACHET Gérard : 41,29 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 2 14.29
2 EO 1S E-1 50 14 100.00
3 EO 3P S+1 170 11 78.57
4 EO 3S E-2 200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
7 HAEDENS Jacqueline -VERBOIS Léon : 55,13 % 5 EO 3P E = -140 6 42.86
6 EO 4K S = 130 6 42.86
7 EO 2T W = -90 8 57.14
8 EO 1S E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
1 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -HUBLET Carlo : 60,27 % 9 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 8 57.14
11 EO 1C S+3 170 3 21.43
12 EO 2C W+3 -200 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,14 %
6 CASSART Guy -MASSAUX Jacques : 50,67 %13 EO 4S S = 630 6 42.86
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 5 35.71
16 EO 3C S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,36 %
4 COLLET Edgard -DELHEZ Jacques : 50,67 %17 EO 5P N = 450 8 57.14
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 50.00
19 EO 4P W+3 -710 14 100.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
5 COLLET Claudine -PETIT Jean : 56,70 %21 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
22 EO 4P E = -620 9 64.29
23 EO 3S W = 100 0 0.00
24 EO 2K N+1 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
3 FRAITURE Louis -ARICKX Roger : 40,18 %25 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 1S N-1 -100 2 14.29
27 EO 3S S = 400 12 85.71
28 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 66,07 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,09 %29 EO 2P S = 110 3 21.43
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 71.43
31 EO 4C E = -420 9 64.29
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 223,0 / 448 = 49,78 %
|
|